Engineering in Miniature - August 2022
Engineering in Miniature - August 2022
06 23 28
16 TENDER BENDER –
A BENDING TOOL
by Peter & Matthew Kenington
Engineering Exhibition, also founded by Chris and the jewel among a
number of shows he organised, would not happen due to his passing.
Well I’m pleased, and frankly not in the least surprised, to be able to
dismiss such rumours as completely untrue – the show team, led by Chris’s daughter Avril,
19 AT THE TRACK - A
CAUTIONARY TALE
By Stuart Rothwell
are working very hard to prepare for the event and have even more reason to ensure that this
year’s show, the first since 2019, is a success as a tribute to Chris. A few days before I penned
these words a list of the latest suppliers to sign up for the event was released and it’s looking
just like the Midlands shows we enjoyed pre-pandemic – more details are on our news pages.
20 RESTORING A GAUGE 1
MIDLAND COMPOUND
by Anthony White
It is very important that the Midlands exhibition is a success, and while to honour Chris
is a very valid reason it is by no means the only one. It’s pretty clear that this will be the only
major model engineering show this year, and we haven’t had one since London in January
2020, getting on for three years ago. I don’t know about you, but the opportunity to get out to
23 PROTOTYPE: HOVERCRAFT
& AIR CUSHIONS
by Rodger P. Bradley
a show is very important to me and something I have greatly missed – not only to take
advantage of a host of suppliers being all in one place at the same time, and to see the various
projects underway on the club stands, but crucially to get to meet up with fellow model
engineers, find out what’s going on in the hobby and yes, put the world to rights! We need
28 HARRY’S GAME: MORE
SOLUTIONS & ISSUES
by Harry Billmore
the Midlands show to return in style to ensure the future of London, of Doncaster... a future
without shows would be a poorer one for all of us.
A reader made me very happy recently when he commented that he enjoys EIM because
he learns something from every issue – that means we are doing something right! The
36 GILLING MAINLINE
RALLY 2022
by John Arrowsmith
learning point from this issue’s cover feature could well be – don’t ever consider a part is
scrap! Rich Wightman’s beam engine made almost entirely of car engine components, and
built some time ago when he was in the motor industry, is a lesson in multiple areas – budget
36 BENCH TALK: A
BRITANNIA DILEMMA
by Warwick Allison
model engineering, recycling, innovation... Brilliant stuff, of the type I’m proud to incude in
our pages. And a reminder again that if you have something you think would look
appropriate in EIM, you know where we are... Andrew Charman – Editor
The September issue of Engineering in Miniature publishes on 18th August
38 GENERAL NEWS
Sisters reunited at Rhyl
Editor: Andrew Charman Technical Editor: Harry Billmore
E
ach cylinder for the David
Piddington-designed Stirling
Single model locomotive, as
supplied by Reeves, was a single
bronze casting with its port face. I cut
to shape a sheet of MDF to fit into the
as yet unmachined cylinder holes of
the casting at each end, then pencilled
in crosshairs to determine the centre
point of the cylinder bore (Photo 12).
I then machined the port face to PHOTO 12:
be parallel to the cylinder bore. This MDF used to
could only be estimated by eye by help determine
visually lining up with the outside of centre line of
the cylinder casting. cylinders for
The top slide of the lathe was then boring out. casting at an angle, a problem that was through a cast dummy leaf spring.
removed and the casting bolted, port solved by clamping the cylinder Although I constructed this as per the
face down onto the cross slide and PHOTO 13: casting to the rear fixed jaw of the mill plans, I feel that it would have been
shimmed so that the centre point of Boring process vice to conform to this angle. This better to have working leaf springs
the crosshair lines on each end were here underway. procedure is shown in Photo 15 – the (Photo 17). Working out a leaf spring
aligned with centres mounted in the mirror in the foreground was to be formula for a given load, however,
chuck and tailstock. PHOTO 14: able to see the slot drill when it broke appears to be more difficult than
The cylinders were then bored to a Port face into the port, so as to stop it going too finding suitable coil springs.
diameter of 1 inch and 7⁄16ths with a clamped in far and marring the far side of the In any case, the trailing wheels of
boring bar (Photo 13), before I fitted position on port chamber. a single driver locomotive must bear
the pistons with Viton O-rings. frame before The steam chest walls were then only a minimal load. If the springs are
Each port face was then inserted drilling out machined from another gunmetal too strong, they lift the driving wheels
into its mounting cut-out in the mounting holes. casting and screwed to the port face, and drastically reduce traction. In my
mainframes, then clamped whilst sandwiching a gasket in between. experience the weight of a single
mounting holes were drilled through PHOTO 15: Photo 16 shows one, with just the top driver locomotive should ideally be
the frames into the cylinder mounting Setup for drilling cover to be added. centred equally between the bogie
flanges (Photo 14). steam exhaust centre and the driving axle.
A central exhaust port of ¼-inch port at required Highly sprung The trailing wheels are mainly
diameter and front and rear exhaust angle to cylinder. The trailing axle completes the present to stop the locomotive tilting
ports of 5⁄32-inch diameter were then Stirling locomotive wheels. I cannot backward with its nose up (like a
drilled using slot drills. However the Photos by deny that it looks rather ridiculous to speedboat) when it is accelerating
exhaust port was required to enter the the author have a coil spring passing right forward. They also provide guidance
12 13
14 15
18
when backing through points. cylinder covers had tabs onto which
These parameters became the piston slide bars were to be
especially apparent to me when I built attached. The mounting surfaces of
a miniature brass Midland Spinner in these tabs of course had to be precisely
P4 scale (4mm to the foot). It was far machined the correct distance apart so
more difficult to obtain the required as to hold the slide bars at the correct
traction with the P4 Spinner than the spacing – careful measuring then
5-inch gauge version. The above machining was required (Photo 19).
weight distribution was especially However, my machining was a bit
critical for the smaller model. inaccurate and when the slide bars
The cylinder covers were next. were bolted to the tabs, they were
Photo 18 shows a front cover being crooked, rather than at precise right s
drilled for mounting bolts. The rear angles to the covers. So I measured the
17
19
20 21
The grub screws or pins securing the The above procedure was made
eccentrics to the axle could be drilled necessary by the fact that the Stirling
through the exposed half of the engine’s boiler is mounted so low in
eccentric, meaning the straps did not the frames. I have often wondered
have to be removed to access the how other builders of this model are
screws for adjustment. So I did this able to lubricate their eccentrics and
and it was a great idea! (Photo 23). driving axleboxes. It is impossible to
get an oil can in there, especially since
angle (Photo 20) then machined this Oiling the way the front sandbox blocks entry under
angle in the reverse direction on the Before we leave the eccentrics, my the boiler. Even access from
slide-bar surface where it met the tab PHOTO 20: solution to oiling them was to attach underneath on a raised track is
and when the slide bar was again An error in nipples to the forward section of each difficult. For example, the top fitting
bolted to the cylinder cover tab, it mounting the eccentric strap, then run neoprene oil on the centrally mounted axle-driven
achieved the required right angle slide bars meant lines from each to a junction box water pump sits just 4mm below the
(Photo 21). this angle needed mounted on the inside of the boiler apex!
