Scribd
Upload
23 views

Intrusion Detection in Homogeneous and

Uploaded by

abreddy2003
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views

Intrusion Detection in Homogeneous and

Uploaded by

abreddy2003
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Hacker Detection in Wireless sensor network

Abstract:

Intrusion detection in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is of practical interest in many


applications such as detecting an intruder in a battlefield. The intrusion detection is
defined as a mechanism for a WSN to detect the existence of inappropriate,
incorrect, or anomalous moving attackers. In this paper, we consider this issue
according to heterogeneous WSN models. Furthermore, we consider two sensing
detection models: single-sensing detection and multiple-sensing detection... Our
simulation results show the advantage of multiple sensor heterogeneous WSNs.

Existing System:
 In single-sensing detection, At a time only one intruder detected by the wsn.
 Our Previous work was according to homogeneous and heterogeneous single
sensor in wireless sensor network

Proposed System:
 In Heterogeneous wireless sensor ,Intruder detected anywhere in the network.
 We are detecting the intruder in multiple sensor heterogeneous wireless
sensor network.

Disadvantage:

 The sensed information provided by a single sensor might be inadequate for


recognizing the intruder.
 So that there is no guarantee for our information has been sent securely.
 Data will not routed if primary detector fails.

Advantage:

 If primary detector fails another detector detect the intruder.


 By finding the intruders we can send our information in a secured manner.

System Requirements:

Hardware:

PROCESSOR : PENTIUM IV 2.6 GHz


RAM : 512 MB DD RAM
MONITOR : 15” COLOR
HARD DISK : 20 GB
CDDRIVE : LG 52X
KEYBOARD : STANDARD 102 KEYS
MOUSE : 3 BUTTONS

Software:
FRONT END : Java
TOOL USED : JFrameBuilder
OPERATING SYSTEM : Window’s Xp

Bibliography or References
[1] D.P. Agrawal and Q.-A. Zeng, Introduction to Wireless and Mobile Systems.
Brooks/Cole Publishing, Aug. 2003.

[2] B. Liu and D. Towsley, “Coverage of Sensor Networks: Fundamental Limits,” Proc.
Third IEEE Int’l Conf. Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Oct. 2004.

[3] S. Ren, Q. Li, H. Wang, X. Chen, and X. Zhang, “Design and Analysis of Sensing
Scheduling Algorithms under Partial Coverage for Object Detection in Sensor
Networks,” IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 334-350,
Mar. 2007.

[4] S. Banerjee, C. Grosan, A. Abraham, and P. Mahanti, “Intrusion Detection on


Sensor Networks Using Emotional Ants,” Int’l J. Applied Science and Computations,
vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 152-173, 2005.

[5] S. Capkun, M. Hamdi, and J. Hubaux, “GPS-Free Positioning in Mobile Ad-Hoc


Networks,” Proc. 34th Ann. Hawaii Int’l Conf.System Sciences, Jan. 2001.

[6] N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, “Gps-Less Low Cost Outdoor Localization
for Very Small Devices,” IEEE Personal Comm. Magazine, special issue on smart
spaces and environments,2000.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy