Consumer Transportation Survey

Vehicle Driven Type Satisfaction with vehicle Gender Age

Truck Domestic Yes Male 31
Truck Domestic Yes Male 29
Truck Foreign No Male 26
Truck Domestic No Male 18
SUV Domestic Yes Male 49
SUV Foreign Yes Male 50
SUV Domestic Yes Male 48
SUV Foreign Yes Male 45
SUV Domestic Yes Male 45
SUV Domestic Yes Male 44
SUV Foreign Yes Male 41
SUV Domestic Yes Male 41
SUV Foreign No Female 39
SUV Foreign Yes Female 36
SUV Foreign Yes Female 33
SUV Domestic Yes Male 31
SUV Domestic No Female 31
SUV Domestic No Female 29
SUV Domestic Yes Male 28
Mini Van Domestic Yes Female 55
Mini Van Domestic No Female 43
Mini Van Domestic Yes Female 41
Mini Van Foreign Yes Female 38
Mini Van Foreign Yes Female 39
Mini Van Domestic No Male 35
Mini Van Domestic Yes Female 33
Mini Van Foreign Yes Female 32
Mini Van Foreign Yes Female 28
Car Domestic Yes Female 21
Car Domestic No Female 62
Car Domestic Yes Female 61
Car Foreign Yes Male 60
Car Domestic No Male 58
Car Domestic Yes Female 51
Car Domestic Yes Female 47
Car Domestic No Male 46
Car Domestic No Male 44
Car Foreign No Female 42
Car Foreign Yes Female 41
Car Domestic No Female 41
Car Domestic Yes Female 39
Car Foreign Yes Female 34
Car Foreign Yes Male 33
Car Foreign Yes Male 30
Car Domestic Yes Female 29
Car Foreign Yes Female 27
Car Foreign Yes Female 26
Car Domestic No Female 24
Car Domestic Yes Female 22
Car Foreign No Female 19
# of hours per week in vehicle Miles driven per week Number of Children Average number of riders
10 450 0 1
5 370 1 1
12 580 0 1
6 300 0 1
21 1000 0 1
16 840 2 1
15 1400 3 4
5 300 2 2
15 850 0 1
10 700 2 1
5 350 1 1
30 1500 4 3
6 280 1 1
4 400 0 1
3 420 0 1
10 675 0 1
15 800 1 1
4 300 1 1
3 400 1 1
8 400 0 2
10 700 2 3
10 720 1 2
10 450 4 5
15 1000 1 2
5 350 2 2
10 800 2 3
2 200 4 5
8 350 3 4
4 150 0 1
5 175 0 2
5 355 0 1
5 150 0 1
10 600 0 1
11 600 0 1
4 300 0 1
4 275 0 1
6 285 2 3
5 400 2 3
5 350 2 2
10 600 1 2
10 700 1 2
10 600 1 2
5 400 1 2
5 350 1 2
5 250 0 1
6 355 0 2
5 175 0 1
5 300 0 1
5 350 0 1
5 500 0 2
Miles from work
30
22
15
20
22
45
25
20
25
40
20
15
17
20
25
35
50
20
15
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
15
10
35
40
21
18
16
22
23
34
45
16
22
18
19
23
11
4
3
4
Ohio Education Performance Results Year 2000

School District Writing Reading Math Citizenship Science All

Indian Hill 95 98 89 95 91 83
Wyoming 98 96 86 93 87 81
Mason City 96 92 85 94 86 72
Madiera 94 95 88 82 88 69
Mariemont 99 92 74 89 88 68
Sycamore 85 88 80 87 84 68
Forest Hills 93 91 73 85 88 67
Kings Local 92 86 78 82 78 64
Lakota 90 88 73 85 81 64
Loveland 85 93 72 86 86 61
Southwest 92 82 73 78 73 58
Fairf ield 90 86 71 83 77 57
Oak Hills 88 86 75 77 79 57
Three Rivers 87 85 66 84 77 56
Milford 82 86 72 82 76 53
Ross 84 85 66 75 78 52
West Clermont 88 83 63 73 70 48
Reading 88 80 58 76 75 46
Princeton 83 75 59 76 63 46
Finneytown 79 71 61 67 62 45
Norwood 86 77 64 75 67 44
Lockland 88 79 52 82 64 41
Franklin City 85 79 49 70 67 40
Winton Woods 82 77 55 65 59 40
Northwest 75 74 51 62 61 38
North College Hill 77 76 50 66 57 35
Mount Healthy 87 72 40 62 53 32
Felicity Franklin 52 64 52 81 64 28
St. Bernard 81 59 40 41 48 26
Deer Park 69 66 40 43 52 25
Cincinnati Public 63 59 35 50 44 23

