Appendix D Geotechnical Review Checklist
Appendix D Geotechnical Review Checklist
Deep foundation members such as caissons, drilled shafts to rock, H-piles, pipe piles, auger-
cast piles, micropiles, timber piles, stone columns
Underpinning elements such as micropiles, hydraulically pushed piers, helical piers and any
other form of underpinning.
Footing or matt foundations (deep excavation because of poor soils and/or because of
proposed basements)
Earth Retention System include but are not limited to steel sheet piling, soldier pile and
lagging, slurry walls, secant pile walls, ground improvement for earth retention, rings and
lagging, timber sheeting, timber boards and lagging, trench boxes or equivalent shoring
systems.
Elevator pits
Elevator with hydraulic pistons
New pits or excavations within the basement of an existing building
Backfilling and/or restoration of vaulted sidewalks (Note: this is a special case whereby any
depth applies
For a building project, contact the Department of Buildings (DOB) or Mr. Avikam Hamieri (312-
742-6084) to start the building or foundation permit process which will include OUC. For non-
building infrastructure projects, bridges, roadways, utilities, tunnels, etc., contact the OUC or Mr.
Zenon Stuck (312-742-3130) to start the geotechnical review. The geotechnical review is concurrent
with the OUC EFP process and the geotechnical approval is required for OUC to issue permit
issuance authorized. The geotechnical calculations are not required prior to OUC EFP submittal.
The CDOT Geotechnical Reviewer will schedule an Intake Meeting to review process and assist the
Permittee as needed. It is the responsibility of the Designer to complete and submit this checklist
along with all required drawings and calculations for Geotechnical Review.
In addition to the requirements on the Plan Preparation Checklist (Appendix D), the drawing set shall
include the items shown in this document, if applicable, including but not limited to the areas to be
excavated and/or the areas where earth retention is required, clearly indicated on Excavation (EX)
and/or Earth Retention System (ERS) plans. Earth retention system design (if applicable) will be
included as part of the review process along with drawings, geotechnical and structural calculations
and installation sequence. Foundation bearing capacity calculations, settlement, (total and
differential) calculations and testing procedures (if applicable) must be provided. Monitoring by a
licensed surveyor during construction may be required for the protection of adjacent public property
and will be outlined as needed by CDOT upon final approval.
Page 1 of 8
Appendix D
Geotechnical Review Checklist
Page 2 of 8
Appendix D
Geotechnical Review Checklist
Page 3 of 8
Appendix D
Geotechnical Review Checklist
Page 4 of 8
Appendix D
Geotechnical Review Checklist
Upon completion of OUC EFP Submittal, the Permittee shall submit design calculations required by
CDOT Geotechnical Reviewer. Hand calculations are required; computer output is not accepted. A
general listing of typical calculations is provided below for reference; additional calculations may be
required on an individual project/site specific basis. Additional requirements specific to soil testing
and analysis as well as foundation load testing and design parameters may be found in the Chicago
Building Code, Chapter 18 – Soils and Foundations.
The following items are to be included with all earth retention (ERS) submittals. All ERS drawings
and calculations to be sealed and signed by Structural Engineer licensed in the State of Illinois.
Page 5 of 8
Appendix D
Geotechnical Review Checklist
E. Provide copies of catalogue cuts, tables of material properties used in the structural
calculations.
F. All submittals must begin with a sketch and/or listing of soil layering, soil parameters, and
design water level assumed in the calculations. Specific borings which were used in
establishing the design conditions should be identified by boring numbers as given on the
logs.
G. Calculations should show cross-sections giving design elevations for:
i. Top and toe of the wall
ii. Existing surrounding ground
iii. Bottom of the excavation
iv. Existing adjacent foundations within the zone of influence
v. Cut slopes and set-backs
vi. Water elevation
H. All formulas must be listed, as they are being used in the various parts of the calculations.
I. Include all calculation steps that are a normal part of an actual hand solution whether or not a
computer-assisted analysis/design was used. Do not submit recopied computer output as hand
calculation.
J. Construction surcharge should be actual conditions planned by the contractor (crane loading
included) or minimum traffic surcharge of 240 psf uniformly distributed vertical load.
K. ERS drawings must include plan views and cross-sections which are consistent with the final
design options, eliminating alternatives. Sufficient cross-sections must be provided to show
top of grade, cutback slopes, adjacent buildings, sidewalks, alleys, and roadways, as well as
utilities with the zone of influence (within 2.5 times the excavation depth from grade).
