Draft Structure Report-W
Draft Structure Report-W
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................2
1.1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................2
1.2 Project Location...........................................................................................................................2
1.3 SCOPE OF WORKS...................................................................................................................2
1.4 CONTENTS OF THE REPORT..................................................................................................2
2 INVESTIGATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES..................................................................................2
2.1 General........................................................................................................................................2
2.2 Minor drainage structures............................................................................................................2
3 DESIGN OF NEW STRUCTURES........................................................................................................2
3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................2
3.2 Minor Drainage Structures Design...............................................................................................2
3.2.1 Slab Culverts........................................................................................................................2
3.2.2 Concrete Pipe Culverts........................................................................................................2
3.2.3 Components of Culverts.......................................................................................................2
3.2.4 Materials..............................................................................................................................2
3.2.5 Flow Control on Roadside Drainage....................................................................................2
List of Figures
Zeluel Yohannes G.C. in JV with Bokra Construction and Trading Page 1
Woldia Town Segment- I, II,and III Design-Build Road Project Draft Structural report
List of Tables
1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In accordance to overall road sector strategy, the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
represented by Ethiopian Roads Authority (ERA) has allocated sufficient budget to finance
payments for the design and construction works of Woldia Town section (Segment-I, II and III)
The Ethiopian Roads Authority (ERA) of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (the
Employer) signed an Agreement with Zeluel Yohannes General Contractor in JV with Bokra
Construction and Trading for design and construction works of Woldia Town section (Segment-I,
The project involves designing and constructing of the road to DC-7 road standard with the
The Project Road is located in the northern part of Ethiopia in Northern Wollo Zone of the
Amhara National Regional State in Woldia Town which is around 520km from Addis Ababa. The
project road Consists of three segments: Segment-I is a spur begins at the Roundabout near
Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Ali Al-Amoudi Stadium along the main trunk road of Addis Ababa-
Woldia and turn to left towards the Stadium and ends near the stadium Gate( about 1.27Km).
Segment –II Starts at segment – I road around 0+700 and Ends at T-Junction of Main Truck road
of Adiss ababa – Woldia road loacaly named Enchet Tera, with length of about 714m. Segment –
III begins from End of segment-I and Ends at the Gate of the Stadium.
Investigating, surveying, Designing and constructing of the roadway and any necessary
structures
Upgrading the existing road (where appropriate) as well as constructing new alignment
section of the route to DC5 and as modified herein, AC standard as per the final contract
agreement
Designing and Constructing Retaining Walls, and other road protection works
that the impact of the construction of the road on the environment shall be prevented
initially
This report discusses the structure design of road segment I, II and II. The report is divided in to
three chapters. This first chapter gives an introduction of the report and basic project
information. The second chapter comprises investigation of existing cross drainage structures.
Structures in road projects mainly consist of drainage structures and retaining walls for stability
of slopes. These are indispensable elements of road construction. The serviceability of a road is
highly influenced by the absence of proper drainage structures and lack of properly located
stabilizing structures. The structures mainly include culverts, bridges, energy dissipation
Assessment of condition of existing structures is essential task to decide for the structure
whether it can function the intended purpose for the design life of the new design standard with
In addition to the desk top study, number of site visits has been undertaken to the site with key
Accordingly, there are a total of 5 existing cross drainage structures in the Road segments of the
project road. Two existing slab culverts, one pipe culvert and one ford structure are found on
Segment-I. One existing RC pipe culvert is identified on Road Segment-II and there is no
existing cross drainage structure on Segment-III. There is no Major cross drainage structure in
this project.
There are total of 5 existing minor drainage structures along the segment. Among this there are
two existing reinforced concrete slab culverts, two Pipe culverts and one Ford Structure. The
Lack of proper erosion Protection structures, damp of waste material has also disturbed
In addition to this, disposal of waste material on the stream channels and lack of channelization
are the potential challenge for the structures to use the structures for the intended purpose.
Figure 2-1 0+196 Slab culvert Figure 2-2 Ford Structure at 0+392
Figure 2-3 Masonry Crack at 0+553 Figure 2-4 Almost buried Slab Culvert at 0+553
Figure 2-5 Completely buried structure at 0+680 Figure 2-6 Double cell Pipe culvert at 0+540 of Segment-II
road with one pipe culvert is clogged and doesn’t give
fuction
As it is clearly stipulated on the employer’s requirement, all the minor culverts are to be
demolished and replaced with new structure. Besides, additional new structure is provided
where required. Hence all the minor culverts are designed as new, pertinent to the hydrologist
recommendations.
