International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING (G+3) BY USING

ETABS SOFTWARE
Nagaratna. S.A1, Ranjita. N.H2, Asif. R.S3, Vijaykumar. K.J4, Sudha. P.H5, Prof. D.S. Maganur6
1,2,3,4U.G.Student, Dept of Civil Enginneering SJT Institute of Technology Ranebennur, KA, India.
5Assistant Professor, Dept of Civil Engineering STJ Institute of technology Ranebennur, KA, India.
6Proffesor, H O D, Dept of Civil Engineering STJ Institute of Technology Ranebennur, KA, India.

---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Etabs stands for extended three-dimensional been considered for the analysis & design of the structures in
analysis of building systems. The main purpose of this accordance with the specification of IS: 456-2000 and
software is to design multistoried building in a systematic IS:875-1987 (Part 1 & Part2).
process. The effective design and construction of an
earthquake resistant structure have great importance al over Subsequently, the beam column layout was prepared with
the world. This project presents multi-storied residential the help of which slabs were identified as One Way or Two-
building analyzed and designed with lateral loading effect of Way Slabs. The slabs were designated names in a series as S1
earthquake using ETABS. This project is designed as per &S2. The slabs were designed as per the moments obtained
INDIAN CODES-IS 1893-PART 2:2002, IS 456-2000. using the Bending Moment Co-efficient as per Annex D of IS
456: 2000.
Every structural engineer should design a building with most
efficient planning and also be economical. They should The present project deals with the analysis of a multi-storied
ensure that it is serviceable, habitable in healthy residential building. The dead load and live loads are applied
environmental for its occupants and have longer design and the design for beams, columns, footing and slabs is
period. structurally robust and aesthetically pleasing obtained. For design calculation MS Excel has been used.
building are beginning constructed by combining the best
properties of any construction material and at the same time 1.1 Stages in structural design
meeting a specific requirement like type of building and its
loads, soil condition, time, flexibility and economy. In the 1. Drawing study
view of above, the high-rise buildings are best suited
2. Load combinations
solution. This paper discusses the analysis of a commercial
building (G+3 hospital building). Shear force and bending
3. Analysis of structures
moments of beams and columns are observed and concluded
that large span having more shear forces and bending 4. Structural design
moment.
2.0 Objectives
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The structure should be able to carry all expected loads
Project on structural analysis and design of multi-storey RCC without failure. Carry out a complete analysis and design of
building focuses on the structural analysis of multi-storey the main structural elements of a multi-stored building
building using appropriate methods of structural analysis including slabs, columns, beams etc. Getting familiar with
and software (E-TABS). structural software's (E-TABS, AUTOCAD) The objectives
include structural analysis of multi-stored RCC building
In this project we have taken an architectural plan of the using software (ETABS) prior to that manual calculation will
building on the basis of which the analysis will be done for be done by appropriate structural analysis methods. Design
the whole structure. For analysing a multi-storied building, of beam, column, footing and slab are done. Later
one has to consider all the possible loadings and see that the calculations are done using MS-Excel.
structure is safe against all possible loading conditions.

Analysis of beams & columns has been done by using E-TABS

software and slabs & footings are designed using “LIMIT
STATE METHOD” according to IS: 456-2000. Materials used
are of M-25 concrete and Fe-415 steel.

The building is designed as a framed structure with brick

infill walls. Keeping in view the requirement & utility of the
building the dead load, live load & super imposed loads have
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5570
 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Preparation of plan in Autocad

Importing to Etabs

Building modeling in Etabs

Define and assigning of

FIRST, SECOND & THIRD FLOOR PLAN
materials
Table -1: SILENT FEATRES OF PROPOSED BUIDING

Assigning load as per Sl.no Description Features

IS 456-2000 1 TYPE OF BUIDLING G+3

STRUCTURE R.C.C
2
FRAME
Analyze the
BUILT UP AREA
building model 3 1262.5m2

HEIGHT BETWEEN THE

4 3.0m
FLOOR
Check results DEPT OF FOUNDATION
5 600mm
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
THICKNESS OF WALL
Designing using 6 300mm

Etabs software

Results

Conclusion

Fig -1 METHODOLOGY

3.0 Plan of Hospital Building

Fig -2(a): BEAM LAYOUT

BEAM SIZE
B1=(300x330) mm
B2=(300x800) mm
B3=(300x830) mm
B4=(300x1300) mm

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5571
 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Step - 5: Slab Details

Define → Wall/Slab Section → Add New Slab
We have to define the slab properties after defining frame
sections.
Step - 6: Assigning of Property
After defining the property we draw the structural
components using command menu. After defining the
columns and beams, the columns and beams are placed on
the grid lines, using various “line object” options under the
command “Draw”.

