6 IM Forces Notes
6 IM Forces Notes
com
247
3 Chemical bonding
This topic introduces the different ways by which chemical bonding occurs and the
effect this can have on physical properties.
INTERMOLECULAR FORCES
3.4 Metallic bonding a) describe metallic bonding in terms of a lattice of positive ions
surrounded by delocalised electrons
3.5 Bonding and a) describe, interpret and predict the effect of different types of bonding
physical properties (ionic bonding, covalent bonding, hydrogen bonding, other intermolecular
interactions, metallic bonding) on the physical properties of substances
b) deduce the type of bonding present from given information
c) show understanding of chemical reactions in terms of energy transfers
associated with the breaking and making of chemical bonds
BOND POLARITIES
In a covalent bond between two different atoms, the atoms do not
The example attract thetwo
in which electron pairatoms
hydrogen in thebond
bond equally.
is simple How strongly
because both atomstheareelectrons
the same. are attracted depends on the size of the individual atoms and their
nuclear
Also, each one charge.
has a single proton and a single electron, so the attractions are easy
to identify. In the F 2 molecule, the two F atoms attract the electrons in the bond
equally and thus the electrons lie symmetrically (Figure 3.87). This
However, many covalent bonds form between two different atoms.
molecule is non-polar.
These atoms often have different attractions for shared electrons.
1
However, in HF, F is more electronegative than H and attracts the
electrons in the H–F bond more strongly than the H atom does. The
electrons in the bond thus lie closer to the F than to the H (Figure 3.8
H–F is a polar molecule. The unsymmetrical distribution of electron
density results in small charges on the atoms. F is − because the electro
However,
in the bond lie closer to F, whereas electron in HF,has
density F isbeen
morepulled
electron
aw
from H, so it is +. electrons in the H–F bond more stron
BOND POLARITIESelectrons in the bond thus lie closer to
H–F is a polar molecule. The unsymm
Now consider a diatomic molecule composed density results in small charges on the
of two different elements; HF is a common in the bond lie closer to F, whereas el
example. from H, so it is +.
It has been experimentally shown that the
tes a small negativeelectrons in the H—F bond are not equally However, in
shared; the electrons spend more time in the electrons in th
vicinity of the fluorine atom. electrons in th
There are various scales of electronegativity and it is important
H–F istoa realise
polar
This is because fluorine is a more
that, although they are derived from physical quantities (such as bond
density results
electronegative element
energies),
− indicates than hydrogen.
the numbers themselves are not physical quantities;
a small negative they
in the havelie
bond
charge. units and must only be used in a comparative way. The most fromcommonly
H, so it i
used scale of electronegativity is that developed by Linus Pauling. The
2
There areare
electronegativity values for some elements various
shownscales of electronega
in Table 3.11.
that, although they are derived from p
energies), the numbers
Noble gases do not have electronegativity values asthemselves
they do notare
als have higher units and must only be used in a com
gativities thanBILAL
metals.
HAMEED form compounds. INTERMOLECULAR FORCES
used scale of electronegativity is that d
www.youtube.com/megalecture
electronegativity values for some elem
bond enthalpy reflects the strength of the covalent bond. As we 151
I–I
ve from single to double to triple bonds theClasses
Online number: of electrons in
Megalecture@gmail.com
250
bond increases resulting in an increase in electrostatic forces and a Table 1 Average bond enthalpies
tening of the bond length. This trend can be seen in the carbon– at 298 K
on bond of the homologous series of alkanes, alkenes, and alkynes.
3.2
The other end
H–Clof the bond1.0
(in this case, the431
H atom) is less electron rich
(lower electron density), hence, δ-
r 3.0 H–Br 0.8 more positive. 366
δ+
These two ends,
le 3 Electronegativity values
one somewhat positive and the other
Table 4 Bond polarity and bond enthalpy at 298 K
somewhat negative may be described as electronic H F
orine has the highest electronegativity value of any element.
polarity of the poles, hence
H–F bond the term
results in a polar
partialcovalent
charge on bonds.
each
m. The bond is said to have ionic character. The partial charges
3
act one another, increasing the strength of the bond (figure 1). Figure 1 The polar H–F bond
153
POLAR BONDS
In a polar covalent bond, the shared electrons, which are in a molecular orbital,
are more likely to be found nearer to the atom whose electronegativity is higher.
