Pre Qualification of Contractors Model Questionnaire
Pre Qualification of Contractors Model Questionnaire
PRE‐QUALIFICATION
OF CONTRACTORS
LABOR
COMMISSIONER’S
MODEL
QUESTIONNAIRE
MARCH 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
A. Contractor Information..................................................................................................10
Prior History..................................................................................................................19
Criminal Matters and Civil Suits.................................................................................21
Occupational Health and Safety Compliance.............................................................22
Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship Compliance.....................................................22
E. Project References...........................................................................................................24
F. Certification.....................................................................................................................25
SCORING WORKSHEET................................................................................................................26
ii
INTRODUCTION AND
OVERVIEW OF THE 1999
LAW AND ITS APPLICATION
1
I. IMPORTANT PROVISIONS OF THE 1999 LAW
In 1999, the Legislature enacted a law that allows many public agencies to require
licensed contractors that wish to bid for public works jobs to “pre-qualify” for the right to bid on
a specific public works project, or on a public works project undertaken by a public agency
during a specified period of time. Public Contract Code section 20101 has the relevant
provisions; it was enacted as part of Assembly Bill 574.
The law applies to all cities, counties, and special districts but does not apply to K-12 school
districts (which have similar authority to create pre-qualification procedures, described in Public
Contract Code section 20111.5, which was enacted in 1997).1
The law does not require any public agency to adopt a pre-qualification system. Instead, it
authorizes every public agency to adopt a pre-qualification system, and describes certain
requirements that must be met (described below), if a public agency chooses to adopt such a
system.
In fact, the 1999 law allows a public agency to establish two different kinds of pre-
qualification procedures for public works projects. The law allows a public agency to establish a
pre- qualification procedure linked to a single project (Section 20101[d]). Or, the public agency
may adopt a procedure by which a contractor may qualify to bid on projects which are put out for
bid by that agency for a period of one year after the date of initial pre-qualification. (Section
20101[c]).
The law requires every public agency that creates either kind of pre-qualification procedure
to:
(2)adopt and apply a uniform system of rating bidders on objective criteria, on the basis
of the completed questionnaires and financial statements (Section 20101[b]);
Assembly Bill 574 required the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) to “develop model
guidelines for rating bidders, and draft the standardized questionnaire.” It required DIR to “consult
with affected public agencies, cities and counties, the construction industry, the surety industry, and
other interested parties.”
From January through October 2000, DIR held a series of meetings in Sacramento with
representatives of public agencies and other interested parties. Each meeting was attended by
more
2
1
Community College Districts also have specific authority to carry out pre-qualification procedures, in Public
Contract Code section 20651.5, enacted in 1998. Community College Districts may also be covered by AB 574,
since they are not specifically exempted.
3
than 25 representatives of interested parties. All told, more than 60 people participated in at least
one such meeting, and most representatives participated in more than one. Contractors, public
agencies both large and small, and associations of each were well represented throughout the
series of meetings. DIR’s initial draft of a questionnaire was revised after each meeting, and
each revised draft was discussed at the next meeting, leading to additional revisions. Eventually,
there was widespread consensus that the model questionnaire offered a system of rating bidders
based on objective criteria, and a useful and appropriate series of questions. In addition, DIR, in
compliance with the 1999 legislation, created model guidelines for rating bidders.
Throughout 2016 and part of 2017 the Labor Commissioner held a series of meetings
with key stakeholders, representatives of public agencies, unions, contractors, and other
interested parties in order to update and enhance the model questionnaire and rating system. The
Labor Commissioner engaged with many representatives of the construction industry through
individual meetings with stakeholders and public agency representatives, as well as by attending
public agency pre-bid meetings and conferences of industry associations attended by over 100
people. The updated model questionnaire and rating system included in this packet was revised
to offer a more effective system of rating bidders based on the input provided during these
meetings.
3. A model scoring system, for rating the answers given by the contractors and by the
references. Note: the documents provided here by DIR are designed to collect the
information that a public agency will need to carry out a pre-qualification procedure,
and the DIR has proposed a rating system. Each public agency, however, is free to
devise its own “uniform system of rating prospective bidders . . . based on objective
criteria.” For example, each public agency may determine its own scoring system
and its own passing scores for different portions of the questionnaire and some may
choose to implement a uniform rating system for the Project References interview
questions.
2
The documents included in this package can be found at the Department of Industrial Relations website at
4
www.dir.ca.gov/prequal.htm.
5
5. Two alternative forms: model announcements of pre-qualification procedures. Each
is a summary and explanation of the pre-qualification procedure, prepared primarily
for licensed contractors, although available for the general public as well. There are
two slightly different versions of this document: one explains the pre-qualification
procedure linked to a single project,3 while the other explains the procedure of pre
qualification valid for one year.
Section 20101(d) requires every public agency that requires prospective bidders to pre-
qualify pursuant to this law to establish “a process that will allow prospective bidders to dispute
their proposed pre-qualification rating prior to the closing time for receipt of bids.” The appeal
process must include written notification by the public agency of the basis for the prospective
bidder’s disqualification “and any supporting evidence that has been received from others or
adduced as a result of an investigation by the public entity.” (section 20101[d][1]). “The
prospective bidder must be given an opportunity to rebut any evidence used as a basis for
disqualification and to present evidence to the public entity as to why the prospective bidder
should be found qualified.” (section 20101[d][2]). The law does not describe the appeal
procedure in any additional detail; each public agency is free to adopt its own procedures, as long
as the statutory requirements are met. As an example, while Section C of the model
questionnaire includes thirteen “Essential Criteria Questions,” a public agency may choose to
allow contractors to appeal a disqualification based solely on an answer to a question in Section
C.
DIR has devised two different schedules for appeal procedures. One schedule would be
used in a system for pre-qualification for a single project. The sequence of steps in this appeal
procedure are scheduled to allow for an appeal decision at least four business days prior to the
submission for bids for the single project. The other schedule for an appeal is applicable to a
system in which prospective bidders seek pre-qualification valid for one year, without a link to
3
The explanation included in this document assumes that the pre-qualification procedure is taking place after the
RFP or project announcement is published. A public agency may choose, instead, to have the pre-qualification
procedure start and end prior to the solicitation of bids for the specific project. If that is the case, the public agency
would have to modify the document offered here to explain the sequence of events.
4
A CAUTIONARY NOTE: The information that will be given to public agencies by contractors seeking pre-
qualification is provided under oath, with the understanding that the intentional providing of false information is, in
itself, grounds for disqualification, and may result in disqualification from bidding on any public works project,
registering as a Public Works Contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations, and may be grounds for
termination of a public works contract. We expect that the information given should be and will be accepted at face
value in most instances. Our list of sources of information available to the public is provided for use where a public
agency reviewing the answers given in a questionnaire has specific reason to believe that one or more answers
should be verified in this manner.
6
the bidding on a specific project. These two appeal sequences are described in the explanation to
contractors (the two documents referred to in paragraph 5, above).
Each public agency should be certain that it distributes to licensed contractors only the
description that is appropriate for the pre-qualification procedures that are in use.
There are a number of laws and court decisions that affect the nature of an appeal hearing
provided by a public agency. Each public agency should consult its own attorneys for advice in this
area.
AB 574 provides that “The questionnaires and financial statements shall not be public
records and shall not be open to public inspection; however, records of the names of contractors
applying for pre-qualification status shall be public records subject to disclosure” under the Public
Records Act. (Section 20101[a]). The model questionnaire forms provided by DIR indicate that the
cover page of each questionnaire is a public record, and that all other pages of the questionnaire are
not public records.
Public agencies are not required to pre-qualify subcontractors, nor are public agencies
prohibited from doing so. Section 20101(f) says:
Nothing in this section shall preclude the awarding agency from pre-qualifying or
disqualifying a subcontractor. The disqualification by an awarding agency does not
disqualify an otherwise pre-qualified [general] contractor.
7
INSTRUCTIONS
FOR AWARDING
BODIES
8
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AWARDING BODIES
Contractors who wish to be pre-qualified must submit a completed pre-qualification questionnaire
to the awarding body for review. Contractors are required to provide any additional information
and/or documentation as instructed on the questionnaire. The Model Pre-qualification Questionnaire
can be found on pages 10 to 27.
If the Contractor is not immediately disqualified based on its answers to the questions in Section
C, the awarding body may assume that the Contractor has passed this pre-qualification section.
However, the awarding body may require additional information be submitted to verify the
accuracy of the responses provided on the Questionnaire.
Contractors are required to answer questions 1 through 21 and must provide additional
information to the awarding body for any questions where the answer is not “0”. The awarding
body will then use this information to calculate a score for Section D in order to determine
eligibility for pre-qualification.
All questions in which the Contractor’s response is not “0” are scored. If all of the Contractor’s
responses to questions 1 through 21 are “0” the awarding body may assume that the Contractor
has passed this pre-qualification section. However, the awarding body may require additional
information from the Contractor to verify the accuracy of the responses provided.
If the answer to any of questions 1 through 21 is not “0”, additional scrutiny is required and the
awarding body will analyze the issues using the following two factors:
1. Whether the incident was a good faith mistake and, if so, the error was promptly and
voluntarily corrected when brought to the attention of the Contractor or Subcontractor.
AND
2. Whether the Contractor or Subcontractor has a prior history or several incidents of the
issue are reported.
9
The Contractor is required to provide additional documentation for all answers which are not “0”.
The awarding body will review the additional documents to calculate a final score between 1 and
5 using the above criteria for each question.
The first factor requires the awarding body to assign a score based on the culpability of the
Contractor. A score of 1 is assigned where the incident is clearly the result of a good-faith
mistake and a score of 5 is assigned where the incident is clearly an overtly willful action for
which the Contractor is culpable. The second factor requires the awarding body to assign a score
based on the prior history of the issue being reported. A score of 1 is assigned where only a
single incident exists, a score of 2 is assigned where two incidents exist, etc. up to a score of 5
assigned where five or more incidents of that kind exist.
Certain questions in Section D are weighted two times as much as others based on the severity of
the actions and level of a Contractor’s control over those actions. These questions are given
additional weight because they involve significant concerns as to whether a Contractor should be
pre-qualified. Also, scores were given additional weight based on a Contractor’s level of control
over those issues. For example, prevailing wage violations committed by a subcontractor receive
less weight than a violation by the Contractor. These questions are scored as follows: If the first
factor receives a score of 5 and the second factor receives a score of 4, the total score for a “Red
Flag” question would be 18. The calculation can be seen as follows: ((5+4) x 2 = 18). The
following questions are assigned additional weight as explained above: 1 through 3, 5 through 6,
8, 10 through 12, 15 through 18, and 20.
The awarding body may use the Scoring Worksheet on page 27 (also provided separately in excel
format), to calculate the Contractor’s overall weighted score for Section D. A contractor pre-
qualifies only if the overall score is 35 or less, and is disqualified if the overall score is
greater than 35.
Section E is not scored, but allows the awarding body to collect information about a Contractor’s
six most recent public works projects. The information is meant to assist the awarding body to
conduct the interviews of the managers of projects previously completed (that is, the people who
supervised the projects for the project owners) by the Contractor wishing to pre-qualify. This
may also provide the awarding body to verify answers provided in sections C and D.
10
LABOR COMMISSIONER’S
MODEL PRE-
QUALIFICATION
QUESTIONNAIRE
11
CONTRACTOR PRE-QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
(All Questions Must Be Answered)
Firm Name (as it appears on CSLB license):
Firm Type (Select one): Corporation LLC Partnership Sole Proprietorship Joint
Venture
Contact Person/Title:
(List Owner(s) if Firm is a Sole Proprietorship or Partnership)
List your firm’s DIR Public Works Contractor (PWCR) Registration Number(s):
PWCR Number Entity Name Expiration Date
If any of your firm’s license(s) are held in the name of a corporation, limited liability company, or
partnership, list below the names of the qualifying individual(s) listed on the CSLB records who
meet(s) the experience and examination requirements for each license.
License Number Qualifying Individual Expiration Date
12
B. CURRENT ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
Complete the section below for the appropriate type of
firm: For Firms That Are Corporations:
1a. Date incorporated:
1b. Under the laws of what state:
1c. Provide all the following information for each person who is either (a) an officer of the
corporation (president, vice president, secretary, treasurer), or (b) the owner of at least ten
percent of the corporation’s stock:
Name Position Years %
with Firm Ownership
1d. Identify every construction firm that any person listed above has been associated with (as
owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five years.
NOTE: For this question, “owner” and “partner” refer to ownership of ten percent or more
of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation.
Person’s Name Construction Firm Date of
Person’s
Participation
13
1d. Identify every construction firm that any person listed above has been associated with (as
owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five years.
NOTE: For this question, “owner” and “partner” refer to ownership of ten percent or more
of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation.
Person’s Name Construction Firm Date of Person’s
Participation with Firm
1d. Identify every construction firm that any person listed above has been associated with (as
owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five years.
NOTE: For this question, “owner” and “partner” refer to ownership of ten percent or more
of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation.
14
For Firms That Are Sole Proprietorships:
1a. Date of commencement of business
1b. Identify every construction firm that the business owner has been associated with (as
owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five years.
NOTE: For this question, “owner” and “partner” refer to ownership of ten percent or more
of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation.
Note: Explain on a separate sheet. Provide all other pertinent information required in the
sections above, for each Corporation, LLC, Partnership, or Sole-Proprietorship that is a part
of the Joint Venture.
15
3. State your firm’s gross revenues for each of the last three fiscal years:
Current year ($):
Previous year ($):
Year prior to previous year ($):
4. How many years has your firm been in business in California as a contractor under
your present business name and license number?
5. Bonding Capacity – Provide documentation from your surety identifying the following:
Name of Bonding Company/Surety:
Name of Surety Agent:
Address:
Telephone number:
6. If your firm was required to pay a premium of more than one percent for a performance and
payment bond on any project(s) on which your firm worked at any time during the last
three years, state the percentage that your firm was required to pay. You may provide an
explanation for a percentage rate higher than one percent, if you wish to do so.
7. List all other sureties (name and full address) that have written bonds for your firm
during the last five years, including the dates on which they were issued:
Name Address Date
8. How often do you require documented safety meetings to be held for construction
employees and field supervisors during the course of a project?
16
11. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the apprenticeship program (approved
by the California Apprenticeship Council) from whom you intend to request the dispatch of
apprentices to employ on any public works project awarded by [Public Entity].
Name Address Phone
12. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the apprenticeship program (approved
by the California Apprenticeship Council) from whom you have requested and/or employed
apprentices in the past three years.
Name Address Phone
14. Has your firm changed names or license number in the past five years? Yes No
(If yes, explain on a separate sheet, including the reason for the
change.)
15. Has there been any change in ownership of your firm at any time
during the last five years? Yes No
(If yes, explain on a separate sheet.)
NOTE: A corporation whose shares are publicly traded is NOT required to answer this question.
17
16. Is your firm a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another
construction firm? Yes No
(If yes, explain on a separate sheet.)
NOTE: Include information about other firms if one firm owns 50 percent or more of another, or if an
owner, partner, or officer of your firm holds a similar position in another firm.
17. Has any owner, partner and/or officer of your firm operated or been connected to a
construction firm under any other name in the last five years not listed in Section A or
Section B above at any time in the past five years? Yes No
(If yes, provide the person’s name, construction firm name, and dates of participation.)
Name Construction Firm Dates of
Participation
18
C. ESSENTIAL CRITERIA QUESTIONS
Circle Answer
NOTE: Financial statements that are not either reviewed or audited are not
acceptable. A letter verifying availability of a line of credit may also be
attached; however, it will be considered as supplemental information only,
and is not a substitute for the required financial statements.
19
Circle Answer
9. Is your firm, any of its officers, supervisors, managers, or any
firm or individual identified above in Section A and/or Section B,
ineligible to bid on or be awarded a public works contract, or Yes No
perform as a subcontractor on a public works contract, pursuant to
Labor Code section 1777.1, Labor Code section 1777.7, or any
other federal, state, county, municipal or other local law providing
for the debarment of contractors from public works?
10. Has your firm, any of its officers, supervisors, managers, or any
firm or individual identified above in Section A and/or Section B
been convicted of a crime involving the awarding of a contract of
a government construction project, the bidding or performance of a Yes No
government contract, antitrust statutes, racketeering statutes, safety
and health regulations, environmental laws, laws banning
workplace discrimination, laws governing wages, hours or labor
standards, or laws involving fraud, theft, or any other act of
dishonesty?
12. Has your firm, any of its officers, supervisors, managers, or any
firm or individual identified above in Section A and/or Section B
ever been terminated from a public works contract, including but Yes No
not limited to termination based on any misconduct, such as
failure to comply with contractual, statutory, or other legal
obligations from any public construction project?
13. Does your firm, any of its officers, supervisors, managers, or any
firm or individual identified above in Section A and/or Section B
currently have any delinquent liability to an employee, the state, or
any awarding body for any assessment of back wages or related Yes No
damages, interest, fines or penalties pursuant to any final
judgment, order, or determination by any court or any federal,
state, or local administrative agency, including a confirmed
arbitration award?
* Public Contract Code section 20101(e) exempts from this requirement a contractor who has qualified as a small
business pursuant to Government Code section 14837(d)(1), if the bid is “no more than 25 percent of the qualifying amount
provided in section 14837(d)(1).” As of January 1, 2001, the qualifying amount is $10 million, and 25 percent of that
amount, therefore, is $2.5 million.
