0% found this document useful (0 votes)
146 views38 pages

Relay Scheme Design Using Microprocessor Relays PDF

The document discusses considerations for designing trip circuits when using microprocessor relays. It provides examples of typical trip circuit designs including direct tripping, dual relay tripping, dual trip coils with one or two relays, dual trip coils with breaker re-trip, dual trip coils with relay cross-tripping, and a dual breaker scheme. Microprocessor relays can simplify designs by integrating multiple functions but also require attention to issues like redundancy.

Uploaded by

Shailesh Chetty
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
146 views38 pages

Relay Scheme Design Using Microprocessor Relays PDF

The document discusses considerations for designing trip circuits when using microprocessor relays. It provides examples of typical trip circuit designs including direct tripping, dual relay tripping, dual trip coils with one or two relays, dual trip coils with breaker re-trip, dual trip coils with relay cross-tripping, and a dual breaker scheme. Microprocessor relays can simplify designs by integrating multiple functions but also require attention to issues like redundancy.

Uploaded by

Shailesh Chetty
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

Relay Scheme Design

Using Microprocessor
Relays

A report to the
System Protection Subcommittee of the
Power System Relay Committee of
the IEEE Power & Energy Society
Prepared by working group C16
June 2014
Presented at PSRC Main Committee Meeting- January 2015
Members of the working group

Raaluca Lascu – chair Tony Seegers – vice-chair

Brian Boysen Alla Deronja


Kevin Donahoe Robert Frye
Gene Henneberg Rich Hunt
Don Lukach Bruce Mackie
Cristian Paduraru Don Sevcik
Jim O’Brien Adi Mulawarman
Michael Stojak Michael Thompson
Rich Young Don Sevcik

Past members:
Ken Birt Ken Behrendt
Angela Higdon Vajira Pathirana

2
Title
1/16/2015
This paper is intended to supplement
to the existing 1999 relay trip circuit
design paper to address the use
microprocessor relays
 Modern relays are changing the way
substations are engineered
 They enable many functions to be carried
out through one piece of hardware
 This flexibility and compactness is
sometimes the cause of increasing levels of
complexity

3
Title
1/16/2015
Typical Trip circuit using
Electromechanical relays
4
Title
1/16/2015
Considerations When Using
Microprocessor Relays
Trip circuits
 Typical breaker trip circuit using
microprocessor relay
(+)

IN1 01/T IN2 86/BF

TRIP/ TRIP*/ CLOSE/


Station OUT1 OUT2 OUT3
Battery 52a
Voltage TC-2 CC

52a
IN1 = Breaker status input
BFI*/ 79 I*/ IN2 = Trip circuit monitor input (optional)
IN3 IN4
OUT4 OUT5 TC-1 = Breaker trip coil 1
TC-1 TC-2 = Breaker trip coil 2
External External External External CC = Breaker close coil
(-) BFI 79 I BF Relay 79 Relay OUT1 = Protective relay trip contact
OUT2 = Protective relay trip contact (* if second trip coil present)
OUT3 = Protective relay close contact (manual or autoreclosing)
Integral to microprocessor OUT4 = Protective relay breaker fail initiate contact (*if external BF relay present)
based relay OUT5 = Protective relay reclose initiate output (*if external 79 relay present)
01/T = Manual control switch trip contact
52a = Breaker auxiliary form “a” contact
86/BF = Breaker failure lockout contact
BFI = Breaker Failure initiate
79 I = Auto reclose initiate

6
Title
1/16/2015
General Scheme Design
Trip Circuit

 Microprocessor relays can simplify trip


circuit design
 Multiple isolated outputs on a single relay
can be used to trip multiple breakers

8
Title
1/16/2015
Integration, Separation, and
Redundancy
 Combining functions into one relay can
reduce size of equipment, reduce wiring, and
lower cost
 However, it can lead to problems such as
measurement or programming errors
effecting multiple protection functions
 Thought must be given to creating redundant
systems which can function despite total
failure of a relay
◦ Ex: Duplicate functions using relay from
different manufacturer
9
Title
1/16/2015
Direct Tripping
(+)

01
PR-1
T
Microprocessor Relay

52a
Multiple protection
functions, auxiliary
timers, etc. included in
TC-1
microprocessor relay
logic.

(-)

52a Breaker auxiliary form “a” contact


52b Breaker auxiliary form “b” contact
TC-1 Trip Coil 1
01/T Breaker control handle Trip
PR Protective relay trip contact

10
Title
1/16/2015
Dual Relay Tripping

11
Title
1/16/2015
Dual Trip Coils with One Relay

12
Title
1/16/2015
Dual Trip Coils with Two Relays

13
Title
1/16/2015
Dual Trip Coils with Breaker Re-
trip
(+)
(+)

Microprocessor
01 Relay

T BFR
PR-1a PR-1b

52a 52a

BFR retrips TC-1 on


breaker failure initiate. TC-2
TC-1
PR-1b trips TC-2 on
backup trip

(-)
(-)

52a Breaker auxiliary form “a” contact


TC-1 Trip Coil 1
TC-2 Trip Coil 2
01/T Breaker control handle Trip
PR Protective relay trip contact
PR-1b Protective relay backup trip contact
BFR Breaker failure retrip contact

14
Title
1/16/2015
Dual Trip Coils, Relay Cross-
Tripping

Probably most common today 15


Title
1/16/2015
Dual Breaker Scheme
(+) (+)

