Code 2
Code 2
570
The various factors which alfect the coelficient are ga
value is
MN ratio should not be less than 0.5, unless this helow:
zero. For ratio between 0 and 0.5, flow conditions are
M/N
extremely unstable. (i) The nature of projie at the top
profile, U.S. Army, on the basis of latest This is the CCoellicienis high as
For upstream most important part. as
recommend-
analytical studies and laboratory test results, has 2.76 have been attained with suitable design.
ed the following equation, (Origin at the crest)
(i) The slope of the rear glacis
Ha)-83
Y = 0.7240.270 +0.126 H be neglected.
H085 The effect is not very considerable and niay
-
0.4315 H,0-375 (x+0.270 H)o-o23 (13.2)
(in) Effect of depth of aproach
The curve extends (0.270 Hi) upstream and (0.126 Ha) With decrease in depth of apprear. the cocflicicnt of
downstream from the crest point).
discharge decreases (Fig. 13.15).
Deiga crileria for pressures over spillway
For medium high spillway negative pressures of about- 1.5m
of water may be permitted. If we keep head 1.33 times Hi,
the values of negative pressures will be about 0.6 Ha with
piers (U.S. Army.equation). Under partial openings negative
pressures of the order of 0.1 Ha were recorded. U.S.B.R.
permits negative pressures of the order of-4.8 m head of
pha
water, whereas Indian Standard Specifications permit a
negative head of 3 m of water. However, it is preferable to
avoid sub-pressures as they involve the foliowing disadvantages.
(a) an increase of the overturning moment,
(b) an increase of the lifting forces in the case of gates,
VALUES OF Nd
(c) a decrease in capability of automatic control,
O1SCHARGE COS FICIENTS FOR oGEE CRIST
(d) vibrations expanding eventually all over the whole UPSTREAM FACE VER 7 I C A 2
structure,
()vibrations destructive to the mortar and therefore, Fig. 13.15
causing cracks that necessitate special anchoring bolts
for the stone lining etc. (iv) fect of heads difering from design kead
A widened shape of erest will result in positive pressurer
Discharge coctficient
along the crest contact surface, thereby reducing the discharge;
The theoretical valuc of co-eficient of discharge disallowing with a narrower crest shape negative pressure along
any reduction due to friction ctc. is 2.96. But this value is
the
surlace will occur, resuiting in an increased discharge. i g
difficult to achicve. The practical limit of coeficient of 13.16 shows the variation of the coefficient vaucs
as
related to
discharge, without allowing subatmospheric pressures is 2.21. of MHi, where H, is the actual head being considered.
.
3
N
(
n
O r e TN OF F L O W - A TER AND ENTRAINE
AIR IN WATER
vERTITICAL DISTANCE BELOW CRIS$7
OF SPLL WAY IN METPE
5
T
SPILLWVAY'S
576 HYDRAULIC DPSIGN OF OGEE SFiLLWAY
F'i 13.17 i
interfcrence and doun 'rn
yea7! pron
rct
Suh-"erEnre
an overf!o: Wer is ligh vugh
Vhon the water ovel below Fig. 13,
weir is sad to be subnicr ti.
fiT te fi:cin.arge, the
ncga yn
pi will be nAatci
t i 7 1 enied
A '
i t hy dnpped andobjection amonting t R 7 , 6 rat
u lantihil
mSpec se l 2.1
Datnl
alia'
The ee
14.
laut S
3 3 te H
at O5 wrth
H
eargs negata
derd USBR
34 e ad
-rable i
autagi s
ales
iat tfaeretee.
vbrat s tructi ve i g boits
t itai
Casg crack ut
a ub
The t
diflicul i uevr
U .NMr
all in "at
7 to ' a t ch
inches, Mnt. p er n al Crr
C.
nro: ' n t Pet
Sqm. in
m
1 tt cft,
l1ches
1,2 56 ,2
21.103 1 5.L
14.01 4,004 11 345
2S. 6 9.750 22,3 2.2 327 17.
3 54 12E 554 S.266 12.164
.472 24,3s 21
0.374 19.34 5.1) 5 S32 12.9
N.9 1-26 25 30 22
17. 5C7 4.35 31. E 13, 190 31.643 23.4 0,793 23,429
43.3
42,37 10,433 42.9 33 31.5 13.0 67 32.199 2n,90 92 47 21.466
1 13,90 45.53 323 14203 33793 21.5 9.697 22. 29
HE
8
VALUE O SILT ACTOR.