** An additional notarized statement from the surety may be requested by [Public Entity] at the time of submission of a
bid, if this pre-qualification questionnaire is submitted more than 60 days prior to submission of the bid.
20
D. PRE-QUALIFICATION CRITERIA QUESTIONS
Prior History Circle Answer
1. How many times has your firm, or any of its officers, supervisors, or
managers, declared bankruptcy at any time during the last five 0 1 2 3 4 5+
years?
(This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in your answer
to Question 11 in Section C. If yes, attach a copy of the bankruptcy petition showing
the case number and the date on which the petition was filed, a copy of the Bankruptcy
Court’s discharge order or any other document that concluded the case if no discharge
order was issued.)
2. How many times has your firm, or any of its officers, supervisors, or
managers, had an injunction, judgment, order, or lien entered against it 0 1 2 3 4 5+
for outstanding taxes assessed or fines, penalties and/or unpaid employee
wages at any time in the last five years?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Provide details, including the name of the government
agency, caption, date, case or docket number, and disposition. Be sure to note any
judgments or liens that have not been fully satisfied.)
3. How many times in the past five years, has your firm, or any of its
officers, supervisors, or managers, been a party in any civil litigation or
administrative proceeding alleging violation of any of the 0 1 2 3 4 5+
following: contract antitrust statutes, racketeering statutes, safety
regulations, environmental laws, laws banning workplace
discrimination, laws governing wages, hours or labor standards, or laws
involving fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Provide details including the nature of the claims and
defenses, caption, date, case or docket number, name of the court or agency before
which the case is pending or which it was heard, and current status.)
4. How many times in the past five years, has your firm, or any of its
officers, supervisors, or managers, been a party in any civil litigation or
administrative proceeding alleging a violation by a subcontractor hired 0 1 2 3 4 5+
by your firm of any of the following: contract antitrust statutes,
racketeering statutes, safety and health regulations, environmental laws,
laws banning workplace discrimination, laws governing wages, hours or
labor standards, or laws involving fraud, theft, or any other act of
dishonesty?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Provide details including the nature of the claims and
defenses, caption, date, case or docket number, name of the court or agency before
which the case is pending or which it was heard, and current status.)
21
Circle Answer
5. How many times in the past five years, has your firm, or any of its
officers, supervisors, or managers, paid any amount, fine or otherwise, 0 1 2 3 4 5+
regardless of characterization, to settle any of the allegations listed in
Questions 3 and 4 above, whether with or without an admission of
responsibility or liability?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Provide details, including the caption, date, case or docket
number, and name of the court or agency before which the case was brought.)
6. How many times has your firm, or any of its officers, supervisors, or
managers, been debarred, suspended, disqualified, denied a classification 0 1 2 3 4 5+
rating or pre-qualification or otherwise been declared not responsible to
or prevented from bidding or performing work on any public works
contract or subcontract in the last five years?
(Explain on a separate sheet. State whether the firm involved was the firm applying for
pre-qualification here or another firm. Identify by name of the company, name of the
person within your firm who was associated with that company, date, owner of the
project, project name and information, basis for the action, and case or docket number.)
7. How many times in the last five years has your firm been assessed and
paid liquidated damages after completion of a project under a 0 1 2 3 4 5+
construction contract with either a public or private owner?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address, date
of completion of the project, amount of liquidated damages assessed and all other
information necessary to fully explain the assessment of liquidated damages.)
8. How many times during the past five years, has any surety company
made any payments on your firm’s behalf as a result of a default, to 0 1 2 3 4 5+
satisfy any claims made against a performance or payment bond
on your firm’s behalf, in connection with a construction project, either
public or private?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Identify the amount of each such claim, name and
telephone number of the claimant, date of claim, grounds for claim, present status of
claim, date of resolution of such claim if resolved, method by which claim was
resolved if resolved, nature of resolution and amount, if any, at which claim was
resolved.)
9. How many times in the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any
form of insurance, refused to renew an insurance policy for your firm? 0 1 2 3 4 5+
(Explain on a separate sheet. Name the insurance carrier, form of insurance, and year
of refusal.)
22
10. How many times during the last five years, has your firm been denied
bond coverage by a surety company, or has there been a period of 0 1 2 3 4 5+
time when your firm had no surety bond in place during a public
works construction project when one was required?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Indicate the date when your firm was denied coverage,
name of the company or companies which denied coverage, and the time period during
which you had no surety bond in place.)
11. How many times has your firm, or any of its officers, supervisors, or
managers, ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or 0 1 2 3 4 5+
local law related to construction?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Identify who was involved, name of the public agency,
date of conviction, and grounds for conviction.)
12. How many times has your firm, or any of its officers, supervisors, or
managers, ever been found liable in a civil suit or convicted of a 0 1 2 3 4 5+
federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or involving any other act of
such as making any false claim or material misrepresentations?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Identify the person or persons convicted or found liable,
court [the county if a state court, the district or location if federal court], year, and
conduct involved.)
NOTE: The following two questions refer only to disputes between your firm and
the owner of a project. You need not include information about disputes between
your firm and a supplier, another contractor, or subcontractor. You need not
include information about “pass-through” disputes in which the actual dispute is
between a sub-contractor and a project owner. Also, you may omit reference to
all disputes involving amounts of less than $50,000.
13. How many times in the last five years has any claim against your firm
concerning your firm’s work on a construction project been filed in 0 1 2 3 4 5+
court or arbitration?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Identify the claim(s) by providing the project name, date
of the claim, name of the claimant, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the
court in which the case was filed and a brief description of the status of the claim [e.g.
"pending" or, if resolved, a brief description of the resolution].)
14. How many times in the last five years has your firm made any claim
against a project owner concerning work on a project or payment for a 0 1 2 3 4 5+
contract and filed that claim in court or arbitration?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Identify the claim(s) by providing the project name, date
of the claim, name of the entity (or entities) against whom the claim was filed, a brief
description of the nature of the claim, the court in which the case was filed and a brief
description of the status of the claim [e.g. "pending" or if resolved, a brief description of
the resolution].)
