Constitutional Convention
Constitutional Convention
“Act of various institutions in a state and the political personalities are governed by two sets
of rules.
One set of rules consists of laws that are enforceable in the court of law and these rules can
be written, unwritten, enacted by legislation, by custom, tradition, judge-made laws, etc.
The second set of rule consists of conventions, habits, practices that govern the behaviour of
various personalities but are not enforceable in the court of law”
.
The non-legal rights, obligation, power of the person holding office in the three branches
of the government, and the relation between each government organ and government is
defined and implemented by conventions.
The conventions can be asserted in common terms and their applicability in most
situations are clearly and precisely stated. However, in certain circumstances, they are
uncertain and debatable.
The constitutional conventions are different from rules of law but still they have the
ability to alter the applicability of rules of law. Despite the differences, conventions in
most of the situations are considered equal to the rule of law and in certain situations even
more important than the laws.
Need:-
The creators of the Constitution have left certain areas of discretion for political
actors.
This freedom gives liberty which may sometimes lead to misuse of the same.
A fact about the Indian Constitution situation is that enough heed has not been paid to
bring decent conduct and convention code in matters of discretion.
The conduct code that was created in the earlier year has been discontinued and is not
functioning properly as per the need.
Moreover, discretion has led to many social, political and economic disputes due to
which more dependents have been placed upon an extra-constitutional method for
settling the same and this point raises a concern as despite having the lengthiest and
detailed law there is still a need to go for non-constitutional methods.
Hence these extra-constitutional arrangements are to be halted plus misuse has to be
regulated and for this relevant code and conventions are required.
The constitutional convention somehow manages the psychology of the people who
are in a position to exercise powers. Hence, standardized convention that has been
followed over a period and is ideal has to be followed, and thus calls for the need of
such convention.
The rules are defined as “statements prescribing conduct that has to be taken in a given
situation and which imposes an obligation on those who are regulated by the rule.”[13] An
important point that is highlighted under the definition is the term obligation which brings out
the underlying meaning of constitutional convention. Where a person is under an obligation
to act in a particular manner as per convention, the failure to act in such a prescribed manner
gives rise to legitimate criticism in terms of constitutionality.
In the case of State of Rajasthan vs Union of India,[19] Chief Justice Beg held that
“constitutional conventions are so attached and linked to constitutional provision which
makes them essential for identifying the true function of constitutional provisions” hence, the
two cannot be viewed apart. In Madras Bar Association vs Union of India,[20] the National
Tax Tribunal Act 2005 validity was challenged on the ground that it is inconsistent with
convention regarding the essential characteristic of court. The court accepted the same and
held the act unconstitutional by giving importance to existing conventions. Similarly
in Consumer Education Research Society vs Union of India constitutional validity of an act
was questioned on the ground that it would alter that who can compete for election to
Parliament. Under the case one of the primary and potential grounds identified by the
Supreme Court for holding an act invalid was “breach of constitutional conventions”.