L. A Groundwater Control Plan and dewatering calculations prepared by an Illinois registered
PE must be submitted for review in all cases where well/wellpoints and/or dewatering are
necessary to maintain a dry, stable excavation.
M. ERS drawings must include Sequencing of work from pot-holing for foundations and pre-
trenching for earth retention to backfilling of area to adjacent (proposed) street grade. Include
step by step procedures regarding installation of bracing and removal of bracing per the
staged excavation design calculations. All items in the construction procedure shall
correspond to items checked in the ERS design.
The ERS submitted must include calculations for the design of all vertical wall components and for
all bracing components. For example, depending the system selected, this may include design for:
Sheet piles, soldier piles and lagging, secant piles, slurry walls, etc.
Walers, struts, rakers, kicker blocks, anchors, and temporary earth berms.
Page 6 of 8
Appendix D
Geotechnical Review Checklist
In addition to Common Items and ERS Items - General, the following must be included as part of the
submitted.
B. Plot lateral pressures on diagram to reasonable size for illustration. Split diagram into
sensible triangular and rectangular units; identify units by letter or number for use in moment
equations. Account for all components of load: soil, water, and surcharge.
C. In cases where a theoretical negative or small positive active earth pressures are predicted
through clay strata, a minimum active earth pressure of 0.25z should be substituted, where z
is the total overburden pressure at depth z.
D. Provide moment calculations based on above pressure diagram, solving for wall embedment
depth required for rotational equilibrium (SF=1.0) about the toe. Show intermediate steps,
reducing moment expression to its final form for solution. Find zero shear, maximum
moment, to size sheeting.
E. Provide additional embedment length to establish safety factor or margin of safety vs.
rotational failure about the toe. Any of the generally recognized methods of determining
design embedment depth may be used. However, a minimum safety factor of 1.5 vs. ultimate
passive resistance is required in all cases.
F. Provide analysis of structural wall deflection and ground deformation required to mobilize
passive resistance. The support assumption for structural deflection should be consistent with
figure 6.1 of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers EM 1110-2504 “Design of Sheet Piles
Walls”. The transition/rotation of the soil/wall system can be estimated roughly from
NAVFAC DM 7.2-6.2, based on soil type.
G. A check of base stability or overall (global) stability should be made using generally accepted
methods. The minimum allowable factor of safety is 1.5.
Page 7 of 8
Appendix D
Geotechnical Review Checklist
In addition to Common Items and ERS Items - General, the following must be included.
A. The free-earth support method should be used as the basis of design. No moment reduction
due to flexibility of the wall should be assumed.
B. Provide calculations to show the wall embedment depth required for rotational equilibrium
about the brace or anchor level (SF=1.0 condition). Provide additional embedment length
required for safety factor as in cantilever case.
C. Provide strut or anchor load calculations by taking moment about toe. Size sheeting as a
beam with above system of forces applied.
D. Bracing Calculations.
In addition to Common Items and ERS Items - General, the following must be included.
A. Provide analyses for cantilever and single brace stages, strut removal, and final depth of
excavation stages.
B. Use generally recognized apparent earth pressure envelopes for determining multi-tier strut
loads, do not reduce strut or anchor loads to account for temporary conditions.
C. Provide base stability analysis for full and partial depth of cut, as needed to final critical
correlation. Minimum required safety factor is 1.5.
D. An estimate of adjacent ground movement should be made (Clough’s method or alternate)
accounting for stiffness of proposed wall used safety factor vs. basal heave.
E. When analyzing overall stability of the execution, do not include friction between the wall
and retained soil as contributing to stability of the system.
F. Provide design for all bracing component (walers, struts, rakers, etc.)
4-6. Bracing
In addition to Common Items and ERS Items and appropriate bracing analysis, the following must be
included.
A. Ground Anchor (tieback) design shall include un-bonded and bonded length calculation and
related sketch; testing procedures (proof, performance and creep), production anchor
procedure.
B. Provide design of all bracing components (walers, struts, rakers, etc.). If friction along the
wall/soil interface is considered, do not reduce load on the walers by more than 20% of the
waler load per linear foot as an allowance for friction.
C. Structural design: stiffeners, connections, support brackets. Check compact and non-compact
sections.
Page 8 of 8