Definition of Communication
Definition of Communication
● The word communication itself provides a clue to what it is—commun implies “something in common”
and ication suggests “understanding”, so communication hints at the meaning “a common
understanding of something”.
● It is define as “the simultaneous sharing and creating of meaning through human symbolic
interaction”. A definition specifies “a systematic process in which individuals interact with through
symbols to create and interpret meanings.”
● The term communication refers to the exchange of information between two or more people. For
communication to succeed, both participants must be able to exchange information and understand
each other. If the flow of information is blocked for some reason or the parties cannot make themselves
understood, then communication fails.
● Communication is used to meet the purpose of a person. The purpose could be to inform, to
persuade, or to entertain.
1. From a linear perspective: Communication is the process or act of transmitting a message from a
sender to a receiver, through a channel and with the interference of noise.
2. From an interactive perspective: Communication is the activity of conveying information
through the exchange of thoughts, messages, or information, as by speech, visuals, signals,
writing, or behavior.
3. From an etymological perspective: The word communication is derived from the Latin word,
communis, which means common. The definition underscores the fact that unless a coomon
understanding results from the exchange of information, there is no communication.
4. From a symbolic perspective: Communication uses symbols to represent things, process, ideas,
or events. These symbols are arbitrary constructions that represent a communicator’s thought.
5. From a pragmatic perspective: Pragmatics defines communication as any sign-mediated
interaction that follows combinatorial, context-specific and content-coherent rules.
Figure 2
ELEMENTS OF COMMUNICATION
The communication process involves elements such as source, message, encoding, channel, decoding,
receiver, feedback, context, and barrier.
● Source. The speaker or sender of a message. The communication process begins with the source, who
is also called the communicator or sender. The source has some kind of information – a command,
request, or idea – that he or she wants to share with others. In order for that message to be received,
the source must first encode the message in a form that can be understood and then transmit it.
● Message. The message or content is the information or ideas that the sender wants to relay to the
receiver.
● Channel. The means to deliver a message such as face-to-face conversations, telephone calls, e-mails,
and memos, among others. Also called the medium is the means by which a message is transmitted.
● Receiver. The person to whom a message is directed or recipient of the message. In order to
comprehend the information from the sender, the receiver must first be able to receive the sender’s
information and then decode or interpret it.
● Feedback. The communication process reaches its final point when the message has been successfully
transmitted, received, and understood.
The receiver, in turn, responds to the sender, indicating comprehension. Feedback may be direct, such
as a written or verbal response, or it may take the form of an act or deed in response.
The communication process is not always simple or smooth, of course. Two other elements may affect
how the message is transmitted, received, and interpreted:
● Noise. This can be any sort of interference that affects the message being sent, received, or
understood. It can be as literal as static over a phone line or esoteric as misinterpreting a local custom.
● Context. This is the setting and situation in which communication takes place. Like noise, context can
have an impact on the successful exchange of information. It may have a physical, social, or cultural
aspect to it.
Morals and ethics ensure discipline among us; without these codes of conduct—standards or
rules that guide our behaviour, our world will be chaotic. But how do morals and ethics differ? Morals
are personal codes while ethics are societal. Morals are our own set of rules, so others are neither
expected nor required to follow them. Ethics, on the other hand, are rules accepted and approved by
society, so they are imposed upon everyone.
ETHICS IN COMMUNICATION
Deirdre D. Johnson (1994) pointed out ten ethics in communication that you should bear in
mind to avoid being labelled “unethical” (as cited in Chase & Shamo, 2013, pp. 140-141).