International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

Alfred Schutz's Perspective in Phenomenology Approach:

Concepts, Characteristics, Methods and Examples
Ruslan Rasid1*, Hilman Djafar2, Budi Santoso3
1
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Sorong, Kota Sorong, Papua Barat 98414, Indonesia dan
Mahasiswa Program Doktor, Kosentrasi Kependidikan Islam,
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
2
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Kota Gorontalo, Gorontalo 96128, Indonesia.
3
Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong, Kab. Sorong, Papua Barat 98414,Indonesia
.
*
Corresponding author:
Email: ruslanrasyid61@gmail.com

Abstract.

Alfred Schutz with his phenomenology introduced the concept of multiple reality. For
Schutz, the reality in this world is not only in the reality of social life, but also
includes fantasy reality, dream reality, etc. Therefore, the aim of this research is to
analyze and describe how the concepts, characteristics, methods and examples of
the use of the phenomenological approach in Alfred Schutz's perspective qualitative
research methodology. The results of the study explain that the phenomenological
approach pioneered by Edmund Husserl has a watchword: zuruck zu den sachen
selbst (back to things themselves) that a method for explain phenomena in their
purity, where these phenomena are anything that in some way appears in human
consciousness . Whether in the form of something as a result of fiction or in the form
of something real.

Keywords: Phenomenology Approach, Qualitative, Alfred Schutz, Concepts and

Methods

1. INTRODUCTION
The term of phenomenology etymologically derived from Greek. From the root
word "phenomenan" or "phenomenon" which literally means "symptoms" or "what
has appeared" so it is real to us. [1] This term was introduced by Johann Heinrickh
Lambert, in 1764. Nevertheless, Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) is more viewed the
father of phenomenology, because of the intensity of his studies in the realm of
philosophy. But, the phenomenology that we know through Husserl is the science of
phenomena. However, Alfred Schutz is better known in building this perspective.
Through Schutz the Husserl's thoughts, which were felt to be abstract, could be
understood and were more "grounded". Schutz was also the first in apply
phenomenology to social science research. For that, in understanding of
phenomenology, the researcher will more refer at Alfred Schutz’s thoughts.

https://ijersc.org/
190
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

Max Weber's theory of social action historically become the basis for the birth
of a phenomenological perspective (also symbolic interactionism). Weber calls social
action when all of a person's behavior when and to the extent concerned gives
subjective meaning to his behavior. According to Weber, human action is essentially
meaningful, involving interpretation, thinking and deliberate action. Social action for
him is an intentional, deliberate action for others and for the actor himself, whose
thoughts are actively interpreting each other's behavior, communicating with each
other, and controlling his own behavior according to the purpose of the
communication. So they mutually direct the behavior of the interaction partners in
front of them. So for Weber, society is an active entity consisting of people who think
and perform meaningful social actions. [3] For this reason, understanding of social
action is carried out by examining the subjective meaning that individuals give to
their actions, because humans act on the basis of the meaning they give to these
actions. [4]
Edmund Husserl then criticized existing scientific phenomena stated that
scientific knowledge has actually been separated from everyday experience from
activities in which experience and knowledge are rooted. Thus, he offers
phenomenology. [5] Husserl developed a philosophical system rooted in subjective
openness, a radical approach to science that continues to be criticized.
Phenomenology, for Husserl, is no use to they who are closed-minded. [6] A
phenomenologist is a person who is open to reality with all possible series of
meanings behind it, without any tendency to evaluate or judge. So it can be said that
phenomenology is a study without prejudice.
Husserl's concept of phenomenology also refers to (influenced) by Max
Weber's concept of verstehen. Verstehen is understanding. Reality is to be understood,
not to explain. According to Husserl, phenomenology is an interest in something that
can be understood directly with their senses. Where all knowledge is obtained through
a "phenomenon" sensor. [7]
Weber's thought about social action is interesting, as well with Husserl as a
source of conceptual basis for Schutz in building phenomenology. [8] Strengthening
Weber's opinion about the importance of social action for humans, Schutz argued that
understanding actions, speech and interactions is a prerequisite for anyone's social
existence. The process of meaning begins with a sensing process, an experience
process which continuous. The stream of sense experience, at first, was meaningless.
Meaning arises when connected to previous experiences and through the process of
interacting with other people.
Alfred Schutz teaches that every individual is present in the stream of
consciousness obtained from the process of reflecting on everyday experiences. By
assuming the existence of other people's reality which is mediated by the way of

https://ijersc.org/
191
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

thinking and feeling, reflection then passed on to others through their social
relationships. According to Schutz, phenomenology as a method is formulated as a
medium for examining and analyzing the inner life of individuals in the form of
experiences regarding phenomena or appearances as they are, which is commonly
called the stream of consciousness.[9]
Besides Husserl and Alfred Schutz, phenomenology developed, among other, in
the thinking of Morleau-Ponty, Martin Heidegger, etc. But in general, from all schools
of phenomenology, according to Lubis [10], have the same belief in terms of:
The belief that human can understand the true reality of a phenomenon.
The belief that there are things that prevent humans from reaching true
understanding.
Desire breaks through the fog (barrier) by seeing the phenomenon itself as is it.

II. DISCUSSION
BASIC CONCEPTS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH WITH A
PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH

The phenomenology that pioneered of Edmund Husserl has a watchword: zuruck zu

den sachen selbst (back to things themselves). [11] Understanding which means that
phenomenology, as said by Husserl a method for explaining phenomena in their purity.
According to Husserl, phenomena are things that in some way appear in human
consciousness. Either in the form of something of fiction or in the form of something
real. [12] Thus, quoting Creswell's oppinion [13] phenomenology seeks to explain the
meaning of the life experience of a number of people about a concept or phenomenon,
including self-concept or their own view of life.

Littlejohn states: "phenomenology makes actual lived experience the basic data
of reality". [14] So in phenomenology, real life experience as the basic data of reality.
So that in the study of phenomenology, what is important is the development of a
method that does not falsify phenomena, but can describe as it appears. For this
purpose the phenomenologist should focus his attention on this phenomenon without
being prejudiced at all. A phenomenologist should abandon all theories,
presuppositions and prejudices in order to understand phenomena as really.
Understanding phenomena as they really is an attempt to return to the goods as they
appear in consciousness.
Unlike the positivistic approach which considers reality is single, Alfred Schutz
with his phenomenology introduced the concept of multiple reality. For Schutz, the
reality in this world is not only in the reality of social life, but also includes fantasy
reality, dream reality, and etc. In this case Schutz modifies the basics of William

https://ijersc.org/
192
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

James's understanding of "parts of the universe". We run into various kinds of reality
or "parts of the universe", from the most important physical world, the world of
knowledge, the world of tribal beliefs, the supernatural world, the world of individual
opinion, to the world of madness, and the world of khalayan. But James did not
discuss the social implications of these different orders of social reality, and this is
what Schutz wanted to further develop.
According to Schutz, the world everyday is an intersubjective world shared with
other people with whom we interact. In this world we always share our stories with
our friends, and with others, who also live and interpret them. Therefore our world as
a whole will never be completely personal, even in our consciousness we will always
find evidence of other people's consciousness. This is proof that our unique
biographical situation is not entirely the product of our own actions.
At this point Schutz's theory is very similar to the symbolic interactionist of
George Herbert Mead. But according to Schutz, the intersubjective world consists of
very multiple realities, in which everyday reality which is common sense or taken for
granted, appears as the main reality. Schutz paid great attention to this common sense
reality. This kind of reality that we accept, putting aside any doubt, unless the reality is
at issue. This common sense reality and everyday existence can be called our practical
importance in the social world.
According to Schutz, the essence of common sense exists automatically, namely
in the everyday world. This is an elaboration by Husserl's Labenswelt. The practical
interest in this common sense reality is contrasted by Shutz with the scientific or
theoretical interests of scientists (scientific reality). Scientific theory is an activity that
aims to observe and understand the world systematically. According to Schutz, people
move not based on scientific theory, but by practical interests. This intersubjective
world is shared by other people who experience it.
CHARACTERISTICS OF PHENOMENOLOGY RESEARCH
Mulyana said that the phenomenological approach is included in a subjective or
interpretive approach. Maurice Natanson further said that the term phenomenology
can be used as a generic term to refer to all views of social science that place human
consciousness and its subjective meaning as the focus for understanding social action.
As a research method, phenomenology, according to Polkinghorne is: “a
phenomenological study describes the meaning of the lived experiences for several
individuals about a concept or the phenomenon. Phenomenologists explore the
structure of cosciousness in human experiences ”(phenomenological studies explain
the meaning of life experiences for some individuals about a concept or phenomenon.
Phenomenologists explore the structure of consciousness in human experience).