Based on the visual assessment and geotechnical recommendation slab culverts are to be
provided with replacement of unsuitable material with good quality material as summarized in
Recommendation
No Station Footing Depth Note/Remark
B.C. (kPa)
(m)
SEGMENT-I
Accordingly all slab culvert super structures and substructure are designed specific to the
analysis and design of each slab culvert are submitted along with this report on Appendix-B
Substructures of slab culverts are designed to be Class “B” cement mortared stone masonry
walls. Wing walls with flare angle of 30° are used to retain the roadway embankment.
Skewness angle of culvert is recommended not to exceed 45 degrees as measured from a line
In this section of the road there are five slab culverts. Cross section design drawing and schedule
Joints between the pipes shall be sealed with reinforced concrete capping to prevent infiltration
of water and fine soils. Selection of pipe bedding is made in accordance to ERA’s 2013 standard
drawing, ERA’s Drainage Design Manual and ERA’s Standard Specification requirements.
Accordingly, depending on the foundation material different types of pipe bedding have been
Class “A” bedding type is recommended for culverts located on rock, shale or other hard
material sections.
Class “B” bedding type is recommended when soft or other objectionable founding
materials.
To prevent scouring at the inlet and outlet level masonry paved water way and cut-off walls is
provided.
Absolute minimum sizes of 1220 millimeters for cross culverts are used to avoid maintenance
End walls or wing walls are used to retain the roadway embankment to avoid a projecting
culvert barrel. They are also used where the side slopes of the channel are unstable, and where
The selection of end structure for pipe culverts is generally dependent on factors such as the
condition of the approaching channel, slope and stability of the outlet channel. The culvert inlet
type is selected from standard details from the Standard drawing prepared based on ERA’s
Standard Detail Drawings for type A, Drop inlet and Type B end wall structures. In addition to
this end wall type C structure is also provided specific to the project. End wall structure types
may need to be modified in site with approval of the engineer based on the actual site situation.
Since the existing minor culvert drainages of the road project are all to be replaced all the
culverts are designed as new. There are two RC pipe culverts on the road segments.
The Schedule of Minor drainage structures is found on Appendix A of this report, though it have
A) Headwalls: For prefabricated reinforced concrete pipe culverts, Class B stone masonry
headwalls& wing wall shall be provided. These retain and protect the embankment at
the ends of the culvert and help to counteract the dislocation of concrete pipes due to
Culverts’ inlet and outlet type and configuration has been selected based on
Invert level of pipe (to determine type of end wall and inlet)
To prevent scouring at the inlet and outlet proper measures have been taken. For inlets paved
water way and cut-off walls have been provided. Whereas for outlets two cases of outlet
conditions are encountered during determination of type of structure. The first case is where
there is no significant elevation difference between the outlet level of the pipe and the
surrounding ground. In this case normal outlet paved waterway was provided. Moreover, the
outlet velocity was controlled by adopting mild slope for the culvert. The second case is where
there is marked difference between the outlet level of the pipe and the surrounding ground. In
this case energy dissipating structures including cascades, retaining walls in conjunction with
paved waterway have been used. Details of these structures and their respective locations are
C) Erosion Protection:-Scour control measures at culvert inlet and outlet shall be designed which
includes, outlet channeling & Stone pitching at the inlet and outlet with cut-off walls of each
D) Culvert Skewness:-In accordance with the ERA DDM angle of skew limits, skew culvert shall be
provided for culverts with the reference of Centre line of the culvert and roadway profile.
Standard requirement,
3.2.4 Materials
Accordingly, all super structural elements are to be of Reinforced Concrete, while the sub-
structures are to be made using stone masonry of class B, with or without RC Pad depending on
the foundation material. Designs would be based on the material properties cited herein.
Concrete
The classes of concrete recommended for the different component of minor and major
structures are taken in accordance to ERA’s 2014 Standard Technical specification requirement.
The recommended grades of concrete and specified strengths are given in the table below:-
28 day Compressive
Grade of Components of bridge to be designed using
Strength (15cm
Concrete specified type of concrete
Cylinder) MPa
Box culvert, Superstructure of Bridge and slab
C30/20 24
culvert
Bridge Substructures (RC Footing of Abutment,
C30/40 24
Wingwall and Pier)
C15/20 12 Lean Concrete under footings
RC footing pad of Slab culvert and retaining
C20/40 16
wall, Plain Concrete footing and lined drains
C35/20 28 Production of Pipe Culverts
Stone Masonry
Stone Masonry consists of stones shaped, dressed, and laid broken-coursed in cement mortar in
accordance with certain specified requirements. Class B is used for minor structures such as pipe
headwall, slab culvert and retaining walls. Sand cement ratio of 3:1 for minor drainage
structures.
Reinforcement
The yield strength for deformed reinforcing steel bar would be grade 420 for main bars with
diameters greater than or equal to 20mm and grade 300 for secondary bars with diameters less
than 20mm and ties with diameters less than 12mm. The minimum yield strength of grade 400
To minimize erosion on roadside watercourse channels, stone masonry check dams will be
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D