State Averages 79 79 60 72 68 46
Graduate School Survey

Gender Married Undergraduate GPA Plan to attend graduate school

M N 3 no
M N 2.8 no
M Y 3.3 no
M Y 3.2 no
F Y 3 no
F Y 3.2 no
F Y 3 no
F Y 2.5 no
F Y 2.7 no
F Y 3.2 no
F Y 2.8 no
M Y 2.9 yes
M Y 3.1 yes
M N 3.5 yes
M N 3.2 yes
M Y 3.7 yes
M Y 2.6 yes
M N 3.3 yes
M N 3.5 yes
M N 2.9 yes
M N 4 yes
M Y 4 yes
F N 3.6 yes
F N 3.3 yes
F Y 2.9 yes
F N 3.4 yes
F N 4 yes
F Y 4 yes
F N 4 yes
F N 3.7 yes
  

INDIVIDUAL
ASSIGNMENT 2
ACADEMIC SESSION: OCT 2020 - FEB
2021
 
NAME
PROGRAM
COURSE
CODE
GROUP
1 a) Individual spend at least 8 hours per week in their vehicle.

1. Write null and alternative hypothesis

H0 = µ ≥ 8
H1 = µ <8

2. Test : Lower One-Tailed Test

Mean 8.16
Hypothesist Means (µ) 8
Standard Deviation (S) 5.16
Count (n) 50
Critical Value -1.68
T-Statictics 0.22
P-Value 0.59

3. The decision rule

By comparing the t-statistic with the critical value, the t-stat = 0.22 greater than critical value=-1.68,
and it falls under the non - rejection region. Therefore, we fail to reject H0

For p-value=0.59 is greater than α=0.05, we do not reject H0.

4. Conclusion

As the result is failing to reject H0, we can conclude that there is sufficient evidence to
support the claim that individual spend at least 8 hours per week in their vehicle

b) Individual drive an average 600 miles per week

1. Write null and alternative hypothesis

H0 = µ = 600
H1 = µ = 600

2. Test : Two -Tailed Test

CV 2.01
Mean 502.1
Hypothesist Means (µ) 600
Standard Deviation (S) 292.16
Count (n) 50
T-Statistic -2.37
P-Value 0.02

3. The decision rule

By comparing the t-test statistic value with the critical value, the t-stat = -2.37 is lower than critical value = 2.01
and it falls under the rejection region. Therefore we reject H0

For p-value=0.02 is lower than α=0.05, we reject H0.

4. Conclusion

The P-Value of 0.02 is less than significant level α=0.05. Thus, we do reject null hypothesis.
Therefore there is sufficient evidence to supports the claim that individual drive an average 600 miles per week.

c) The average age of SUV drivers is no greater than 35

1. Write null and alternative hypothesis

H0 = µ ≤ 35
H1 = µ > 35
2. Test : Upper One-Tailed Test

CV 1.76
Mean 39.33
Hyothesist Means (µ) 35
Standard Deviation (S) 7.56
Count (n) 15
T-Statictics 2.22
P-Value 0.02

3. The decision rule

By compairing the t-test statistic value with the critical value, the t-stat = 2.22 is greater than critical value = 1.76
and it falls under the rejection region. Therefore we do rejct H0

For p-value=0.02 is lower than α=0.05, we reject H0.

4. Conclusion

As the result is rejecting HO , there is insufficient evidence to support the average age of SUV driven is no greater than 35.
Paired sample procedure.

