PIAGGIO ELECTRIC AUTO

TEST REPORT

IDENTIFICATION CREATED VERIFIED APPROVED

NAME

DESIGNATION

DATE

1
 CONTENTS
1. Declared Specifications............................................................... 4
1.1 Vehicle Specifications 4
1.2 Battery Specifications 4
1.3 Charger Specifications 5
1.4 Other Specifications 5

2. Features................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Motor 6
2.2 Accessories 6

3. Testing ...................................................................................................... 9
3.1 Test 1 – (No Load) 9
3.1.1 Test Data 10
3.1.2 Result 11
3.1.3 Test Observations 11
3.2 Test 2 – (Load) 12
3.2.1 Test Data 13
3.2.2 Result 14
3.2.3 Test Observations 14
3.3 Test 3 – (Load) 15
3.3.1 Test Data 16
3.3.2 Result 17
3.3.3 Test Observations

2
 3.4 Test 4 – (Gradient) 18
3.4.1 Test Data 19

4. Observation...................................................................................... 20

3
 1. Declared Specifications:
Below are the vehicle, battery and charger specifications details given by the OEM:

1.1 Vehicle specifications:

Parameters Data Units
Maximum Speed kmph

Range kms

Charging Time Hrs

Motor Type -
Nominal Power kW
Peak Power kW
Load Bearing Capacity kgs
Brake Type -
Weight (with battery) kgs
Weight (without battery) kgs

1.2 Battery Specifications:

Parameters Data Units

Battery Capacity kWh

Upper cut-off V

Voltage Nominal V

Lower cut-off V

Charge Current A

Discharge Current -

Current Capacity Ah

IP Rating -

Battery weight kgs

Battery dimensions mm
4
1.3 Charger Specifications:

Parameters Data Units

Charger C – Rating -
V
Charger Input (AC)
Hz
V
Charger Output (DC)
A
Connector Type -

1.4 Other Specifications:

Parameters Data
FAME2 Compliance
Telematics Data Points
CAN Communication
Guarantee on Battery
Guarantee on Vehicle and Sub-systems
Motor serial number
Chassis number
Front
Tyre specifications
Rear
Brake shoe size

5
2. Features:
2.1 Motor:
The image of the motor is as follows:

Fig. 1: Motor

2.2 Accessories:
Below are the images of the accessories of the vehicle:

Fig. 2: Display

6
Fig. 3: Battery
Fig. 4: Charger
Coupler

Fig. 5: Charger Fig. 6: Head Light &

Indicators

7
Fig 7: Front Brake Fig 8: Rear Brake
Drum Drum

Fig 9: Tail Lamp

8
3. Testing:
3.1 Test 1 – (No Load)

Date 23-03-2023

Rider Name NADEEM KHAN

Rider Weight (kgs) 70

Vehicle Number KA 51 TC 111/2

Environment Temperature (℃) -

Driving Mode NORMAL

Maximum Speed (Kmph) 45

Trip Start Time -

Trip End Time -

Battery SOC at start of the trip (%) -

Battery Voltage at the start of the trip (V) 57.55

Total (kms) 90

9
3.1.1 Test Data:

Distance
Actual
Covered – Motor Battery
Distance Voltage
Odometer Temperature SOC
Covered (v)
reading (◦C) (%)
(km)
(km)
28 0 57.55 25.9 -
38 9 56.90 50.9 -
48 18 56.58 58.5 -
58 27 56.31 56.0 -
68 36 55.61 60.3 -
78 45 54.47 62.4 -
88 54 53.37 68.2 -
98 63 53.37 61.01 -
108 72 53.40 59.8 -
118 81 52.60 62.01 -
128 90 52.04 59.5 -

10
3.1.2 Results:
The below is the graph plotted with the following parameters -Voltage vs Distance Covered.

VOLTAGE (v) V/S DISTANCE COVERED (kms)

59

58

57

56
voltage
(V)

55

54

53

52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Distance covered
in kms

Graph 1. – Test 1 – Voltage (v) V/S Kms

3.1.3 Test Observations

⚫ All the observations on this test done on normal mode without load.
⚫ Observations are taken as per 3wheeler driver records.
⚫ The responsiveness of throttle was good.
⚫ Torque addressed was satisfactory.
⚫ Brake response and stability of vehicle was good.
⚫ Battery soc indication was not accurate.
⚫ Maximum speed obtained on normal mode was 45kmph.
⚫ Maximum speed on boost mode was 54kmph.

11
3.2 Test 2 – (Load):

Date 24-03-2023

Rider Name NADEEM KHAN

Rider Weight (kgs) 70

Load Weight (kgs) 250

Vehicle Number KA 51 TC 111/2

Environment Temperature (℃) -

Driving Mode NORMAL

Maximum Speed (Kmph) 30

Trip Start Time

Trip End Time

Battery SOC at start of the trip (%) -

Battery Voltage at the start of the trip (V) 57.71

Total (kms) 75

12
3.2.1 Test Data:

Distance
Actual
Covered – Motor Battery
Distance Voltage
Odometer Temperature SOC
Covered (v)
reading (◦C) (%)
(km)
(km)
132 0 57.71 30.03 -
142 9 56.86 53.04 -
152 18 56.49 55.02 -
162 27 56.09 61.05 -
172 36 55.38 54.02 -
182 45 55.49 64.09 -
192 54 54.05 64.01 -
202 63 53.27 65.03 -
212 72 52.22 64.07 -
217 75 52.06 67.07 -
-

13
3.2.2 Results:
The below is the graph plotted with the following parameters – SOC vs Distance Covered.