I made a jig to construct the rectification. mainframe immediately in front of I had thought that the shortest oil
eccentrics. The eccentric blank was the driving axle horn guide. From line might get all the oil, starving the
shimmed beneath to stand it at the PHOTO 21: here a single oil line runs to an oil box longer ones, but I found this not to be
correct height. The strap was secured Problem sorted located in one of the front sandboxes. the case. I’ve fitted a length of fine
around this, from which the eccentric by applying a I had originally intended to run all copper tube to my Reilang oil can and
rod proceeded to its lower resting little ingenuity five lines from each eccentric nipple to I insert this into the neoprene tube,
point at the far end of the jig, creating described in its own nipple on the oil box. extending into the sandbox oil
the necessary offset. the text. However, they ran the risk of being reservoir and prime the tubes. Once
Pins through the eccentric blank cut to pieces by the eccentric rods, they are all full, they continue to duct
and the fork at the end of the rod PHOTO 22: especially when the motion was in oil from the reservoir.
ensured the length between Jig made to reverse. Mike Boddy’s solution was to I had the locomotive’s expansion
attachment points was the same for all construct the take all the piping immediately to the links water-cut at a local firm which
the eccentric rods. Each rod was then eccentrics. side junction box , preventing the proved a real time saver. Mike Boddy
silver soldered to its eccentric strap pipes from being positioned above the produced a CAD drawing with the
whilst held in the correct position on PHOTO 23: rods towards the expansion links, outside profile made slightly oversize
the jig (Photo 22). Completed where the rod movement would be and the slot for the die block slightly
My friend Mike Boddy suggested valve gear with greater (Photo 24). Being just forward undersize. The water cutter made two
that as I had the room to do so, why double-width of the driving axle, they are thus expansion links to these dimensions
not make double-width eccentrics? eccentrics fitted. moved only minimally by the rods. in gauge plate, also pinpointing the
22 23
24 25
27 28
PHOTO 1: The
beam engine and
boiler – a lesson
in recycling
scrap parts...
PHOTO 2:
The cylinder –
once activating
the brakes of a
Rover car.
PHOTO 3: The
cylinder with
its piston and
guide fitted.
PHOTO 4: All
the components
for the cylinder.
PHOTO 5: The
displacement
lubricator, the
condenser and
valve linkage
have been fitted.
PHOTO 6:
2 3 The crankshaft
and flywheel – a
camshaft gear.
PHOTO 7: Two
solid fuel trays
provide the heat.
PHOTO 8: The
front panel of the
porcupine boiler.
PHOTO 9: The
boiler mounted
in its housing.
Photos by
the author
4 5
T
here has been mention recently In my early days in the motor
on a couple of the model trade it was a common job to remove a
engineering forums that I am a
member of that the price of castings
seems to be on the increase. Which is
dynamo or water pump, recondition it
and refit it to the car. It later became
the norm, however, to buy an
6
not surprising given the current state exchange unit, in automotive terms
of world affairs – the rising cost of raw everything from starter motors to
materials, electricity and gas brake shoes. Nowadays they are
inevitably mean a rise in the price of throw-away items, they don’t even
finished goods. want the old units any more.
Anyway thinking about this Is this progress? I’m not sure but
motivated me to write a few lines let’s save that debate for another day
about one of my early engines. I have and get back to the subject of this
always been a bit of a recycler, a keen article, a beam engine made from
skip-dipper, scrounger and forager castings. Well castings of a sort –
and from an early age I have been please take a close look at the main
amazed at the amount of stuff we view of my beam engine (Photo 1). I
throw away. completed it way back in 2008 and at
the time I wasn’t in the habit of taking
many photos.
9 Raiding the bin
You can see that there are a good
number of car engine parts involved
in this build, all rescued from the
scrap bin at work. One lunch hour I
s
8 7
A freelance traction
engine in 3-inch scale
Pipework occupies Jan-Eric in the latest part of his road engine project.
BY JAN-ERIC NYSTRÖM Part Eleven of a series
114
B
uilding this traction engine, I’ve PHOTO 114:
already come as far as having to The fabricated
find a way for the ‘steam cylinder assembly
plumbing’, even though there was an attached to the
almost two-year hiatus in top of the boiler.
construction – this was partly due to a engine. You may remember that I’m visible, on top of the boiler, going
painful, almost completely snapped PHOTO 115: building it ‘off-the-cuff’, almost from the cylinder assembly to the
tendon in my right shoulder (from The superheater completely without any construction chimney. Would it be sacrilegious to
attempting to start a recalcitrant pipe ‘bend’ is drawings (except for the necessary also have the live steam coming into
mower), which prevented any heavy fabricated from CAD designs for the plasma cutting of the cylinder in the same, visible way?
lifting for more than a year. The a short piece of the cab and coal bunker parts). I’m I thought it could, since my engine
finished traction engine will probably copper tube. ‘ad-libbing’ as I go – even though this is not an exact model of any existing
weigh around 120kg/260lb, so it is sometimes paints me into a corner, to prototype, anyway – I’m just building
definitely not a toy for tiny tots... nor PHOTO 116: coin a phrase... a fun toy!
for broken tendons! In addition, I had The return So, instead of having the steam
to take care of the estate inventories bend assembly Pipe dream or nightmare? coming from a hole in the top of the
after my parents, who both died is sealed with The steam cylinder was finished long boiler shell, straight up into the
within 15 months of each other – a phosphor-copper ago, but now I had to find a way to get cylinder assembly’s steam chest, I
quite exhausting task... solder – silver the steam in and out of it. Looking at copied the design from my ten-wheeler
Now, with the tendon healed, and solder is not photos of original, antique equipment locomotive, using a throttle in the
the other duties brought to suitable here. as well as the many drawings in smokebox instead of in the valve chest.
completion, there was again time to go decades-old issues of model Then, I could simply drill a hole in the
down to the basement workshop and Photos by engineering magazines, I noted that top of the smokebox, and pass the
plan the final design of the traction the exhaust pipe almost always was steam through a pipe to the cylinder
▲
the author
115 116
123 124
www.model-engineering-forum.co.uk ENGINEERING in MINIATURE | AUGUST 2022 15
WORKSHOP TOOLS
Tender Bender
The latest part of father-and-son team Peter and Matthew’s project to build a ‘universal’
bending tool able to form almost any radius focuses on adding a sharp bending accessory.
BY PETER & MATTHEW KENINGTON Part Three of a short series
O
ne further part was made for
the bending tool that we have FIGURE 7
constructed over the past Approx three times
couple of issues – an ‘anvil’ to enable full-size
sharp bends to be made precisely. This
is an example of a ‘custom-designed’
part for a specific application
(achieving very tight radius bends),
although many other possibilities
exist for other ‘custom’ parts, to fit
into the same place (U-channel base
section) in the bender.
