Decline of Reliance Communications LTD
Decline of Reliance Communications LTD
After a short stint in Yemen, Dhirubhai Ambani came back to India in 1957
and set up a yard trading business in Mumbai. In 1973 he set up Reliance, a
synthetic fabrics mill in Naroda, Gujarat. In 1975, the company expanded
into textiles with “Vimal” becoming a national brand. When Reliance
Industries got listed in 1977 on the Bombay Stock Exchange, it had attracted
thousands of small investors to a market then dominated by state run
financial institutions. The company's annual shareholders' meetings were so
well attended they had to be held in a football stadium. The name 'Reliance'
spelled shareholder value.
The company later entered into petroleum refining, financial services, power,
telecom and infrastructure sector. It grew from being a synthetic fabric and
textile company to one of India’s first multinational conglomerate. When
Dhirubhai Ambani died in 2002, Reliance had over two million shareholders,
the largest investor base for any Indian company.
Sensing future growth in the telecom industry and working on the vision of
his late father Dhirubhai Ambani, Mukesh Ambani in 2002 founded a
telecom company named RELIANCE INFOCOMM LTD. It was a part of
the Reliance group of industries offering voice and 2G and 3G data services.
It brought about a revolution in mobile telephony in India. Reliance
Infocomm was later renamed as RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
In 2006 the Reliance group split between Dhirubhai Ambani’s two sons -
Mukesh and Anil Ambani. Younger son Anil Ambani (his group of
companies came to be known as Reliance ADA Group), got the new-age
telecom business, along with the financial services and energy business.
Companies like Reliance Capital, Reliance Infrastructure, Reliance Power
and Reliance Communications came to Anil Ambani whereas the bread-and-
butter petrochemicals operations – Reliance Industries, a Fortune Global 500
company and Indian Petrochemical Corporation Ltd went to the elder son
Mukesh Ambani.
INITIAL DAYS OF THE COMPANY
In the Reliance group, telecom business was the next frontier for growth.
Reliance Infocomm Ltd was founded in 2002. It introduced nationwide
telephony services using CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access)
technology. In 2006 the company rechristened as Reliance Communications
Ltd.
Telecom market started with 2G voice and then shifted to data and internet
heavy 3G and 4G. Reliance Communications used CDMA (Code Division
Multiple Access) platforms whereas its rivals like Airtel, Vodafone and Idea
used the GSM (Global System for Mobile) platform. CDMA was limited to
2G and 3G (second and third generation) telephony. Rcom had to compete
with the GSM based telecom companies not only on price front but also on
the basis of technology.
Heavy investments and stiff competition made it an uphill task. Debts kept
mounting by the day. Heavy debt, plunging profitability and price wars not
only crippled Reliance Communications but affected the whole telecom
industry.
Slowly the decline of Reliance Communication started with its growing debt
without commensurate increase in income. In 2010 Reliance
Communications had a debt of Rs 25,000 crore which ballooned to Rs
43,000 crore by 2017. It had no clear strategy for debt management.
When RCom did sell unfortunately it did not time the sale right. It was
offered over Rs 30,000 crore by Tillman and TPG for its tower and fibre
assets, but when it did a deal with Reliance Jio, the assets were valued at Rs
8,500 crore. Similarly, Sun TV offered Rs 2,500 crore for a 26 percent stake
in Reliance Communications’ direct-to-home business, which eventually it
sold it with no cash.
Finally suppliers like Swedish telecom major Ericsson took the company to
court. It accused the company of deliberate and willful default in payment of
Rs 550 crore, scaled down from the original demand of Rs 1600 crore. It
filled a petition before National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to invoke
insolvency proceedings against Reliance Communications. In May 2018,
the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted three insolvency
petitions against Reliance Communications filed by the Swedish company
Ericsson. Reliance Communications moved the National Company Law
Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and averted bankruptcy proceedings by citing
its telecom infrastructure sale deals with Reliance Jio and Brookfield. It
agreed to pay Ericsson Rs 500 crore as a settlement.
The final nail in the coffin for Reliance Communications’ troubles was the
failure of a potential deal to sell its telecommunication assets including
spectrum to Reliance Jio. To its dismay, the spectrum sale to Reliance Jio
was rejected by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) after Jio
refused to be held liable for any of Reliance Communication’s past dues. Its
towers sale deal with Brookfield also failed. Reliance Communications was
unable to pay Ericsson the promised amount, triggering contempt of court
petitions in the Supreme Court against RCom’s Chairman Anil Ambani.
Chairman Mr. Anil Ambani had to face the humiliation of being threatened
with a jail term by the Supreme Court. Finally Mukesh Ambani helped his
younger brother Anil to pay the Rs 500 crore dues to Ericsson and escape
imprisonment.