https://ijersc.org/
193
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

According to Watt and Berg, phenomenology is not interested in studying the

aspects of causality in an event, but seeks to understand how people experience
something and the meaning of that experience for themselves. [15] Kuswarno further
describes the basic nature of qualitative research, which relevant describes the
methodological position of phenomenology and distinguishes it from quantitative
research:
Explore values in the experience of human life.
The focus of research is on the whole, not on the parts that make up the whole.
The purpose of research is to find the meaning and nature of experience, not
just looking for explanations or looking for measures of reality.
Obtain a picture of life from a first-person perspective, through formal and
informal interviews.
The data obtained is the basis for scientific knowledge to understand human
behavior.
Questions made reflect the interests, involvement and personal commitment of
the researcher.
Seeing experience and behavior as an inseparable unity, be it the unity between
subject and object, or between parts of the whole. [16]
Phenomenology seeks to reveal and understand the reality of research based on
the perspective of the research subject. This requires the union of the research subject
with the supporting subjects of the research object. Involvement of research subjects
in the field to experience is one of the main features of research with a
phenomenological approach. The phenomenology used in this research is in the
perspective of Alfred Schutz which emphasizes the importance of intersubjectivity.
The essence of Schutz's phenomenology is that the understanding of action, speech
and interaction is a prerequisite for any social existence. Schutz explained that
phenomenology examines how members of society describe their everyday world,
especially how individuals with their consciousness construct meaning from
interactions with other individuals.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE WITH
PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH
The application of phenomenology in the qualitative realm can be briefly
explained as follows:
Research focus.
Phenomenological research is essentially concerned with the interpretation of
reality. Phenomenology seeks answers about the meaning of a phenomenon.
Basically, there are two main things that are the focus of phenomenological research,
namely:

https://ijersc.org/
194
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

Textural description: what is experienced by research subjects about a

phenomenon. What is experienced is an objective aspect, data that factual,
things that happen empirically.
Structural description: how the subject experiences and makes sense of his
experience. This description contains a subjective aspect. This aspect
concerns opinions, judgments, feelings, hopes, and other subjective
responses from research subjects related to their experiences. [17]
Determination of informants and research locations
The determination of informants in phenomenological research depends on the
capability of the person being interviewed to be able to articulate their life
experiences. Creswell revealed that the requirements for good informants are: "... all
individuals studied represent people who have experienced the phenomenon" (all the
individuals studied represent people who have experienced the phenomenon).
Meanwhile, the research location can be in a certain place or scattered, with attention
to the individuals who will be used as informants. The problem of numbers is not the
main thing, although Creswell said that there are only 10 informants, the most
important thing is the occurrence of data saturation (data redundancy).
Data collection technique
The main data collection technique in phenomenological studies is in-depth
interviews with informants to uncover the flow of consciousness. In the interview
process, the questions posed were not structured and in a fluid atmosphere. Although
it can be deepened by using other techniques such as participatory observation,
document tracing, and others.
Data analysis technique
Creswell explains the data analysis techniques in phenomenological studies as
follows:
Researchers fully describe the phenomena / experiences experienced by
research subjects.
The researcher then finds statements (interview results) about how people
find topics, details of these statements and the treatment of each statement
has equal value, then these details are developed without repetition.
The statements are then grouped into meaningful units, the researcher
breaks down these units and writes a text description of the experience
accompanied by examples carefully.
The researcher then reflects on his thinking using imaginative variation or
structural description, looks for the overall possible meaning and through
divergent perspectives, considers the frame of reference for the

https://ijersc.org/
195
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

phenomenon, and constructs how the phenomenon is experienced. .

