Rock Engineering Background
Rock Engineering Background
ABSTRACT
The study of geology is the study of the
Earth, and so is ultimately the study of rocks.
Geologists define a rock as:
A bound aggregate of minerals, mineraloids,
or fragments of other rocks
ROCK ENGINEERING-
BACKGROUND
Rock mechanics
Definition
Rock mechanics is the branch of geotechnical engineering concerned with the
engineering mechanics and the properties of rocks.
In general, civil engineers deal with two types of earth materials: soils and rocks.
Geotechnology is a term used in the literature to describe both the science and
engineering of soil deposits, rock masses, and the fluids they contain.
Soils Rocks
are aggregates of mineral grains that can are aggregates of mineral grains that are
be separated by slight mechanical means connected by strong and permanent
such as agitation in water. forces.
a soil refers to a material that can be a rock is a material for which blasting is
excavated without blasting (with a required for excavation. From a
mechanical ripper for instance) behavioral point of view
soils are the end-products of the the engineering properties (deformability,
mechanical or chemical weathering of strength, permeability, etc..) of a rock
rocks. mass do change as it weathers.
The zone where the rock is weathered, also called the "weathered zone", can be a
few feet thick in arid areas and several hundred feet thick in tropical (hot and
humid) areas.
A rock that is not weathered is called "fresh" (weathering grade I), whereas a fully
weathered rock is called a soil (weathering grade VI). Obviously, there is a wide
range of materials in nature that fit in between those two extremes. some of them
have properties that are more rock dominant whereas others have properties that
are more soil dominant. These materials are sometimes called rock-like soils or soil-
like rocks. As civil engineers, we need to know the vertical and lateral extent of the
weathering zone, the different grades of weathering, and the depth to the fresh un-
weathered rock.
In general, geologists classify rocks into three major groups: igneous, sedimentary,
and metamorphic. Rocks are classified from a genetic point of view, i.e. how they
were formed. Each rock group is further divided into sub-groups based on the grain
size, the rock texture, etc. On the other hand, engineers are more interested in how
rocks behave in practice. They classify rocks based on their performance in various
engineering applications such as drilling, blasting, tunneling, rock/dam interaction,
etc.
The study of geology is the study of the Earth, and so is ultimately the study of
rocks. Geologists define a rock as:
Chert
The use of the word 'bound' means that a rock must have structural integrity, e.g.
an aggregate of sand does not become a rock until the grains are bound together.
Typical binding agents are very fine grained minerals (e.g. calcite, clay)
or mineraloids (e.g. chert, glass), though in some rock types the crystals are
intergrown and no binder is required.
Classification
1. Igneous rocks are those that have formed by the cooling and crystallization
of magma, either at the Earth's surface or within the crust.
2. Sedimentary rocks are those that have formed when eroded particles of
other rocks have been deposited (on the ocean floor, stream/lake beds, etc.)
and compacted, or by the precipitation of minerals / mineraloids from water.
3. Metamorphic rocks are those that have formed when existing rocks have
undergone pressure and / or temperature changes so that their original
mineralogy has been changed.
Each of these rock groups contains many different types of rock, and each can be
identified from its physical features.
Being able to describe and name rocks is one of the fundamental skills of a
geologist. Important information regarding the nature of rocks is communicated
through concise, accurate descriptions. This information allows the geologist to
identify the rock, and, in the process, to learn about its history and the geological
environment in which it was formed.
Methodology
Igneous rocks
Igneous rocks are formed by the solidification of magma, a silicate liquid generated
by partial melting of the upper mantle or the lower crust. Different environments of
formation, and the cooling rates associated with these, create very different
textures and define the two major groupings within igneous rocks:
Volcanic rocks
Volcanic rocks form when magma rises to the surface and erupts, either as lava
or pyroclastic material. The rate of cooling of the magma is rapid, and crystal growth
is inhibited. Volcanic rocks are characteristically fine-grained. Volcanic rocks often
exhibit structures caused by their eruption, e.g. flow banding (formed by shearing
of the lava as it flows), and vesicles (open cavities that represent escaped gasses).
Plutonic rocks
Plutonic rocks form when magma cools within the Earth's crust. The rate of cooling of
the magma is slow, allowing large crystals to grow. Plutonic rocks are
characteristically coarse-grained.
