GR-1 Hireng
GR-1 Hireng
DESIGN OF
HIGHWAYS
CHAPTER 3
MEMBERS:
HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT-
One of the alignment problems in this figure corresponds roughly to x and z coordinates
VERTICAL ALIGNMENT-
The other corresponds to highway length (measured along some constant elevation) and y coordinates (elevation).
PRINCIPLES OF HIGHWAY ALIGNMENT
1. Plan view (horizontal alignment)- which is roughly equivalent to the perspective of
an aerial photo of the highway.
2. Profile view (vertical alignment) - which gives the elevation of all points measured
along the length of the highway
PRINCIPLES OF HIGHWAY ALIGNMENT
instead of using x and z coordinates, highway positioning and length are defined as
the distance along the highway (usually measured along the centerline of the
highway, on a horizontal, constant-elevation plane) from a specified point. This
distance is measured in terms of stations, with each station consisting of 100 ft of
highway alignment distance.
where:
GIVEN:
G = - 3.5%
1
G = +0.5%
2
REQUIRED:
Stationing of the PVI = ?
Elevation of the PVI = ?
Stationing of the PVT = ?
Elevation of the PVT = ?
Lowest point of the curve (y)= ?
PROBLEM 3.1
L/2
Stationing of the PVC = 170 + 00
Elevation of the PVC = 1000 ft -3. %
5% .5
+0
PROBLEM 3.2
An equal-tangent vertical curve is to be
constructed between grades of −2.0%
(initial) and +1.0% (final). The PVI is at station
110 + 00 and at elevation 420 ft. Due to a
street crossing the roadway, the elevation of
the roadway at station 112 + 00 must be at
424.5 ft. Design the curve.
PROBLEM 3.2
L
L/2 Stationing of the PVT = ?
Elevation of the PVT = ?
X
Stationing of the PVC = ?
Elevation of the PVC (c) = ?
G
%
1
.0
=
+1
-2
.0
=
%
2
G
Station 112 + 00
Elevation (y) = 424.5 ft
two
Stationing of the PVI = 110 + 00 stations
GIVEN:
G = - 2.0%
1
G = +1.0%
2
where:
K = value that is the horizontal distance, in ft, required to affect a 1% change in the
slope of the vertical curve,
L = length of curve in ft, and
A = absolute value of the difference in grades (|G1 − G2|) expressed as a percentage.
Distance from the PVC to the high/low point:
REQUIRED:
a. The depth, below the surface of the curve, of the
top of the pipe
b. Station of the highest point on the curve
% G2 =
.20 -1.0
= +1 8%
G1
300 ft
= 600 ft
Stopping Sight Distance
Longer curve lengths provide more SSD, all else being equal, but
are more costly to construct.
1
Shorter curve lengths are less expensive to construct but may not
provide adequate SSD due to more rapid changes in slope.
Forrmula :
EXAMPLE 3.5 DESIGN SPEED AND CREST VERTICAL CURVE DESIGN
A highway is being designed to AASHTO guidelines with a 70-mi/h design speed, and at one section, an equal-
tangent vertical curve must be designed to connect grades of +1.0% and −2.0%. Determine the minimum length of
curve necessary to meet SSD requirements.
GIVEN:
G = + 1.0%
1
G = - 2.0%
2
REQUIRED:
Lm = ?
FORMULA:
A x (SSD)
2
Lm =
2158
GIVEN:
G1 = + 1.0% SOLUTION:
G = - 2.0%
2
A=IG -G I
1 2
SSD = 730 ft.
A x (SSD)
2
Lm =
Lm =
2158 2158
2
PVI
(3%) x (730 ft.)
Lm =
G
0%
2158
2
1.
=
+
-2
=
.0
%
1
G
PVC PVT
Lm
Lm = 740.82 ft.
The advantage of this assumption is that the relationship between A and Lm is linear,
and Eq. 3.10 can be used to give Lm = KA
L
K=
A
Lm
K=
A
2
A (SSD)
Lm =
2158
Lm (SSD) 2
=
A 2158
(SSD) 2
K=
2158
ICE
BREAKER
EXAMPLE 3.7 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AND CREST VERTICAL CURVE DESIGN
If the grades in Example 3.5 intersect at station 100 + 00, determine the stationing of the PVC,
PVT, and curve high point for the minimum curve length based on SSD requirements.
a. Station of PVC
G
0%
2
b. Station of PVT
1.
=
+
-2
Y c. Station of Highest Point (Y)
=
.0
%
1
G
Xhl
PVC 370.5 ft. PVT
370.5 ft.
741 ft.
GIVEN:
SOLUTION: PVI
Sta.
a. Sta. PVC = Sta. PVI - L/2
100+00
Sta. PVC = (100+00) - (370.5 Ft.)
Sta. of PVT= ?
Sta. PVT = 103+70.5
PVC PVT
L/2 = 370.5 ft.
GIVEN: K = 247 (from table 3.2)
SOLUTION: PVI
c. Xhl = K ( G 1 )
Xhl = (247)(1%)
G
0%
2
1.