Silt in 0.60 Gravel = Mrdiun = 4.75
Moiium ,85 Heavy = 9,00
1.75 0.39/1o0
1.26 15. 1
0 17.
33
.31 24,
10 140 2
** ** *
WS.s
- - - - - -
f -° in yaloCly
2.00
0.35/1000 1 33 21.3
35 244
10 1.3
11 1.4 30,8
12 1. 12 34.1
13 1.4 7.7
8 2..25 1.#T 41.2
10 0.32/1000 1.40 29
12 1.49 37
1.60 47
10
.50
2 11 0.295/1000 1.68 47
14 1.7 58
16 .79 68
,
1.83 78
18
20 1.88 78 85
1. 99
12 2.75
14 0.27/1000 1..73. 64
1.77 75
16. 1
18. .80 86
1.84 96
.87 110
1.90 122
L5 3.00
13
0.25/1000 1.80 89
1.84 105
20 1.87 121
23 1.90 137
1.94 154
2.05 221
25 00 0.20/1000 267
30 09
2.13 316
35
2.16 364
0
7
-ve i
30 .5 0.18/1000 300
35 .15 362
40 2,19 18
45 2.23 473.
50 2.25 528
0 5 .0 0.16/100 00
45 2.30 546
50 2,37 622
55 2.44 704
60 .52 786
BXTT GRADIENT.
i t gradient represmts the rats of loss of head or the grad ient
at the exit end. It is the. energy of head at the extreme end of the
apron. hen it reaches at the critical point failure by underminingimpervious
is eminent,
At th is. stage it is called critical grgdient, he exit
'hen the value GE reaches 0,99 or nearly one, angradient
is
by . average, it represented
redhes
the eritical groiient. he safe
permissible value of t must be much le ss
thar 1/ to /6 or 0.25 to 0.16 vhich requires for the
safety of the hydraulic
structure. The folloing formilas are used for finding the value of GEB,
GE
hen
and b/a,
2
Head of uplift pressura.
0.5232 2.30
5.00
O.538 2,54
5.50 O.30 O.295/1o0 0,474 0.544 "
2.79
6.00
O.549 3.03
6.50 0.554 3.27
7,00
9
9
usually required
to bring
be. such shall Wherever heavy
of openings should increased suitably.
dim.ersion
mininum therein.
7.1.4 The mar:uai clcaring ot deposits
as far as possib.e 11
perit
10
7.3 Clennce AMENDMENT NO. 2
for AUGUST 1982
7.3.1 Clearance Superpasage
7.2.2 --Clearances
in 7.2.1 and of TO
975
mudari malndis about 50 percent of those IS:7784 ( Part I>1975 cODE OF PRACTICE FOR
73.2 of recommcnded
may be
proided.Free Board-Free board as
provided in case
recommended in 724 superpassag. DESIGN OF CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS
7.4 AM may be
7.4.1 PARTI GENERAL FEATURESS
The
corespand to affux be to
adopted in the
deign flood. design
the marimum shall be that which Alterations
7.4.2 The would
affux should be
velociry does not cause
serious
restricted to such a value
bed that the (Pag 13, clause 7.4.4.1(b), formula ]- Substitute the following for
7.4.3 The effect of affux
scour in the
drainage. resulting the existing formula:
should be the
specially srudied. submergence of the surrounding country
on
at
7.4.4
74.4.1The affux
and 7.4.4.2.may be alulated by cither of the
-Co V2g LDa V+ U+p
7.4.4.1 methods given (Page 14, clauss 7.4.4.2):
Ralionsl_formular-
ordice dis-harge formulu Broad crested weir discharge a) Formula-Substitute the following for the existing formula:
cross drainage work depending upon the flow
openings
formula
conditions 1hrough
rk
ttie periormance of the may be
applied for calculating afflux. the A-
the depth
downstream ofcross
the dainage work openings remains unaffected
When ( +00152) |( AIe»-
weir formula is obstruction, that is, by b) Dehnition of symbol ' a ' - Sub:titute the following for the cxisting
Approximately whenapplicable, otherwise the orificestanding
a wave is formed, hc
the forrmula matter:
0
percent of the upstream
downstream depth Da above the crest holds good.
is
cd
a) eir formala depth D. the weir formula more
does not bold than 'a-sectional area of river provided in the construction in m, 33
good.