This part was fabricated from a
piece of 30mm x 16mm x 750mm mild
steel bar. Fortunately, such bar is
readily available, with the correct
width and thickness dimensions, so
the only fabrication required was to
cut the bar to length and then to mill
the V-groove along its length. This is
not straightforward to do, particularly
on a mill with an X-travel of less than
the required 750mm and it required both readings should be as near FIGURE 7: Diagram of the anvil V-groove.
careful setup. identical as possible (or zero, if Z = 0
The end-elevation drawing of the was set at the first probe location). PHOTO 36: Overview of the setup for machining a
anvil is shown in Figure 7. Essentially Note that a challenge with this V-groove in the ‘anvil’ bar.
the whole part is a 750mm extrusion method is that the end of the probe,
of this end-face. being spherical, is difficult to place PHOTO 37: Checking that the vice is level…
The basic setup used is shown in centrally on the bar’s edge, if the
Photo 36. Two V-clamps were used, front-rear (Y-direction) placement of PHOTO 38: …and then that the installed bar is level.
the smaller of which was held in a the bar isn’t accurate beforehand. This
machine vice (to the right in the
photo) and the larger of which was
supported on a collection of
can be overcome by edge-finding the
front and rear of the bar, at equivalent
Z-heights for both measurements and
36
123-blocks. Parallels were used to splitting the difference (and doing this
provide some positional adjustment again at the second measurement
– one was used on each V-block, location) – a slightly tedious process,
although only the left-hand one is but the most accurate method. It also
visible in the photo. serves to confirm (or otherwise) the
The workpiece needs to be parallel alignment of the workpiece to
precisely level and precisely parallel to the mill’s Y-axis.
the mill-table. The latter is relatively Finally, it is necessary to find the
easy to achieve, with a little patience centre of the face into which the
and an edge-finder. In the former groove needs to be cut (the wider of
case, we used two methods: the first the two faces on the bar). Whilst this
was to deploy a digital inclinometer, can be done by a little trigonometry (I
with a magnetic base.
With this method, it is first
necessary to ensure that the reference
machine vice is level – or at least to
37 38
note what angle it subtends to
horizontal (Photo 37). As can be seen,
our mill is pretty well set up in this
regard. The workpiece itself can then
be measured (Photo 38) and adjusted,
for example using shims in either the
vice or a V-clamp.
The second method was to use an
electronic edge-finder, essentially as a
depth probe (Photo 39). The DRO
Z-reading is checked at two points
some distance apart along the bar and
39A 39B
set Matthew this as an exercise, which order to make it distinctive, and the
he got right in method but wrong due location of this mark again measured.
to misunderstanding how to use the This process can be repeated as many
calculator built into Microsoft times as necessary to find the centre
Windows!), it can also be done by position. As can be seen in the photo,
FIGURE 39A/B: Re-checking that bar is level by a different observation relatively quickly/easily. it took us three iterations to do this.
means; (a) reference position and (b) measurement position. The centreline doesn’t need to be Once the central position has been
perfect, as the blade has a little lateral found, it is probably a good idea to
PHOTO 40: Setting tool-height – the three ‘scratches’ show ‘slack’, in use, and can move small zero the Y and Z axes on your DRO (if
the attempts at doing this; callipers can be used to measure amounts to accommodate errors you have one) as it makes it easier to
the position of the (very light) cut and adjustments to the Y made here. then set the required cut depth for the
and Z axes made accordingly. These scratches will, of course, The iterative method involves final V-groove.
be milled away when cutting the groove. setting the edge of the milling cutter’s The depth of a cut required in
‘corner’ to approximately the correct both of the Y and Z directions, in
PHOTO 41: Completed anvil, after painting (and some use!). position and then taking a short, light, order to form an a mm depth in the
cut (Photo 40). The position of the centre of the ‘V’, is given by:
PHOTO 42: U-section before milling. resulting score line can then be Y & Z cut depth = √2 x a
measured (for example using callipers)
PHOTO 43: U-section after milling and painting. and the tool position re-adjusted. So, for example, to achieve the
A second light cut can then be desired 4mm V-depth in a single pass,
Photos and diagrams by the authors taken, slightly longer than the first in a cut depth of 5.66mm in both Y and
Z axes would be required. With many
44 45 46
as the angle-iron pieces will absorb gravity) in the milled V-groove PHOTO 44: 14mm diameter in position.
the majority of any such loads discussed above. This rod is capable of Bending blade This photo illustrates the use of
present, in use. ‘sharp’ bends when used with the with 6mm square small neodymium magnets in order to
angle-iron base shown in Figure 4 in cross-section hold the rod in place. These can be
Bending options part 2 of this series. rod resting in used whilst the workpiece is being
An example range of options for Photo 45 and 46 show increasing the V-shaped positioned and initial bending
bending-rods, which can be sizes of round cross-section rod (also groove. This pressure is applied. After this point,
accommodated by the tool, are shown held in place simply by gravity) – both can be used for the bending pressure alone will hold
in Photos 44-47. In Photo 44 a 6mm fit and centre easily. Finally, Photo 47 tight (minimum the rod in place and the magnets can
square cross-section rod is shown shows the blade inverted (as it would radius) folds. be removed, if they are likely to
placed (but not held, other than by be in use) with a much larger rod of impinge upon the bend.
PHOTO 45:
Blade with 5mm
47 diameter rod in
the V-shaped
49
groove. This will
result in slightly
greater than (but
close to) a 2.5mm
radius bend.
PHOTO 46:
Blade with 8mm
diameter rod in
the groove – this
still fits securely
and produces a
slightly greater
than 4mm
radius bend.
48 PHOTO 47:
Finally, bending
blade (inverted,
to its correct
orientation) with
a 14mm diameter
rod held in the
groove by small
neodymium
magnets. These
allow blade to
be positioned
on work-piece
but will have no
impact on the
bend itself.
AT THE TRACK
A word of warning...
Stuart tells a sorry tale to alert clubs to the dangers at tracks that seem safe...
BY STUART ROTHWELL
E
ncouraged by the articles I wrote
in recent times for EIM I
became involved in the
restoration of a 5-inch gauge half-a-
mile long track formally known as the
Moss Bank Model Engineering
Society. It was run for the public in the
1980s but the then society eventually
closed down and the track was used by
a local fairground as part of the
attractions in the park – eventually it
stopped altogether about six years ago.
The population of Bolton that a huge success and the line has “It proved
frequent this park have fond memories received massive amounts of easy for
of having rides on the line with their encouragement from the residents
parents and were very disappointed at who were able to take their children these
the closure. Some 2½ years ago and on a nostalgia trip. crooks
with encouragement from our council Around 1am on Saturday 5th who with
a very small group decided to attempt June, however, a group of thieves stole the right
a rescue – I joined the group and since all the aluminium rail on the line
most of the physical engineering work including the new stock we had for equipment
had been done to the track, passenger repairs and in doing so destroyed all did not undertaking with very few people and
trucks and locos I concentrated on the of the track. have any no finance, but we will see. EIM
legal, health & safety and insurance I write this in order to warn other problems
side of things. societies that though they believe The Editor adds: A cautionary tale
Eight weeks ago we opened to the their property is secure, which ours getting indeed. Sadly such thefts are
public, running only diesel-outline was, it proved easy for these crooks what they becoming more common due to rising
locos for now and in a quiet way who with the right equipment did not wanted...” prices of metal. If any person or
whilst we allowed the track to settle have any problems getting what they organisation feels able to help Stuart
and our volunteers got used to the wanted. We do not know what we will Photos by and his fellow members we will gladly
procedures. I have to say that it proved do now, restoration again is a major the author pass on your contact details.
Restoring a Gauge 1
Midland Compound
Anthony’ G1 restoration project this month begins to tackle the locomotive itself.
BY ANTHONY WHITE Part Five of a short series
Hitting rock bottom
I
now turn to the perhaps more
exciting and engineering part of Once I had the two frames separated it
the project; the restoration of the was time to remove paint, glue and
locomotive – firstly the chassis and general thick grime from them so I
then the superstructure. The chassis I used a paint stripper followed by
had to begin with is shown in Photo really hot soapy water. This I felt was
28, and as I previously found with the the low spot of the rebuild, it becomes
bogie and tender, the back-to-back a horrible thick gunky mess and I did
wheel measurement was incorrect for worry that I would discover that part pieces soldered to the inside of the
the standards so I needed first to of the chassis was plastic – I already frames in the appropriate places,
dismantle the chassis and remove the knew it had been a loco with insulted drilling holes through to take the 8BA
cross-pieces by a mix of unsoldering wheels for two-rail track pickup – and screws of the existing cross-pieces.
and localised heating, to break down my restoration would become a major This can just be seen in Photo 30
the glue and dismantle it into its rebuild. But once the job was done where the front spacer has been
component parts. and I was starting to clean up the widened with a 1mm extra nickel-
I described in Part 1 the challenges metal things begin to look better. silver layer soldered in place on the
of getting wheels off their axles on the With the wheel back-to-back PHOTO 28: The inner aspect of the frames.
side where the spokes had been sawn having to be increased by 2mm on the chassis before The spacer further back for the
through and re-glued, as I dare not get tender and bogie the same was restoration. bogie fixing has not yet been replaced
too much heat into those spokes. After required of the width of the main loco but the 1mm thick packing piece is
dealing with the remaining driver on frames, so I replaced the two round PHOTO 29: just visible soldered in position and
its ‘solid’ side I used a small blowlamp cross-pieces with new turned ones The main frames drilled with matching holes, although
close to the axle into the wheel on the 37mm rather than 35mm long. separated, but as it has been filed and shaped to the
‘fragile’ side, with the wheel itself The rectangular cross-pieces were still with cylinders frame it is quite difficult to see.
placed in a packing of ice before of a hard non-metallic material and I and the slide Increasing the frame width by
heating the axle. This seemed to wanted to avoid completely remaking bars attached. 2mm means moving the cylinders and
quickly do the trick without damaging them, as it would have meant buying their associated parts in by 2mm. As
the glued spokes and I finally had the in some suitable material. So I added Photos by the cylinders sit in a shaped brass
frames apart as shown in Photo 29. 1mm thick matching rectangular the author block (Photo 31), this was an easy task
as all I had to do was mill away 1mm
30 31
lower end of the hangers are put in brake hangers from being fitted in paint the chassis was an unnecessary
place. One or more will be skewed and their correct position. It needed chore that could easily be avoided.
worse when the pull rods are added redesigning and remaking and that I have previously detailed how I
these will not be parallel to the ground became the next job after I had worked on the tender and bogie
or each pair in line. quickly checked that my replacement wheels, but doing the drivers was a job
I did move each brake fitting point motor and gearbox would also fit the I had been putting off. Restoring them
1mm further out from the axle centre chassis without modifications. first required the chipped paint to be
of each driver than on the prototype, The new rear spacer was fabricated PHOTO 30: removed, again without damaging the
to accommodate the slightly larger with some scraps of brass angle and a Front frame glued spokes on one side and fitting
flanges on the model. Once happy that piece of ⅛-inch thick brass 15mm x spacer increased the new longer and now telescopic
the side shown in the photo was going 37.5mm to fit between the rear of the in width by metal axles. I had been thinking about the
to be satisfactory I repeated the frames. Its shape is not important, spacers added to two major issues, getting the back-to-
changes for the other frame. except that the hole for the rear fitting inside of frames. back correct at 42mm and quartering.
screw needed to be measured up Getting the paint off required a
Adding some spring carefully so that it lined up with the PHOTO 31: combination of isopropyl alcohol and
Reviewing the new chassis, I realised existing screwed hole in the cab floor. A cylinder and its elbow grease with wire brushes, files,
that though it didn’t have real sprung I decided to paint the now holding block. grit blocks and emery paper. It was
suspension it even lacked any obvious complete chassis before replacing the very definitely a tedious job but
cosmetic spring detail, leaf springs for drivers, although the brake gear still PHOTO 32: important as the wheels are quite
the rear and twin coils at the front. So had to be redesigned, remade and The chassis prominent on the finished model.
I faked it and manufactured these added. All the 12BA steel bolts for reassembled I also had to repair part of one
from a couple of spring castings in my holding the brake gear were in place 2mm wider and driver as it had some missing spokes
scrap box and some old coil springs – I put a short length of plastic tube now with 12BA where a magnet had been glued. It was
and scraps of brass and nickel silver. over each to keep paint off the threads. brake hangers a dirty, laborious and boring job – the
The result before and after can be seen I then thoroughly degreased and in position. alternative would have been turning
by comparing Photo 32 with Photo 33. cleaned everything and with a length new castings, which I would have
For the coil springs the dimensions of wooden dowel in the main bearings PHOTO 33: enjoyed a little better and which
are approximations of works drawing I sprayed it all with primer and a Cosmetic spring probably would have been quicker.
dimensions – the top is an 11mm couple of coats of black enamel. arrangement I decided to paint the spokes and
length of brass angle drilled and Experience had taught me that getting fitted under faces of the drivers before starting on
s
tapped for 10BA bolts, over which fits the brake gear and wheels off again to the frames. fitting the axles. I felt I needed to have
some 3.5mm brass rod. This is drilled
1.7mm to fit into some Mark Wood
coil springs that are 4mm outside
diameter. This brass tube helps fill the
32
interior of the spring coil and keep
everything symmetrical –the springs
having an internal diameter of about
3mm didn’t sit comfortably and
straight over the 10BA bolts with an
external diameter of 1.7mm.
At the bottom is a scrap of brass of
4mm x 10mm with holes to go over
the lower end of the spring, tube and
10BA bolts. The whole lot is tightened
up to slightly compress the springs for
a better appearance.
The frames were then reassembled
33
and it was then necessary to see how
this widened chassis would fit under
the body. Apart from a little filing at
the lower end of the reversing lever on
the bodywork it seemed to settle in,
but the rear chassis spacer was no
longer usable as it prevented the rear
37
A
s a child, like many of us I was
drawn to building models, and
of course, at school we had
these arts and crafts lessons – a
welcome relief from learning ‘times
tables’ and ‘weights & measures’,
although those skills did come in
handy too.
One of my earliest attempts at
building a model was inspired by news
of the latest transport technology –
the SRN1 hovercraft. But, surprisingly
the idea for the real thing had a very
long history and was almost 250 years
old, although like many of us my first
thoughts were directed to Christopher
Cockerell, creator of the SRN1.
The original concept came from a
Swedish theologian, a philosopher
with a passion for science. Emanuel
Swedenborg had studied physics at
Uppsala in Sweden, and travelled
across Europe, through the the 20th Century as either theories or ABOVE: Popular image of the hovercraft, here on the Isle
Netherlands, Germany and England. small-scale models. One of the most of Wight service in summer 1980. Photo: Andrew Charman
He returned to Sweden in 1715, and in ingenious perhaps came during the
his own publication Daedelus in 1716 First World War, when a fast torpedo BELOW: The author’s interest in model hovercraft was
described his own design for a “Flying boat was built in Austria, based on a stoked by plans published by MAP, still available in the 1970s.
