Case Analysis 2 Plant Location Layout and Service Design
Case Analysis 2 Plant Location Layout and Service Design
Customer Relationship:
Customer Service
Submitted by:
Students name
section
Submitted to:
MARY JANE R. DE LEON, LPT, MBA, CB
Plant Location
II- DISCUSSION
5. Social infrastructure
Education institutions,
7. Nearness to market
III- APPLICATION
Many situations give rise to the problem of plant layout. Two plants having similar
operations may not have identical layouts. This may be due to size of the plant, nature of the
process and management’s calibre.
The necessity of plant layout may be felt and the problem may arise when:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(v) Some new department is to be added to the enterprise and there is reallocation of the
existing department.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
The layout of a plant is quite important in view of the above definition but the importance of
a layout may greatly vary from industry to industry.
The possibility of attaining the best possible layout is directly proportional to following
factors:
If the final product is quite heavy or difficult to handle involving costly material handling
equipment or a large amount of labour, important consideration will be to move the product
minimum possible e.g. boiler, turbines, locomotive industries and ship building companies
etc.
(iv) The Extent to which the Process Tends towards Mass Production:
A good rather an optimum layout is one which provides maximum satisfaction to all
concerned i.e. shareholders, management employees and consumers.
(ii) Material handling and internal transportation from one operation to the next is minimized
and efficiently controlled.
(iii) The production bottle necks and points of congestions are to be eliminated so that input
raw materials and semi-finished parts move fast from one work station to another.
(v) Should utilize the space most effectively; may be cubical utilization.
(vi) Should provide worker’s convenience, promote job satisfaction and safety for them.
(ix) Should lead to increased productivity and better quality of the product with reduced
capital cost.
Keeping in view the type of industry and volume of production, the type of layout to be
selected is to be decided from the following:
Fig. 3.3 shows product layout for two types of products A and B.
(iv) Less floor area is occupied by material in transit and for temporary storages.
(iii) If one or two lines are running light, there is a considerable machine idleness.
(iv) A single machine breakdown may shut down the whole production line,
The process layout is particularly useful where low volume of production is needed. If the
products are not standardized, the process layout is more desirable, because it has greater
process flexibility than other. In this type of layout the machines are not arranged according
to the sequence of operations but are arranged according to the nature or type of the
operations.
See Fig. 3.4 for process layout. Therefore, the process carried out in any area is according to
the machine available in that area.
(i) There will be less duplication of machines. Thus total investment in equipment purchase
will be reduced.
(ii) It offers better and more efficient supervision through specialization at various levels.
(iii) There is a greater flexibility in equipment and man power thus load distribution is easily
controlled.
(v) Breakdown of equipment can be easily handled by transferring work to another machine/
work station.
(vi) There will be better control of complicated or precision processes, especially where
much inspection is required.
(i) There are long material flow lines and hence the expensive handling is required.
(ii) Total production cycle time is more owing to long distances and \waiting at various
points.
(iii) Since more work is in queue and waiting for further operation hence bottlenecks occur.
(v) Since work does not flow through definite lines, counting and scheduling is more tedious.
(v)Specialization creates monotony and there will be difficulty for the laid workers to find
job in other industries.
(iii) The task is usually done by gang of operators, hence continuity of operations is ensured
(iv) Production centres are independent of each other. Hence effective planning and loading
can be made. Thus total production cost will be reduced and
(v) It offers greater flexibility and allows change in product design, product mix and
production volume.
(iii) Complicated fixtures may be required for positioning of jobs and tools. This may
increase the cost of production.
Now days in pure state any one form of layouts discussed above is rarely found. Principles of
Plant Layout:
These are:
- provides integration of production facilities like men, machinery, raw materials, supporting
activities and any other such factors which result in the best compromise.
According to Muther, the best layout is one which arranges the work station for each
operation process in same order or sequence that forms treats or assembles the materials.
According to this principle best layout is one which provides satisfaction and safety to all
workers concerned.
IV - RECOMMENDATION
For me I think after all I had read the topics about plant location, layout and design, I
may recommend that the major factors considered for service providers, is an impact of
location on sales and customer satisfaction. Customers usually look about how close a
service facility is, particularly if the process requires considerable customer contact. Hence,
service facility layouts should provide for easy entrance to these facilities from the freeways.
Well-organized packing areas, easily accessible facilities, well designed walkways and
parking areas are some of the requirements of service facility layout.
needed by a customer. These service layouts follow conventional layouts as required. For
example, for car service station, product layout is adopted, where the activities for servicing a
car follows a sequence of operation irrespective of the type of car. Hospital service is the best
example for adaptation of process layout. Here, the service required for a customer will
follow an independent path.
Although location is a long-term investment, a firm does not decide on a location with
the sole objective of maximizing its profits or minimizing its costs. Managers may choose a
“safer” location that is more likely to produce higher profits rather than a riskier location that
yields the maximum investment return. Personal factors of the people involved are also
influences. Plant location must be conducive and properly well ventilated its working
environment that promotes staff comfort.
V- CONCLUSION
Estimating capacity for a service business layout is somewhat more complicated than it
is in manufacturing. This is because most of the services available in the economy are
delivered on a need basis. Therefore estimating capacity for start up or expansion layout can
prove to be a little tricky especially for inexperienced service providers or in cases where the
plans were rushed without proper research.
Operations managers in service industries should bear in mind that contact with
customers is inevitable. Given that different customers have different tastes that have to be
met, it’s possible to deal with irate customers whose special demand may subject managers
to considerable pressure.
Plant layout is a significant factor in the timely execution of orders. An ideal layout
eliminates such causes of delays as shortage of space, long-distance movements of materials,
spoiled work and thus contributes to the speedy execution of orders. The location and layout
of a plant can greatly impact its economic and operational success. Objectives such as cost
minimization, efficient material distribution, room for expansion, and safety of the plant
operators and local community play important roles in the site decision. The major factors
affecting this decision are market and labor. National and regional environmental
legislation's impact the processes, and thus make some areas more desirable than others.
Least important are land costs and financial incentives. Then with the help of consultants like
master student like me, a location is narrowed down and further analyses are done to justify
the continuation of the project. The location should be obtained before design of the details
of the process. Within the site itself, process units are arranged to allow for the most
economical flow of people and material, optimal safety, and room for future expansion.
VI- References