Agree:: Free Education For Everyone in The World
Agree:: Free Education For Everyone in The World
FREE EDUCATION
FOR EVERYONE
IN THE WORLD
Critical Thinking – Group 17
Pham Thi Thach Thao – BAFNIU17060
Nguyen Thi Anh Thu – BAFNIU17013
Le Dang Quang – BAFNIU17065
Van Thi Que Lam – BABAIU17026
Nguyen Duy Khoa – BABAWE18189
Pham Huy Hien – BTBTIU18077
1
E D U C A T I O N
Develop potential skills
4
DEVELOP POTENTIAL SKILLS
Categorial syllogism:
5
DEVELOP POTENTIAL SKILLS
Categorial syllogism:
All S are E
No P are E
So, no P are S
=> Valid
6
P S
GET BETTER FUTURE JOB
Argument from Authority:
• P1: Malcome X (An American Muslim minister and human rights activist)
mentioned: "without education, you are not going anywhere in this world''
• P2: Being a leader in the field, Malcome should knows better about how
critical education is for everyone in getting a job
• P3: Tuition fee should not be a barrier for poor child from their bright future
• C: Therefore, education should be approachable and free for everyone.
• Ref: https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Education-Makes-Life-Better!-
PKJ5TZPYTJ
7
STABLE CAREER
Predictive Argument:
8
INDIVIDUAL FREE
FAMILY
SOCIETY EDUCATION
SEO
RESEARCH
9
SUPPORT FOR POOR FAMILY
Argument based on Mathematics:
• P1: The research was about total student loans debt in the US in 2018, 69%
of parents who have children go to college took out student loans, and they
borrow an average debt of $7,100 per year.
• P2: When they graduated, the average total amount of debt is around
$35,600 in a period of 4 to 5 years of college. This amount of debt creates
economic burden to families.
• C: Therefore, free education help to reduce the economic burden to families,
especially poor families
• Ref: https://studentloanhero.com/student-loan-debt-statistics/
10
MAKE HAPPIER FAMILY
Causal Argument:
• P1: Parents usually concern about how to spend money rationally in many
aspects, especially about school fees for their children when they go to the
universities.
• P2: That anxiety can be a burden to parents and may make them have a
quarrel to each other.
• P3: Free education helps parents reduce some school fees.
• Con: They are likely not worried about the school fees and make the family
happier without arguments.
• Ref:
(1) https://www.todaysparent.com/family/money-quarrels/
(2) https://www.studentpeaceprize.org/tuition-free-schools-the-hope-for-a-
better-world-free-from-knowledge-inequality/
11
INDIVIDUAL FREE
FAMILY
SOCIETY EDUCATION
SEO
RESEARCH
12
LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
Statistical Argument:
• P1: Both low-income and rich families have to pay tuition fees for their
children.
• P2: Only low-income students cannot afford school fees.
• Subcon: Education fees should not be applied for those who are incapable
of paying.
• Con: Free education plays a role in promoting fairness in school between
poverty and richness.
• Ref: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/nov/02/education-
opportunities-fairness
15
REDUCE BURDEN ON
SOCIAL WELFARE
Hypothetical Syllogism:
• P1: If we keep charging tuition fees then the number of people depend on
welfare will be huge.
• P2: We're not charging education fees.
• Con: Therefore, we'll not increase burden on social welfare.
• Ref: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/free-education-can-benefit-all-of-
society-1.794861
16
DEVELOPED COUNTRY DO,
GOOD TO FOLLOW
Inductive generalization:
• P: Most of countries such as Norway, Germany or Finland offered tuition free
schools for all students which help their countries be able to eliminate
knowledge inequality.
• Con: Therefore, probably tuition free schools is undoubtedly a great idea to
ensure knowledge equality among all social classes of the world.
• Ref: https://www.studentpeaceprize.org/tuition-free-schools-the-hope-for-a-
better-world-free-from-knowledge-inequality/
17
THANK
YOU GUYS
ANY QUESTION?
18