=
Xhl = 247 ft. Sta. Y = ?
-2
Y
.0
Sta. Y = Sta. PVC + Xhl
%
1
G
Sta. Y = (96+29.5) + (247 ft.) Sta. 96+29.5
Xhl
Sta. Y = (96+29.5) + (2+47) PVC PVT
370.5 ft.
Sta. Y = 98+76.5
3.3.4 Stopping Sight Distance and Sag Vertical Curve Design
Sag vertical curve design differs from crest vertical curve design in
the sense that sight distance is governed by nighttime conditions
because in daylight, sight distance on a sag vertical curve is
unrestricted.
the critical concern for sag vertical curve design is the length of
roadway illuminated by the vehicle headlights, which is a function
of the height of the headlight above the roadway and the inclined
angle of the headlight beam, relative to the horizontal plane of the
car.
Forrmula :
3.3.5 Passing Sight Distance and Crest Vertical Curve Design
PVC PVT
H1 H2
Thus, the sum of these four distances gives the required passing
sight distance (PSD).
Table 3.4 Design Controls for Crest Vertical Curves Based on Passing Sight Distance
The minimum distances needed to
pass (PSDs) at various design speeds,
along with the corresponding K-values.
Notice that the K-values in this table
are much higher than those required
for SSD. As a result, designing a crest
curve to provide adequate passing
sight distance is often an expensive
proposition (due to the length of curve
required).
Given:
L = 1000 ft
G1 = +2.5%
G2 = -1.5%
Speed = 55 mi/h
Solution:
From the table, at 55 mi/h, K = 289, Alternatively, solving for K;
solving for L; K = L /A
L=K×A K = 1000 / |2.5%-(-1.5%)|
L = 289 × |2.5% - (-1.5%)| K = 1000 / 4
L = 289 × 4 K = 250
L = 1156 ft *Since the K-value of 250 for the existing curve
design is less than 289, this curve does not
*Since the curve is only 1000 ft long, it is not long
provide adequate PSD for a 55-mi/h design
enough to provide adequate passing sight distance.
speed.
3.3.6 UNDERPASS SIGHT DISTANCE AND SAG VERTICAL CURVE DESIGN
FORMULA:
where
L m= minimum length of vertical curve in ft,
A = absolute value of the difference in grades (|G1−G2|),
expressed as a percentage
3.3.6 UNDERPASS SIGHT DISTANCE AND SAG VERTICAL CURVE DESIGN
Current AASHTO design guidelines use a driver eye height, H1 , of 8 ft for a truck
driver, and an object height, H2 , of 2 ft for the taillights of a vehicle.
S = SSD
for SSD < L for SSD > L
SSD = stopping sight distance in ft, and other terms are as defined previously
Maximum vehicle heights as regulated by state laws range from 13.5 to 14.5 ft. AASHTO recommends
a minimum structure clearance height of 14.5 ft and a desirable clearance height of 16.5 ft.
AASHTO also recommends that clearance heights be no less than 1 ft greater than the maximum
allowable vehicle height.
3.3.6 UNDERPASS SIGHT DISTANCE AND SAG VERTICAL CURVE DESIGN
EXAMPLE 3.13
An equal-tangent sag curve has an initial grade of −4.0%, a final grade of +3.0%,
and a length of 1270 ft. An overpass is being placed directly over the PVI of this
curve. At what height above the roadway should the bottom of this sign be placed?
L = 1270 ft GIVEN:
L/2 = 635 ft L = 1270 ft
LINE OF SIGHT
G1 = -4.0%
Hc
G2 = +3.0%
REQUIRED:
G
%
HC= ?
1
.0
=
+3
-4
.0
=
%
2
G
PVI 2
3.3.6 UNDERPASS SIGHT DISTANCE AND SAG VERTICAL CURVE DESIGN
SOLUTION:
L for SSD < L
K=
A 730 ft < 1270 ft
1270 ft
K=
-4.0% - +3.0%
K = 181. 4 2
A (SSD)
Hc = +5
800L
For a 70-mi/h design speed, 2
the required SSD is 730 ft
7 (730)
Hc = +5
(Table 3.3) 800(1270)
Hc = 8.67 ft
Thus, the bottom of the overpass should be placed at least 14.5 ft
above the roadway surface (at the PVI), but desirably at a height of
16.5 ft according to AASHTO
3.4 HORIZONTAL
ALIGNMENT
3.4.1 Vehicle Cornering
e = 100 tan α
EXAMPLE 3.14 SUPERELEVATION ON HORIZONTAL CURVES
Given:
V = 70 mi/h (5280 ft/1 mi)(1 h/3600 s) = 70(5280/3600) ft/s = 70(1.467) ft/s
e = 8%
fs = 0.10
Solution:
(70 × 1.467)²
Rv = 32.2 [0.10 + (8%/100)] = 1819.40 ft
3.4.2 Horizontal Curve Fundamentals
HORIZONTAL
Elements of a simple curve
Elements of a simple circular horizontal curve
R = radius, usually measured to the centerline of the road in ft,
PC = point of curve (the beginning point of the horizontal curve),
∆ = central angle of the curve in degrees,
PI = point of tangent intersection,
T = tangent length in ft,
E = external distance in ft,
PT = point of tangent (the ending point of the horizontal curve), and
M = middle ordinate in ft, L = length of curve in ft
FORMULA
EXAMPLE 3.15 STATIONING ON HORIZONTAL Sta. 103 + 00
CURVES PI
.