where Q-170C.LH*/
Q
dischbarge through the openings in
C=
coeficient m°/s;
the values of discharge
may be takenaccounting
for losses in friction;
as under:
Condiiom Value
1) Narrow openings with or without floors
2) Wide openings 0'94
with
3) Wide openings without floors 0 96
I= fioors 0'98
linear waterway
H= in m;
total energy head upstream of
D. +V'[2g the obstruction in m, that is,
D.= depth of flow
upstream in and
2g= veiocity head where v is them; (BDC61
section worked out from the average velocity in
known width ( W) ofapproach1
the
tructed sction, unobs
Reproduced by Repro grapny Unit, ISi, New Deih
12
S7184(Parn 1y-19ns
b) Orifce formula
1-00
095
0-90
0-85
0-5 0-7 0-9 11:0
OR
F1o. 1 CoEFFICIENT "C IN THE ORFICE FoRveLA
13
1975
I-0 75 Depth of
Scour
Lacey s iormua i case-The natural scour
depu1 should be esiated
ot largc alluvial
sream, namely:
O-8
where
D 1'35 (*
6 D= normal
scour depth in m below the maximum flood
irvel,
9 design flood discharge per unit width in
Lacey's silt factor corresponding the m'/sn,
0.4 and
bed to
The usual values as
given by Lacey materiál are shown in Tabie
at ulc.
4.
C-2 TABLE 4
SL No.
VALUES OF F' FOR DIFFERENT SO1LS
TIPE or SoiL Si or PanTICLK
() (2)
VALU or 'S'
()
0.6 0-7 0 8 0.9 1.0
mn
Very ine silt
0052
ii) Fine silt
OR iv)
Mdium ailt
Sancard ailt
O120
0-233
0-323
085
Fic. 2 CoEFFICIENT '" 1N THE ORiFiCz FORMULA v) Medum s2ad -00
0 508
vi) Coane and T25
0-725
7.4.4.2 Er^irical formula-When the area of
arge compared to the original unrestricted area obstruction
is vit) Fine bajra and and
the following not very
formuia viii) Havy and
988 175
T-290
CMoleswortth ' gives reasonably good results, Gravel medium 7-25 475
Hay 2610
where
A-1785+00132)( -1)) xi) Boulder*
Sm!
Mec:um
50 00 12-00
725
h = aiux in m, Lige 88-80
1500
4 00
= relocity in the unobstructed stream in m/s, 7.5.1 The sco depth
computed from 75
as
for the Regime is
d = t e unobstructed sectional area of the river in m2, and channcls". The r.cmal scour depth will be much greatcr along uhe piers,
foundation, aproas. etc. Tbe normal scour depuh
athe
obstructed sectional area of the river at the eross drainage
O k ic mi following cquatioc: may be 1ound irom the
If 1he value of f varies considerably in the unobstructed cross section D'
of the river, as :he casc of a river which spills over its banks, for the
purposes of this fo:nula may be taken as the average velocity in the main where
strcam and corre:pondingly the value of A sbould be determined by dividing D= normal scour depth in m below the maximum flood level,
he total discharg: by . R =
hydrzulic mean depth in m,
affux as calculated i = recgim.e width of the stream in m, and
7.4.9.3 r case of readily erodable
srom 7.4.4.1 or 7.4.4.2 may not occur.
beds, full L = obstu::ed width of waterway in m.
14 15
IS: 7784 ( Part I ) - Y 7
0-15 0 '63S9
3 !3
Cekal
Ane
V&h
o1 té)
x CXH*
&b
23
=0-61-t6 098Va'3 2
C 13Cu)
1t0
2
20
72C
0
2 2 1 C
3
6:935 44 (
Lt
SlogodAe v
di
d o4®
2 (o40
SKETCH
( b + 3
14 mm SLALANT
3mm
1ImmT
b C
65-70 mm 9mm 27 mm
1 mm 33 mmn
15-eomm
l o o mm I mm
NoTeC nt
shauld191 be more IKan t); C sAouldbe munimum 3
slg
orced
Arut EONVENTIONAL
is GROOVES
e
V F r L u l h o n r d( A n n )
LONGLTUDINALJTRANS VERSE
CONTRACTION
pAeJONTS
Tal paDesm
h
f
oto
CU+d)
f oCU t d )
valnui
(owming
mna
conJupA
J
l
t