Question: The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of

the population between 2002 and 2010, and by the level of education for the years 2002 and
2010.

The accorded bar charts depict the proportion data of computer ownership as well as the
percentage of computer ownership categorized by education level from 2002 to 2010.
At the onset, it is stated that the proportion of society with said device were gradually uplifting as
well as the ownership percentage in all academic stages, with the highest position held by
postgraduate qualifiers while no high school diploma was the least.

Firstly, computer ownership started below 60% in 2002 before moderately increasing until it
reached roughly 80% by the end of the reporting period. The statistics moved to 60% in 2004,
slightly beyond that number in 2006, and rose more significantly in the next two years.

On the other hand, all stages of education faced leverages in 2010 compared to eight years
earlier. Postgraduate qualification ownership increased at least 15% from 80% to approximately
95%. On the contrary, no high school diploma accounted for the lowest amount of ownership
among all categories, starting at below 20% in 2002. However, its figure nearly tripled that
number in less than a decade. Other categories ranked from the least to the highest in both years
were bachelor's degree, incompleted college, and high school graduates.
Question: The two tables below show the number of international students from different
resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.

The accorded two tables delineate comparative data about the number of international students
studying in Canada and USA in the years 2002 and 2003 and the percentage of change in the
number of students in the two years.

At the first glance, it is worth noticing that the total number of students in 2002 and 2003, it is
evident that it has increased in 2003 except for the number of Indian students in the USA. Even
though the percentage change in Canada is higher, the total number of foreign students is more in
the USA.

There is a 45% increase in the number of Chinese students in Canada from 5400 in 2002 to 7850
in 2003. But in the USA the change is only 6% in the number of Chinese students. The highest
number of international students in the USA are from India but faced a decrease of 9% in the
numbers in 2003. Meanwhile there was an increase of 35% in the number of Indian students
studying in Canada from 2100 in 2002 to 2835 in 2003.
Furthermore, the increase of Canadian students in the USA and the increase of USA students in
Canada are comparable. The increase is 7% and 9% respectively. Canada saw a 17% increase in
the number of international students while the USA only witnessed a growth of 2%.
The bar chart demonstrates the total number of Japanese tourists who took a trip overseas
between 1985 and 1995, while the line chart delineates the share percentage of Australia that
resulted from the Japanese tourist market.
From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that overseas travel showed increase
popularity over these reporting periods, whils, the rate of these travellers visiting Australia
increased.

As it is conspicuous that in 1985, there are roughly 5 million of the population in Japan went to
international destination. Afterwards, half a decade, this number approximately doubled, till
reached 11 million in 1990. However, there was a marginal decline in this amount by almost one
million in 1991. In the following years, those share significantly rose and peaked at moderately
below 16 million at the end of period.

Moving onto the second chart, in terms of the Australian territory only received 2% of the total
in 1982. Interestingly, this number went up slightly by 3% after four years, then it decreased in
1989. Since then, there was an upward trend in Australia's share of Japan's tourist market, till
finished at 6 million in 1995.
Questions: The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less
productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the
1990s.

The pie chart provides information about the lack of productivity in the agricultural sector
and there is a table which illustrates the reasons that affected North America, Europe, and
Oceania during the 1990s.
The pie chart compares the proportion of main causes which affected the productivity of lands in
terms of agriculture, while the table shows the information in North America, Europe, and
Oceania in the 1990s.

From an overall perspective, it is evident that over-grazing was the most important reason around
the world, while that for Europe as the first region, which suffered from land degradation, was
deforestation.

According to the pie chart, It is clear that the highest share of reasons for damaging land fertile
was over-grazing, accounting for 35%, followed by deforestation, recorded at just under a third.
Deforestation is accounted for 30% degradation of cultivable land while over-cultivation results
28% land degradation. All other minor reasons are categorised as ‘other’ and constituted 7% loss
of land fertility

Regarding the details of the table, the data shows the percentages of agricultural land degradation
in three regions during the 1990s, namely North America, Europe, and Oceania. Oceania
comprised many islands in the South Pacific area including New Zealand and Australia. The
analysis shows that highest percentage of land degradation, 23%, occurred in Europe in the
1990s. This is followed by Oceania and North America where these percentages were 13% and
5% respectively. The most striking feature was that over-cultivation had zero impact in Oceania
as it was mostly affected by over-grazing.