ELECTRONEGATIVITY
Electronegativity is a measure of the ability of an atom to attract electrons
in a chemical bond. Elements with high electronegativity have a greater
ability to attract electrons than do elements with low electronegativity.
The four most electronegative elements are F, O, N, Cl.
electronegativity increases
increases
Electronegativity increases across a period and decreases down a group
5
BOND POLARITIES
Non-polar bond Polar bond
• Similar atoms have the same • Different atoms have different
electronegativity electronegativities
• They will both pull on the • One will pull the electron pair closer to its end
electrons to the same extent • It will be slightly more negative than average, δ-
• The electrons will be equally • The other will be slightly less negative, or more
shared positive, δ+
• A dipole is formed and the bond is said to be
polar
• Greater electronegativity difference = greater
polarity
Linus Pauling
Linus Pauling
related
Linus the MOLECULAR
related
Paulingelectronegativity
the
related the POLARITY
electronegativity
electronegativity
difference diffbetween
erencediffbetween
erence between
two atomstwo
Thetoatoms
thetwo ionic
toatoms
the
electronegativity character
ionic
to the
character
of
ionic
difference a between
bond.
character
of aHe
bond.
twosuggested
of He
a bond.
atoms suggested
that
Heansuggested
covalently that an that an
bonded Exam
electronegativity
electronegativity
togetherelectronegativity
difference
results in diff
theof erence
1.7diff
electronscorresponded
oference
1.7 more
lying corresponded
of 1.7 tocorresponded
towards50%one to
ionic
50%
atom character
ionic
to 50%
than character
the in in If aske
ionic character in
a bond and
aother.
bondreasoned
Weand
a call
bond
reasoned
that
such and aa bond
greater
reasoned
thatpolar.
a electronegativity
greater
that aelectronegativity
greater electronegativity
difference diffthan
erencethis
diffthan
erence that th
thisthan this
corresponded
corresponded
tocorresponded
a structure
to a structure
that
to was
a structure
that
more wasionic
that
more than
was
ionic
more
covalent,
than
ionic
covalent,
whereas
than covalent,
whereas whereas two e
However, whether an overall molecule is polar also depends on the
if the diff
ifshape
erence
the diff differe
ofifis
erence
thethe
less diff
than
iserence
molecule. less
thatthan
the
is less
that
bonding
than
the that
bonding
is more
the bonding
iscovalent
more covalent
isthan
moreionic.
covalent
than ionic.
than ionic.
This is aThis
useful
is aidea,
This
usefulbut
is idea,
a ituseful
must
butidea,
be
it must
used
butbe with
it must
used
great
with
be used
caution.
great
with
caution.
For
great
instance,
caution.
For instance, and c
For instance,
The polarity of molecules is distinct from the polarity of individual bonds; less th
KI (electronegativity
KI (electronegativity
KI (electronegativity
difference diff1.7)
erencewould
diff1.7)
erence
come
would1.7)
outcome
would
of this
outcome
discussion
of this
outdiscussion
of this discussion
a non-polar molecule may have polar bonds.
as havingas 50%
having
ionic
as50%
having
and
ionic
50%
50%and
covalent
ionic
50%andcovalent
character,
50% covalent
character,
and NaIcharacter,
and
(diffNaI
erence
and
(diffNaI
erence
(difference
of 1.6) would
of 1.6)appear
would
of 1.6)to
appear
would
be mostly
toappear
be covalent,
mostly
to becovalent,
mostly
whereas covalent,
whereas
both behave
whereas
both asbehave
bothasbehave as
predominantly
predominantly
ionic
predominantly
compounds.
ionic compounds.
ionic
Pauling,
compounds.