Since the split in Reliance group, Anil's fortunes have spiraled downwards.
The companies between the two groups too reflected this trend. The 10-year
compounded annual growth rates (CAGRs) of Mukesh Ambani's Reliance
Industries since the split have been 11.2% (sales), 9.4% (profit) and 17.8%
(returns). The same for Anil's Reliance Group have been 9.4% (sales), -
12.6% (profit) and and -1.7%(returns).
RCom posted a consolidated loss of Rs 30,142 crore for the September 2019
quarter due to provisioning of Rs 28,314 crore for liabilities after the Supreme
Court's ruling on adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues. This loss of of Rs
30,142 crore was the second worst in corporate India history, behind that of
Vodafone Idea losses.
Reliance Communications has been waging legal battles against the telecom
department and other operational creditors over its dues. Lenders – financial and
operational – have put in claims worth almost Rs 90,000 crore against the
company.
After his company posted losses of Rs 30,142 crore for the September 2019
quarter, chairman Mr. Anil Ambani along with four directors - Ryna Karani,
Chhaya Virani, Manjari Kacker and Suresh Rangachar, resigned from the Board
of Directors of Reliance Communications. But the Committee of Creditors
(CoC) rejected their resignations and advised them to continue to perform their
duties and responsibilities as the directors of RCOM and provide all
cooperation in the corporate insolvency resolution process.
RCom in the past had tried to sell its assets to various companies, including
Reliance Jio, to clear debts but the deals did not materialize. Reliance Jio
cancelled the agreement to buy RCom assets as it did not want to bear the
previous liabilities of the debt-ridden firm. Insolvency proceeding against
RCom was started on a case filed by Swedish telecom gear maker Ericsson after
the company failed to clear its dues. As on August 2019, RCom's secured debt
is estimated to be around Rs 33,000 crore. Lenders have submitted claims of
around Rs 49,000 crore in August 2019.
Telecom rivals Reliance Jio Infocomm and Bharti Airtel, besides private
equity firm Varde Partners and infrastructure focused I Squared Capital fund,
are competing for Reliance Communications assets. While Airtel and Jio are
bidding mainly for RCom's 850 MHz spectrum, I Squared Capital is interested
in RCom's data centres and optic fibre assets. RCom's 43,000 towers, housed
under Reliance Infratel, are also up for sale. An asset reconstruction company,
namely UV Asset Reconstruction Company is bidding for these assets.
At the time of its bankruptcy filing, RCom had debt of Rs 46,000 crore, making
it one of India’s largest insolvencies. As many as 53 financial creditors,
including local and foreign banks, nonbanking finance companies and funds,
have claimed Rs 57,382 crore as dues from the company, out of which Rs
49,224 crore has been accepted by the resolution professional. Besides banks,
operational creditors such as tower companies, equipment vendors and DoT
have claimed nearly Rs 30,000 crore in dues, of which over Rs 21,000 crore has
been verified.
These three Chinese banks had agreed to loan $925.2 million to RCom in 2012
on the condition that Chairman Mr. Anil Ambani provided a personal guarantee.
The RCom chairman had travelled to Beijing in 2011 to directly negotiate the
loan with ICBC’s then chairman Jiang Jianqing. The lenders had sought a share
pledge before granting the loans. But now a legal dispute has arose which
centres on whether Mr. Anil Ambani or one of his associates went on to provide
a personal guarantee as security or not. Mr. Anil Ambani claims he never
knowingly provided any guarantee. According to him he had only authorized
his employees to furnish a non-binding "personal comfort letter" to the three
lenders. Somehow, that letter of comfort got converted into what the banks now
argue to be a personal guarantee. A trial will commence next year. Pending the
verdict, the court may ask some or all of the claim to be deposited with it.
Decline of Reliance Communications Ltd.
This topic as project was chosen by me as it demonstrates the entire life cycle of
the company – from its birth, to growth, to its peak, and then its decline and
demise.
Finally it justifies the old age adage – bite as much as you can chew – take debt
that can be repaid for spreading oneself too thin and obtaining high debt to fuel
expansion without a proper business model, can bring down a business.
HYPOTHESIS
To study the factors that can cause a blue-chip company to fall from its peak
to its rock bottom. To see how excessive debt with inconsistent and
declining income can lead to the fall of a company. To see how the coming
of a new business rival having a new business model coupled with changes
in business environment, cause even a well-established company to its
demise. To understand how unforeseen situations like changes in
government policies and new companies entering an already saturated
market can pose a threat to the existence of a company.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Wikipedia
India Today
NDTV News
Economic Times
Rediff.com
Business Standard
Live Mint
Bloomberg
www.ril.com
www.rcom.co.in