Design Coefficientsfor Three Cell Box Culvert
Design Coefficientsfor Three Cell Box Culvert
net/publication/270656163
CITATIONS READS
0 3,491
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by R. Shreedhar on 11 January 2015.
DesignCoefficientsforThreeCellBoxCulvert
Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of :
© 2013. Sujata Shreedhar & R. Shreedhar. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non commercial
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Design Coefficients for Three Cell Box Culvert
Sujata Shreedhar Į & R. Shreedhar ı
Abstract - Multiple cell reinforced box culverts are ideal bridge Width of dispersion parallel to the span is also
structure if the discharge in a drain crossing the road is large calculated. Then the maximum magnitude of load is
and if the bearing capacity of the soil is low as the single box divided by width of dispersion parallel to span and width
culvert becomes uneconomical because of the higher of dispersion perpendicular to the span to get the load
thickness of the slab and walls. In such cases, more than one
intensity on the top slab.
box can be constructed side- by- side monolithically.
The box culvert has to be analyzed for moments, b) Weight of Side Walls
shear forces and thrusts developed due to the various loading
The self weight of two side walls acting as
Year 2013
conditions by any classical methods such as moment
distribution method, slope deflection method etc. It becomes
concentrated loads are assumed to produce uniform
very tedious for the designer to arrive at design forces for soil reaction on the bottom slab.
various loading conditions. Hence a study is made to arrive at
c) Water Pressure Inside Culvert
the coefficients for moments, shear forces and axial thrusts for
different loading cases and for different ratios of L/H = 1.0,
The pressure distribution on side walls is
25
L/H = 1.25, L/H = 1.5, L/H = 1.75 and L/H = 2.0 for three cell assumed to be triangular with a maximum pressure
box culvert. intensity of p=wh at the base, where w is the density of
R
CC box culverts comprising of top slab, base slab height of box.
and stem are cast monolithically to carry live load, e) Uniform Lateral Load on Side Walls
embankment load, water pressure and lateral Uniform lateral pressure on vertical side walls is
earth pressure in a better way. They may be either single considered due to the sum of effect of embankment
cell or multiple cells. The top of the box may be at road loading and live load surcharge. Also the uniform lateral
level or it may at a depth below the road level if the road pressure on vertical side walls is considered due to
is in embankment. The required height and number of embankment loading alone.
boxes depends on hydraulic and other requirements at
the site such as road level, nalla bed level, scour depth III. Design Moments, Shears and
etc. The barrel of the box culvert should be of sufficient Thrusts
length to accommodate the carriageway and the kerbs.
The box culvert is analysed for moments, shear
II. Loads forces and axial thrusts developed at the critical
The loads considered for the analysis of box sections due to the various loading conditions by
culverts are Dead load, Live load, Soil pressure on side moment distribution method. The critical sections
walls, Surcharge due to live load, and Water pressure considered are at the centre of top slab, bottom slab
from inside. and vertical slab and at the corners of top slab, bottom
slab and vertical wall. The moments, shear forces and
a) Uniform Distributed Load axial thrusts at the critical sections for different loading
The weight of embankment, deck slab and the cases are computed for different ratios of L/H = 1.0, L/H
track load are considered to be uniformly distributed = 1.25, L/H = 1.5, L/H = 1.75 and L/H = 2.0 for three
loads on the top slab with the uniform soil reaction on cell box culverts.
the bottom slab. For live load distribution, the width of
dispersion perpendicular to the span is computed first. IV. Design Coefficients for Moments,
Auhtor Į : Assistant Professor, S. G. Balekundri Institute of Shears and Thrusts
Technology, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
e-mail: sujata.shreedhar55@gmail.com
The design coefficients for moments, shear
Author ı : Associate Professor, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, forces and axial thrusts at the critical sections for
Belgaum. e-mail: rshreedhar@git.edu different loading cases are computed for different ratios
of L/H = 1.0, L/H = 1.25, L/H = 1.5, L/H = 1.75 and L/H ɶ is the density of soil
= 2.0 for three cell box culverts. H is the vertical height of the box
a) Uniform Distributed Load V. Sign Conventions
Design coefficient for moment = M/wL2
The following sign conventions are used in the
Design coefficient for shear = V/ wL analysis for moment, shear and thrust:
Design coefficient for thrust = N /wL x Positive moment indicates tension on inside face.
