We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Design
of
water
distribution
systems
The
network
of
pipes
which
makes
up
the
distribution
system
may
be
subdivided
into
primary
or
arterial
lines,
secondary
lines
and
small
distribution
mains.
The
primary
or
arterial
mains
form
the
basic
structure
of
the
system
and
carry
flow
from
the
pumping
station
to
and
from
elevated
storage
tanks
and
to
the
various
districts
of
the
city.
The
secondary
lines
form
smaller
loops
within
the
primary
mains
and
run
from
one
primary
line
to
another.
The
small
distribution
mains
form
a
grid
over
the
entire
service
area
–
supplying
water
to
every
user
and
to
the
fire
hydrants.
They
are
connected
to
primary,
secondary,
or
other
small
mains
at
both
ends
and
are
valved
so
that
the
system
can
be
shut
down
for
repairs
without
depriving
a
large
area
of
water.
The
size
of
the
small
mains
is
generally
dictated
by
fire
flow
except
in
residential
areas
with
very
large
lots.
The
detailed
design
of
a
water
distribution
system
is
affected
by
local
topography,
existing
and
expected
population
densities,
and
commercial
and
industrial
demand.
First,
the
flow
must
be
disaggregated
to
individual
subareas
of
the
system
.
Next,
a
system
of
interlocking
loops
must
be
laid
out.
The
disaggregated
flows
are
then
assigned
to
the
various
nodes
of
the
system.
The
design
then
involves
determination
of
the
sizes
of
the
arterials,
secondary
lines,
and
small
distribution
mains
required
to
ensure
that
the
pressures
and
velocities
desired
in
the
system
are
maintained
under
a
variety
of
design
flow
conditions.
These
design
considerations
are
based
on
the
maximum
daily
flow
rate
plus
one
or
more
fires,
depending
on
the
size
of
the
community.
The
fire
flow
rate
depends
on
the
character
of
the
individual
subarea.
In
general,
those
fire
location
s
which
are
most
distant
either
vertically
or
horizontally
from
the
pumping
plant
will
be
critical
for
design;
however
i
tis
usually
necessary
to
assume
various
fire
locations
in
order
to
ensure
that
all
areas
are
adequately
protected.
Consideration
of
the
design
problem
described
above
leads
us
to
the
obvious
conclusion
that,
in
general,
there
are
many
possible
solutions
which
will
satisfy
the
design
constraints.
The
task
then
becomes
determining
the
“best”
solution.
Such
an
optimization
problem
for
a
looped
pipe
network
is
very
complicated
since
the
distribution
of
flows
in
the
pipes
is
a
function
of
the
design,
hence
simplified
techniques
are
often
used.
Even
so,
the
optima
for
the
various
design
conditions
will
not
be
the
same,
so
that
the
final
design
which
satisfies
all
required
conditions
may
not
be
an
optimum
for
any
particular
condition.
The
usual
engineering
approach
to
design
of
looped
pipe
systems
involves
layout
of
the
network,
assignment
of
estimated
pipe
sizes
and
calculation
of
resulting
flows
and
head
losses.
The
pipe
sizes
are
then
adjusted
as
necessary
to
ensure
that
the
pressures
at
the
various
nodes
and
the
velocities
in
the
various
pipes
meet
the
criteria
established
for
the
community.
For
a
given
set
of
pipe
sizes,
the
calculation
of
flows
and
pressures
is
normally
a
reasonably
straightforward
task
which
can
be
performed
in
a
variety
of
ways.
The
Hardy-‐Cross
method
and
its
modifications
have
been
used
in
design
and
analysis
of
water
distribution
systems
for
many
years.
The
method
is
based
upon
the
hydraulic
formulas
previously
studied,
which
are
used
to
calculate
the
energy
losses
in
the
elements
of
the
system.
It
is
not
unusual
to
neglect
the
losses
in
fittings,
since
these
will
be
small
with
respect
to
those
in
long
pipes.
The
energy
loss
in
any
element
of
the
system
may
be
expressed
as
ℎ! = 𝑘! 𝑄!!
(1)
where
hi
=
energy
loss
in
element
i
Qi
=
flow
in
that
element
ki
=
constant
depending
on
pipe
diameter,
length,
type
and
condition
x
=
1.85
to
2
normally,
depending
on
equation
(units)
used
Note:
x
=
1.85
for
SI
units
For
any
pipe
in
a
loop
of
the
system,
the
actual
flow
will
differ
from
an
assumed
flow
by
an
amount
Δ:
𝑄! = 𝑄!! + ∆
(2)
where
Qi
=
actual
flow
in
pipe
Qi0
=
assumed
flow
Δ
=
required
correction
Substituting
equation
(2)
in
(1)
gives
(!!!) 𝑘! 𝑄!! = 𝑘! 𝑄!! ! + 𝑥𝑄!! ∆ + ⋯
(3)
The
remaining
terms
in
the
expansion
may
be
neglected
if
Δ
is
small
compared
to
Qi.
For
any
loop,
the
sum
of
the
head
losses
about
the
loop
must
be
equal
to
zero.
Thus,
for
any
loop,
! ! ! 𝑘! 𝑄! = 0
(4)
where
n
is
the
number
of
pipes
in
the
loop.
Then,
from
equation
(3)
The
procedure
(usually
performed
on
a
computer)
may
be
outlined
as
follows:
1. Disaggregate
the
flow
to
the
various
blocks
or
other
subareas
of
the
community.
2. Concentrate
the
disaggregated
flows
at
the
nodes
of
the
system.
3. Add
the
required
fire
flow
at
appropriate
nodes.
4. Select
initial
pipe
sizes
using
the
defined
criteria
(legal
criteria).
5. Assume
any
internally
consistent
distribution
of
flow.
The
sum
of
the
flows
entering
and
leaving
each
node
must
be
equal
to
zero.
6. Compute
the
head
loss
in
each
element
of
the
system.
Conventionally,
clockwise
flows
are
positive
and
produce
positive
head
loss.
7. With
due
attention
to
sign,
compute
the
total
head
loss
around
each
loop:
! ! ! ℎ! = 𝑘! 𝑄!!
! !
8. Compute,
without
regard
to
sign,
the
sum
! (!!!) 𝑘! 𝑄!!
!
9. Calculate
the
corrections
for
each
loop
from
equation
(6)
and
apply
the
correction
to
each
line
in
the
loop.
Lines
common
to
two
loops
receive
two
corrections
with
due
attention
to
sign.
10. Repeat
the
procedure
until
the
corrections
calculated
in
step
9
are
less
than
some
stipulated
maximum.
The
flows
and
pressures
in
the
initial
network
are
then
known.
11. Compare
the
pressures
and
velocities
in
the
balanced
network
to
the
criteria
(legal
criteria).
Adjust
the
pipe
sizes
to
reduce
or
increase
velocities
and
pressures
and
repeat
the
procedure
until
a
satisfactory
solution
is
obtained.
12. Apply
any
other
fire
flow
conditions
which
may
be
critical
and
reevaluate
the
velocities
and
pressure
distribution.
Adjust
pipe
sizes
as
necessary.