Phaneritic - This texture describes a rock with large, easily visible, interlocking
crystals of several minerals. The crystals are randomly distributed and not aligned
in any consistent direction. A phaneritic texture is developed by the slow cooling and
crystallization of magma trapped within the Earth's crust and is characteristic
of plutonic rocks.
Porphyritic - This texture describes a rock that has well-formed crystals visible to the
naked eye, called phenocrysts, set in a very fine grained or glassy matrix, called
the groundmass. A porphyritic texture is developed when magma that has been
slowly cooling and crystallizing within the Earth's crust is suddenly erupted at the
surface, causing the remaining uncrystallized magma to cool rapidly. This texture is
characteristic of most volcanic rocks.
Aphanitic - This texture describes very fine grained rock where individual crystals
can be seen only with the aid of a microscope, i.e. the rock is mostly groundmass.
An aphanitic texture is developed when magma is erupted at the Earth's surface and
cools too quickly for large crystals to grow. This texture is exhibited by
some volcanic rocks.
Eutaxitic (applies only to welded ignimbrites) - This texture describes a rock with a
planar fabric in which flattened pumice clasts are surrounded by a fine
grained groundmass of sintered ash. The flattened pumice clasts are lenticular (lens-
shaped) in cross-section and are called fiamme (Italian for flame).
An eutaxitic texture is developed when hot, pumice-rich material is erupted
explosively and is then compressed by overlying material while still in a hot, plastic
state.
Other features
The chemical composition of the magma determines which minerals will form and in
what proportions they will occur. Therefore, identification of the minerals present in
the rock is an important step in being able to correctly identify the
rock. Magmas that are relatively low in silica (SiO 2) crystallize olivine, pyroxene
( augite) and calcium-rich plagioclase, while magmas that are high in
SiO2 crystallize quartz, sodium-rich plagioclase, orthoclase, biotite and hornblende.
As with minerals, igneous rocks can be broadly divided
into mafic and felsic types. Mafic rocks are generally darker, and have higher
abundances of mafic minerals. Felsic rocks are generally lighter in colo r, having a
higher concentration of felsic minerals.
Sedimentary rocks
Sedimentary rocks are the product of the erosion of existing rocks. Eroded
material accumulates as sediment, either in the sea or on land, and is then
buried, compacted and cemented to produce sedimentary rock (a process
known as diagenesis).
Coarse 20 – 60
Medium 6 – 20
Fine 2–6
Mud < 0.002 – 0.06 Clasts not visible to the naked eye. Feels
smooth.
Clasts in sandstone
Structures produced during deposition, e.g. bedding and cross-bedding, can give
clues as to depositional environment. So can structures produced by re-working by
tidal or storm-generated currents, e.g. ripple marks, rip-up clasts.
Metamorphic rocks
Metamorphism is the alteration of pre-existing rocks in the solid state due to
changes in temperature and pressure. Under increasing temperature and / or
pressure existing minerals become unstable and break down to form new minerals.
In the case of regional metamorphism the rocks are subjected to tectonic forces
which provide the necessary mechanisms for metamorphism. Products
include schist and slate. Contact metamorphism involves metamorphosis through
heating by an intruding plutonic body. Hornfels is the result of this type of
metamorphism.
Metamorphic rocks are classified according to the conditions under which they
recrystallized, known as their metamorphic facies. The key parameters in this
classification are index minerals which indicate particular pressure / temperature
conditions. These minerals may only be present in small proportions, and in many
cases are difficult to recognize in hand specimen. An alternative classification,
useful in the field or for hand specimens, is based upon the degree of
recrystallization of the original minerals, and so grain size and the degree
of foliation (see below) are important. As metamorphism occurs in areas undergoing
deformation, look also for structures that indicate deformation, such as folding
(often shown as crenulations or small crumpled folds), and small fractures or faults.
Metamorphic textures
The two distinctive metamorphic textures are:
Foliation - This represents a distinct plane of weakness in the rock. Foliation is caused
by the re-alignment of minerals when they are subjected to high pressure and
temperature. Individual minerals align themselves perpendicular to the stress field
such that their long axes are in the direction of these planes (which may look like
the cleavage planes of minerals). Usually, a series of foliation planes can be seen
parallel to each other in the rock. Well developed foliation is characteristic of most
metamorphic rocks. Metamorphic rocks often break easily along foliation planes.