The researcher then constructs all explanations about the meaning and
essence of the experience.
Researchers reported the results of their research. The report shows a unity
of meaning based on the experiences of all informants. After that, then write
a combined description.

EXAMPLES OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH WITH A

PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH
In this sub-section, a summary of qualitative research articles is presented. This
article entitled "Because Life Must Go On (A Phenomenology Study of the Life of
People with HIV / AIDS)" written by Septiana Dewi Indriani and Nailul Faiuziah.
This article was published in the Journal of Empathy Volume 6 Number 1 in January
2017. [18]
Abstract:
HIV / AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease that is common in the community. Data
on HIV and AIDS cases are increasing every day. Apart from being a medical
problem, HIV / AIDS is also a social problem, related to stigma and discrimination.
This study aims to provide an overview of the life experiences of people with HIV /
AIDS. This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. Data
collection was carried out by interview which will be analyzed using data exclusion
techniques. The research subjects were three people from the snowball technique with
different patterns of transmission. The results showed that each subject had different
psychological dynamics. The three subjects had different responses in dealing with
HIV diagnosis and the problems they faced. The three subjects chose different coping
strategies. AG and R use coping strategies that focus on emotions, while A uses
coping strategies that focus on problem solving.
Preliminary
HIV or Human Immunodeficiency Virus is a type of virus that attacks white blood
cells in humans which has an effect on reducing the immune system. With this
condition, humans will be susceptible to infection and disease. AIDS (Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndrome) is a symptom of a disease that arises from the
weakening of the immune system.
Data from the Indonesian Ministry of Health in 2016 shows that the pattern of
transmission is very large in early adulthood, namely the age range of 20-40 years.
The stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV / AIDS in the
community will directly affect the psychology. This condition will cause shame for
sufferers because they feel they do not get moral support from their environment.

https://ijersc.org/
196
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

In Indonesia, there is still a lot of exclusion and different treatment from people with
HIV / AIDS. Thus, the problem of HIV / AIDS is not merely a medical problem but
also a problem of stigma and discrimination in society or the environment. With the
high rate of people living with HIV / AIDS and the stigma and discrimination they
experience, research on the life experiences of people who have contracted the
disease is interesting to study. The aim of this study is to find out and understand the
psychological dynamics in the lives of people with HIV / AIDS.
III. METHOD AND RESEACH
This research is a qualitative research with a phenomenological perspective. The
study of phenomenology is a perspective that focuses on individual experiences and
interpretations of the world. Femonenology is also interpreted as a method of looking
for psychological meanings that shape symptoms through investigation and analysis
of examples of symptoms experienced by participants.
The focus of this research is to understand and describe the psychological dynamics
of life experiences for people living with HIV / AIDS. The psychological dynamics
referred to are the period before HIV / AIDS diagnosis, the period at the time of
diagnosis, the postdiagnosis period, and the time when experiencing discrimination
from the surrounding environment.
Participants in this study were people living with HIV / AIDS who were selected
based on predetermined criteria in accordance with the objectives of the study. These
criteria are:
People with HIV / AIDS,
Are in the category of early adulthood,
Individuals who are willing to be research subjects.
Taking research subjects using the snowball technique. Data collection and analysis
data collection in this study using semi-structured interviews. There are things that are
conveyed to research subjects before the interview process is carried out, namely:
a. Researcher's goals and interests,
b. Confidentiality,
c. Research procedures, and
d. Prepare to start the interview.
The data analysis method used in this research is data exclusion technique. This
technique is a data analysis technique that includes several steps, namely:
Obtain an understanding of the data as a whole,
Prepare a Description of Individual Phenomena (DFI),
Identifying episodes in each DFI,

https://ijersc.org/
197
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

The implications of the themes in each episode, and

Synthesis of the explanation of each theme in each episode.
IV. REULT AND DISCUSSION
The three participants in this study experienced different treatments in the process of
caring for their families. According to Diana Baumrind, there are several patterns or
styles of parenting in the family, namely authoritarian parenting, authoritative
parenting, neglectful parenting, and indulgent parenting. The three participants each
experienced authoritarian parenting, neglectful parenting, and taxing parenting in
childhood.
The three participants also differed in relation to the origin of disease. There are
people who get HIV / AIDS from their partner (husband) who is a drug addict.
Meanwhile, other participants contracted HIV / AIDS because they used drugs. It is
generally known that transmission of this disease can occur through needles (drugs or
when injecting drugs using non-sterile needles), sexual intercourse, and through
breast milk.
The three participants also experienced different stigma and discrimination in their
surroundings. The first participant (A) experienced unpleasant treatment from his
extended family. Family A did not want to visit or interact with family A. In fact,
when they came into contact they accidentally took ablution water. The second
participant (B) experienced a similar treatment. In the family, cutlery is separated
from his family. Not only family, work environment B (Puskesmas) also does the
same thing. There were some co-workers who yelled and scolded him while doing his
job. The third participant (C) experienced different stigma and discrimination. He
must find the fact that his child is also infected with HIV / AIDS until he dies.
The burden of life from psychological stress and worsening physical conditions made
the three participants have different views about the meaning of their lives. There
were participants who interpreted their lives as God's people who had to accept all the
trials and conditions that were placed on them. Other participants consider that the
conditions they must accept now are a form of sin from their past. This is a form of
resilience aspect, namely the ability to analyze problems. That is, he is able to analyze
the various causes that lead to his current condition. Other participants interpret their
life differently. She interpreted that the life line she had to accept now was a form of
warning from God that his life would not be long. For that, She never blamed her
husband for infecting her the disease. She also analyzed that the disease she is
experiencing is a consequence of having chosen to marry the wrong person (living
with HIV / AIDS). Because initially, she decided to get married as an outlet for
disappointment with her first ex-husband. Moreover, her second marriage did not ask
permission from her extended family as a form of resistance to her family's

https://ijersc.org/
198
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

authoritarian form. Finally, she decided to use the rest of her life by doing something
that could benefit others. One of them joined the Peduli Kasih Foundation in
Semarang.
Conclusion:
Based on research that has been conducted on these three participants, the researchers
found that each participant has different psychological dynamics in living their life.
The background of childhood care has a big influence on the participants contracting
the HIV / AIDS virus. Some are infected from their husbands and some are infected
because of drugs (use of unsterile needles). The treatment, stigma, and discrimination
inflicted on the three participants from their families and environment were also
different. Some were excluded from the extended family, some were treated
differently down to the smallest things (separation of cutlery), and some were treated
harshly in their workplace. The three participants also differed in interpreting their
life after being convicted of HIV / AIDS. There were participants who thought that
their illness was a trial from God. There are those who also think that the HIV / AIDS
they experienced at that time was a form of punishment for their past actions. Other
participants interpreted their life as a warning that their life would not be long. For
this reason, she never blames other people for the cause of his illness and is more
interested in activities that benefit others.
This is an example of qualitative research with a phenomenological approach, if you
pay attention to the example of the research results above, then substantially you see
the point of view of the research object as a whole or explicitly then the data that has
been obtained from the informant or research object is written as is it in the form of
scientific narratives. If you want to learn more about phenomenological approach, I
recommended you to read my result research with the title tolerance people religions in
Sorong Regency [19]. There, I discuss about phenomenon of people religion.