ft
radius. The curve has a tangent length of 400 ft
0
40
and the PI is at station 103 + 00. Determine the
=
T
stationing of the PT. L Sta. of PT = ?
PC PT
GIVEN: R = 2000 ft.
T = 400 ft.
ft.
Sta. of PI = 103+00
0
=2
00
00
REQUIRED:
=2
0
R
ft.
2 2
Sta. of PT = ?
SOLUTION:
Sta. 103 + 00 a. Sta. PC = Sta. PI - T Sta. PT = Sta. PC + L
PI
Sta. PC = (103+00) - (400 ft.) Sta. PT = (99+00) + (789.58 ft.)
Sta. PT = 106+89.58
40
Sta. PC = 99+00
=
T
L Sta. of PT = ?
T = R tan
2
Sta. PT = 106+89.58
PC PT 400 = 2000 tan
2
= 22.62 °
π
ft.
L= R
R
180
0
=2
00
π °
00
L= ( 2000)(22.62° )
=2
0
180
R
ft.
2 2
L = 789.58 ft.
3.4.3 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AND HORIZONTAL CURVE DESIGN
R = radius measured to the centerline of the road in ft,
Ms = middle ordinate necessary to provide adequate
stopping sight distance (SSD) in ft.
Rv = radius to the vehicle’s traveled path in ft,
SSD = stopping sight distance in ft,
PC = point of curve (the beginning point of the
horizontal curve)
Δ = central angle of the curve in degrees,
Δs = angle (in degrees) subtended by an arc equal in
length to the required stopping sight distance (SSD),
PT = point of tangent (the ending point of the horizontal
curve).
L = length of curve in ft
FORMULA:
3.4.3 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AND HORIZONTAL CURVE DESIGN
EXAMPLE 3.16
A horizontal curve on a four-lane highway (two lanes each direction with
no median) has a superelevation of 6% and a central angle of 40 degrees.
The PT of the curve is at station 322 + 50 and the PI is at 320 + 08. The
road has 10-ft lanes and 8-ft shoulders on both sides with high retaining
walls going up immediately next to the shoulders. What is the highest
safe speed of this curve (highest in 5 mi/h increments) and what is the
station of the PC?
3.4.3 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AND HORIZONTAL CURVE DESIGN
EXAMPLE 3.16 Superelevation = 6% GIVEN:
L
STA of PT = 322+50
STA of PI = 320+08
SSD
Superelevation = 6%
= 40°
shoulder width = 8 ft
inside lane width = 10 ft
Ms
PT
PC SIGHT
322+50
10 ft OBSTRUCTION
Rv
PC PT
R = 40° 322+50
8 ft
PI
320+08
3.4.3 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AND HORIZONTAL CURVE DESIGN
SOLUTION:
T = PI - PC T = PI - PC
T = (320+08) - PC Eq. 1 T = (320+08) - (317+44.41)
L = PT - PC T = 263.59 ft
L = (322+50) - PC Eq. 2
T
R=
SOLVING FOR STA OF PC tan
2
T L 263.59 ft
R= R= R=
tan 40
tan
2 180 2
T L R = 724.21 ft
=
tan
2 180 10
Rv = R - 10 -
(320+08) - PC (322+50) - PC 2
= R = 724.21 ft - 10 - 5
40
tan (40) R = 709.21 ft
2 180
STA OF PC = 317+44.41
3.4.3 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AND HORIZONTAL CURVE DESIGN
SOLUTION: Consider the SSD required at 40 mi/h.
superelevation of 6%, at 45 mi/h a SSD = 305 ft
radius of 643 ft is needed; and at 50 MS= R v 1 - cos 90SSD
mi/h a radius of 833 ft is needed Rv
709.21 > 643
90(305ft)
833 > 709.21 MS= 709.21 ft 1 - cos
(709.21ft)
highest design speed for centripetal MS= 16.33 ft
force is 45 mi/h
Consider the SSD required at 35 mi/h.
SSD = 250 ft
SOLVING FOR THE ADEQUATE SIGHT
DISTANCE MS= R v 1 - cos 90SSD
10 Rv
MS = 8 +
2 90(250ft)
MS= 13 ft MS= 709.21 ft 1 - cos
(709.21ft)
M S= 10.99 ft
Thus, 35 mi/h (the highest safe speed for sight distance) is the lower
of the two speeds and is the highest safe speed for this curve.
THANK
YOU!