Machine”, which was described as design by Dagobert Müller von
resembling an upside-down boat. At Thomamühl. This was powered by a BOTTOM LEFT: Emanuel Swedenborg’s design for a ‘Flying
the heart of this – literally – was a six-cylinder engine driving two Machine’ from 1715, operated by manpower!
control position, with a paddle used to propellers, but the key component was Image: Swedenborg/Wikipedia Commons
compress the air beneath the boat, to a four-cylinder engine driving a fan to
provide lift. blow hot air down the hull to create an
Clearly manpower alone would air cushion, the vessel described as a
never provide enough force to provide ‘Hydrofoil with Thomamühl system’.
the necessary lift – so it remained Later, the eminent Russian rocket
simply a sketch on paper. There was scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, who
then around a 150-year gap until in had been working on aerodynamics
Britain, Sir John Thornycroft began and rocketry since the late Victorian
experimenting with the idea of using a era, turned his attention to jet aircraft
‘film’ of air to reduce the drag and gas turbines, and in the 1920s
between the hull of a ship and water. published his design for a train riding
There was no intention to try and use on an air-cushion.
air to ‘lift’ the ship, but simply to In fact, Tsiolkovsky had been
provide less friction. developing the idea of the hovercraft
Various other ideas appeared in since 1921, publishing a fundamentally
▲
Cold storage
They were not keen, and oddly, and
sadly, the design disappeared into the
bowels of Whitehall for some time RIGHT: The
around 1955 and was placed on the first passenger
‘Secret’ list – this was the time of the hovercraft SRN.2
early battles of the ‘Cold War’. Not captured at
until 1958 was the design and its Weston-super- Saunders-Roe coming under the mounted fan – the outer casing of the
supporting technology declassified, Mare beach in Westland umbrella and from the cylinder was reinforced to protect the
and whilst the ‘authorities’ delayed, August 1963. company’s involvement with both crew in the event of a catastrophic
reports had been received by This craft carries sides of the aero industry, it was engine failure.
developments of the technology the ‘Westland’ perhaps why the NRDC awarded the A simple cab was placed at the
overseas – much to the annoyance of logo, in contrast project to build the world’s first forward end, where the captain, or
its creator and his supporters. to the NRDC hovercraft to Saunders-Roe. pilot would be positioned – this was
It was as a result of these reports lettering on its initially built without doors for its
that a Whitehall official and Cockerell predecessor. Nautical 1 maiden outing and not very watertight
persuaded the Ministry of the need to Its unique hull The go-ahead to complete this for its occupants.
act quickly, and approval was given to shape, complete revolutionary project, from its The air drawn in by the fan and
the National Research & Development with bow, was a previously ‘secret’ classification, was used for lift could also be directed
Corporation (NRDC) to build and test success. Image: swift. It began with the prototype through twin ducts at the outer edges
a full-size working hovercraft. And Rocknrollmancer/ model, which had a large, inverted fan of the structure to provide propulsion
this led to the involvement of aircraft Wikipedia Commons in the centre to provide lift and a and manoeuvrability. At the end of
manufacturer Saunders-Roe. ‘driving cabin’ at the front. Air was each duct were simple aerofoils used
A year earlier there had been a BELOW: The diverted through ducts from the for changing the direction of airflow.
massive re-thinking of air defence SRN.3 was central fan to provide propulsion. The The power unit to drive the lift fan
philosophy in Britain, outlined in the the last of the ‘model’ was tested over land as well as was an Alvis Leonides nine-cylinder
1957 Defence White Paper, which prototypes, and water, to confirm that it was able to radial piston engine, which developed
called for manned combat aircraft to the first to be clear obstacles safely. 450hp – later examples of this engine
be replaced by missiles. fitted with Rolls The world’s first full-sized were developed for use in light
This clearly had an immediate Royce ‘Gnome’ hovercraft was initially known as the transport aircraft and trainers, as well
effect on manufacturing in Britain, power units. Model A and consisted essentially of a as Sikorsky and Westland helicopters.
especially in design and planning Here it is on riveted aircraft-grade aluminium Including the design and testing
phases. The previous programme had Interservice trials, alloy sheet buoyancy tank, coated with phases, the 7-ton, 20 feet long, almost
included a new interceptor aircraft IHU lettering a thin layer of pure aluminium to circular craft by then known as SRN.1
type, designated SR.177, which was to prominently protect against corrosion. Set in a (Saunders-Roe Nautical 1) was built
be built by Saunders-Roe at its factory displayed. large cylinder in the middle of the and launched in less than eight
on the Isle of Wight. The company Image: Jasta013/ upper surface of this ‘deck’ was the months. This rapid development of
had been in the aircraft and Wikipedia Commons such a new and unusual craft as a
craft’s engine and horizontally ▲
shipbuilding industries for many
years, and was well known for its
flying boats – the first and last
jet-powered flying boats built in 1947.
The age of the flying boat was over
by 1950, and in the fixed-wing arena,
Saunders-Roe developed an
innovative ‘mixed propulsion’ fighter
aircraft as an interceptor. The SR53
combined the use of a rocket engine to
achieve maximum rate of climb and
attack hostile aircraft together with a
jet engine to allow the plane to return
to its home airfield.
Saunders Rowe was also heavily
involved in the early days of autogiros
and helicopter development, with a
controlling interest in one of the
pioneer businesses. The restructuring
of Britain’s aerospace industries in the
1950s under the British Aircraft
Corporation (fixed wing) and
Westland Aircraft (helicopters) led to
By 1963, the military had some orders globally for hovercraft was such as P&O, Swedish American Line
interest in hovercraft and formed an overshadowing Britain’s pioneering and Swedish Lloyd were keen to join,
Interservice Hovercraft Trials Unit, at efforts. One MP, during a debate in but the port facilities at either end of
the Royal Navy’s base HMS Daedalus Parliament shortly after the huge the route were not open to them for
at Lee-on-the-Solent close to ABOVE: SRN.4 SRN.4 was launched, commented “I conventional ferry services.
Portsmouth. Unsurprisingly a new design at Dover will turn for a few minutes to In 1966 the two Swedish
military hovercraft designated SRN.3 in 1973, seen here hovercraft. The British Hovercraft companies formed ‘Hoverlloyd’ to
appeared – this like SRN.2 was with the cargo Corporation has 90 per cent of the operate a Calais to Ramsgate service
produced under the Westland brand, ramp down, and market and it made the very big and using the SRN.6 craft whilst awaiting
but by 1964, all the hovercraft in ‘Hoverlloyd’ bold jump from the 7 to 10 tons SRN.5 the larger SRN.4 vessels. From 1969
businesses were merged into the markings. Photo: and 6 to the huge SRN.4, just the company took on four of the larger
British Hovercraft Corporation (BHC). GeorgeLouis/ launched. But technically the new vessels and operated between the
Between 1966 and 1974, SRN Wikipedia Commons hovercraft is not very different in newly built hoverports on both sides
types were operated by the design and layout from the small of the Channel well into the 1970s.
