Scribd
Upload
73 views9 pages

Bosy Midsy Eosy Scores of Pupils Under Stres Program

The document appears to contain test scores from before, during, and after a STREs reading program. It lists scores for 41 students in a pre-test (BoSY) and post-test (MidSy). It then calculates the mean scores which were 0 for the pre-test and 11.146 for the post-test. A t-test was conducted and found a statistically significant difference between the pre and post-test means, indicating the STREs program was effective in improving reading scores.

Uploaded by

Rafaela Villanueva
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views9 pages

Bosy Midsy Eosy Scores of Pupils Under Stres Program

The document appears to contain test scores from before, during, and after a STREs reading program. It lists scores for 41 students in a pre-test (BoSY) and post-test (MidSy). It then calculates the mean scores which were 0 for the pre-test and 11.146 for the post-test. A t-test was conducted and found a statistically significant difference between the pre and post-test means, indicating the STREs program was effective in improving reading scores.

Uploaded by

Rafaela Villanueva
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

SCORES OF PUPILS UNDER

STRES PROGRAM
BOSY MIDSy EoSY
1 MANGAHAS, JOHN RIZ L. 0 10
2 DELA CRUZ, RAYBEN AYE P. 0 3
3 ESCUBIDO, ERNESTO S. 0 17
4 MINA, MARK JOSHUA A. 0 8
5 PAGUNSAN, PRINCE JOHNDY V. 0 12
6 VINDUYA, FIANA LEAH B. 0 6
7 REYES, JAMES MATHEOU DR 0 18
8 PULIDO, JHASMINE M 0 10
9 ARROGANTE,JARRED KYLE R. 0 13
10 CAYABYAB,STANLEY RICH M. 0 12
11 PAGUNSAN,KYLE AEROS P. 0 16
12 SESE,RAINER B. 0 16
13 BOHOL,CHLOE ALLYSON R. 0 18
14 BONIFACIO,COLEEN JHONEA RHASLENE D. 0 20
15 CABAYAN,ELLYSE JAZZ G. 0 0
16 CAGAS,CRIZZA IGNALIG 0 16
17 CO,PRINCESS JESRIE P. 0 19
18 NACION,CRISHA FAITH DELA CERNA 0 13
19 OCSON,MARIA ANGELA DELA CRUZ 0 0
20 SIMBULAN,MICHAELA 0 0
21 TAVERA,AUTUMN 0 15
22 TEJERO,CHRISNA MAE NICOLE E. 0 12
23 ASUNCION, MARK MESA 0 0
24 CADANO,JOEMAR 0 0
25 ELLES, SEAN ANTHONY RENTILLO 0 15
26 CALICDAN,SERENITY TRISH 0 10
27 RODECILLAS, MARIELLA SALIMBOT 0 10
28 IMUS,MARK ANDREI, DE LEON 0 1
29 NAVARRO,MARK JOHN, MINGO 0 7
30 RAZA,BHONCHOY, CATAROS 0 0
31 SAUSA, DWANE LEWIS DUMLAO 0 11
32 BALANQUIT,JENNY ROSE, ESPIRITU 0 0
33 ORONGAN,PRINCESS SAMLYN, ASUGE 0 8
34 BELTRAN, KYLE NICOLAI D. 0 19
35 CASTOR, JR., EDSEL FUGAR 0 19
36 DEATO, JOHN STEVEN C. 0 19
37 JAINGUE, LEVI M. 0 17
38 MANDAPAT, JAYRALD LUIS D. 0 18
39 MEDEZ, JUSTIN 0 17
40 ANGANA, ALEXA JOICE 0 17
41 CASTOR, BEVERLY FULGAR 0 15
MEAN 0 11.15
Mean Scores of Teachers' Perception towards the implementation of the STREs Program

5 4 3
The STREs Program is contributing to the development
of my pupils. 3 5 1

My pupils enjoyed joining STREs Program 2 5 2


There was a change in the reading progress of my
pupils. 4 5 0
My pupils show understanding in letters and combining
its sounds to read a word. 3 3 3
My pupils show understanding of letters but needs
extra guidance in blending sounds. 0 2 3
My pupils show learning comprehension on what s/he
read. 1 3 3
My pupils became active and demonstrates skills within
the class. 1 4 3

My pupils does not show activeness in class discussion. 0 1 2


My pupil is showing improvement in his reading
progress but needs further guidance. 1 1 2
My pupils show the skills that s/he learned under the
STREs program. 2 2 3
My pupils demonstrates the skills s/he learned in the
program but needs further development. 2 3 2
STREs program is a good project to develop skills of
children in reading. 4 4 1
I will continue supporting the STREs program for the
development of my pupils’ reading progress. 5 4 0
I will continue to support the program but it needs
further changes.
I recommend the continuity and improving STREs 0 2 2
program for the development of my pupils’ reading
progress. 3 4 2

OVERALL MEAN 10.33 12.80 5.80


STREs Program
Verbal
Mean Interpretation
2 1
4.22
0 0 Strongly Agree
4.00
0 0 Agree
4.44
0 0 Strongly Agree
4.00
0 0 Agree
2.78
4 0 Neutral
3.33
2 0 Neutral
3.56
1 0 Agree
2.22
4 2 Disagree
2.56
3 2 Disagree
3.44
2 0 Agree
3.56
2 0 Agree
4.33
0 0 Strongly Agree
4.56
0 0 Strongly Agree
2.44
3 2 Disagree
4.11
0 0 Agree

2.80 0.40 3.57 Agree


5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1
Mean Scores of Parents' Perception towards the implementation of the STREs Program
5 4 3

The STREs Program is contributing to the development of my child. 10 16 12

My child enjoyed joining STREs Program 14 16 10

There was a change in the reading progress of my child. 11 20 8

My child shows understanding in letters and its sounds. 13 17 8

My child shows understanding of letters but needs extra guidance. 15 21 4

My child shows learning comprehension on what s/he read. 9 23 3

My child shows improvement in his class progress. 15 20 3

My child does not participate in class especially in learning areas about


5 5 11
languages.

My child is showing improvement in his reading progress but needs further


14 13 9
guidance.

My child shows the skills that s/he learned under the STREs program. 17 13 10

My child demonstrates the skills s/he learned in the program but needs
16 13 11
further development.

STREs program is a good project to develop skills of my child in reading. 15 20 4

I will continue supporting the STREs program for the development of my


18 20 2
child’s reading progress.

I will continue to support the program but it needs further changes. 10 10 12

I recommend the continuity and improving STREs program for the


16 21 3
development of my child’s reading progress.

OVERALL MEAN 66.00 66.13 22.00


STREs Program
2 1 Mean V.I

3 0 3.80 Agree

1 0 4.05 Agree

2 0 3.98 Agree

1 1 3.90 Agree

1 0 4.22 Strongly Agree

5 1 3.83 Agree

2 1 4.12 Agree

15 5 2.76 Neutral

5 0 3.88 Agree

1 0 4.12 Agree

0 0 4.02 Agree

2 0 4.17 Agree

1 0 4.34 Strongly Agree

9 0 3.51 Agree

1 0 4.27 Strongly Agree

6.53 0.53 3.93 Agree


5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

BoSY MidSy
Mean 0 11.14634146
Variance 0 45.8780487804878
Observations 41 41
Pearson Correlation
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 40
t Stat -10.5371169995599
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.09031608976E-13
t Critical one-tail 1.68385101333565
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.18063217951E-13
t Critical two-tail 2.02107539030627

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy