Drude
Drude
dρ
Substance ρ [Ωm] σ [(Ωm)−1 ] ρdT [K−1 ]
Silver 1.59 × 10−8 6.30 × 107 0.0038
Copper 1.68 × 10−8 5.96 × 107 0.0039
Tungsten 5.6 × 10−8 1.79 × 107 0.0045
Lead 2.2 × 10−7 4.55 × 106 0.0039
Titanium 4.2 × 10−7 2.38 × 106 0.0038
Stainless steel 6.9 × 10−7 1.45 × 106 0.0009
Mercury 9.8 × 10−7 1.02 × 106 0.0009
Carbon (amorph) 5 − 8 × 10−4 1 − 2 × 103 -0.0005
Germanium 4.6 × 10−1 2.17 -0.048
Silicon 6.4 × 102 1.56 × 10−3 -0.075
Diamond 1.0 × 1012 1.0 × 10−12
Quartz 7.5 × 1017 1.3 × 10−18
Teflon 1023 − 1025 10−25 − 10−23
0
0 100 200 300
Temperature [K]
~vd ≡ h~v i = 0
+ + + + +
but electrons are not stationary: e-
e- e-
e-
hv 2 i = u2 + + + + +
e- e-
I Current density carried by electrons: e-
e-
+ + + + +
~j = n(−e)~vd = 0 e-
e-
e-
e-
where n is number density of electrons + + + + +
6
Apply electric field
I Electron starts at past time t = −t0 with random velocity ~v0
I Force on electron is F~ = (−e)E~
I Solve equation of motion till present time t = 0:
d~v ~
m = (−e)E
dt
~ 0
eEt
~v = ~v0 −
m
~vd ≡ h~v i
!
Z Z ∞ ~ 0
eEt
≡ d~v0 P (~v0 ) dt0 P (t0 ) ~v0 −
0 m
Z Z ∞ Z Z ∞ ~ 0
eEt
= d~v0 P (~v0 )~v0 dt0 P (t0 ) − d~v0 P (~v0 ) dt0 P (t0 )
0 0 m
∞ ~ 0
e−t0 /τ eEt
Z
=0·1−1· dt0
0 τ m
~ Z ∞
−eE
= · t0 dt0 e−t0 /τ
mτ 0
~ Z ∞
−eE 2 n −ax n!
= ·τ x dxe = n+1
mτ 0 a
~
−eEτ
=
m
8
Drude conductivity
ne2 τ
σ=
m
I For a given metal, n is determined by number density of atoms and
number of ‘free’ electrons per atom
I e and m are fundamental constants
I Predictions of the model come down to τ (discussed next)
I Later: quantum mechanics changes τ , but above classical derivation
remains essentially correct!
9
Classical model for scattering
I Electrons scatter against ions (nuclei + fixed core electrons)
I Scattering cross-section σion : projected area within which electron would
be scattered
I WLOG assume electron travelling along z
I Probability of scattering between z and dz is
+ + + + +
where nion is number density of ions
and dVeff is the volume from which
ions can scatter electrons + + + + +
I This yields P (z) ∝ e−σion nion z
I ⇒ Mean free path
+ + + + +
1
λ=
nion σion e-
+ + + + +
10
Classical estimate of scattering time
I Classical model:
σion ∼ π(1 Å)2 ∼ 3 × 10−20 m2
1 1
λ= ∼ ∼ 4 × 10−10 m
nion σion 8.5 × 1028 m−3 · 3 × 10−20 m2
r s
3kB T 3 · 1.38 × 10−23 J/K · 293 K
u= = = 1.2 × 105 m/s
m 9 × 10−31 kg
λ
τ= ∼ 3 × 10−15 s
u
I Need σion to be 10x smaller to match experiment
12
What changes in quantum mechanics?
πkB T
σion = ∼ 4 × 10−22 m2 (at room T )
k
I
1 k
τ = = ∼ 1.7 × 10−14 s (at room T )
nion σion vF nion πkB T vF
I Correct 1/T dependence and magnitude at room T (expt: 2.5 × 10−14 s)!
