0% found this document useful (0 votes)
185 views24 pages

Drude

This document provides an overview of the classical Drude model of free electron conductivity. It begins with an introduction to Ohm's law and typical conductivity values for various materials at room temperature. It then describes the setup of the Drude model, which treats electrons as a free gas moving within a lattice of fixed positive ions. The document derives expressions for the electron drift velocity and conductivity under an applied electric field based on the electron scattering time between collisions. It discusses estimates of the scattering time and mean free path classically in terms of electron scattering by ion cores.

Uploaded by

mohamed salama
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
185 views24 pages

Drude

This document provides an overview of the classical Drude model of free electron conductivity. It begins with an introduction to Ohm's law and typical conductivity values for various materials at room temperature. It then describes the setup of the Drude model, which treats electrons as a free gas moving within a lattice of fixed positive ions. The document derives expressions for the electron drift velocity and conductivity under an applied electric field based on the electron scattering time between collisions. It discusses estimates of the scattering time and mean free path classically in terms of electron scattering by ion cores.

Uploaded by

mohamed salama
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

1

MTLE-6120: Advanced Electronic Properties of Materials

Classical Drude theory of conduction


Contents:
I Drude model derivation of free-electron conductivity
I Scattering time estimates and Matthiessen’s rule
I Mobility and Hall coefficients
I Frequency-dependent conductivity of free-electron metals
Reading:
I Kasap: 2.1 - 2.3, 2.5
2
Ohm’s law

I Local Ohm’s law: current density driven by electric field


~
~j = σ E

I Current in a sample of cross section A is I = jA


I Voltage drop across a sample of length L is V = EL
I Ohm’s law defines resistance
V EL L
R≡ = = σ −1
I jA A
I Units: Resistance in Ω,
resistivity ρ = σ −1 in Ωm,
conductivity σ in (Ωm)−1
3
Typical values at 293 K


Substance ρ [Ωm] σ [(Ωm)−1 ] ρdT [K−1 ]
Silver 1.59 × 10−8 6.30 × 107 0.0038
Copper 1.68 × 10−8 5.96 × 107 0.0039
Tungsten 5.6 × 10−8 1.79 × 107 0.0045
Lead 2.2 × 10−7 4.55 × 106 0.0039
Titanium 4.2 × 10−7 2.38 × 106 0.0038
Stainless steel 6.9 × 10−7 1.45 × 106 0.0009
Mercury 9.8 × 10−7 1.02 × 106 0.0009
Carbon (amorph) 5 − 8 × 10−4 1 − 2 × 103 -0.0005
Germanium 4.6 × 10−1 2.17 -0.048
Silicon 6.4 × 102 1.56 × 10−3 -0.075
Diamond 1.0 × 1012 1.0 × 10−12
Quartz 7.5 × 1017 1.3 × 10−18
Teflon 1023 − 1025 10−25 − 10−23

Note 1/T = 0.0034 K−1 at 293 K ⇒ approximately ρ ∝ T for the best


conducting metals.
4
Temperature dependence
4
i
%N
+2
Resistivity [10-8 m]
3
i
%N
+1
2
ed
ork
dw
Col
per
e cop
1 Pur

0
0 100 200 300
Temperature [K]

I Linear at higher temperatures


I Residual resistivity (constant at low T) due to defects and impurities
5
Drude model setup
I Fixed nuclei (positive ion cores) + gas of moving electrons
I Electrons move freely with random velocities
I Electrons periodically scatter which randomizes velocity again
I Average time between collisions: mean free time τ
I Average distance travelled between collisions: mean free path λ
I In zero field, drift velocity (averaged over all electrons)

~vd ≡ h~v i = 0
+ + + + +
but electrons are not stationary: e-
e- e-
e-
hv 2 i = u2 + + + + +
e- e-
I Current density carried by electrons: e-
e-
+ + + + +
~j = n(−e)~vd = 0 e-
e-
e-
e-
where n is number density of electrons + + + + +
6
Apply electric field
I Electron starts at past time t = −t0 with random velocity ~v0
I Force on electron is F~ = (−e)E~
I Solve equation of motion till present time t = 0:
d~v ~
m = (−e)E
dt
~ 0
eEt
~v = ~v0 −
m

