.

Republic of the Philippines

Department of the Interior and Local Government
BUREAU OF FIRE PROTECTION

OLP RATING MATRIX FORM FOR RD, PFM/DFM. &C/MFM

OUTPUTS QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
5 - 100% of targeted barangays submitted a
5 - 100% of targeted barangays prepared a 5 - CFPP were submitted within specified
comprehensive and effective CFPP within
comprehensive and effective CFPP target date
specified target date
4-N/A 4-N/A 4-N/A
3 - 80 - 90% of targeted barangays submitted a
1. Comprehensive Fire 3 - 80-90% of targeted barangays prepared
comprehensive and effective CFPP within 3-N/A
Prrotection Plan a comprehensive and effective CFPP
specified target date
2-N/A 2-N/A 2-N/A
3 - 0% of targeted barangays submitted a
1 - 0% of targeted barangays prepared a 1 - CFPP were submitted after specified target
comprehensive and effective CFPP within
comprehensive and effective CFPP date
specified target date
5 - 100% of targeted barangays established a
5 - 100% of targeted barangays established
highly competent CFAG within specified time
a highly competent CFAG
frame
4-N/A 4-N/A
2. Organized Community 3 - 80-90% of targeted barangays
3-N/A
Fire Auxilliary Group established a highly competent CFAG
2- N/A 2-N/A
1 - 0% of targeted barangays failed to
1 - None of targeted barangays established
established a highly competent CFAG within
a highly competent CFAG
specified time frame
3.Fire Prevention 5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented 5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
Intervention within Highly among targeted barangays within the duration
among targeted barangays within the duration of the program
Vulnerable Zone (Red of the program
Zone) 4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented among
4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented 4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
program
3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented among
3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented 3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
program
2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented 2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented among 2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented within
among targeted barangays targeted barangays within the duration of the the duration of the program
 program
1 - Failed to implement FPI's among 1 - Failed to implement FPI's among targeted 1 - Failed to implement FPI's within the
targeted barangays barangays within the duration of the program duration of the program
5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented 5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
among targeted barangays within the duration
among targeted barangays within the duration of the program
of the program
4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented among
4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented 4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
3.Fire Prevention program
Intervention within 3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented among
3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented 3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented within
Moderately Vulnerable targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
Zone (Orange Zone) program
2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented among
2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented 2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
program
1 - Failed to implement FPI's among 1 - Failed to implement FPI's among targeted 1 - Failed to implement FPI's within the
targeted barangays barangays within the duration of the program duration of the program
5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented 5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
among targeted barangays within the duration
among targeted barangays within the duration of the program
of the program
4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented among
4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented 4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
5.Fire Prevention program
Intervention within Mildly 3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented among
3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented 3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented within
Vulnerable Zone (Yellow targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
Zone) program
2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented among
2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented 2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
program
1 - Failed to implement FPI's among 1 - Failed to implement FPI's among targeted 1 - Failed to implement FPI's within the
targeted barangays barangays within the duration of the program duration of the program
5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented 5 - 100% of FPI's were fully implemented
among targeted barangays within the duration
among targeted barangays within the duration of the program
of the program
4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented among
4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented 4 - 80-90% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
6.Fire Prevention program
Intervention within Safe 3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented among
3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented 3 - 60-70% of FPI's were implemented within
Zones (Blue Zone) targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
program
2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented among
2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented 2 - 40-50% of FPI's were implemented within
targeted barangays within the duration of the
among targeted barangays the duration of the program
program
1 - Failed to implement FPI's among 1 - Failed to implement FPI's among targeted 1 - Failed to implement FPI's within the
 targeted barangays barangays within the duration of the program duration of the program

OLP IPCR RATING MATRIX FORM FOR STATION PERSONNEL

OUTPUTS QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
5 - 100% of targeted barangays submitted a
5 - 100% of targeted barangays prepared a 5 - CFPP were submitted within specified
comprehensive and effective CFPP within
comprehensive and effective CFPP target date
specified target date
4-N/A 4-N/A 4-N/A
3 - 80 - 90% of targeted barangays submitted a
1. Comprehensive Fire 3 - 80-90% of targeted barangays prepared
comprehensive and effective CFPP within 3-N/A
Protection Plan a comprehensive and effective CFPP
specified target date
2-N/A 2-N/A 2-N/A
3 - 0% of targeted barangays submitted a
1 - 0% of targeted barangays prepared a 1 - CFPP were submitted after specified target
comprehensive and effective CFPP within
comprehensive and effective CFPP date
specified target date
5 - 100% of targeted barangays established a
5 - 100% of targeted barangays established
highly competent CFAG within specified time
a highly competent CFAG
frame
4-N/A 4-N/A
2. Organized Community 3 - 80-90% of targeted barangays
3-N/A
Fire Auxilliary Group established a highly competent CFAG
2- N/A 2-N/A
1 - 0% of targeted barangays failed to
1 - None of targeted barangays established
established a highly competent CFAG within
a highly competent CFAG
specified time frame

5 - 100% of targeted barangays within the 5 - 100% of targeted barangays within the
5 - Survey and inspection were conducted
zone were surveyed and inspected zone were surveyed and inspected thoroughly
during the semester
thoroughly during the semester

4-N/A 4-N/A 4-N/A

3. House-to-house Fire
Safety Survey
3 - 80-90% of targeted barangays within the
3 - 80-90% of targeted barangays within the
zone were surveyed and inspected during the 3-N/A
zone were surveyed and inspected
semester

2-N/A 2-N/A 2-N/A

 1 - Failed to survey and inspect the number of
1 - Failed to survey and inspect the number 1 - Survey and inspection were conducted
targeted barangays within the zone during the
of targeted barangays within the zone beyond the semester
semester

5 - 100% of noted hazards within the 5 - 100% of noted hazards within the barangay 5 - Noted hazards within the barangay were
barangay were removed were removed within the target date removed within the target date

4 - 80-90% of noted hazards within the 4 - 80-90% of noted hazards within the
4-N/A
barangay were removed barangay were removed within the target date

3 - 60-70% of noted hazards within the 3 - 60-70% of noted hazards within the
4. Direct Hazard Removal 3-N/A
barangay were removed barangay were removed within the target date

8 - 40-50% of noted hazards within the 2 - 40-50% of noted hazards within the
2-N/A
barangay were removed barangay were removed within the target date

9 - 0-30% of noted hazards within the 1 - 0-30% of noted hazards within the 1 - Noted hazards within the barangay were
barangay were removed barangay were removed within the target date removed after the target date

5 - Intensive lecture was conducted to 5 - Intensive lecture was conducted to 100% of

5 - Intensive lecture was conducted within the
100% of targeted participants within the targeted participants within the zone during the
zone during the semester
zone semester

4 - Lecture was conducted to 80-90% of

4 - Lecture was conducted to 80-90% of
targeted participants within the zone during the 4-N/A
targeted participants within the zone
semester

3 - Lecture was conducted to 60-70% of

3 - Lecture was conducted to 60-70% of
5. Intensive Lecture targeted participants within the zone during the 3-N/A
targeted participants within the zone
semester

2 - Lecture was conducted to 40-50% of

2 - Lecture was conducted to 40-50% of
targeted participants within the zone during the 2-N/A
targeted participants within the zone
semester

1 - Lecture was conducted to 100% of

1 - Lecture was conducted to 0-30% of 1 - Intensive lecture was conducted within the
targeted participants within the zone during the
targeted participants within the zone zone after the semester
semester

5 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 5 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 100% of

6. CFPP Simulated 5 - CFPP exercises were simulated within the
100% of targeted barangays within the targeted barangays within the zone during the
Exercises zone during the semester
zone semester
 4- CFPP exercises were simulated to 80-90%
4 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 80-
of targeted barangays within the zone during 4-N/A
90% of targeted barangays within the zone
the semester

3 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 60-70%

3 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 60-
of targeted barangays within the zone during 3-N/A
70% of targeted barangays within the zone
the semester

2 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 40-50%

2 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 40-
of targeted barangays within the zone during 2-N/A
50% of targeted barangays within the zone
the semester

1 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 0-30%

1 - CFPP exercises were simulated to 0- 1 - CFPP exercises were simulated within the
of targeted barangays within the zone during
30% of targeted barangays within the zone zone after the semester
the semester

5 - Fire safety information materials were 5 - Fire safety information materials were
5 - Fire safety information materials were
distributed to all or 100% of the barangays distributed to all or 100% of the barangays
distributed within the zone during the semester
within the zone within the zone during the semester

4 - Fire safety information materials were 4 - Fire safety information materials were
distributed to 80-90% of the barangays distributed to 80-90% of the barangays within 4-N/A
within the zone the zone during the semester

7. Distribution of Fire 3 - Fire safety information materials were 3 - Fire safety information materials were
safety information distributed to 60-70% of the barangays distributed to 60-70% of the barangays within 3-N/A
Materials within the zone the zone during the semester

2 - Fire safety information materials were 2 - Fire safety information materials were
distributed to 40-50% of the barangays distributed to 40-50% of the barangays within 2-N/A
within the zone the zone during the semester

1 - Fire safety information materials were 1 - Fire safety information materials were 1 - Fire safety information materials were
distributed to 0-30% of the barangays within distributed to 0-30% of the barangays within distributed within the zone beyond the
the zone the zone during the semester semester