VOLTAGE (v) V/S DISTANCE COVERED (kms)

60
59
58
57
Voltage

56
(v)

55
54
53
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Distance covered
in kms

Graph 2. – Test 2 – Voltage (v) V/S Kms

3.2.3 Test Observations:

⚫ All the observations on this test done on normal mode with partial load of 250 kg.
⚫ Battery soc indication was not accurate.
⚫ Torque addressed was not satisfied with partial load of 250 kg
⚫ Braking response was poor when driven with load
⚫ Uncommon jerk s observed on front wheel when driven on down roads
⚫ Temperature indicator began to blink on every 10 meter after 50 kms of travel with load
⚫ Uncommon burning smell was observed on driving with load of 250kg
⚫ Maximum speed in normal mode was 30 kmph
⚫ Maximum speed in boost mode was 35 kmph

14
3.3 Test 3 – (Load):

Date 25-03-2023

Rider Name NADEEM KHAN

Rider Weight (kgs) 70

Load Weight (kgs) 500

Vehicle Number KA 51 TC 111/2

Environment Temperature (℃) -

Driving Mode NORMAL

Maximum Speed (Kmph) 20-25

Trip Start Time

Trip End Time

Battery SOC at start of the trip (%) -

Battery Voltage at the start of the trip (V) 57.05

Total (kms) 57

15
3.3.1 Test Data:

Distance
Covered – Actual
Motor Battery
Odometer Distance Voltage
Temperature SOC
reading Covered (v)
(◦C) (%)
(km) (km)

221 0 57.05 29.04 -

231 09 56.67 53.09 -
241 18 56.28 65.03 -
251 27 55.50 67.00 -
261 36 54.34 72.05 -
271 45 53.74 72.06 -
281 54 52.82 74.09 -
287 57 52.07 67.04 -

16
3.3.2 Results:
The below is the graph plotted with the following parameters – SOC vs Distance Covered.

VOLTAGE (v) V/S DISTANCE COVERED

58

57

56
Voltage

55
(v)

54

53

52

51
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Distance covered
in kms

Graph 3. – Test 3 – Voltage (v) V/S Kms

3.3.3 Test Observations:

⚫ All the observations on this test done on normal mode with partial load of 500 kg.
⚫ Braking response was poor when driven with load.
⚫ Battery soc indication was not accurate.
⚫ Uncommon jerk s observed on front wheel when driven on down roads.
⚫ Temperature indicator began to blink on every 10 meter after 30 kms of travel with load.
⚫ Uncommon burning smell was observed on driving with load of 500kg.
⚫ Torque addressed was not satisfied with partial load of 500 kg.
⚫ Battery soc indication was not accurate.
⚫ Maximum speed in normal mode was 15 kmph
⚫ Maximum speed in normal mode was 20 kmph

⚫ Motor temperature was 74(◦c) (was quite high as per driver )

17
3.4.1 Test 4– Gradient

Date 30-03-2023

Rider Name VENUKUMAR

Rider Weight(kgs) 120

Load Weight (kgs) 500

Vehicle Number KA 51 TC 111/2

Environment Temperature (℃) -

Driving Modes NORMAL

Maximum Speed
NORMAL 7
(Kmph)

Trip Start Time -

Trip End Time -

Battery SOC at start of the trip -

Battery Voltage at the start of the trip 57.5

18
Various Loads for Gradient Testing:
Loads Data Units

Rider 120 KG

Payload 500 KG

Payload + Rider 620 KG

3.4.2 Test Data:

Cut – off
Weight Gradient Maximum speed Cut – off
status
Sl. No. Drive Mode over gradient status with
(kgs) (°) without
(kmph) Momentum
Momentum

1. 500 15 NORMAL 5 YES YES

2. 500 15 BOOST 5 NO YES

3. 500 9 NORMAL 6 YES YES

4. 500 9 BOOST 6 NO YES

5. 500 7 NORMAL 7 YES YES

6. 500 7 BOOST 7 NO NO

19
4 Observations:
Battery charging time: OEM specified time vs Actual time taken

OEM specified time for Actual time taken for

Charging Charging
(Hrs) (Hrs)

Pros:
• The throttle response and torque was good at no load conditions.
• Braking response was good on no load.
• Vehicle stability was good.

Cons:

• Battery soc indication was not accurate (needs to be concerned).

• Uncommon jerk s observed on front wheel when driven on down roads.

• Braking response was poor when driven with load.

• Uncommon burning smell was observed on driving with load.

• Temperature indicator began to blink after certain kms of travel (mentioned on test 2 and 3)

The Below table shows the estimated range that was displayed on the cluster for both Eco and
Sports mode versus the actual range achieved in both Eco and Sports mode.

Weight Display Range Range achieved

Mode
(kg) (kms) (kms)

NORMAL NO LOAD - 90

NORMAL 250 KG - 75

NORMAL 500 KG - 57

20
21