Interservice Hovercraft Trials Unit, ABOVE RIGHT: vessels. Will this new craft be Competition with British Rail’s
with various programmes intended to SRN.4 at Dover commercially viable at a capital cost of Seaspeed was fierce, and by the late
test the structure and its operations to Hoverport in £1½ million? It was designed at a time 1970s sales were falling and losses
the limit. With the success of the 1980, from where of shortage in cross-Channel mounting. In the early 1980s,
technology established BHC went on it operated shipping, but now that there are 16 to Seaspeed and Hoverlloyd were merged
to design and build more and bigger services to Calais 18 ships a day crossing the Channel, to form ‘Hoverspeed’. But the
craft – the SRN.5 and SRN.6 were the and Boiulogne competition will be severe.” economics were against these large
most numerous of these, launched in under the British craft and despite restructuring, the
1964 and 1965 respectively. In 1967 Rail Seaspeed Cross-Channel operation frequent services were dwindling, as
the biggest craft of all was launched – banner. Photo: In the 1960s, British Rail was the the competition from large hydrofoils
the SRN.4 or ‘Mountbatten Class’ was Murgatroyd49/ owner and operator of a number of and of course the opening of the
perhaps the most famous of all Wikipedia Commons coastal and ferry services, including Channel Tunnel spelled the end.
hovercraft and provided the basis for its ‘Sealink’ traffic between Dover and Today, the military usefulness of
commercial cross-channel services for BELOW: Calais, and it was a logical step to the hovercraft and its ability for search
several years – yet only six were built. Twilight of the exploit the new technology in the and rescue duties is exploited in many
A ’crossover’ between air and land technology – cross-Channel ‘British Rail places, but in Britain, sadly, that
transport saw the arrival of the Hoverspeed’s Hovercraft’ services. In 1965, BR had a potential was never fully realised.
‘cushion craft’, such as those Mark III SRN.4 50/50 partnership with SNCF (French A museum near Gosport in
developed by plane maker Britten- arriving in National Railways), to operate these Hampshire is dedicated to the
Norman, and which appeared only Dover on its last new services from ‘hoverports’ at memory of this remarkable craft – the
two years after SRN.1. As the commercial flight Dover and Calais, under the brand Hovercraft Museum has more than 50
company was developing STOL (Short on 1st October name ‘Seaspeed’. craft on display. Here it is still possible
Take Off & Landing) it seemed an 2000. Photo: These two were not, however, to experience a trip on one of these
opportunity. Britten-Norman was also Andrew Berridge/ alone in the competition for cross fascinating vehicles more than 60
based on the Isle of Wight, and Wikipedia Commons Channel traffic, as ferry operators years after their birth. EIM
though its first product – the CC1 –
hovered successfully, it was not until
the CC2 arrived a year later that the
air from the lift engine (a 240hp
Rolls-Royce V8) was deflected to
provide effective propulsion. The
company went on to improve and
develop these cushion craft, although
it too was later absorbed into the
British Hovercraft Corporation.
For making lake and short sea
crossings, the hydrofoil was a serious
contender, and whilst most did not
have car-carrying capability, they
were certainly competition to the
hovercraft for many services.
As early as 1967, the lack of major
T 1
hankfully after all the hard
work that had been put in on
‘Sherpa’, the Fairbourne
Miniature Railway’s 6-inch scale
Darjeeling B-class (and described in
recent editions of this column – Ed),
the locomotive went into traffic on the
day before the May bank-holiday Gala
and then performed well throughout
the three-day event.
The Gala also gave me the kick up
the behind to finish re-commissioning
my 7¼-inch Scamp petrol loco that I
had inherited just before lockdown. It
had languished in a somewhat leaky
shed for two and a bit years before I
managed to bring it to my house and
start work on it, although it turned
out to not need too much
mechanically – a new belt for the
generator drive, a new clutch cable, a
few adjustments, drain the fuel and
then off it went! Unfortunately, it only
went in one direction... investigation it turned out that the badly between the layers and the rust
After a little investigation this was two c-channel steel sections, that had jacking had applied enough force to
traced to the forward/reverse switch been welded on top of each other to break two 3-inch long welds.
contacts being dirty, however the issue form the chassis, had started to rust Unfortunately to sort this issue
was only discovered on the Saturday
afternoon of the Gala, the loco having
run on the short multi-gauge section
of track at the Fairbourne’s Barmouth
PHOTO 1:
Two of Harry’s
projects running
2
Ferry terminus station (see last well, Darjeeling
month’s Club News pages) using a 0-4-0ST ‘Sherpa’
friend of mine’s 5-inch gauge battery with new axles,
electric Ruston as a reverse gear. cranks and crank
pins and his
Friendly fuel 7¹₄-inch gauge
After a load of mechanical operation, Scamp which has
the switch contacts were clean enough required a bit of
to operate and the Scamp was back to recommisioning.
working as it should. On a slight side The 5-inch gauge
note, I am now running the loco wagons are very
entirely on a synthetic four-stroke fuel interesting in
called Aspen 4 – this has two
advantages over petrol from the
pumps: it does not degrade in the tank
how they were
built – a story for
another time!
3
over time so it can be left for a long
period without having to drain the PHOTO 2: One
tank between runs and it will not of the welds split
attack the various engine components on a carriage.
over time like E5 petrol can. I get my
supply from my local lawnmower PHOTO 3: The
supply shop. rust jacking that
With the Gala successfully out of caused the weld
the way I was about to start work on to split.
various other projects when I noticed
one of our semi-open carriages had a Photos by
weld that had split. Upon the author
9 10
the gasket face clean. As the firm charged by Ports to ponder behind on the spacer casting that the steam
the day, I continued to strip the loco down Once the loco had been stripped down I had passages didn’t line up and created a step.
until more asbestos gasket material was my first opportunity to really look at the This is really not good for steam flow,
found at which point they would step in, deal cylinder porting and how it passes through especially with a design that has long steam
with it and dispose of it in a safe manner. the frames – unfortunately this is going to passages. How I proceed will require a lot of
I found there were asbestos gaskets on create some challenges. As you can see in the thought – I am currently leaning towards
the front and rear cylinder covers and photos, the steam passages from the cylinder putting a piston valve conversion onto it,
between the cylinder casting and the valve bore to the inside edge of the cylinder casting both to improve the porting but also to
chest spacer. It is worth noting that the loco are extremely close to the clamping studs – reduce the load on the valve gear which has
was only built in 1979 so anyone working on this necessitated the builder putting been excessive over the years – as I will show
slightly older locos needs to be aware that significantly smaller studs in this position to you next month!
they could contain asbestos gasket material allow for any sort of land for a gasket. The other interesting feature that
that will require appropriate action. You can also see from the impression left removing the cylinder has revealed, is the
12 13
16
T
his annual and always enjoyable
1 HEADING:
event at the Ryedale SME took
place over the weekend of the
A line-up really 14th-15th May and as usual the
epitomising the preparations for the rally started on
appeal of the Friday, with many of the locomotives
Mainline Rally arriving along with the rolling stock
with a B1 and an and being unloaded and put into
O4 waiting to storage for the next day’s operations.
leave the up yard There is a very good hydraulic
as a B1 passes locomotive lift adjacent to the Gilling
with a coal train. track’s shed so that engines and large
stock can be unloaded directly onto
PHOTO 1: The the system without any problems
useful hydraulic (Photo 01). It is also a good time to
locomotive lift at catch up with lots of people who have
the Ryedale track travelled to be present – one visitor
leads directly to had travelled all the way from
the shed roads. Australia to be there and enjoy the
atmosphere which is ‘Gilling’.
