Portfolio Assignment Unit IV
Portfolio Assignment Unit IV
As a new Products Process Manager you are responsible for helping project
managers to develop new product processes and use them effectively;
Explain the difference between Invention and innovation relative to new product
development.
2. Take a moment and reflect on the topics introduced in this Unit.
Formulate at least one question that arose while you were reading the material and
completing the assignments.
Was there anything in this Unit that surprised you or caught your attention?
Explain.
For assistance with reflective writing, read How to Write a Reflective Paper.
The Portfolio Assignment entry should be a minimum of 500 words and not more than
750 words. Use APA citations and references if you use ideas from the readings or
other sources. This assignment is graded by the instructor.
***********************************************************************************
***********************************************************
There are three steps of innovation (Schoen, J., et.al. (2005)) as shown in the
description and a model in the figure below. The three steps are,
1. Basic Research: The need for basic research. It comprises the search for new
knowledge, information and wisdom. The prime objective is to know and discover how
things work and very little focus on commercial applications or use. Journal and
conference Publication is the primary outcome of basic research.
2. Invention: Invention means “The creation of new products and processes through
the development of the new knowledge or from new combinations of existing
knowledge. Most inventions are the result of novel applications of existing
knowledge” (Grant, 2021). This is an intermediate step between the basic research
and innovation and may also be called as applied research. Development of useful
tool and technological process etc., is the outcome of invention stage.
There is no guarantee that a new product will be developed from inventions and
basic research, there is no guarantee that it will turn into a successful new
product for the marketplace until a strong business and market is favorable for the
newly developed product. A fair degree of luck is involved in innovation even when
a strong product is in place, After the product is available it is the business
strategy that brings the invention to the market.
4. People interested in technology usually study technology and will continue down
a path of technological development with a new product just
waiting for the day the technology is “perfect” for introduction into the market.
Knowing when to stop development (the invention process) and start focusing on the
business model (the innovation process) is extremely difficult for many technology
oriented individuals. For technology managers working with new product ideas and
leaders of incubators, knowing when to inject some business assistance into the
team is of vital importance. The only way to make such a decision requires more
than a technology development focus: the business model is vital
References:
Schoen, J., Mason, T. W., Kline, W. A., & Bunch, R. M. (2005). The innovation
cycle: A new model and case study for the invention to innovation process.
Engineering Management Journal, 17(3), 3-10.
Grant, R. M. (2021). Contemporary strategy analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Hamel, Gary, Leading the Revolution, Harvard Business School Press (2000)
The Innovation Cycle: A New Model and Case Study for the Invention to Innovation
Process
1. The model is cyclic in nature and includes both invention and innovation cycles
with input from many sources. Recommendations developed for technology managers
include evaluating their portfolio of technologies and projects to assess their
position on the invention to innovation timeline and ensuring the appropriate
resources are in place to support further progress
2. assist researchers in making decisions about new technologies to investigate,
and will assist technology managers in evaluating candidate inventions for
commercialization and determining the tactics to best bring them to markets
3. The model is intended to aid those pursuing a more entrepreneurial approach to
utilizing university basic research but may also be helpful to those pursuing new
product development from anywhere in the cycle