Some fine-grained metamorphic rocks, e.g. schist, have larger crystals present.
These crystals are called porphyroblasts. Porphyroblasts represent minerals that
Grain size
Fine Medium Coarse
Poorly foliated Hornfels Marble, quartzite Marble, quartzite
Well foliated Slate Schist Gneiss
Well foliated and sheared Mylonite Mylonite, schist Augen gneiss
Although the methodology may differ from one activity to the other, all these
activities have three basic similarities. First, they all require an evaluation of the
site geology, i.e. rock types, extent of each rock unit, extent and type of
weathering, etc... This is usually done by conducting detailed site exploration and
investigation using surface mapping, boreholes, trenches, or geophysical survey.
Site exploration and investigation is usually conducted in several steps (preliminary,
advanced, etc..). Second, all the aforementioned activities require an assessment of
the engineering properties (strength, deformability, permeability, etc..) of the rocks
involved in the projects. This is done by testing samples of intact rock in the
laboratory and by conducting field tests. Finally, engineers need to take into
account possible geologic hazards and their impact on existing and future
structures. In general, geological hazards can be divided into hazards from
geological materials (reactive minerals, asbestos, gas hazards), and hazards from
geological processes (volcanoes, earthquakes, landslides and avalanches,
subsidence, floods, coastal erosion).
The two previous disasters triggered the creation of the International Society for
Rock Mechanics (ISRM) which organized its first congress in Madrid in 1966. Since
then, other ISRM sponsored international congresses have taken place in Belgrade
(1971), Denver (1974), Montreux (1979), Melbourne (1983), Montreal (1987),
Aachen (1991) and Tokyo (1995).
Over the past 30 years, the number of engineering projects involving rock either as
construction or foundation material has increased drastically. These engineering
activities have strongly enhanced the need for a better understanding of rock
behavior. As a result, a large body of literature is now available on the subjects of
rock mechanics and rock engineering.
Classification of Discontinuities
Planes of weakness in rock are formed through failure in extension/tension, shear
or in more complex failure modes that involve a combination of both. Failure
surfaces formed in shear are usually smooth with some gouge material whereas
failure surfaces formed in extension are rough and usually clean. Once formed,
planes of weakness are more susceptible to weathering than the intact rock.
The properties of planes of weakness that affect the engineering behavior of rock
structures include: (i) scale, frequency, continuity, density, spacing, (ii) roughness,
type and degree of infilling, moisture conditions, hardness and degree of
weathering, (iii) mechanical properties (shear strength and deformability) and
hydraulic properties (permeability or conductivity) and, (iv) orientation.
Note that joints often occur in sets. In each set, the joints have approximately the
same orientation and usually the same character. Rock masses can contain several
joint sets and some of them may be dominant. Several joint sets are frequent in
igneous and metamorphic rock masses and can have special patterns such as
columnar joints formed during the cooling of lava beds or sheet joints that are
extension features resulting from the unloading near the free surfaces of massive
rock masses.
Almost all rock outcrops exhibit joints – thin extension fractures that penetrate
rocks without any appreciable shear displacement – and many well-exposed regions
show joint systems defined by sets of parallel and planar joints. Because there are
so many of them, and because they weaken rocks and conduct fluids, they can be
extremely important structures in the uppermost crust. Tunnel makers, reservoir
engineers, solid rock hydrogeologists and magmatic geologists trying to understand
intrusion mechanisms all have to deal with joints in one way or another, simply
because they are weak and laterally extensive structures that easily affect geologic
processes. For example, petroleum geologists and engineers are concerned with
joints. Geologists do not want them in the cap rock of hydrocarbon structures, but
production engineers deliberately create them in reservoir formations to enhance
the flow of fluids into production wells. As structural geologists we also study joints
because they tell us something about the state of stress in rock layers at the time
when they formed, and by studying their relative timing with other structures they
add important information about the structural or tectonic evolution of a region.
Extension fractures can also become mineralized to form veins, sometimes with
economically interesting minerals. Also the mineral fill found in veins may preserve
a record of the history of vein formation and hence add important information to
our understanding of the brittle deformation history of an area.
Examples of irregular joints are the non-systematic joint set between the regular
and long joints in Figure 7.5b, and the polygonal joints in Figure 7.5c.