2 PHOTO 2:
An impressive Scale action
fleet awaiting The railway is located in the village of
their turns as Gilling East which is about 20 miles
Geoff Moore north of York and the rally is
backs his little organised by the Ryedale Society in
GWR 0-6-0 conjunction with the Ground Level
Saddle tank 5-inch Gauge Mainline Association
onto the main (GL5). For readers who are not
turntable to familiar with this event, it is a rally
collect his first where apart from the loco drivers, no
train of the day. passengers of any kind are carried on
trains. All the operations are based on
Photos by British Railways practice from the
the author steam age and all locos and stock are
6 7
engine movements the signalmen have Another very pleasing aspect of busy, one as the station pilot driver
to concentrate very hard to ensure these weekends is the number of and another learning the signal box
there are no near-misses or accidents younger people actively involved with operations. There is always
and with two boxes to man they are all the many operations needed. A encouragement for these young people
always busy (Photo 06). couple of 8 year-olds were both kept and another young man from the
PHOTO 6: Tyneside club was quite happy and
Erimus signal content driving an A3 loco without
8 box provides a
good view for
any problems at all (Photo 07) – 16
year-old Sam Yields came through the
operators of the Young Engineers section at his club
yard and main and is now fully capable of handling a
line at Gilling. large engine at these sort of rallies.
PHOTO 7: Well-travelled
Among many The visitor from Australia was Neil
young people Howley, a member at the Boxhill club
involved was in Melbourne and he was thoroughly
16-year-old Sam enjoying himself as he absorbed the
Yields from the sights, sounds and smells of this busy
Tyneside club rally. When I caught up with him he
– here heading was with Mike Aherne who was
back to the shed steaming his King Arthur class loco
after his shift. ‘Queen Guinivere’ with some eco-coal
he was trying out and this was making
PHOTO 8: plenty of smog to add to the
Visitor from atmosphere (Photo 08).
Australia Neil Since my last visit to Gilling the
9 Howley certainly
enjoyed himself,
steaming bays have been fitted out
with a new roof (Photo 09) which
here chatting certainly helps with the weather that
matters model sometimes affects the running at the
engineering rally. This year though the event was
in the steaming blessed with fine dry and warm
bay with conditions which always helps.
Mike Aherne. I always like to see rare locomotive
prototypes and Gilling is one of those
PHOTO 9: events where they often appear – this
Part of what year was no exception. The model of a
Gilling is all about War Department 2-10-0 named
– discussions ‘Dame Vera Lynn’ (Photo 10) really
about everything stood out – finished in olive green it
railway-related was an excellent example.
10 go on under
the new roof
There were some good double-
header combinations as well – the
covering the Doug Hewson-designed BR Standard
steaming bays. Class 4 2-6-4 tank loco combined with
his tender version of the loco (Photo
PHOTO 10: 11) made for a good display. The
A rare example double-chimney engine was driven by
of a 2-10-0 War Paul Uttfield while Doug’s own engine
Department was driven by Joe Gibbons and a fine
locomotive sight they made as they handled their
awaits its turn. heavy passenger train with ease.
11 12
PHOTO 14: John Gaye waits for the signal on the up line
with a train of steel hauled by his LMS ‘Crab’ 2-6-0.
Family affair
The father-and-son combination of
Steve and Matt Andrews, who are
14
regulars at these events, displayed
their driving skills on the extended
Royal Mail train which was coupled
up to an LNER V2 and an LMS Jubilee
class loco (Photo 12), demonstrating
the sights of yesteryear very well.
The weekend continued with
constant loco changes and movements
in and out of the shed combined with
lots of shunting in the yards. If railway
operations are your interest then you
can do no better than visit one of
these events where you will be well
entertained. More than 30 locos were
15
booked in for both days with many
types of wagons and carriages all very
well built and maintained.
The organisation was excellent and
the inner man was amply catered for
by the host club’s catering ladies, who
did a splendid job. My thanks go to
everyone concerned for a great
weekend filled with lots of interest and
banter and some excellent running – it
was a pleasure to be there. EIM
A Britannia Dilemma
Warwick sorts an issue of appearance with an acquired part-built locomotive.
BY WARWICK ALLISON
S
ome time ago I acquired a very
well built 3½-inch gauge
Britannia chassis. The boiler was
part-built, and all in all it was a very
desirable project to finish.
Now a Britannia is a difficult
construction. Apart from lots of bits,
the shape must be correct or else it
will look terrible. And the shape is not
simple! Very little is straight and
right-angled, the cab is low on the
boiler and the sloping-back firebox in
three planes means there is very little
room above the boiler and below the
cab roof for the manifold and other
piping. My loco is to the LBSC design.
The chassis came with some which included a very clear elevation was too high. LBSC did not lag his
drawings, but alas no general line drawing. I have since seen similar boilers and I wanted to lag this one, so
arrangement. I obtained the Model (if not the same) drawing in other I needed said boiler to be a smidgeon
Engineer articles from the club library publications. I scanned this to a PDF lower than what it should have been.
but these were not overly and then imported the drawing into I found that filing the corner of
dimensionally informative. To speed my CAD program. (I use a free one the angled lower throatplate edge
the construction I obtained the tender available online). parallel with the frame did not remove
kit from Model Engineers Laser and I knew what the prototype wheel much material but made a substantial
some loco parts, mainly the smoke ABOVE: The size should be, so measured the wheel difference to the boiler height. I also
deflectors and cab parts. Britannia after size on my CAD drawing. I then removed a small amount of the cross
acquisition – scaled the drawing in the ratio of the chassis member, and soon the boiler
That’s not right some issues wheel sizes to create my 3½-inch level was correct.
I finished the boiler but when placed to address... gauge version. I could then dimension Further troubles were experienced
on the chassis it was clear that things any item I desired! The critical with the cab sides and roof but with
were not right. It was far too high at BELOW: The dimensions were the height from the my CAD program I could find any
the cab end, while the cab sides looked completed loco, rail to the top of the frame, and the dimension I wanted and it was now a
too deep, the cab roof too long. suitably splendid. rail to top of the boiler and cab. straightforward task to manipulate
It was clear I had a problem, but I I found the rear truck rollers were the cab plate sizes to the correct scale.
did not know where the actual FIGURE 1: lifting the rear too high so I removed It was still a squeeze to fit everything
problems were. The missing general The Britannia them. I then set the loco springs to under the cab roof, but with some
arrangement and the dimension- drawing in CAD, give me the correct height, and a space now determined at least I had a
sparse remaining drawings did little dimensioned for frame parallel to the ground. fighting chance!
to help. I needed a dimensioned 3¹₂-inch gauge. The benefit of a CAD drawing of
drawing for 3½-inch gauge. Lagging behind what you are making is that you can
The problem was resolved by Photos and Now that the chassis was sitting easily obtain any dimension you want,
creating my own. I had an elderly but drawing by correctly, I could place the boiler on it many more than are usually shown on
very useful Locomotive Profile book the author and see how it fitted. Of course this drawings. Bliss! EIM
Sisters reunited at
Rhyl Miniature line
F ive of the six ‘Barnes Atlantic’ 4-4-2 steam
locomotives built in the 1920s for
miniature seaside lines are now together at
following engineering work to its boiler,
while the fifth, ‘Billy’ is owned by Rhyl Town
Council and on display in the line’s museum
the Rhyl Miniature Railway, following the at Central Station.
arrival of ‘Billie’ on the north Wales 15-inch Billie was built for the Dreamland
gauge line on 28th June. Miniature Railway in Margate – the loco is
The Rhyl Steam Preservation Trust, thought to have been completed in 1922, and “I would like to thank everyone who has
which runs the Rhyl line, purchased the loco so celebrates its centenary this year. It has supported us during the last few years and
from Austin Moss of the Windmill Farm not hauled public trains since 1983. have made this possible, in particular the
Railway in Lancashire. Austin had already RSPT chairman Les Hughes has wanted passengers who ride on the trains and our
carried out much of the restoration of the to bring all the locos built by Albert Barnes team who operate the railway.”
engine – this will now be completed at Rhyl back together since 1980, when he first The sixth Barnes Atlantic, ‘John’ is in
allowing Billie to enter service alongside started supporting the line. Les described the private ownership – it spent some years
sisters ‘Joan’ and Railway Queen’. arrival of Billie as a real achievement. “It is based at the Evesham Vale Light Railway but
A fourth Barnes Atlantic, ‘Michael’ is another chapter in a dream I have been is now understood to be in storage.
currently being reassembled at Rhyl following for the last 40 years,” he said. Photos: RSPT
REVIEWS
Transport Curiosities, 1850 – 1950
By John Wade
F
our packed pages rounding up
the club action this month,
reflecting just how busy the
scene has been over the past few
weeks, evident in the many magazines
and newsletters sent into EIM Towers
and the pictures arriving from our
various correspondents (Yes – we are
getting some pictures sent in at last!).
We start with the 7¼” Gauge
Society and it is no surprise at all that
the summer edition of 7¼ Inch Gauge
News features on its cover a picture of
chairman Frank Cooper, presenting
awards at the Society’s Nottingham
Mini Gathering on what proved to be
his final duty before his untimely
passing on 3rd May.
In the magazine Society president
Brian Reading pays full tribute to
Frank, commenting that he “was a
great asset not only for our Society but
to model engineering interests in a
variety of fields – he worked extremely
hard on behalf of our Society and his ABOVE: Phil reducing the space between vehicles What is clear from all this is that
contribution was so wide it is difficult Barnes visited on one side. clearly our operations will be watched
to start in trying to record all that he the 7¹₄-inch The HSE has insisted that closely in future by the authorities –
has achieved.” gauge line at manufacturers and designers of you have been warned...
Brian adds that it must not be Hollycombe passenger-carrying miniature railway
forgotten that Frank was also Steam Museum stock (on raised or ground-level track) Fire risk
chairman of the Northern Association on 19th June should ensure there is no potential for Continuing the safety theme and a
of Model Engineers, and “on and pictured the entrapment points. Operators of very serious incident that shows that
occasions, such as at model line’s Tinkerbell railways should appoint a competent smaller-scale locomotives should not
engineering exhibitions, was able to 0-4-2T ‘Bob’ person to assess their stock and if they be treated any less carefully than
juggle the two (or more) hats with running for feel it is capable of trapping passengers larger passenger-carrying examples.
conspicuous ease.... Frank will be the first time should take the vehicles out of service The Gauge 1 Model Railway
greatly missed not only by our Society in some years until they can be rectified. The HSE Association has issued urgent advice
but also the whole world of model following the also advocates continuous instruction, following a fire at a UK model
engineering and heritage railways.” completion of inspection and maintenance regimes engineering club track.
an overhaul. for anyone operating such stock. Fuel leaking from a locomotive at
Carriage safety
Elsewhere the 7¼ Inch Gauge News
publishes the latest advice issued by
the Health & Safety Executive
concerning open vehicles used on
passenger-carrying miniature
railways, and it is advice that every
club operating trains for the public
needs to read and act upon.
The advice follows an incident on
a line in 2021 when a member of the
public got their leg trapped between
the carriage they were travelling on
and the raised track the train was
travelling on. The HSE investigation
concluded that there were no suitable
guards installed to ensure the limbs of
passengers could not extend into the
dangerous entrapment area between
the moving carriage and track. And a
further potential entrapment point
was identified between carriages when
trains round curves in the track,
MEIM22,
STEAMWAYS ENGINEERING LTD
Dovecote House, Main Road, Maltby Le Marsh, Alford,
MEIM22, Lincs, LN13 0JP
Tel/Fax: 01507 206040
Email: info@steamwaysengineering.co.uk
www.SteamwaysEngineering.co.uk
webuyanyworkshop.com
Home workshops cleared,
INCORPORATING MODEL
ENGINEERING PRODUCTS, BEXHILL good prices paid, especially
T: 07811 768382 for those with either Myford
E: apmodelengineering@gmail.com 7 or 10 lathes.
AP Model Engineering
supplies the largest range of Send your photos to
andrew@webuyanyworkshop.com
battery electric diesel outline
Or call me on 07918 145419
ready-to-run locomotives,
locomotive kits, riding cars, rolling
I am also interested in buying
stock and accessories in 5" scale,
Polly steam locomotives,
7¼" scale and 3½" scale. Quality
especially those that need
products at affordable prices!
some ‘TLC’
www.apmodelengineering.co.uk
www.mkmetals.co.uk www.itemsmailorderascrews.com
TO ADVERTISE Trade
enquiries
ADVERTISERS’ INDEX welcome
17D MINIATURES..................................48
HERE CALL
MINTONICS ..........................................49 Manufacturer of Steam Fittings
ABBOTS MODEL ENGINEERING ..............49
AMADEAL ..............................................4
POLLY MODEL ENGINEERING ................52 BEV ON 01778 for Model Engineers
R.A BARKER ENGINEERING ....................50 3” to 6” Scale
AP MODEL ENGINEERING ......................50
BARRETT STEAM MODELS ...................49
SILVER CREST MODELS .........................5 392055 From Lubricators, water gauges,
STATION ROAD STEAM..........................51 gauge glass protectors,
GB BOILER SERVICES ...........................50
STEAMWAYS ENGINEERING ...................46 whistles & sirens,
EDDIE YARWOOD ..................................49
STUART MODELS ...................................2 4” & 6” Injectors
GAUGE 1 MODEL RAILWAY ASSOCIATION47
TEE PUBLISHING ............................46,50
HORLEY MINIATURE LOCOMOTIVES........50 sales@rabarker.co.uk
THE STANTON COLLECTION ..................48
ITEMS MAIL ORDER .............................50 www.rabarker.co.uk
TIGGY ENGINEERING .............................50
J & C R WOOD LTD (METALCRAFT) ........46
TRACY TOOLS .....................................47 Phone: 01245 462100
LIVE STEAM MODELS............................47
WALKER MIDGLEY INSURANCE ..............48 Mob: 07980 855510
MAXITRAK ..........................................45
WE BUY ANY WORKSHOP......................50 Briars Farm, Main Road, Boreham,
MECCANO SPARES ...............................50
WILLIAM ROWLAND .............................45 Chelmsford, Essex CM3 3AD
MILTON KEYNES METALS ......................50