23
Occupational Health and Safety Compliance Circle Answer
15. How many times in the last five years has CalOSHA cited and
assessed penalties against your firm for any “serious,” “willful” or 0 1 2 3 4 5+
violation(s)
“repeat” or the federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration cited and assessed penalties against your firm for
violation(s) of safety or health regulations?
NOTE: If you have filed an appeal of a citation, and the Occupational Safety
and Health Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not
include information about it.
16. How many times in the last five years has the EPA or any Air Quality
Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board 0 1 2 3 4 5+
cited and assessed penalties against either your firm or the owner of a
project on which your firm was the contractor?
(Explain on a separate sheet describing each citation.)
NOTE: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Appeals Board has not
yet ruled on your appeal, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not
include information about the citation.
17. How many times within the last five years has there ever been a period
when your firm had employees but was without workers’ compensation 0 1 2 3 4 5+
insurance or state-approved self-insurance?
(Explain the reason for each absence of workers’ compensation insurance on a separate
sheet. If “None,” please provide a statement by your current workers’ compensation
insurance carrier that verifies periods of workers’ compensation insurance coverage for
the last five years. If your firm has been in the construction business for less than five
years, provide a statement by your workers’ compensation insurance carrier verifying
continuous workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the period that your firm has
been in the construction business.)
24
Circle Answer
19. How many times during the last five years, has your firm or any
subcontractors hired by your firm been required to pay back wages 0 1 2 3 4 5+
and/or penalties related to state or federal prevailing wage laws for
work performed by a subcontractor?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Identify the subcontractor’s business name and CSLB
license number, describe the nature of each violation, and identify the name of the
project, date of its completion, public agency for which it was constructed, number
of employees underpaid, and amount(s) of back wages and penalties your firm was
required to pay.)
NOTE: This question refers only to the violation of prevailing wage laws
by subcontractors, not to violations by your firm.
20. How many times during the last five years, has your firm paid any
penalties related to any provision of California apprenticeship laws or 0 1 2 3 4 5+
regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public
projects, including Labor Code sections 1777.5 and 1777.7?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Provide the date(s) of such findings, case number(s), and
attach copies of the Department’s final decision(s).)
21. How many times during the last five years, has any subcontractor hired
by your firm paid any penalties related to any provision of 0 1 2 3 4 5+
California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining
apprentices on public works projects, including Labor Code sections
1777.5 and 1777.7?
(Explain on a separate sheet. Provide the date(s) of such findings, case number(s), and
attach copies of the Department’s final decision(s).)
25
E. PROJECT REFERENCES
Provide information about the firm’s six most recently completed public works projects and its three
largest completed private projects within the last three years. Names and references must be current
and verifiable. Use separate sheets of paper that contain all of the following information*:
For General Contractors: Only list projects your firm performed as the general contractor.
For Subcontractors: Only list projects your firm performed as the prime contractor if a single trade
job or as a subcontractor on a multiple trade contract. For multiple trade contracts, indicate the
general contractor’s name and contact information.
Project Name:
Location:
Owner:
Owner Contact (name and current phone number):
Architect or Engineering Firm:
Architect or Engineer Contact
(name and current phone number):
Construction Manager (name and current phone number):
Inspector of Record (name and current phone number):
Description of Project, Scope of Work Performed:
26
F. CERTIFICATION
Questionnaires submitted by corporations must be signed with the legal name of the corporation,
followed by the name of the state of incorporation and by the signature and designation of the
chairman of the board, president or any vice president, and then followed by a second signature by
the secretary, assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or assistant treasurer. All persons signing
must be authorized to bind the corporation in the matter. The name of each person signing shall also
be typed or printed below the signature. Satisfactory evidence of the authority of each officer
signing on behalf of a corporation shall be furnished.
Questionnaires submitted by partnerships must furnish the full name of all partners and must be
signed in the partnership name by a general partner with authority to bind the partnership in such
matters, followed by the signature and designation of the person signing. The name of the person
signing shall also be typed or printed below the signature.
Each person signing below makes the following representations under penalty of perjury:
The submitter of the foregoing answers to the questionnaire has read the same and the matters stated
therein are true to the best of his or her own personal knowledge. This information is provided for
the purpose of qualifying to bid on the Project, and any individual, company or other agency named
herein is hereby authorized to supply the awarding body with any information necessary to verify
the prospective bidder’s statements. By signing below, the submitter and the named contractor
hereby grant permission to the [Public Entity] to contact any or all of the above listed persons or
entities to confirm facts or otherwise investigate the above facts and issues.
The submitter understands that any statement which is proven to be false shall be grounds for
immediate disqualification from bidding on the Project. The submitter whose signature appears
below represents and warrants that he or she has authority to bind the named contractor.
I, (Name), the undersigned, am the
(Title), with the authority to act for and on behalf of
(Contractor Entity Name), declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing information provided in this Pre-qualification Questionnaire is true, full, and
correct.
I understand that making a false statement may result in disqualification from bidding on any public
works project, registering as a Public Works Contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations,
and may be grounds for termination of a public works contract.
27
SCORING WORKSHEET
28
Section D. PRE‐QUALIFICATION CRITERIA
QUESTIONS AND SCORING
Question Factor #1 ‐ Factor #2 ‐ Multiplying Total
Number Points Points Factor Points
1 x2 Factor #1: Whether the
2 x2 incident was a good
3 x2 faith mistake and, if so,
the error was promptly
4 x1
and voluntarily
5 x2 corrected when brought
6 x2 to the attention of the
7 1 Contractor or
8 x2 Subcontractor.
9 x1
10 x2 Factor #2: Whether the
11 x2 Contractor or
12 x2 Subcontractor has a
prior history or several
13 x1
incidents are reported.