Joints that are straight, parallel and repeat themselves with more or less constant
spacing are called systematic (first set in Figure 7.5a, b, and both sets in d).
The two sets in Figure 7.6 are both regular and systematic. Joints that are
irregular with respect to geometry, orientation and spacing do not define sets and
are called non-systematic.
Figure 7.5 Some common types of joint patterns. Note that “conjugate” joint sets
are not really conjugate because the two sets must have formed at different times
(in different stress fields).
Figure 7.6 Two high-angle sets of joints developed in the Permian Cedar Mesa
Sandstone of Canyonlands National Park, Utah.
Joints are sometimes referred to as sharp discontinuities. This means that the
structures are sharply defined under the microscope as well as in hand samples and
outcrops (Figure 7.7), and also that they abruptly change the rock’s mechanical
properties, particularly its cohesion. Loss of cohesion is a very important property
of jointed rocks. For this reason, joints control topographic expressions in many
places. They also make many rocks split into blocks, making quarrying much easier.
At the same time, joints make many rock slopes unstable, which can lead to serious
rock falls and avalanches.
Figure 7.7 Densely jointed sedimentary rocks (calcareous shale) intruded by mafic
dikes. During intrusion, some of the joints were slightly sheared as rock layers were
twisted. Hovedøya, Oslo, Norway.
Joints are opening-mode fractures that in principal form in the part of the Mohr
envelope where the normal stress is negative, i.e. to the left of the vertical shear
stress axis in Figure 7.8. This negative side of the diagram also hosts opening-
mode fractures, for which there is both an opening and a shear component. Hence,
joints that show a minute component of shear offset may possibly have formed as
such hybrid fractures, and not necessarily by reactivation in a rotated stress field. If
the rock is deeply buried and thus on the right-hand side of the Mohr diagram, we
need to build up an internal fluid pressure in the incipient joint that counteracts and
exceeds the compressional σ3 in the host rock
Figure 7.8 Ideally, joints are tension fractures that involve no or almost no shear
stress, i.e. they are represented by the point where the fracture envelope crosses
the horizontal axis in the Mohr diagram. T = tensile strength.
Shear fractures tend to form conjugate sets with an acute angle of something like
60°, or somewhat less as we cross into the tensile field (left-hand side) of the Mohr
diagram (Figure 7.8). Hence where we find two joint sets that make this type of
angular relationship, we need to consider the possibility that they formed as shear
or hybrid fractures. We need to look for evidence of displacement, for relative age
relations between the two sets and for regional explanations for their orientations.
If we find evidence for shear along the two sets, and still believe that they initiated
as pure extension fractures, we need three phases of deformation: (1) a stress field
with σ3 oriented perpendicular to the first joint set; (2) new deformation with σ3
oriented perpendicular to the second joint set (possibly generating some shear
along the first set); and (3) σH (max horizontal compressive stress) oblique to the
two sets to reactivate them as shear fractures. The alternative interpretation, i.e.
that the two sets initiated simultaneously as shear or hybrid fractures, only requires
one phase of deformation (one stress field). Our choice of model has very important
implications for understanding the stress or deformation history of the region.
Hence, even though joints by definition represent extension fractures, we should be
careful as to how we interpret joint-like fractures in the field.
Joint formation requires tensile effective stress and low differential stress.
Figure 7.9 Columnar joints in basalt, formed as the lava contracted during cooling.
Reynir, Iceland.
Veins
In general, a vein is a fracture or elongate cavity filled with secondary mineral(s)
deposited from a water-rich fluid entering the fracture. As structural geologists we
are particularly interested in the type of veins that form during the opening of the
vein walls (margins), i.e. veins that are syn-kinematically filling dilation or
extension veins. The other group of veins fill voids and fissures in the uppermost
crust that were already open for various reasons. While such veins may contain
interesting ore or gem minerals, they do not bear any record of the opening history
(some even grow in voids created by dissolution), and we will not dwell on such
veins here.
The term vein is also used for melt-filled fractures such as small dikes and sills,
and about leucosomes in migmatites. Furthermore, some structural geologists
include pressure or strain shadows among the different types of veins. In the
current treatment of veins we focus on extension veins, which we define as
elongate volumes of secondary mineral(s) that were introduced into a fracture in
the host rock as the fracture was opening, and are therefore related to the
kinematics of the associated deformation (Figure 7.10)
Figure 7.10 Example of calcite veins in shale. These veins are shooting off a right-
dipping mother vein that was reactivated in dextral shear (violet arrows), creating
extension veins (wing cracks) in the upper left part of the hanging wall.
Faults
Definition
A fault is any surface or narrow zone with visible shear displacement along the
zone.
This definition is almost identical to that of a shear fracture, and some geologists
use the two terms synonymously. Sometimes geologists even refer to shear
fractures with millimeter- to centimeter-scale offsets as micro-faults. However,
most geologists would restrict the term shear fracture to small-scale structures and
reserve the term fault for more composite structures with offsets in the order of a
meter or more.
The thickness of a fault is another issue. Faults are often expressed as planes and
surfaces in both oral and written communication and illustrations, but close
examination of faults reveals that they consist of fault rock material and subsidiary
brittle structures and therefore have a definable thickness. However, the thickness
is usually much smaller than the offset and several orders of magnitude less than
the fault length. Whether a fault should be considered as a surface or a zone largely
depends on the scale of observation, objectives and need for precision.
By discontinuity we are here primarily referring to layers, i.e. faults cut off rock
layers and make them discontinuous. However, faults also represent mechanical
and displacement discontinuities. Figure 8.1 illustrates how the displacement field
rapidly changes across faults in both map view and cross-section. A kinematic
definition, particularly useful for experimental work and GPS-monitoring of active
faults can therefore be added:
Geometry of faults
Non-vertical faults separate the hanging wall from the underlying footwall (Figure
8.2). Where the hanging wall is lowered or downthrown relative to the footwall, the
fault is a normal fault. The opposite case, where the hanging wall is upthrown
relative to the footwall, is a reverse fault. If the movement is lateral, i.e. in the
horizontal plane, then the fault is a strike-slip fault. Strike-slip faults can be sinistral
(left-lateral) or dextral (right-lateral) (from the Latin words sinister and dexter,
meaning left and right, respectively).
Figure 8.2 Normal (a), strike-slip (sinistral) (b) and reverse (c) faults. These are
end-members of a continuous spectrum of oblique faults. The spherical projections
represent the fault plane (great circle) and the displacement vector (red point).
While faults may look simple when portrayed as lines on geologic maps and
interpreted seismic sections, more detailed considerations reveal that they are
complicated and composite structures. Although our understanding of faults and
related structures has increased significantly over the last couple of decades, much
research remains to be done before we reach the point where we can predict or
model their geometries and properties based on inputs such as tectonic regime,
lithology and burial depth. Some key points and review questions from this chapter
are presented here:
Folds form when initially planar structures transform into curved structures during
ductile deformation. It is fascinating to watch folds form and develop in the
laboratory, and we can learn much about folds and folding by performing controlled
physical experiments and numerical simulations. However, modeling must always
be rooted in observations of naturally folded rocks, so geometric analysis of folds
formed in different settings and rock types is fundamental. Geometric analysis is
important not only in order to understand how various types of folds form, but also
when considering such things as hydrocarbon traps and folded ores in the
subsurface. There is a wealth of descriptive expressions in use, because folds come
in all shapes and sizes. Hence we will start this chapter by going through the basic
jargon related to folds and fold geometry
Every geologist mapping or describing folds in the field probably has the same
question in mind: how did these structures actually form?
As geologists we tend to look for a simple history or mechanism that can explain
our observations reasonably well. Folding is no exception, and there are different
approaches and process-related terms.
One approach is to consider the way force or stress acts on a layered rock, which
leads to the threefold classification and terminology shown in Figure 12.15. Other
terms are related to how the layer(s) react to force and stress, for instance whether
layers fold by layer-parallel shearing, orthogonal flexure or some other mechanism
that is controlled by rock rheology.
Still other classes of folding, such as kinking and chevron folding, are related to fold
geometry. For this reason, several different fold mechanisms are defined, and many
of them overlap in definition. This is why terms such as buckling, kink folding and
bending can be confusing when discussed in terms of mechanisms such as flexural
slip and simple shear.
Figure 9.1The relation between how force is applied and fold mechanisms.
Folds are eye-catching and visually attractive structures that can form in
practically any rock type
Simple models of folding, such as flexural slip and simple shear, are attractive and
quite useful at times. Nevertheless, we should be aware of the possibility that
natural folds have gone through a growth history where different mechanisms have
been active at the same time or during different parts of the deformation history.
We can use strain distribution and fold geometry to try to discover the dominant
mechanism, and from field observations and experimental results we can to some
extent predict both mechanism and geometry if we have knowledge of such factors
as competence contrasts, layer thickness, mineralogy and anisotropy. Use the
following summary points and review questions to test your knowledge of folds and
folding:
References:
GOODMAN, Richard E. Introduction to rock mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
HOEK, Evert. Strength of jointed rock masses. Geotechnique, 1983, 33.3: 187-223.
CARTER, Trevor G.; MARINOS, Vassilis. Putting geological focus back into rock engineering
design. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53.10: 4487-4508.
RAGAN, Donal Mackenzie; RAGAN. Structural geology. John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
DAVIS, George H.; REYNOLDS, Stephen J.; KLUTH, Charles F. Structural geology of rocks and regions.
John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
WANG, Pengyu, et al. Classification and extent determination of rock slope using deep
learning. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2020, 6: 1-12.
YAN, Dan-Ping, et al. Constraints on the depth, geometry and kinematics of blind detachment faults
provided by fault-propagation folds: An example from the Mesozoic fold belt of South China. Journal of
Structural Geology, 2009, 31.2: 150-162.
POPPE, Sam, et al. Structural and geochemical interactions between magma and sedimentary host rock:
the Hovedøya case, Oslo Rift, Norway. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2020, 21.3:
e2019GC008685
AMADEI, B.; CARLIER, J.-F.; ILLANGASEKARE, T. Effect of turbulence on fracture flow and advective
transport of solutes. In: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics
abstracts. Pergamon, 1995. p. 343-356.
BARTON, Nick. The shear strength of rock and rock joints. In: International Journal of rock mechanics
and mining sciences & Geomechanics abstracts. Pergamon, 1976. p. 255-279.
BONS, Paul D.; ELBURG, Marlina A.; GOMEZ-RIVAS, Enrique. A review of the formation of tectonic
veins and their microstructures. Journal of structural geology, 2012, 43: 33-62.
MARONE, Chris; SCHOLZ, C. H. The depth of seismic faulting and the upper transition from stable to
unstable slip regimes. Geophysical Research Letters, 1988, 15.6: 621-624.
MA, Bailong, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the shear mechanical behavior of rock joints
under normal vibration loads. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 165: 105892.
PACHRI, Hendra, et al. Study of Mineralogy and Engineering Properties of Volcanic Rock at the Base of
the Pamukkulu DAM Foundation, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2022. p. 012004.
REGELOUS, Anette; SCHARFENBERG, Lars; DE WALL, Helga. Origin of S-, A-and I-type granites:
Petrogenetic evidence from whole rock Th/U ratio variations. Minerals, 2021, 11.7: 672.
DEL MORO, Stefano, et al. Unusual lapilli tuff ejecta erupted at Stromboli during the 15 March 2007
explosion shed light on the nature and thermal state of rocks forming the crater system of the
volcano. Journal of volcanology and geothermal research, 2013, 254: 37-52.
FENG, Fan, et al. Influence of moisture content and intermediate principal stress on cracking behavior of
sandstone subjected to true triaxial unloading conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2023, 284:
109265.
GÖRGÜLÜ, K., et al. Influences of uniaxial stress and moisture content on the thermal conductivity of
rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45.8: 1439-1445.
YANG, D. S., et al. Dependence of elastic properties of argillaceous rocks on moisture content
investigated with optical full-field strain measurement techniques. International Journal of Rock
Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012, 53: 45-55.
MA, Xi, et al. Mineralogical and frictional properties of fault rocks from the Laohushan creep segment of
the Haiyuan fault, Northeastern Tibet. Journal of Structural Geology, 2023, 105017.
LA BRUNA, Vincenzo, et al. High-permeability zones in folded and faulted silicified carbonate rocks–
Implications for karstified carbonate reservoirs. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, 128: 105046.
JU, Wei, et al. Factors influencing fault-propagation folding in the Kuqa Depression: Insights from
geomechanical models. Journal of Structural Geology, 2023, 168: 104826.