Pauling,
in his original
Pauling,
in his original
discussion
in his original
discussion
of discussion
of of
this, wasthis,
actually
was this,
actually
referring
was referring
actually
to diatomic
referring
to diatomic
molecules
to diatomic
molecules
and not
7 molecules
and
to macroscopic
not and
to macroscopic
not to macroscopic
compounds.
compounds.compounds.
The electronegativity
The electronegativity
The electronegativity
differencediffbetween
erence diffbetween
erence
two atoms between
twocovalently
atomstwocovalently
atoms
bonded covalently
bonded bonded
togethertogether
results in
together
results
the electrons
inresults
the electrons
in
lying
themore
electrons
lyingtowards
morelying
towards
onemoreatomtowards
onethan
atom the
one
than
atomthethan the
other. We
other.
call We
such
other.
call
a bond
such
We calla bond
suchHowever,
polar. a bondHowever,
polar. whether
polar. However,
whether
an overallwhether
an molecule
overallanmolecule
overall
is molecule
is is
polar also
polar
depends
alsopolar
depends
on also POLAR
the shape
depends
on theMOLECULES
theofshape
on the
molecule.
of shape
the molecule.
of the molecule.
For a For
molecule
For a molecule
to
Forbe
a molecule a polar
to molecule
topolar
be be
it polar
must
to be
it musthave
ithave
must
polar
aapositive
have
it must
a positive
positive have
endto ato
end thepositive
end
the to the
molecule end to the
moleculemolecule
andand molecule
a negative
andend.
a negative a negative
and
end.
For a For instance,
negative
end.
instance, HCl,For
NH instance,
3 HCl,
end.andFor
HNH
2O 3 and
instance,
HCl,
are allNHH 32O
and
HCl,
polar. are
NHHall
23OandareHall
2O are all
polar (Figure
polar (Figure
polar
3.89). These
(Figure
3.89). molecules
These
3.89). molecules
These
all havemolecules
all
an have
overall
an
all dipole
These molecules all have an overall dipole moment, and the arrow
overall
have andipole
overall moment,
moment, dipole moment,
and the and
arrow
theindicates
indicates arrow
and theindicates
the
arrow
the direction direction
of indicates
thedipole
the direction
of the direction
dipole
moment.of themoment.
dipole
of themoment.
dipole moment.
8
Saying
momen
AlthoughAlthough
individual
Although
individual
bondsindividual
may
bondsbemay polar,
bonds
bethe
may
polar,
overall
bethe
polar,
overall
molecule
the molecule
overall molecule
saying t
may bemaynon-polar
be may
non-polar
if,beowing
non-polar
if, to
owing
theif,symmetry
to
owing
the symmetry
to of
thethe
symmetry
molecule,
of the molecule,
ofthe
the molecule,
the the
dipole moments
dipole moments
BILAL HAMEED dipole
of themoments
individual
of the individual
of bonds
the individual
cancel
bonds out.
cancel
bonds out.
cancel out.
INTERMOLECULAR FORCES
www.youtube.com/megalecture
a bond and reasoned that a greater electronegativity difference
a bond than this
and reasoned that the
that a greater bonding between
electronegativity diffe
corresponded to a structure that wasOnlinemoreClasses
ionic than covalent, whereas
corresponded two elements is ionic
to a structure that was more ionic than cov if the
: Megalecture@gmail.com
f the difference is less than that the bonding is more covalent
if253 than
the diff diffthe
ionic.is less than that
erence erence is more
bonding than cov
is more 1.7
This is a useful idea, but it must be used with great caution.