14 x1
15 x2
16 x2
17 x2
18 x2
19 x1
20 x2
21 x1
Total =
Questions Type:
14 Red Flag Questions (x2)
7 Non‐Red Flag Questions (x1)
Notes: The awarding body will review additional documents provided by the Contractor in
response to the questions in Section D to calculate a final score using the two factors listed above.
A score on a scale of 1 to 5 is assigned to each factor.
Factor #1: A score of 1 is assigned where the incident is clearly the result of a good‐faith mistake,
and a score of 5 is assigned where the incident is clearly an overtly willful action for which the
Contractor is culpable.
Factor #2: A score of 1 is assigned where only a single incident exists, and a score of 5 is assigned
where five or more incidents of that kind are reported.
A contractor is PRE‐QUALIFIED if the total score above is: 35 points or LESS.
A contractor is DISQUALIFIED if the total score above is: GREATER THAN 35 points.
29
MODEL
INTERVIEW
QUESTIONS
30
MODEL INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
The following questions are optional and may be used by the public agency to interview
individuals identified as “project references” in Section E of the questionnaire.
31
REQUEST FOR
PRE-QUALIFICATION
OF BIDDERS
COMMENCING WITH
FORTHCOMING PUBLIC
WORK BID
32
REQUEST FOR PRE-QUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS COMMENCING
WITH FORTHCOMING PUBLIC WORK BID
[Pre-qualification procedure begun at the same time as RFP]
Notice is hereby given that [Public Entity] has determined that all bidders on [Name of specific
project] to be undertaken by the [Public Entity] must be pre-qualified prior to submitting a bid on
that project. It is mandatory that all Contractors who intend to submit a bid, fully complete the pre-
qualification questionnaire, provide all materials requested herein, and be approved by [Public
Entity] to be on the final qualified bidders list. No bid will be accepted from a Contractor that has
failed to comply with these requirements. If two or more business entities submit a bid as part of a
Joint Venture, or expect to submit a bid as part of a Joint Venture, each entity within the Joint
Venture must be separately qualified to bid. The last date to submit a fully completed questionnaire
is mm/dd/yy. [35 days prior to the bid closing date]. Contractors are encouraged to submit pre-
qualification applications as soon as possible, so that they may be notified of omissions of
information to be remedied or of their pre-qualification status well in advance of the bid
advertisement for this project.
Answers to questions contained in the attached questionnaire, information about current bonding
capacity, notarized statement from surety, and the most recent reviewed or audited financial
statements, with accompanying notes and supplemental information, are required. [Public Entity]
will use these documents as the basis of rating Contractors in respect to the size and scope of
contracts upon which each Contractor is qualified to bid. [Public Entity] reserves the right to check
other sources available. [Public Entity’s] decision will be based on objective evaluation criteria.
[Public Entity] reserves the right to adjust, increase, limit, suspend or rescind the pre-qualification
rating based on subsequently learned information. Contractors whose rating changes sufficient to
disqualify them will be notified, and given an opportunity for a hearing consistent with the hearing
procedures described below for appealing a pre-qualification rating.
While it is the intent of the pre-qualification questionnaire and documents required therewith to
assist [Public Entity] in determining bidder responsibility prior to bid and to aid [Public Entity] in
selecting the lowest responsible bidder, neither the fact of pre-qualification, nor any pre-
qualification rating, will preclude [Public Entity] from a post-bid consideration and determination
of whether a bidder has the quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the
proposed work, and has demonstrated the requisite trustworthiness.
The pre-qualification applications should be submitted under seal and marked “CONFIDENTIAL”
to [address].
33
Each questionnaire must be signed under penalty of perjury in the manner designated at the end of
the form, by an individual who has the legal authority to bind the Contractor on whose behalf that
person is signing. If any information provided by a Contractor becomes inaccurate, the Contractor
must immediately notify [Public Entity] and provide updated accurate information in writing, under
penalty of perjury.
[Public Entity] reserves the right to waive minor irregularities and omissions in the information
contained in the pre-qualification application submitted, to make all final determinations, and to
determine at any time that the pre-qualification procedures will not be applied to a specific future
public works project.
Contractors may submit pre-qualification applications during regular working hours on any day that
the offices of [Public Entity] are open. Contractors who submit a complete pre-qualification
application will be notified of their qualification status no later than ten (10) business days after
submission of the information.
[Public Entity] may refuse to grant pre-qualification where the requested information and materials
are not provided, or not provided by mm/dd/yy [date specified in first paragraph – 35 days before
bid closing] There is no appeal from a refusal for an incomplete or late application, but re-
application for a later project is permitted. The closing time for bids will not be changed in order
to accommodate supplementation of incomplete submissions, or late submissions.
Where a timely and completed application results in a rating below that necessary to pre-qualify, an
appeal can be made. An appeal is begun by the Contractor delivering notice to [Public Entity] of its
appeal of the decision with respect to its pre-qualification rating, no later than ten (10) business days
prior to the closing time for the receipt of bids for this public works project. Without a timely
appeal, the Contractor waives any and all rights to challenge the decision of [Public Entity],
whether by administrative process, judicial process or any other legal process or proceeding.
If the Contractor gives the required notice of appeal and requests a hearing, the hearing shall be
conducted so that it is concluded no later than five business days after [Public Entity’s] receipt of
the notice of appeal, and no later than five business days prior to the last date for the receipt of bids
on the project. The hearing shall be an informal process conducted by a panel to whom the
[governing body of Public Entity] has delegated responsibility to hear such appeals (the “Appeals
Panel”). At or prior to the hearing, the Contractor will be advised of the basis for [Public Entity’s]
pre-qualification determination. The Contractor will be given the opportunity to present information
and present reasons in opposition to the rating. Within one day after the conclusion of the hearing,
the Appeals Panel will render its decision. It is the intention of [Public Entity] that the date for the
submission and opening of bids will not be delayed or postponed to allow for completion of an
appeal process.
Note: A contractor may be found not pre-qualified for bidding on a specific public
works contract to be let by [Public Entity], or on all contracts to be let by [Public
Entity] until the contractor meets [Public Entity’s] requirements. In addition, a
contractor may be found not pre-qualified for either:
(1) Omission of requested information or
(2) Falsification of information
34
* * * **
NOTICE: To contractors who are using subcontractors for this job, please be advised that
[Public Entity] may require, as to subcontractors, one of the following:
35
ANNOUNCEMENT OF
PRE-QUALIFICATION
PROCEDURES AND
OPEN DATES FOR
ANNUAL PRE-
QUALIFICATION
36
ANNOUNCEMENT OF PRE-QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES AND OPEN DATES
FOR ANNUAL PRE-QUALIFICATION
Notice is hereby given that on [Date], [Public Entity] determined that all bidders on public works to
be undertaken by the [Public Entity] must be pre-qualified prior to submitting bids for public works.
It is mandatory that all licensed contractors who intend to submit bids fully complete the pre-
qualification questionnaire, provide all materials requested herein, and be approved by [Public
Entity] to be on the final bidders list. No bid will be accepted from a Contractor that has failed to
comply with these requirements. If two or more business entities submit a bid on a project as a
Joint Venture, or expect to submit a bid as part of a Joint Venture, each entity within the Joint
Venture must be separately qualified to bid.
Pre-qualification applications may be submitted four times each year: (1) from January 1 through
January 10; (2) from April 1 through April 10; (3) from July 1 through July 10; and (4) from
October 1 through October 10. Contractors who submit a complete pre-qualification application will
be notified by first class mail of their qualification status, such notice to be mailed no later than
fifteen business days after submission of the information.
Answers to questions contained in the attached questionnaire, information about current bonding
capacity on an aggregate and per project limit, notarized statement from surety, and the most recent
reviewed or audited financial statements, with accompanying notes and supplemental information,
are required. [Public Entity] will use these documents as the basis of rating Contractors in respect to
the size and scope of contracts upon which each Contractor is qualified to bid. [Public Entity]
reserves the right to check other sources available. [Public Entity’s] decision will be based on
objective evaluation criteria.
Pre-qualification approval will remain valid for one (1) calendar year from the date of notice of
qualification, except that [Public Entity] reserves the right during that calendar year to adjust,
increase, limit, suspend or rescind the pre-qualification ratings based on subsequently learned
information and after giving notice of the proposed action to the Contractor and an opportunity for
a hearing consistent with the hearing procedures described below for appealing a pre-qualification
determination.
While it is the intent of the pre-qualification questionnaire and documents required therewith to
assist [Public Entity] in determining bidder responsibility prior to the submission of bids and to aid
[Public Entity] in selecting the lowest responsible bidder, neither the fact of pre-qualification, nor
any pre- qualification rating, will preclude [Public Entity] from a post-bid consideration and
determination on a specific project of whether a bidder has the quality, fitness, capacity and
experience to satisfactorily perform the proposed work, and has demonstrated the requisite
trustworthiness. Contractors are encouraged to submit pre-qualification applications as soon as
possible, so that they may be notified of pre-qualification status well in advance of upcoming
projects.
The pre-qualification applications should be submitted under seal and marked “CONFIDENTIAL”
to [address].
Each questionnaire must be signed under penalty of perjury in the manner designated at the end of
the form, by an individual who has the legal authority to bind the Contractor on whose behalf that
person is signing. If any information provided by a Contractor becomes inaccurate, the Contractor
must immediately notify [Public Entity] and provide updated accurate information in writing, under
penalty of perjury.
[Public Entity] reserves the right to waive minor irregularities and omissions in the information
contained in the pre-qualification application submitted, to make all final determinations, and to
determine at any time that the pre-qualification procedures will not be applied to a future public
works project.
A contractor who has submitted a completed application, and who receives a rating of “not
qualified” from [Public Entity] may appeal that determination. There is no appeal from a finding
that a contractor is not pre-qualified because of a failure to submit required information, but re-
application during one of the designated time periods is permitted. A contractor may appeal [Public
Entity’s] decision with respect to its request for pre-qualification, and request a hearing, by giving
notice to [Public Entity] no later than ten business days after receipt of notice of its qualification
status. Unless a Contractor files a timely appeal, the Contractor waives any and all rights to
challenge the qualification decision of [Public Entity], whether by administrative process, judicial
process or any other legal process or proceeding.
If the Contractor gives the required notice of appeal and requests a hearing, the hearing shall be
conducted so that it is concluded no later than ten business days after [Public Entity’s] receipt of its
Notice of Appeal. The hearing so provided shall be an informal process conducted by a panel to
whom the [governing body of Public Entity] has delegated responsibility to hear such appeals (the
“Appeals Panel”). At or prior to the hearing, the Contractor will be advised of the basis for [Public
Entity’s] pre-qualification determination. The Contractor will be given the opportunity to present
information and present reasons in opposition to the pre-qualification determination. At the
conclusion of the hearing or no later than one day after completion of the hearing, the Appeals
Panel will render its decision. The date for submission and opening of bids for a specific project
will not be delayed or postponed to allow for completion of an appeal process.
Note: A contractor may be found not pre-qualified for bidding on a specific public
works contract to be let by [Public Entity], or on all contracts to be let by [Public
Entity] until the contractor meets [Public Entity’s] requirements. In addition, a
contractor may be found not pre-qualified for either:
(1) Omission of requested information or
(2) Falsification of information
38
*****
NOTICE: To contractors who are using subcontractors for this job, please be advised that
[Public Entity] may require, as to subcontractors, one of the following:
39
SOURCES FOR
VERIFICATION OF
INFORMATION GIVEN
BY CONTRACTORS
40
SOURCES FOR VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION
GIVEN BY CONTRACTORS
Names and addresses of licensed contractors, information about the type of license(s)
issued and the dates when licenses were issued (and certain other information), are
available from the Contractors’ State Licensing Board (CSLB), 9821 Business Park
Drive, Sacramento, CA 95827. Telephone number 800-321-2752. The CSLB web site for
public information is: www.cslb.ca.gov.