I Need to average over all electrons


I Probability that electron started at −t0 and did not scatter till t = 0 is
P (t0 ) ∝ e−t0 /τ = e−t0 /τ /τ (normalized)

I Probability distribution of initial velocities satisfies


Z
d~v0 P (~v0 ) = 1 (normalized)
Z
d~v0 P (~v0 )~v0 = 0 (random)
7
Drift velocity in electric field
I Drift velocity is the average velocity of all electrons

~vd ≡ h~v i
!
Z Z ∞ ~ 0
eEt
≡ d~v0 P (~v0 ) dt0 P (t0 ) ~v0 −
0 m
Z Z ∞ Z Z ∞ ~ 0
eEt
= d~v0 P (~v0 )~v0 dt0 P (t0 ) − d~v0 P (~v0 ) dt0 P (t0 )
0 0 m
∞ ~ 0
e−t0 /τ eEt
Z
=0·1−1· dt0
0 τ m
~ Z ∞
−eE
= · t0 dt0 e−t0 /τ
mτ 0
~ Z ∞ 
−eE 2 n −ax n!
= ·τ x dxe = n+1
mτ 0 a
~
−eEτ
=
m
8
Drude conductivity

I Current density carried by electrons:


!
~ ne2 τ ~
~j = n(−e)~vd = n(−e) − eEτ = E
m m

I Which is exactly the local version of Ohm’s law with conductivity

ne2 τ
σ=
m
I For a given metal, n is determined by number density of atoms and
number of ‘free’ electrons per atom
I e and m are fundamental constants
I Predictions of the model come down to τ (discussed next)
I Later: quantum mechanics changes τ , but above classical derivation
remains essentially correct!
9
Classical model for scattering
I Electrons scatter against ions (nuclei + fixed core electrons)
I Scattering cross-section σion : projected area within which electron would
be scattered
I WLOG assume electron travelling along z
I Probability of scattering between z and dz is

−dP (z) = P (z) σion dz nion


| {z }
dVeff

+ + + + +
where nion is number density of ions
and dVeff is the volume from which
ions can scatter electrons + + + + +
I This yields P (z) ∝ e−σion nion z
I ⇒ Mean free path
+ + + + +
1
λ=
nion σion e-
+ + + + +
10
Classical estimate of scattering time

I From Drude model, τ = σm/(ne2 )


I Experimentally, σ ∝ T −1 ⇒ τ ∝ T −1
I From classical model, τ = λ/u, where u is average electron speed
I λ = 1/(nion σion ) should be T -independent
1 2 3
p
Kinetic theory: 2 mu = 2 kB T ⇒ u = 3kB T /m
I

I Therefore classical scattering time


λ 1
τ= = p ∝ T −1/2
u nion σion 3kB T /m

gets the temperature dependence wrong


11
Comparisons for copper
I Experimentally:
σ = 6 × 107 (Ωm)−1 (at 293 K)
4
n = nion = = 8.5 × 1028 m−3
(3.61 Å)3
σm 6 × 107 (Ωm)−1 · 9 × 10−31 kg
τ= 2 = = 2.5 × 10−14 s
ne 8.5 × 1028 m−3 (1.6 × 10−19 C)2

I Classical model:
σion ∼ π(1 Å)2 ∼ 3 × 10−20 m2
1 1
λ= ∼ ∼ 4 × 10−10 m
nion σion 8.5 × 1028 m−3 · 3 × 10−20 m2
r s
3kB T 3 · 1.38 × 10−23 J/K · 293 K
u= = = 1.2 × 105 m/s
m 9 × 10−31 kg
λ
τ= ∼ 3 × 10−15 s
u
I Need σion to be 10x smaller to match experiment
12
What changes in quantum mechanics?

1. Electron velocity in metals is (almost) independent of temperature


I Pauli exclusion principle forces electrons to adopt different velocities
I ‘Relevant’ electrons have Fermi velocity vF (=1.6 × 106 m/s for copper)
2. Electrons don’t scatter against ions of the perfect crystal
I Electrons are waves which ‘know’ where all the ions of the crystal are
I They only scatter when ions deviate from ideal positions!
I Crude model σion = πx2 for RMS displacement x
I Thermal displacements 12 kx2 = 21 kB T

I Spring constant k ∼ Y a ∼ (120 GPa)(3.6Å/ 2) ∼ 30 N/m
I

πkB T
σion = ∼ 4 × 10−22 m2 (at room T )
k
I

1 k
τ = = ∼ 1.7 × 10−14 s (at room T )
nion σion vF nion πkB T vF
I Correct 1/T dependence and magnitude at room T (expt: 2.5 × 10−14 s)!
13
Matthiessen’s rule
I Perfect metal: τT ∝ T −1 due to scattering against thermal vibrations (so
far)
I Impurity and defect scattering contribute τI ∝ T 0
I Scattering rates (not times) are additive, so net τ given by

τ −1 = τT−1 + τI−1 + · · ·

I Resistivity ρ ∝ τ −1 ∼ ρ0 + AT with residual resistivity ρ0 due to τI


4
i
%N
+2
Resistivity [10-8 m]

3
i
%N
+1
2
ked
wor
Cold
er
opp
Pu re c
1

0
0 100 200 300
Temperature [K]
Is the experimental data strictly ρ0 + AT ?
14
Mobility

I Drude conductivity in general

nq 2 τ
σ= = n|q|µ
m
where n is the number density of charge carriers q with mobility

|q|τ
µ=
m
effectively measuring the conductivity per unit (mobile) charge
I In metals, q = −e since charge carried by electrons (so far)
I In semiconductors, additionally q = +e for holes and

σ = e(ne µe + nh µh )

I Semiconductors have typically higher µ, substantially lower n and σ


15
Hall effect

I Apply magnetic field perpendicular to current: voltage appears in third


direction
I Hall coefficient defined by

Ey VH /W VH d
RH = = =
jx Bz I/(W d)Bz IBz
I Simple explanation in Drude model
I Average driving force on carriers now

F~ = q(E
~ + ~vd × B)
~
= q(Ex x̂ − (vd )x Bz ŷ)

I Steady-state current only in x̂


I ⇒ Ey = (vd )x Bz develops to cancel Fy
16
Hall coefficient in metals

I Note Ey = (vd )x Bz , while jx = nq(vd )x


I Eliminate (vd )x to get

Ey 1
RH ≡ =
jx Bz nq
I In particular, q = −e for electronic conduction ⇒ RH = −1/(ne)
I Compare to experimental values:
Metal Experiment RH [m3 /C] Drude RH [m3 /C]
Cu −5.5 × 10−11 −7.3 × 10−11
Ag −9.0 × 10−11 −10.7 × 10−11
Na −2.5 × 10−10 −2.4 × 10−10
Cd +6.0 × 10−11 −5.8 × 10−11
Fe +2.5 × 10−11 −2.5 × 10−11
I Good agreement for ‘free-electron’ metals
I Wrong sign for some (transition metals)!
17
Hall coefficient in semiconductors

I Remember: conductivities due to electrons and holes add


σ = e(ne µe + nh µh )
I Different drift velocities for electrons and holes
I For each of electrons and holes
I ~ , drift velocity ~vd = F
Given driving force F ~ τ /m
I Mobility µ ≡ |q|τ /m, so ~vd = F ~ µ/|q|
I Driving force Fy = q(Ey − (vd )x Bz )
I Corresponding drift velocity (vd )y = Fy µ/|q|
I And corresponding current
jy = nq(vd )y = nqFy µ/|q| = nq 2 (Ey − (vd )x Bz )µ/|q|
I Substitute (vd )x = (qEx )µ/|q| to get
jy = nµ(|q|Ey − qEx µBz )
I Net jy must be zero (that’s how we got Hall coefficient before):

0 = ne µe (eEy + eEx µe Bz ) + nh µh (eEy − eEx µh Bz )


18
Hall coefficient in semiconductors (continued)
I Net zero jy yields:

0 = ne µe (eEy + eEx µe Bz ) + nh µh (eEy − eEx µh Bz )