where, x Positive shear indicates that the summation of force
w is the sum of weight of embankment, deck slab and at the left of the section acts outwards when viewed
track load. from within.
x Positive thrust indicates compression on the
Year 2013
H12
A3
G11
E4
F10
D5
D6 C7 F8 F9 J16
Table 1 : Coefficients for Moment, Shear and Thrust in three celled box culvert for ratio 1:1
Coefficients Loading Case
L:H Section
for 1 2 3 4 5
M +0.063 +0.008 +0.008 -0.008 -0.008
B1
N 0 -0.077 -0.160 +0.160 +0.494
M -0.030 +0.016 +0.023 -0.023 -0.023
A2 N 0 -0.077 -0.160 +0.160 +0.494
V +0.432 -0.017 -0.030 +0.030 +0.030
M -0.030 +0.016 +0.023 -0.023 -0.023
A3 N +0.432 -0.335 -0.030 +0.030 +0.030
V 0 -0.017 0.160 -0.160 -0.494
M -0.030 -0.023 -0.037 +0.037 +0.098
E4
N +0.432 +0.165 -0.030 +0.030 +0.030
M -0.030 -0.061 +0.030 -0.030 -0.030
Year 2013
D5 N +0.432 +0.665 -0.038 +0.038 +0.038
V 0 +0.077 -0.340 +0.340 +0.506
M -0.030 -0.061 +0.030 -0.030 -0.030
D6 N 0 +0.077 -0.340 +0.340 +0.506
V -0.432 -0.665 +0.038 -0.038 -0.038
27
M +0.063 +0.085 +0.011 +0.011 +0.010
C7
N 0 +0.077 -0.340 +0.340 +0.506
Table 2 : Coefficients for Moment, Shear and Thrust in three celled box culvert for ratio 1.25:1
Table 3 : Coefficients for Moment, Shear and Thrust in three celled box culvert for ratio 1.5:1
Year 2013
H14 N 0 -0.133 -0.108 +0.108 +0.329
V 0.5 0 0 0 0
M +0.036 -0.003 -0.001 +0.001 +0.001
I15
N 0 -0.133 -0.108 +0.108 +0.329
M +0.036 -0.131 -0.001 +0.001 +0.001 29
J16
N 0 +0.133 -0.225 +0.225 +0.336
Table 5 : Coefficients for Moment, Shear and Thrust in three celled box culvert for ratio 2:1
for 1 2 3 4 5
M +0.056 +0.005 +0.002 -0.002 -0.001
B1
N 0 -0.191 -0.081 +0.081 +0.247
M -0.044 +0.015 +0.004 -0.004 -0.004
A2 N 0 -0.191 -0.081 +0.081 +0.247
3 0
V +0.448 -0.019 -0.006 +0.006 +0.006
M -0.044 +0.015 +0.004 -0.004 -0.004
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( E ) Volume XIII Issuev vVI Version I
0.04 Case1
Case2
0.02
0.008 Case 3
0.006 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.005
0.008 0.003 0.002 0.002
0 -0.003 -0.002 Case 4
-0.005
0.75 -0.0081 1.25 1.5 1.75
-0.002 2 -0.002 2.25
-0.005 -0.003 -0.001 Case 5
-0.008
Year 2013
-0.02
-0.04
Ratio L/H
3 1
0.04
0.03 0.023
0.02 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.015
Coefficients for bending moment
Case 1
0.01 0.016 0.014 0.006
0.009 0.004
0 Case 2
-0.006
0.75 1 1.25 -0.009
1.5 1.75 2 -0.004 2.25
-0.01 -0.014 -0.006 -0.004 Case 3
-0.009
-0.023
-0.02 -0.014
-0.023 Case 4
-0.03
-0.03 Case 5
-0.04 -0.035
-0.038
-0.042 -0.044
-0.05
-0.06
Ratio L/H
0.1
0.06
0.063 Case 1
0.061 0.059 0.057 0.056
0.04 Case 2
-0.04
3 2
-0.06
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( E ) Volume XIII Issuev vVI Version I
Ratio L/H
-0.13
-0.15
Ratio L/H
0.11
0.098
Coefficients for bending moment 0.09
Year 2013
-0.05 -0.037 -0.035 -0.038
-0.042 -0.044
-0.07
Ratio L/H
33
0.6
0.5
Coefficients for shear force
0.448 Case 1
0.4 0.432 0.437 0.441 0.445
0.3 Case 2
0.2
0.018 0.008 Case 3
0.1 0.03 0.012 0.006
0.018 0.012 0.008
0.03 0.006
0 Case 4
0.75 0.12 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 -0.006 2.25
-0.1 -0.018 -0.012 -0.008-0.019 -0.019