Every workers’ compensation insurance carrier issues to each of its insured businesses a
Certificate of Insurance. The contractor should be willing to provide a copy upon request.
Each contractor’s Experience Modification Rate for the year should be stated in a letter to
the contractor from the contractor’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier.
Some large companies are legally self-insured for workers’ compensation, with the
consent and authorization of the Department of Industrial Relations. The names of
companies that are legally self-insured are available from the Department’s Office of
Self-Insurance Plans, Workers’ Compensation, 11050 Olson Drive, Suite 230, Rancho
Cordova, CA 95670; (916) 464-7000. The Office of Self-Insurance Plans web site for
public information is: www.dir.ca.gov/osip/
The names of each business’s current and recent workers’ compensation insurance carriers
are available from the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Reporting Bureau (WCIRB), 1221
41
Broadway, Suite 900, Oakland, CA 94612, telephone (888) 229-2472. WCIRB is not a
public agency but it provides information to the public. It will provide the names of the
current and recent workers’ compensation insurance carriers of every employer in California,
in response to a written request, for a fee of $8 for every year for which you seek
information. WCIRB’s web site for public information is: www.wcirb.com.
Information on the identities of contractors that have been debarred and disqualified from
working on public works contracts is available from the California Labor Commissioner,
Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, 1515 Clay Street, Suite 401, Oakland, CA
94612. A list of debarred contractors can be found using the following link:
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html
The California Secretary of State has certain current and historical information about all
corporations that operate in California: dates of incorporation, articles of incorporation, the
name of the original incorporators, the names of the corporate officers (who are not
necessarily the corporate stockholders) and an agent for service of process for the
corporation. This information is available from the Secretary of State upon written request.
(Secretary of State, Business Programs Division, 1500 11th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Telephone (916) 653-6814 or (916) 657–5448). Public information from the California
Secretary of States is available at their website: www.sos.ca.gov. The Secretary of State
does not ordinarily have a listing of the names of initial stockholders or current
stockholders, and that information is generally not available in any public record.
Every business, including a partnership, that operates under a “fictitious name” (for
example, “Ajax Sheet Metal Contractors” or “Smith Brothers Electrical Contractors”) is
required to file with the County Clerk in the county in which its home office is located a
“Fictitious Business Name” statement. This statement will indicate the owner of the
business, if the business is a sole proprietorship, and the names of partners, if the business is
a partnership. The information is available to the public from the County Clerk Office upon
request. Requests should be made to the County in which the business is operating. It may
be necessary to submit such a request in writing.
42
Bankruptcy Information
Bankruptcy petitions, which include the name of the person or business that is seeking
protection from the Bankruptcy Court, are available for public inspection at the office of
the Clerk of each Bankruptcy Court (which are federal courts). In California, Bankruptcy
Courts are located in Sacramento, Modesto, Fresno, San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose,
Los Angeles, Santa Ana, Riverside, and San Diego. Most documents filed in court in
bankruptcy proceedings are available for public inspection, at the Bankruptcy Court
clerk’s office. Some information on bankruptcy filings may also be available from
commercial enterprises that collect and sell information from public records. In addition
some information about bankruptcy cases filed August 1990 and later is available on-line
through the “PACER” (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) system. To obtain
information from PACER, you must register with the system, and pay a fee for the
materials obtained. Call 1-800-676-6856 or you may register online at
http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/.
Each court keeps records of every civil suit filed in that county, and of the judgments issued
after trials. However, the exact terms of pre-trial settlements are generally not recorded in
court files. Documents related to disputes submitted to arbitration are generally not available
for public inspection. Public agencies, however, are required to disclose the terms of such
settlements, when documents are requested under the California Public Records Act.
Criminal convictions are a matter of public record. Each website has an index of its own
criminal case records at http://www.courts.ca.gov/ . In addition, a few data collection
businesses have collected criminal conviction information from public records throughout
the state, and the collected information about particular individuals or businesses is available
for sale from these private businesses.
Information about federal criminal cases (filed August 1991 and later) and civil cases
(filed August 1990 and later) is available on-line through the “PACER” (Public Access to
Court Electronic Records) system. To obtain information from PACER, you must register
with the system, and pay a fee for the materials obtained. Call 1-800-676-6856 or register
online at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/.
43
Industrial Safety and Health Laws Compliance Information
Information about citations issued by both the federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration and the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal OSHA)
are available on a website maintained by federal OSHA, http://www.osha.gov. At that web
site, click on “Data.” On the Data page, click on “Statistics and Inspection Data.” Next,
click on “Establishment Search.” When the next screen appears, enter the name of the
contractor (entity) about whom you seek information in the “Establishment” window. Click
on California in the “State” window. In the “Inspection Date” window, enter the date range
in which you would like to request information. Then click the submit button.
Information about recent prevailing wage law violations is available from the California
Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, 1515 Clay Street, Suite
401, Oakland, CA 94612, telephone (844) 522-6734. Requests may also be sent by email to:
Publicworks@dir.ca.gov. Additional public information can be found at their website:
www.dir.ca.gov/dlse.
Information about citations issued by the California Air Resources Board is available from
that agency under the Public Records Act. Their address is 1001 "I" Street Sacramento, CA
95814, or Post Office Box 2815, Sacramento, 95812. In addition, Regional Air Quality
Management Districts and Regional Water Quality Control Boards throughout the state may
issue citations for violation of air quality or water quality standards. Consult the appropriate
board in your area for information about how to gather appropriate information. For other
information they can be reached at by phone at (800) 242-4450 or by email:
helpline@arb.ca.gov. Additional public information can be found at their website:
ww2.arb.ca.gov.
Information about violations of state apprenticeship laws is available from the California
Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, 1515 Clay Street, Suite
401, Oakland, CA 94612, telephone (844) 522-6734. Requests may also be sent by email to:
Publicworks@dir.ca.gov. Additional public information can be found at their website:
www.dir.ca.gov/dlse.
44