= (ne µe + nh µh )Ey + (ne µ2e − nh µ2h )Ex Bz
Ey Ey
⇒ RH = =
jx Bz σEx Bz
ne µ2e − nh µ2h
=−
(ne µe + nh µh )σ
−ne µ2e + nh µ2h
=
e(ne µe + nh µh )2
I Reduces to metal result if nh = 0
I Note holes conrtibute positive coefficient, while electrons negative (not
additive like conductivity)
I Transition metals can have positive Hall coefficients for the same reason!
(Explained later with band structures.)
19
Frequency-dependent conductivity
I ~ constant in time
So far, we applied fields E
I ~
Now consider oscillatory field E(t) ~ −iωt (such as from an EM wave)
= Ee
I Same Drude model: free electron between collisions etc.
I Only change in equation of motion:

d~v qE~
= e−iωt
dt m
Z t ~
qE
~v (t) = ~v0 + dt e−iωt Note: must account for t explicitly
t−t0 m
qE~  e−iωt t
= ~v0 +
m −iω t−t0
~ e−iω(t−t0 ) − e−iωt
qE
= ~v0 + ·
m iω
20
Frequency-dependent conductivity: drift velocity
I Drift velocity (at t = 0) is the average velocity of all electrons
!
Z Z ∞ ~ e−iω(t−t0 ) − e−iωt
qE
~vd (t) ≡ d~v0 P (~v0 ) dt0 P (t0 ) ~v0 + ·
0 m iω
Z ∞ ~ e−iω(t−t0 ) − e−iωt
qE
= dt0 P (t0 )
0 m iω
Z ∞ −t0 /τ ~ iωt0
e qE e − 1 −iωt
= dt0 e
0 τ m iω
qE~ Z ∞  
= dt0 e−t0 (1/τ −iω) − e−t0 /τ e−iωt
imωτ 0
~   Z ∞ 
qE 1 n!
= − τ e−iωt xn dxe−ax = n+1
imωτ 1/τ − iω 0 a
qE~ 1 − (1 − iωτ ) −iωt
= · e
imωτ 1/τ − iω
~
q Eτ 1
= · e−iωt
m 1 − iωτ
21
Frequency-dependent conductivity: Drude result

I As before, ~j(t) = nq~vd (t), which yields conductivity

nq 2 τ σ(0)
σ(ω) = =
m(1 − iωτ ) 1 − iωτ
I Same as before, except for factor (1 − iωτ )
(which → 1 for ω → 0 as expected)
I What does the phase of the complex conductivity mean?
I Current density has a phase lag relative to electric field
I When field changes, collisions are needed to change the current, which
take average time τ
I From constitutive relations discussion, complex dielectric function

iσ(ω) nq 2 /m
(ω) = 0 + = 0 −
ω ω(ω + i/τ )
22
Plasma frequency
I Displace all electrons by x
I Volume xA containing only electrons with charge −xAne
I Counter charge +xAne on other side due to nuclei
I Electric field by Gauss’s law:

~ = xne x̂
E
0
I Equation of motion of electrons:

d2 x ne2
m 2
= (−e)Ex = −x
dt 0

I Harmonic oscillator with frequency ωp given by

ne2
ωp2 =
m0
23
Drude dielectric function of metals
I Simple form in terms of plasma frequency
!
nq 2 /m ωp2
(ω) = 0 − = 0 1−
ω(ω + i/τ ) ω(ω + i/τ )

I For ω  1/τ ,
!
iωp2 τ
(ω) ≈ 0 1+
ω

imaginary dielectric, real conductivity (Ohmic regime)


I For 1/τ  ω < ωp ,
!
ωp2
(ω) ≈ 0 1 − 2
ω

negative dielectric constant (plasmonic regime)


I For ω > ωp , positive dielectric constant (dielectric regime)
24
Copper dielectric function

40
20
0
-20
ε/ε0

-40
-60 Re ε Expt
Im ε Expt
-80 Re ε Model
Im ε Model
-100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
-hω [eV]

I For copper, ωp = 10.8 eV and τ = 25 fs


I Note 1 eV corresponds to ω = 1.52 × 1015 s−1 and ν = 2.42 × 1014 Hz

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy