Basics of Case Law - SYNOPSIS: Page - 1
Basics of Case Law - SYNOPSIS: Page - 1
Page | 1
Basics of Case Law - SYNOPSIS
TENTATIVE
CHAPTERISATION
Judicial Activism
International Conventions
Enforcement of Fundamental
Rights against Private parties
Conclusion
Bibliography
Page | 2
Basics of Case Law - SYNOPSIS
INTRODUCTION
In India, before 1997, there were no formal guidelines for how an incident involving sexual
harassment at workplace should be dealt by an employer. Women experiencing sexual
harassment at workplace had to lodge a complaint under Section 354 of the Indian Penal
Code that deals with the criminal assault of women to outrage women's modesty' and Section
509 that punishes an individual or individuals for using a 'word, gesture or act intended to
insult the modesty of a woman'. These sections left the interpretation of 'outraging women's
modesty' to the discretion of the police officer.
Page | 3
Basics of Case Law - SYNOPSIS
METHOD OF STUDY
This project is based on doctrinal research methodology. The researcher has used diverse
sources like the use of SCC Online, reading of the relevant judgments, use of search
regarding the articles and books on interpretation of articles 21, the relevant powers of the
court under article 141, and manually looking up the professional journals for articles.
Page | 4
Basics of Case Law - SYNOPSIS
In the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan the court laid down the definition of
sexual harassment and the steps to be taken by the employer to prevent this menace.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Whether the court exceeded its jurisdiction by framing rules and regulations in the
absence of legislation?
Whether the court was competent to interpret international conventions which had
though been ratified by the government, not been read into the law expressly by the
parliament?
Whether fundamental rights can be enforced against private parties?
Page | 5