V. CONCLUSION
The phenomenology that was pioneered by Edmund Husserl has a principle:
zuruck zu den sachen selbst (back to things themselves) which is a method for
explaining phenomena in their purity, where these phenomena are everything that in
some way appears in human consciousness. Whether in the form of something as a
result of fiction or in the form of something real. Phenomenology according to
Creswell seeks to explain the meaning of the life experience of a number of people
about a concept or phenomenon, including their own self-concept or view of life. The
phenomenological approach is included in a subjective or interpretive approach.
The application of phenomenology in the qualitative realm can be briefly
explained as follows:

https://ijersc.org/
199
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

Research focus. Two main things are the focus of phenomenological research,
namely: a. Textural description: what is experienced by the research subject
about a phenomenon. b. Structural description: how the subject experiences and
makes sense of his experience.
Determination of informants and research locations. The determination of
informants in phenomenological research depends on the capability of the
person being interviewed to be able to articulate their life experiences.
Meanwhile, the research location can be in a certain place or scattered, with
attention to the individuals who will be used as informants.
Data collection technique. The main data collection technique in
phenomenological studies is in-depth interviews with informants to uncover the
flow of consciousness proposed that is not structured and in a fluid atmosphere.
Data analysis technique
Researchers fully describe the phenomena / experiences experienced by
research subjects.
The researcher then finds statements (interview results) about how people
find topics, details of these statements and the treatment of each statement
has equal value, then these details are developed without repetition.
The statements are then grouped into meaningful units, the researcher
breaks down these units and writes a text description of the experience
accompanied by examples carefully.
The researcher then reflects on his thinking using imaginative variation or
structural description, looks for the overall possible meaning and through
divergent perspectives, considers the frame of reference for the
phenomenon, and constructs how the phenomenon is experienced. .
The researcher then constructs all explanations about the meaning and
essence of the experience.
Researchers reported the results of their research.

REFERENCES
[1] N. Driyarkara, Percikan Filsafat, Jakarta: PT. Pembangunan, 1962, h. 122
[2] Imam Suprayogo dan Tobroni, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama, (Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya: 2001), h. 102
[3] Deddy Mulyana, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan
Ilmu Sosial Lainnya, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2001, h. 61
[4] Kamanto Sunarto, Pengantar Sosiologi, (Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Indonesia,2000), h. 234
[5] Zainuddin Maliki, Narasi Agung: Tiga Teori Sosial Hegemonik, Surabaya: PAM, 2003, h.
233

https://ijersc.org/
200
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

[6] Clark Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods, New Delhi: Sage Publications,
1994, h. 25
[7] Ruth A. Wallace, & Alison Wolf. 1986. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Continuing
The Classical Tradition. New Jersey: Practice-Hall Englewood Cliff, 1986), h. 234
[8] Alfred Schutz, The Phenomenology of The Social World, London: Heinemann Educational
Book, 1972, h. xii
[9] Tom Campbel, Tujuh Teori Sosial, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1994, h. 233-235
[10] Akhyar Yusuf Lubis, Metodologi Posmodernis, Bogor: Akademia, 2004, h. 202
[11] Imam Suprayogo dan Tobroni, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama, Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya, 2001, hlm. 202
[12] Bernard Delfgaauw, Filsafat Abad 20, Terj. Soejono Soemargono, Yogyakarta: Tiara
Wacana Yogya, 1988, h. 105
[13] Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry: Choosing Among Five Traditions, USA: Sage Publications
Inc, 1998, h. 51
[14] Stephen W. Littlejohn, Theories of Human Communication, Belmont: Thomson Learnig
Academic Resource Center, 1996, h. 204
[15] James H. Watt, dan Sjef A. Van den Berg, Research Methods for Communication Science,
Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995, h. 417
[16] Kuswarno, Engkus. Fenomenologi. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran, 2009, h. 36
[17] Hasbiansyah, “Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Penelitian dalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi”,
Jurnal Mediator, Vol. 9, Nomor 1. Juni 2008, h. 171
[18] Septiana Dewi Indriani, Nailul Fauziah, “KARENA HIDUP HARUS TERUS BERJALAN
(Sebuah Studi Fenomenologi Kehidupan Orang dengan HIV/AIDS),” Jurnal Empati,
Januari 2017, Volume 6, No. 1, h. 385-395
[19] Rasid, Ruslan. BIOGRAFU ANDERSON MEAGE: Merajut Kerukunan di Bumi
Cenderawasih. Tangan Emas, 2020.

https://ijersc.org/

201