Case Study 3
Case Study 3
The Wells Fargo scandal was due to millions of fake savings and
checking accounts were created on behalf of their clients without
their consent for more sales goals at Wells Fargo. After the company
was fined a total of US$185m by various regulatory bodies including
(CFPB) for engaging in illegal activities, news of the fraud spread
widely in late 2016. By 2018 about 2.7b civil and criminal lawsuits
were filled against the organisation. Clients of the bank started to
become aware of the fraud when they received unexpected fee etc.
The widespread fraud the consequent media attention and the
discovery of additional fraudulent practices by the company harmed
bank’s reputation. The issue was first traced to specific Wells Fargo
branch employee and managers as well as incentives connected
with recommending several “solutions or financial product. Later,
the blame was placed on higher-level management’s top-down
pressure to open as many accounts as possible through cross
selling. The bank had a stable reputation on wall street and in the
financial industry because it had taken comparatively few risks in
the year preceding the 2007-2008 financial crisis. The widespread
fraud, the consequent media attention and the discovery of
additional fraudulent practices by the company damaged the bank’s
once stable reputation. A number of towns between Wells Fargo and
different parties, an investigation into the company’s bank-led
model, the dismissal of CEO John Stumpf, and promises from the
new leadership to reform the bank are all final of this revelation
Background
Impact
On Wells Fargo: About 3000 employees were fired and the bank
faced decreased profitability in the first quarter after the news. John
Stumpf the CEO was subject to hear before a senate banking
committee on September 21,2016. Before the hearing Stumpf
agreed to Forgo $41m, Stumpf resigned roughly a month after the
fines by CFPB were announced, to be replaced by COO Timothy
Sloan, they had internal pressure for Stumpf’s resignation also
payments to law firm and other expenses increased
On consumers: customers credit score were also hurt by fake
accounts. Also incurring fee. Bank was unable to prevent customers
from pursing legal action
Take Aways
Business should prioritize clients need and interest ahead of their
own financial goals. Retaining credibility and trust requires strict
adherence to legal requirements as well as ethical standards.
Accountability and trust are created by open and honest
communication will all stakeholders including customers, investors
and staff. Long term success depends on honesty, responsibility and
moral conduct at all organization levels. Scandals can be avoided
and risk can be reduced by putting strong assessment and
monitoring systems in place to quickly identify and address
unethical misconduct
Bible Verse Proverbs 12:22 states- “ The lord detests lying lips but
he delights in people who are trustworthy” Integrity and honesty are
emphasized in all spheres of including business regarding wells
Fargo ethical issue business should put its efforts into making
amends by owing up to any misconduct accepting accountability
and outing policies in place to make sure it doesn’t happen again.
This verse might serve us as a guide to value honesty and reliability
in life
Reference
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wells_Fargo_cross-selling_scandal
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/wells-fargo-scandals-the-complete-
timeline-141213414.html