Writing Reading
95 98 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
98 96
96 92 Writing Reading
94 95 Mean 84.93548 81.29032
99 92 Variance 99.72903 108.07957
85 88 Observations 31.00000 31.00000
93 91 Pearson Correlation 0.80093
92 86 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0.00000
90 88 df 30.00000
85 93 t Stat 3.15033
92 82 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.00184
90 86 t Critical one-tail 1.69726
88 86 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.00368
87 85 t Critical two-tail 2.04227
82 86
84 85
88 83 Critical Value Approach
88 80
83 75 The t-statistic value is 3.15 and the critical t-value (one tail) is 1.70,
79 71 whereby the statistic value is greater than the critical t-value.
86 77 Thus , we would reject the null hypothesis.
88 79
85 79
82 77 p-Value approach
75 74
77 76 The t-statistic value is 3.15 which is positive value (upper -tailed) as stated earlier, if the statistic is positiv
87 72 , the p-value in the output is the p-value for an upper - tailed test. The p-value one tail is 0.00184
52 64 As the p-value is less than α=0.05, we to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the result of writing
81 59
 69 66
63 59

Math Science
89 91 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
86 87
85 86 Math Science
88 88 Mean 64.19355 71.70968
74 88 Variance 227.49462 172.14624
80 84 Observations 31.00000 31.00000
73 88 Pearson Correlation 0.93530
78 78 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0.00000
73 81 df 30.00000
72 86 t Stat -7.71033
73 73 P(T<=t) one-tail 6.668150971E-09
71 77 t Critical one-tail 1.69726
75 79 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.00000
66 77 t Critical two-tail 2.04227
72 76
66 78
63 70 Critical Value Approach
58 75
59 63 The t-statistic value is -7.710 and the critical t-value (one -tail) is -1.697 (the negative t-statistic value indic
61 62 that it is a lower - tail test. The one - tailed critical value is negative), whereby the t-statistic value is greate
64 67 Thus, we would reject the null hypothesis.
52 64
49 67
55 59 p-Value approach
51 61
50 57 The statistic value is -7.71033 which is negative value (lower tailed), as stated earlier, if the statistic is neg
40 53 , the p-value in the output is the p-value for and lower - tailed test. The p-value one tail is 6.66815097096
52 64 by submitting the exponential notation E-06, the p-value is 0.00000666815. As the p-value is less than α=
40 48 to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the result of Math is improve than sciences.
40 52
35 44
r, if the statistic is positive
e tail is 0.00184
that the result of writing is greater than reading.
ative t-statistic value indicates
t-statistic value is greater than the critical t-value.

rlier, if the statistic is negative

ne tail is 6.66815097096643E-09;
e p-value is less than α=0.05, we fail
Perform a Chi-square test

Gender Plan to attend graduate school

M yes
M yes 1) Null & Alternative Hypothesis
M no
M yes H0 : Gender and planning to attend graduate school are independent
M yes H1 : Gender and planning to attend graduate school are dependent
M yes
M no
M yes 2) Test : Chi-Square test
M no
M yes Count - Plan to attend graduate school Plan to attend graduate school
M yes Gender no yes Total Result
M no F 7 8 15
M yes M 4 11 15
M yes Total Result 11 19 30
M yes
F yes
F yes Observe (fo) No Yes Grand Total
F yes Female 7 8 15
F yes Male 4 11 15
F no Grand Total 11 19 30
F no
F yes
F no Expected (fe) No Yes Grand Total
F no Female 5.5 9.5 15
F yes Male 5.5 9.5 15
F yes Grand Total 11 19 30
F no
F yes
F no Chi-square No Yes Grand Total
F no Female 0.41 0.24 0.65
Male 0.41 0.24 0.65
 Grand Total 0.82 0.47 1.29

r-1 = 1 CV 3.84
c-1 = 1 p-value 0.26
DF 1

3) Decision Rule

The ꭓ2 =1.29 Is lower than CV=3.84 and it falls under non-rejection region, thus, we fail to reject H0.

For p-value=0.26 is greater than α=0.05, we do not reject H0.

4) Conclusion

As we fail to reject H0, so we can conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support gender and planning to atten
er and planning to attend graduate school are independent.