Fig -2(b): COLUMN LAYOUT Step - 7: Defining of loads

Define → Static Load Cases → Add New Load
COLUMN SIZE In ETABS all the load considerations are first defined and
C1=(230x300) mm then assigned. The loads in ETABS are defined as using static
load cases.
C2=(450x450) mm
C3=(450x600) mm Step - 8: Assigning of Supports
Select Plan Level →Base →Select all columns
C4=(600x600) mm Assign →Joint Points →Restraints →Fixed Support
4.0 Analysis Methods By keeping the selection at the base of the structure and
selecting all the columns we assigned supports by going to
Etab is the primer FEM analysis and design tool for any assign menu joint\frame Restraints (supports) fixed.
type of project including towers, culverts, plants, bridges,
stadium and marine structures. With an array of advanced Step - 9: Assigning Loads
analysis capabilities including linear static, response spectra, Slab loads
time history, cable and push over and non-linear analysis, Select slabs → Assign →Shell area loads →Uniform
Etab provides good compatibility with a scalable solution that
will meet the demands of project every time . 6.0 ANALUSIS RESULTS
5.0 Steps in Modelling

Step - 1: Initial setup of Standard Codes and Country

codes.
Display units: KN-m.

Step - 2: Creation of Grid points & Generation of

structure.
File → New model → Custom Grid Spacing → Edit Gird
After getting opened with ETABS we select a new model and
a window appears where we had entered the grid
dimensions and storey dimensions of our building. Fig -3: MODEL

Step - 3: Defining of Material property.

Define → Material Properties → Add New Material
Here we had first defined the material property by selecting
define menu material properties. We add new material for
our structural components (beams, columns, slabs) by giving
the specified details in defining.

Step –4: Define Frame Sections.

Define → Frame Sections → Add Rectangular Section
After defining the property we define section size by
selecting frame sections & added the required section for
beams, columns etc.
Fig -4: BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM

© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5572
 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Shorter span Lx=10.0m

Longer span Ly=8.0m

d=l/28 (for simply supported beam)

d=8000/28=285.71mm ≈ 300mm

Equating Mux = Mu lim = 0.138 fck b d2

=0.138x20x3002x1000

=248.4x106N/mm2

Fig -5: SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM FROM ETAB Mu = 0.87 fy x Ast x d 1 – fy x Ast

7.0 DESIGN DETAILS fck b d

Design of slabs
Shorter span Lx=8.0m 248.4x106 = 0.87x415xAstx300 1- Astx415

Longer span Ly=6.5m 20x300x1000

d=l/28 ( for simply supported beam)
248.4x106 = -7.49 Ast2 +108.31x103Ast
d=6500/28=232.14mm ≈ 250mm
Ast = 1255.75mm2
Equating Mux = Mu lim = 0.138 fck b d2

=0.138x20x2502x1000 Take ast = 113.0mm2

=172.5x106N/mm2 ast =3.14x122/4=113.0mm2

Mu = 0.87 fy x Ast x d 1 – fy x Ast
Spacing = 113.0 x 1000 =89.98mm≈100mm
fck b d
1255.75
172.5x106 = 0.87x415xAstx250 1- Astx415
Shorter span Lx=10.0m
20x250x1000
Longer span Ly=3.0m
172.5x106 = -7.49 Ast2 +90.26x103Ast
d=l/28 (for simply supported beam)
Ast = 2381.97mm2
d=3000/28=107.14mm ≈ 110mm
Take ast = 113.0mm2
Equating Mux = Mu lim = 0.138 fck b d2
ast = .14x122/4=113.0mm2
=0.138x20x1102x1000
Spacing = 113.0 x 1000 =47.49mm≈100mm
=33.396x106N/mm2
2381.97

© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5573
 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Mu= 0.87 fy x Ast x d 1 – fy x Ast Factored Bending Moments:

Cantilever projection from the short side face of

fck b d
The column = 0.5(2.4-0.23)
33.396x106 = 0.87x415xAstx110 1- Astx415
= 1.085 m
20x110x1000 Cantilever projection from the long side face of

33.396x106 = -7.49 Ast2 +39.715x103Ast The column = 0.5(2.4-0.450)

= 0.975 m
Ast = 2112.82mm2
Bending moment
Take ast = 113.0mm2
@short side face of the column
ast = 3.14x122/4=113.0mm2 = (1.5x149.25x1.0852)/2

= 131kN-m

Spacing = 113.0 x 1000 =53.48mm≈100mm

2112.82 Bending moment at long side face

Design of footing: of the column = (1.5x149.25x0.9752)/2

Column size = 300 x 600mm =106kN-m

Grade of Concrete = M25 Depth of footing:

Grade of steel = Fe415 (a) From BM consideration

SBC of soil =160kN / mm2 Mu = 0.133xfckxbxd2

P = 597kN d = 362mm

Mxx = 19kN-m (b) From shear stress considerations we have the critical
section for one-way shear is located at a distance d from the
Myy = 68kN-m face of the column.

Area of Footing = P/SBC Shear force per meter width is

= 597/160 Vu = 149.25 (1085-d)

= 3.73 m2. Assuming the shear strength of τc = 0.36 N/mm2 for M-20
grade concrete with nominal percentage of reinforcement Pt
Provide a footing of 2.4 x 2.4 m = 0.25

Provide area = 4 m2 τc = Vu /bd

Factored soil pressure = 597/4 0.36 = 149.25(1085-d)/1000d

Qu = 149.25kN/m2 dmin = 317 mm

Hence the footing area is adequate since the soil pressure D = 600 mm
developed at the base is less than the factored bearing
capacity of soil. dprov = 550mm

© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5574
 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Reinforcement in footing: Hence, safe under one-way shear.

(a)Longer direction:

Mu =0.87xfyxAstxdx(1- fyxAst/fckxbd)

131x106 =0.87x415xAstx550(1-
415xAst/20x1000x550)

Ast = 678 mm2

Hence provide 12 mm dia bars @ 200 mm c/c.

Provide Ast = 708 mm2

(b) Shorter direction

106x106= 198577.5Ast-7.49 Ast2

Ast = 544mm2

Hence provide 12 mm dia bars @ 200 mm c/c.

Provide Ast = 565 mm2

Fig -6 Footing reinforcement details
Check for shear stress:
CONCLUSIONS
One Way Shear Along X-direction:
1. The provided member size in the Hospital building
Vu = 1.5x149.25x2(1.085- are found safe when structure is analysed using
(550/1000)) ETABS.
2. By observing results of design data we can adopt
= 239.54kN different sizes of members at different part of the
structure.
τv = 239.54/2400x550
REFERENCES
= 0.1814
1. Chandrashekar and Rajasekar (2015), “Analysis and
τc = 0.36N/mm2 Design of Multi Storied Building by Using ETABS
Software”, International journals of scientific and
Vc1 = 0.36x2400x550 research vol.4: issue.7: ISSN no. 2277-8179.
2. Balaji and Selvarasan (2016), “Design and Analysis
= 475kN
of multi-storied building under static and dynamic
One Way Shear Along Y-direction: loading conditions using ETABS”, International
Journal of Technical Research and Applications e-
Vu =1.5x149.25x2(0.975- (550/1000)) ISSN: 2320-8163, www.ijtra.com Volume 4, Issue 4,
PP. 15
= 190.2kN 3. Geethu S N, Deepthi M, Abdul Nasir N A and
Izzudeen K M(2016) “Comparative study on design
τv = 190.2/2400x550 and analysis of multi storied building by STAAD.Pro
and ETABS softwares”.
= 0.144 4. IS 456-2000, Code of practice for plain and
reinforced concrete
τc = 0.36N/mm2 5. IS-875(PART-1): code for dead loads
6. IS-875(PART-2): code for imposed loads
Vc1 = 0.360x2400x550
7. IS-1893: code for seismic loads
= 475kN. 8. SP 16 Design aid for reinforced concrete to IS-456.

τ c > τv

© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5575
 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

BIOGRAPHIES

VIJAYKUMAR K J
Student
Dept of Civil Engineering
S T J I T Ranebennur

NAGARATNA S A
Student
Dept of Civil Engineering
S T J I T Ranebennur

ASIF R S
Student
Dept of Civil Engineering
S T J I T Ranebennur

RANJITA N H
Student
Dept of Civil Engineering
S T J I T Ranebennur

SUDHA P HADADI
Professor
Dept of Civil Engineering
S T J I T Ranebennur

D S MAGANUR
H O D,
Dept of Civil Engineering
S T J I T Ranebennur

© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5576