EuroCode 4 - Lecture 2
EuroCode 4 - Lecture 2
Development of
a Trans-National Approach
Course: Eurocode 4
Summary:
• A number of terms used in EC4 have a very precise meaning
• The principal components for composite construction are concrete, reinforcing steel, structural steel,
profiled steel sheet, and shear connectors.
• Material properties for each component are defined in other Eurocodes.
• Guidance is given on what methods of analysis, both global and cross-sectional, are appropriate.
• EC4 is based on limit state design principles
• The Ultimate Limit State is concerned with collapse
• The Serviceability Limit State is concerned with operational conditions. These relate specifically to
deflections and crack control, and EC4 provides guidance for controlling both.
• EC4 is structured on the basis of element type, and detailed procedures for the design of beams,
columns and slabs are given in separate sections.
Pre-requisites:
• None
Objectives:
• To describe the structure of EC4.
• To explain some specific technical terms and define principal notation
• To identify the principal components and corresponding material characteristics for composite
construction.
• To introduce the principles of limit state design in relation to composite steel and concrete construction.
• To outline the principles for analysis and design for both ultimate and serviceability conditions for
composite beams, columns and slabs.
References:
• EC4: EN 1994-1-1: Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures Part 1.1: General rules
and rules for buildings.
Contents:
1. Structure of Eurocode 4 Part 1.1
2. Terminology
3. Notation/Symbols
4. Material properties
4.1 Concrete
4.2 Reinforcing steel
4.3 Structural steel
4.4 Profiled steel sheeting for composite slabs
4.5 Shear connectors
5. Frame and element design and analysis
5.1 Ultimate Limit State
5.2 Properties and classification of cross-sections
5.3 Serviceability Limit State
6. Ultimate Limit State
6.1 Beams
6.2 Columns
7. Serviceability Limit State
7.1 Deflections
7.2 Concrete cracking
8. Composite Joints
9. Composite Slabs
10. Concluding Summary
2. Terminology
The Eurocodes define a number of terms which, although often used generally in a rather loose cl. 1.4.2
way, have more precise meanings in the context of EC4. These terms are clearly defined and
include the following:
• ‘Composite member’ refers to a structural member with components of concrete and
3. Notation/Symbols
A complete list of symbols is included in EC4. The most common of these are listed below: cl. 1.6
Symbols of a general nature:
L, l Length; span; system length
N Number of shear connectors; axial force
R Resistance; reaction
S Internal forces & moments; stiffness
δ Deflection; steel contribution ratio
λ Slenderness ratio
χ Reduction factor for buckling
γ Partial safety factor
4. Material properties
4.1 Concrete
Properties for both normal weight and lightweight concrete shall be determined according to cl. 3.1
EC2, but EC4 does not cover concrete grades less than C20/25 or greater than C60/75.
5. Structural analysis
General guidance is given on what methods of analysis are suitable for different circumstances. cl. 5.1.2
cl. 6
6. Ultimate Limit State
The ultimate limit state is concerned with the resistance of the structure to collapse. This is
generally checked by considering the strength of individual elements subject to forces
determined from a suitable analysis. In addition the overall stability of the structure must be
checked.
The ultimate limit state is examined under factored load conditions. In general, the effects on
individual structural elements will be determined by analysis, and each element then treated as
an isolated component for design. Details of individual design checks depend on the type of
member (eg beam, column) and are described in other parts of this course.
The ultimate limit state design for composite connections and composite slabs are dealt with in
Sections 8 and 9 respectively.
6.1 Beams
For beams, guidance is given on the applicability of plastic, non-linear and elastic analysis for cl. 6.3
determining the bending resistance of the cross-section, with full or partial interaction.
Procedures for calculating the vertical shear resistance, including the effects of shear buckling
and combined bending and shear.
Beams with concrete infill between the flanges enclosing the web are defined as partially cl. 6.4
encased, and separate considerations apply to the design for bending and shear for these.
In general, the top flange of the steel beam in composite construction is laterally restrained cl. 6.5
against buckling by the concrete slab. However, in the hogging bending zones of continuous
beams, the compression flange is not restrained in this way, and procedures for checking lateral-
torsional buckling for such cases are given. If a continuous composite beam satisfies certain
conditions defined in EC4, such checks are unnecessary.
Detailed procedures are given for the design of the longitudinal shear connection, including the cl. 6.7
requirements for the slab and transverse reinforcement. A range of different connector types is
considered.
6.2 Columns
Various types of composite columns, including encased sections and concrete-filled tubes, are cl. 6.8
covered. Simplified procedures are given for columns of doubly symmetrical cross-section and
uniform throughout their length. Guidance is given on the need for shear connection and how
this can be achieved.
7.1 Deflections
At the serviceability limit state, the calculated deflection of a member or of a structure is seldom cl. 7.2
meaningful in itself since the design assumptions are rarely realised. This is because, for
example:
• the actual load may be quite unlike the assumed design load;
• beams are seldom "simply supported" or "fixed" and in reality a beam is usually in some
intermediate condition;
The calculated deflection can, however, provide an index of the stiffness of a member or
structure, i.e. to assess whether adequate provision is made in relation to the limit state of
deflection or local damage. Guidance is given on calculating deflections for composite beams,
including allowances for partial interaction and concrete cracking. No guidance is given
regarding simplified approaches based on limiting span/depth ratios.
No reference is given to limiting values for deflections in EC4. It is therefore recommended that EC3 Table
calculated deflections should be compared with specified maximum values in Eurocode 3, which 4.1
tabulates limiting vertical deflections for beams in six categories as follows:
• roofs generally.
• roofs frequently carrying personnel other than for maintenance.
• floors generally.
• floors and roofs supporting plaster or other brittle finish or non-flexible partitions.
• floors supporting columns (unless the deflection has been included in the global analysis
for the ultimate limit state).
• situations in which the deflection can impair the appearance of the building.
The deflections due to loading applied to the steel member alone, for example those during the
construction stage for unpropped conditions, should be based on the procedures of EC3 using
the bare steel section properties.
Deflections due to subsequent loading should be calculated using elastic analysis of the
composite cross-section with a suitable transformed section. Where necessary, methods of
allowing for incomplete interaction and cracking of concrete are given
Detailed guidance is given in relation to the design of composite slabs, for both ultimate and
serviceability limit states. This includes construction stages when the steel sheeting is acting as
permanent shuttering and, in an unpropped condition, must resist the applied actions due to wet
concrete and construction loads. In this case reference is made to EC3 Part 1.3.
Calculation procedures are given for determining the resistance of composite slabs in relation to
flexure, longitudinal shear and vertical shear. Principles for determining stiffness for calculating
deflections are stated, and conditions in which detailed calculations can be omitted are specified
in relation to span:depth ratios.
• The principal components for composite construction are concrete, reinforcing steel,
structural steel, profiled steel sheet, and shear connectors.
• Guidance is given on what methods of analysis, both global and cross-sectional, are
appropriate.
• The Serviceability Limit State is concerned with operational conditions. These relate
specifically to deflections and crack control, and EC4 provides guidance for controlling
both.
• EC4 is structured on the basis of element type, and detailed procedures for the design of
beams, columns and slabs are given in separate sections.