-0.03 0.17 Case 5
-0.02
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
Ratio L/H
0.2
Case 4
Year 2013
-0.4
-0.432 -0.448
-0.437 -0.441 -0.445 Case 5
-0.6 0.665
Ratio L/H
1.2
1
Coefficients for shear force
0.2 Case 4
0.038 0.015 0.01
0.023 0.007
0 Case 5
-0.038 -0.015 -0.007
0.75 1 -0.0231.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25
-0.2 -0.038 -0.023 -0.01 -0.007
-0.015
-0.01
-0.4
Ratio L/H
0.2
Year 2013
-0.6 -0.563 -0.555 -0.552
-0.568 -0.559
-0.7
Ratio L/H 35
1.5
Coefficients for normal thrust
1.25 Case 1
1
1.068 1.063 1.059 1.055 1.052 Case 2
0.75
Case 3
0.5 1.221 0.332 0.316 0.309
1.204 Case 4
0.25
0.023 0.015 0.01 0.007
0.038
0 Case 5
-0.038 -0.007
0.75 1
-0.038 1.25
-0.023 1.5 -0.015 1.75 -0.01 2 2.25
-0.25 -0.023 -0.015 -0.01 -0.007
-0.5
Ratio L/H
Figure 11 : Coefficients for Normal thrust at section G11 in three cell box culvert
VII. Discussions on Three Cell Box load and live load. The weight of side walls decreases
the net negative moment as the moment due to side
Culvert
walls is positive. As the span increases, there is
The maximum positive moment develop at the significant contribution to negative bending moment due
centre of top slab when the culvert is running full and to dead load and live load only as the contribution due
uniform lateral pressure due to superimposed dead load to earth pressure becomes less significant.
only as shown in figure 2. As the span increases, there The maximum positive moment develop at the
is significant contribution to positive bending moment centre of bottom slab when the culvert is running full and
due to dead load and live load only as the contribution uniform lateral pressure due to superimposed dead load
due to earth pressure becomes less significant. and live load (referring fig.4). As the span increases,
It is seen from figure 3 that the maximum there is significant contribution to positive bending
negative moment develop at the corner of top slab when moment due to dead load and live load only as the
the culvert is empty and the top slab carries the dead contribution due to earth pressure becomes less
significant. The weight of side walls also has the i. When the top slab supports the dead load and live
significant effect on net positive bending moment. load and the culvert is empty.
The maximum negative moment develop at the ii. When the top slab supports the dead load and live
corner of bottom slab when the culvert is empty and the loads and the culvert is running full.
top slab carries the dead load and live load as shown in iii. When the sides of the culvert do not carry the live
figure 5. There is significant contribution to maximum load and the culvert is running full.
negative moment due to weight of side walls. As the
span increases, there is contribution to negative d) The study shows that the maximum positive
bending moment due to dead load and live load only as moment develop at the centre of top and bottom
the contribution due to earth pressure becomes less slab for the condition that the sides of the culvert not
significant. carrying the live load and the culvert is running full of
water.
Year 2013