13
Matthiessen’s rule
I Perfect metal: τT ∝ T −1 due to scattering against thermal vibrations (so
far)
I Impurity and defect scattering contribute τI ∝ T 0
I Scattering rates (not times) are additive, so net τ given by
τ −1 = τT−1 + τI−1 + · · ·
3
i
%N
+1
2
ked
wor
Cold
er
opp
Pu re c
1
0
0 100 200 300
Temperature [K]
Is the experimental data strictly ρ0 + AT ?
14
Mobility
nq 2 τ
σ= = n|q|µ
m
where n is the number density of charge carriers q with mobility
|q|τ
µ=
m
effectively measuring the conductivity per unit (mobile) charge
I In metals, q = −e since charge carried by electrons (so far)
I In semiconductors, additionally q = +e for holes and
σ = e(ne µe + nh µh )
Ey VH /W VH d
RH = = =
jx Bz I/(W d)Bz IBz
I Simple explanation in Drude model
I Average driving force on carriers now
F~ = q(E
~ + ~vd × B)
~
= q(Ex x̂ − (vd )x Bz ŷ)
Ey 1
RH ≡ =
jx Bz nq
I In particular, q = −e for electronic conduction ⇒ RH = −1/(ne)
I Compare to experimental values:
Metal Experiment RH [m3 /C] Drude RH [m3 /C]
Cu −5.5 × 10−11 −7.3 × 10−11
Ag −9.0 × 10−11 −10.7 × 10−11
Na −2.5 × 10−10 −2.4 × 10−10
Cd +6.0 × 10−11 −5.8 × 10−11
Fe +2.5 × 10−11 −2.5 × 10−11
I Good agreement for ‘free-electron’ metals
I Wrong sign for some (transition metals)!
17
Hall coefficient in semiconductors
d~v qE~
= e−iωt
dt m
Z t ~
qE
~v (t) = ~v0 + dt e−iωt Note: must account for t explicitly
t−t0 m
qE~ e−iωt t
= ~v0 +
m −iω t−t0
~ e−iω(t−t0 ) − e−iωt
qE
= ~v0 + ·
m iω
20
Frequency-dependent conductivity: drift velocity
I Drift velocity (at t = 0) is the average velocity of all electrons
!
Z Z ∞ ~ e−iω(t−t0 ) − e−iωt
qE
~vd (t) ≡ d~v0 P (~v0 ) dt0 P (t0 ) ~v0 + ·
0 m iω
Z ∞ ~ e−iω(t−t0 ) − e−iωt
qE
= dt0 P (t0 )
0 m iω
Z ∞ −t0 /τ ~ iωt0
e qE e − 1 −iωt
= dt0 e
0 τ m iω
qE~ Z ∞
= dt0 e−t0 (1/τ −iω) − e−t0 /τ e−iωt
imωτ 0
~ Z ∞
qE 1 n!
= − τ e−iωt xn dxe−ax = n+1
imωτ 1/τ − iω 0 a
qE~ 1 − (1 − iωτ ) −iωt
= · e
imωτ 1/τ − iω
~
q Eτ 1
= · e−iωt
m 1 − iωτ
21
Frequency-dependent conductivity: Drude result
nq 2 τ σ(0)
σ(ω) = =
m(1 − iωτ ) 1 − iωτ
I Same as before, except for factor (1 − iωτ )
(which → 1 for ω → 0 as expected)
I What does the phase of the complex conductivity mean?
I Current density has a phase lag relative to electric field
I When field changes, collisions are needed to change the current, which
take average time τ
I From constitutive relations discussion, complex dielectric function
iσ(ω) nq 2 /m
(ω) = 0 + = 0 −
ω ω(ω + i/τ )
22
Plasma frequency
I Displace all electrons by x
I Volume xA containing only electrons with charge −xAne
I Counter charge +xAne on other side due to nuclei
I Electric field by Gauss’s law:
~ = xne x̂
E
0
I Equation of motion of electrons:
d2 x ne2
m 2
= (−e)Ex = −x
dt 0
ne2
ωp2 =
m0
23
Drude dielectric function of metals
I Simple form in terms of plasma frequency
!
nq 2 /m ωp2
(ω) = 0 − = 0 1−
ω(ω + i/τ ) ω(ω + i/τ )
I For ω 1/τ ,
!
iωp2 τ
(ω) ≈ 0 1+
ω
40
20
0
-20
ε/ε0
-40
-60 Re ε Expt
Im ε Expt
-80 Re ε Model
Im ε Model
-100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
-hω [eV]