ThisForis a instance,
useful idea, but it mustandbecovalent
used withif the diffcautio
great eren
KI (electronegativity difference 1.7) would come out ofKI this(electronegativity
discussion less1.7)
difference than 1.7. come out of
would
as having 50% ionic and 50% covalent character, and NaIas (diff erence
having 50% ionic and 50% covalent character, and NaI
of 1.6) would appear to be mostly covalent,POLAR
whereas bothof behave
1.6) would
MOLECULES as appear to be mostly covalent, whereas both
predominantly ionic compounds. Pauling, in his originalpredominantly
discussion of ionic compounds. Pauling, in his original
his, was actually referring to diatomic molecules and not this,
to was actually referring to diatomic molecules and not
macroscopic
compounds. compounds. δ+
CHCl3 δ+ NH3 Cl
δ+ δ-
H δ- δ- O C
N
other. We call such a bond polar. However, whether an other. overallWe call suchis a bond polar. However, whether an o
molecule
polar also depends on the shape of the molecule. polar also depends on the shape of the molecule.
For a molecule to be polar it must have a positive end For a molecule to be polar it must have a positive en
to the
molecule and a negative end. For instance, HCl, NHmolecule and a negative end. For instance, HCl, NH3
3 and H2O are all
polar (Figure 3.89). These molecules all have an overall d
polar (Figure 3.89). These molecules all have an overall dipole moment,
and the arrow indicates the direction of the dipole mome
and the arrow indicates the direction of the dipole moment.
9
10
Cis-1,2-dichloro
This will also be discussed on pages isomers – they d
487–491. DIPOLE MOMENTS C=C (Figure 3.9
g atoms
he in order
following of in order of 15 Sort the
atoms 15following
Sort themolecules
following into polar and
molecules into polar and
allest first):
gativity (smallest first): non-polar molecules. For the polar molecule
non-polar molecules. For the polar molecule
Br H NaBr Na draw diagrams
drawshowing
diagramstheshowing
dipoles.the dipoles.
ecules
polar from from the following XeF6
the following
molecules XeF
XeF46 SF
XeF4 4 PCl
SF45 SF
PCl2 5 SF2
lecules,
he draw diagrams
e polar molecules, draw diagrams SF 6 ClF
SF65 BrF
ClF35 SOCl
BrF3 2 SOCl2
he dipoles.
HCNPH3 SCl
PH23 CF
SCl4 2 CF4
O
OCl32 BCl
O3 3 C
BClCl
2 32 C2Cl2 Both molecul
CH2Cl2
except that one
the boiling poin
12
interactions in th
lecular
ow
w intermolecular
SKILL CHECK 1
Decide whether the following bonds are polar or non-polar. if the
bond is polar, state which is the δ+ atom, and explain whether or not
the molecule is polar:
A C-O as in CO2
B C-I as in CH3I
13
SKILL CHECK 2
Predict which of the following bonds are polar, and, if polar, in which
direction the electrons are pulled:
a. O—S b. Cl—Cl c. C—N d. I—Cl
14
SKILL CHECK 3
Predict whether each of the following molecules is polar:
a. CO2 b. BrCl c. SCl2 d. CS2
Using the shapes drawn on slide 48 to 51, predict whether each of the
following molecules is polar:
a. CF4 b. Cl2O c. PF3 d. NCl3 e. SiCl4 f. SO3
15
INTERMOLECULAR FORCES
Intermolecular forces are weak attractive forces between molecules.
These forces determine such properties as the solubility of one substance in
another and the freezing and boiling points of liquids.
Without intermolecular forces there could be no molecular liquids or solids.
16
INTERMOLECULAR FORCES
Weak intermolecular forces arise from electrostatic attractions between
dipoles, including attractions between:
17
Van der Waal’s forces due to permanent dipoles are interactions between
polar molecules - the positive end of one molecule attracts the negative
end of a neighbouring molecule.
H Cl H Cl H Cl H Cl
δ+ δ- δ+ δ- δ+ δ- δ+ δ-
δ- δ- δ-
Cl Cl Cl van der Waal’s forces
C C C
Cl δ- Cl δ- Cl δ-
H H H
δ+ Cl δ+ Cl δ+ Cl
δ- δ- δ-
18
he H–Cl
l(l) but,
molecular
– 19
ttractions.
ar
der Waals’
n der All other things being equal:
this basically means that we should
ole VAN DER WAALS’compare compounds
FORCES with relative
IN NON-POLAR MOLECULES
molecular
ling pointsIntermolecular forces also existmasses as molecules.
in non-polar similar Van
as der Waal’s forces
possible.
due to induced dipoles are the intermolecular attraction resulting from the
uneven distribution of electrons and the creation of temporary dipoles.
ecular massBecause electrons move quickly in
This results in a temporary (instantaneous) dipole in the atom, which will induce an
opposite dipole in a neighbouring atom.
These dipoles will attract each other so that there is an attractive force between atoms.
21
molecular mass also increases, and we normally talk about ‘an increase in the
er Waals’ forces VAN DER WAALS’ FORCES DUE TO INDUCED DIPOLES
strength of van der Waals’ forces as the relative molecular mass increases’.
he relative
A clear correlation between boiling point and relative molecular/
ncreases. In general, van der Waals’ forces get stronger as the number of electrons in a
atomic mass can be seen down group 7 (blue line) and down group 0 (red
molecule increases.
line) in Figure 3.94. As the number of electrons increases, the relative molecular
mass also increases, resulting in an increase in the strength of van der Waals’ forces.
22
as freezing and melting points are the same, condensation points and boiling points are the
0
same temperature. For this reason published 50 tables are of100
freezing points
140 and boiling points.
Mr
PbH4
24
25
SiH
H, polarising the bond such that there is a strong interaction between the
-160
4 bonding, bu
+ H and the − atom (N, O,CHF) on the other molecule. be explained
26 4
more diffuse
The hydrogen bonding between ammonia molecules and hydrogen
interacting e
fluoride molecules is shown in Figure 3.99.
The requ
are that
a very el
O, F – w
one lone
27
expected
he relative
ld be
here must
ween H2O There is more to hydrogen bonding
than just an electrostatic interaction
han van der
between dipoles. When H is attached
O molecules HYDROGEN BONDING
to a very electronegative atom,
ater molecules
the electron density is pulled away
One reason
strongly from thethat hydrogen
H. There is then bonds are such strong forces is because the
an interaction between the electron
is the hydrogen
density of theatom ison
lone pair small
N, O andor F has only one electron.
han in one molecule and the H nucleus
When thatmolecule.
in a different electron is pulled
There is thus away by a highly electronegative atom, there
a directional component to hydrogen
are no more electrons under it. Thus, the single proton of the hydrogen
bonds. If the interaction were purely
y dipole–dipole,
nucleus Cl, with theexposed.
is partially same
in the electronegativity as N, would also be
ity from the expected
As to participate
a result, in hydrogen
hydrogen’s proton is strongly attracted to the lone pair of
between the bonding, but it does not. This could
electrons
be explained of other
by the highermolecules.
energy and The combination of the large
more diffuse lone pair on the Cl not
hydrogen electronegative difference (high polarity) and hydrogen’s small size
interacting effectively with the H.
accounts for the strength of the hydrogen bond.
28
The requirements for H bonding
are that the H atom is attached to
a very electronegative atom – N,
O, F – which possesses at least
one lone pair of electrons.
ethanol inuence
water Octan-1-ol is insoluble in water. Although there is some h
We have looked at several factors that infl the strength of The stronger the intermolecular
bonding between the O–H group of the alcohol and the
intermolecular forces and hence the melting and boiling points of forces, the more energy must be chain prevents water molecules on
the long hydrocarbon
covalent substances. Now let us consider all the above points together supplied to hydrogen
break them and theto each other (Figure 3.106). Energy is
bonding
with some examples. higher the boiling point.
break the hydrogen bonds between the water molecules, b
paid back as only van der Waals’ forces form between the
Intermolecular forces increase in strength as: 29
and the hydrocarbon part of the molecule.
van der Waals’ forces < permanent dipole–dipole < hydrogen bonding
WEAKEST STRONGEST
Relative molecular mass –
If relative molecular masses are approximately equal, then the boiling generally substances with higher
points usually go in the order shown in Table 3.13. relative molecular masses have
higher melting points and boiling
points due to stronger van der
Waals’ forces.
SOLUBILITY
Generally a substance will dissolve in a solvent if the intermolecular forces in the solute
and solvent are similar. E.g. pentane is readily soluble in hexane but not in water.
Compare the
Theboiling points of
amount of sulfur,
energy chlorine and argon.
required to break the van der Waals’ forces in pure hexane and
pure pentane is paid back when van der Waals’ forces are formed between the
Sulfur, chlorine and argon are all non-polar substances, and therefore the strongest intermolecular forces are van
molecules
der Waals’ forces. of hexane
Any difference betweenand
thesepentane
substances is thus due to the strength of van der Waals’ forces,
which is affected by relative molecular mass (relative atomic mass for argon). Sulfur forms S8 molecules with a
relative molecular mass of 256.48; Cl2 has a relative molecular mass of 70.90; and Ar has a relative atomic
Consider themass of
dissolving of sodium chloride:
39.95. Therefore the boiling point of sulfur would be expected to be highest, as S8 has a greater relative molecular
‘+ water’
mass and therefore stronger van der Waals’ forces than Cl2 and Ar. More energy is thus required to break the
NaCl(s) NaCl(aq)
intermolecular forces in sulfur than to break the intermolecular forces in chlorine and the interatomic forces in Ar.
Chlorine would be expected to have a higher boiling point than Ar, again due to the greater The mass aqueous solution contains aqueous ions (Na+(aq) and
and the stronger
van der Waals’ forces. Ion–dipole interactions form between the water and the i
3.107). Energy is required to break the electrostatic forces
lattice but energy is released when hydrated ions are form
released when the hydrated ions are formed is comparable
required to break apart the lattice then the substance is ge
30
SOLUBILITY
Pentane does not dissolve in water because there is hydrogen bonding
between water molecules.
If pentane were to dissolve in water there would be van der Waals’ forces
between water molecules and pentane. The energy released if van der Waals’
forces were to form between water molecules and pentane molecules would not
pay back the energy required to break the hydrogen bonds between water
molecules, as hydrogen bonds are stronger than van der Waals’ forces
31
SOLUBILITY
Ethanol (C2H5OH) is very soluble in water, because ethanol is able to form
hydrogen bonds with the water.
Substances that are able to
The hydrogen bonding between water andinethanol
participate moleculesEthanol
hydrogen bonding in the (C2H5OH) is very soluble in water, beca
will generally be soluble in water, hydrogen bond to the water (Figure 3.105). The
solution releases energy and pays back the energy to break
as they are able to hydrogen bond the hydrogen
between water and ethanol molecules in the solu
to the water. pays back the energy to break the hydrogen bond
bonds in pure water and pure ethanol. ethanol.
Explain why, in comparison with the other group 6 hydrides, water has
an anomalous boiling temperature.
34
SKILL CHECK 5
State all the forces operating between molecules of:
(a) ammonia, NH3
(b) methane, CH4
35
36
CH4 267 50
HF
–200
boiling point/°C
2 3 4 5 Group 17
0
period NH3
H2S
gure 3.54 Thymine, adenine, cytosine –50
Group 15 HC
nd guanine are bases in DNA. The hydrogen 03_53 Cam/Chem AS&A2
PH3
onding between them allows the DNA
olecule to replicate (make new copies of
self) and also allows the genetic code to be
Barking Dog Art HYDROGEN BONDING IN DNA –100
Group 14 SiH4
xpressed in the synthesis of proteins. –150
CH4
–200
C O N N N O N 2 3
C C
C C C C C C C C
C O N N
66
C
C C C C C
N
C N N C C
Cam/Chem AS&A2 66
_Chem_BP_044-068.indd 30/09/14 5:52 PM
to DNA
N C C N N
g Dog Art chain
to DNA O to DNA
chain chain
thymine adenine cytos
37
66
38
SKILL CHECK 7
Which types of intermolecular forces can exist between adjacent urea
molecules?
A hydrogen bonding
39