Microprocessor
Relay
01 01
PR-1a PR-1b
T T

52a 52a
Protection logic trips
both circuit breaker
coils simultaneously.
TC TC

(-) (-)

52a Breaker auxiliary form “a” contact


TC Trip Coil
01/T Breaker control handle Trip
PR Protective relay trip contact

16
Title
1/16/2015
There are a few problems

17
Title
1/16/2015
Circuit Contacts
 One leading cause of failure is burned and
failed output contacts due to inductive DC
current
 Must ensure circuit contact being used is
properly rated for all possible signals
 Often can assess by calculating L/R rating:
Load Inductance
L/R rating = Load Resistance + Cable Resistance to Load
 Relay manufacturers are developing ways
to mitigate burnout
18
Title
1/16/2015
 Speed of relay contacts must be
considered
 Typical closing time is 3 to 8 milliseconds

 Choosing incorrect contacts can lead to


leakage or sneak currents
 Extend Seal-in time and/or add arc
suppression

Circuit Contacts (cont.)


19
Title
1/16/2015
PRO

 Low CT burden

20
Title
1/16/2015
CON
Battery Creep

 Upgrading stations typically leads to


increased continuous DC system loads
 Once adequate DC supply systems may
need to be revisited

21
Title
1/16/2015
Sneak Currents

 Sneak currents are unintended design flaws that


can result in serious consequences
 With increased complexity, sneak currents are
more likely
 With Microprocessors, the sneak circuits have
often moved inside
 Systematic testing and inspection is most
common way to prevent
 Many sneak conditions are located through trial
and error over time in the field

22
Title
1/16/2015
Battery System Grounding

IN 4
130 Vdc

IN 3
 Can use spare input contacts on relay to
monitor grounding conditions of DC system

23
Title
1/16/2015
It’s Not All Bad
there are a few new perks

24
Title
1/16/2015
Trip Circuit Monitoring
 Typical breaker trip circuit using
microprocessor relay
(+)

IN1 01/T IN2 86/BF

TRIP/ TRIP*/ CLOSE/


Station OUT1 OUT2 OUT3
Battery 52a
Voltage TC-2 CC

52a
IN1 = Breaker status input
BFI*/ 79 I*/ IN2 = Trip circuit monitor input (optional)
IN3 IN4
OUT4 OUT5 TC-1 = Breaker trip coil 1
TC-1 TC-2 = Breaker trip coil 2
External External External External CC = Breaker close coil
(-) BFI 79 I BF Relay 79 Relay OUT1 = Protective relay trip contact
OUT2 = Protective relay trip contact (* if second trip coil present)
OUT3 = Protective relay close contact (manual or autoreclosing)
Integral to microprocessor OUT4 = Protective relay breaker fail initiate contact (*if external BF relay present)
based relay OUT5 = Protective relay reclose initiate output (*if external 79 relay present)
01/T = Manual control switch trip contact
52a = Breaker auxiliary form “a” contact
86/BF = Breaker failure lockout contact
BFI = Breaker Failure initiate
79 I = Auto reclose initiate

25
Title
1/16/2015
Lockout Function

26
Title
1/16/2015
Breaker Control Switch
(+) (+) (+)

Microprocessor
Relay 01
01
PR-1a PR-1b C
T

Digital
Input
52a 52b Microprocessor Relay
PR-1b closes circuit
breaker. Relay logic
includes control
TC CC (-)
handle supervision.

(-) (-)

52a Breaker auxiliary form “a” contact


TC Trip Coil
CC Close Coil
01/T Breaker control handle Trip
01/C Breaker control handle Close
PR Protective relay trip contact

27
Title
1/16/2015
SCADA Functions
SCADA Control

 An RTU or other gateway is used to issue


open/close commands to circuit breakers,
motor-operated switches, and other
devices remotely
 Microprocessor relays can act as I/O
hardware to implement commands

29
Title
1/16/2015
SCADA Circuit Breaker Control

 CB control implemented using “select-


before-operate” concept
 This is intended to prevent any other
device from issuing untimely commands
to the breaker with unintended results

30
Title
1/16/2015
SCADA Metering and Monitoring

 Microprocessors can greatly simplify


monitoring and metering of stations
through digital communication through
the gateway
 SCADA data collection can be distributed
to the microprocessor relays
 These functions used to require an
independent electromechanical unit for
each
31
Title
1/16/2015
Maintainability and Testing
Multifunction Relay Testing
Considerations

 Testing occurs at many stages: acceptance,


commission, and as scheduled
 Desire method to conduct tests without
changing any relay settings since this could
introduce unintended errors
 Some designs may allow for spare contacts
which can be used for testing
 Built-in recording functions can be used to
determine if appropriate response to test
occurred

33
Title
1/16/2015
A couple of additional issues
Test Switches

 Approach on test switches can vary widely

 Test switches may become more rare with


microprocessor units since removing all
the functions of a single relay at once may
be unacceptable

 Test switches enable a relay to be isolated


for hot change out

35
Title
1/16/2015
Test Switches part 2

 Testing relays has become more


complicated since each relay may be
programmed completely differently
 Test switches enable more isolation for
testing to prevent inadvertant trips (ie
breaker fail outputs)
 Consistent design methods are needed to
decrease complexity

36
Title
1/16/2015
Logic Performance Considerations

 Loss of power or network connection can


dramatically effect output from relay logic
 Consideration must be given for the
default state given either condition
 Volatile memory will reset whereas non-
volatile memory will maintain the previous
value

37
Title
1/16/2015
Questions?

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy