Readings in Philippine History
Readings in Philippine History
History
First Semester
2024-2025
Chapter 1:
Meaning and Relevance
of History
Learning Objectives
• Explain history as an academic discourse;
• Apply historical methodologies;
• Discuss the development of historiography,
• particularly Philippine historiography.
• Discuss the importance of history in the creation of
national identities and development and make it
part of Filipino consciousness.
Chapter 1:
Meaning and Relevance of History
A. Meaning and Relevance of History
B. Distinction of Primary and Secondary
Sources; External and Internal Criticism
A. Meaning and
Relevance of History
History
Traditional Understanding:
• Study of the past
• Chronological record of significant
events often including an
explanation of their causes
Modern Understanding:
SCIENCE
NATURAL SOCIAL
-HISTORY
-ECONOMICS
-POLITICAL
SCIENCE
PHYSICAL BIOLOGICAL -SOCIOLOGY
-Physics -Zoology -ANTHROPOLOGY
-Chemistry -Botany -PHILOSOPHY
-GEOGRAPHY
-PSYCHOLOGY
Historiography
• “Writing of history” (Historical Writing)
• Based on critical examination of sources, selection
of particular details from authentic materials in
those sources and the synthesis of those details
into a narrative
• Done through “Historical Research” with the aid of
“Historical Methodology”
History and Philippine
historiography
• Historiography is the art of writing. It also refers to the theory
and history of historical writing.
9000 BCE or
7000 BCE 21st Century
Japanese era
B. Distinction of
Primary and Secondary
Sources;
External and Internal
Criticism
Historical Sources
1. Primary Sources
• Produced at the same time as the event being
studied (Contemporary Accounts)
• Include documents or artifacts created by a
witness or participant of the event
• “Firsthand testimony,” “Eyewitness accounts”
• It may include diaries, letters, interviews,
photographs, newspapers
2. Secondary Sources
• Produced by authors who used and interpreted
primary sources
• Analyzed a scholarly question and often use
primary source as evidence
• Include books, theses, dissertations, journals,
magazines, knowledge of historians
• Written few years after the exact time of the event
Primary
Source A
Equals:
Primary
COMPARISON Secondary
Source B
Source
Primary
Source C
Drill: Identify whether Primary or
Secondary Source
1. “Batas Militar: Martial Law Under President
Ferdinand E. Marcos Full Documentary”
2. “La Revolucion Filipina” of Apolinario Mabini
3. National Historical Commission of the
Philippines YouTube Channel
4. Historical Data Papers from National Library
of the Philippines
5. “War Memoirs of Jose P. Laurel” by Jose P.
Laurel
Drill: Identify whether Primary or
Secondary Source
1. “Batas Militar: Martial Law Under President
Ferdinand E. Marcos Full Documentary”
2. “La Revolucion Filipina” of Apolinario Mabini
3. National Historical Commission of the
Philippines YouTube Channel
4. Historical Data Papers from National Library
of the Philippines
5. “War Memoirs of Jose P. Laurel” by Jose P.
Laurel
Drill: Identify whether Primary or
Secondary Source
1. “Batas Militar: Martial Law Under President
Ferdinand E. Marcos Full Documentary”
2. “La Revolucion Filipina” of Apolinario Mabini
3. National Historical Commission of the
Philippines YouTube Channel
4. Historical Data Papers from National Library
of the Philippines
5. “War Memoirs of Jose P. Laurel” by Jose P.
Laurel
6. “Brains of the Nation” by Resil B. Mojares
7. “A Question of Heroes” by Nick Joaquin
8. “Anting-anting ni Manuel Quezon” at National
Museum of the Philippines- Museum of
Anthropology
9. “Veneration Without Understanding” by
Renato Constantino
10. Homo luzonensis ecofacts (fossils) unearthed
by UP Archaeological Studies Program
Primary and Secondary sources should be evaluated
its validity and credibility by asking these questions:
1. How did the author know about the given details?
Was the author present at the event?
2. Where did the information come from? Is it a
personal experience, an eyewitness account etc.?
3. Did the author conclude based on a single or
multiple source?
In terms of historical reliability,
Primary source:
• The closer the date of creation, the more reliable
one.
Secondary source:
• The more recent, the more reliable one.
Historical Criticism
1. External Criticism
• Verification of authenticity by examining physical characteristics;
consistency with the historical characteristics of the time when it
was produced, and materials used.
• We can ask the following questions:
-when it was written?
-where it was written?
-who was the author?
-why did it survive?
-what were the materials
used?
-where the words used were
being used those times?
2. Internal Criticism
• Looks at the truthfulness and factuality of the
evidence by looking at the author of the source, its
context, the agenda behind its creation
• It looks at the content of the source and examines
the circumstance of its production
• We can ask the following questions:
-was it written by eyewitness or not?
-why was it written?
-is there consistency?
-what are the connotations?
-what is the literal meaning?
-what is the meaning
of the context?
7 factors in evaluating through Internal Criticism
(Howell and Prevenier, 2001):
1. Genealogy of the document
2. Genesis of the document
3. Originality of the document
4. Interpretation of the document
5. Authorial authority of the document
6. Competence of the observer
7. Trustworthiness of the observer
Rizal did not write “Sa
Aking Mga Kabata”
“First Voyage Around the
World”
(“Primer Viaje en Torno del Globo”)
SPAIN PORTUGAL
Historical background
• Written by Antonio Pigafetta
in one of the five ships that
first circumnavigate the world
• It covers the time when
Ferdinand Magellan’s fleet
“Armada de Molucca” started
the voyage (1519) until it was
successfully went back to Spain
• The copies of this account was presented by
Pigafetta to Pope Clement VII, King Francis I’s
mother, etc.
• His original diary was lost and
not known in what language
it was written
• Survived in 4 manuscript
versions; 1 Italian
(Carlo Amoretti) and
3 French
MARCH 17, 1521 (originally March 16)
• Arrival in “Zamal” (Samar) particularly in the island
of “Humunu” (Homonhon)
• Magellan called it “Acquada da li buoni Segnialli”
(Watering place of God Signs)
• The district was called “Las Islas de San Lazaro”
(Islands of Saint Lazarus)
MARCH 18, 1521 (originally March 17)
• Magellan and his men landed in Humunu and saw
by native boatmen from Suluan Island who gave
Magellan went back to
them foods. Portugal with Enrique (1511)
•
APRIL 28, 1521 (originally April 27)
• 60 of Magellan’s men set out armed with corselets
and helmets and 20-30 Balanhais loaded by Rajah
Humabon’s men went to Matan to attack Cilapulapu
• The local islanders had lances of bamboo and
stakes hardened with fire
• “Battle of Mactan”
happened
“Organisado ang paglusob ng mga tiga-Mactan habang
nagsisigawan. Isang grupo kada tagiliran ng mga Espanyol at
isa sa harap na tila tatsulok. Nang magpaputok ng mga kanyon
at riple ang mga Espanyol, nakahanda na ang mga kalasag ng
mga ito. Gayundin, kanya-kanyang tago ang mga mandirigma
upang makaiwas, malinaw na malinaw na sila’y handa sa
atake. Hindi nakayanan ng mga Europeo ang mga pana, sibat,
putik at bato na dumapo sa kanila.
At matapos nito’y iniutos ni Magellan na magsunog ng mga
bahay ng mga taga-Mactan na siyang lalong ikinagalit ng mga
ito. At natutunan ng mga mandirigmang taga-Mactan na
puntiryahin sa paa ang mga kalabang nakabaluti.
Tinamaan si Magellan ng panang may lason sa kanang binti,
pero sinabi nitong bumalik na sa mga barko. Sa katapusan ng
laban si Magellan ay tinamaan ng sibat sa mukha ngunit
nakalaban pa, nasugatan pa braso at nakampilan pa sa
kaliwang binti. Sa kanyang pagbagsak, pinagtulungan na siya
ng mga tiga-Mactan. At nang makita ng mga kasama na patay
na si Magellan, sila’y nagsiatrasan, dala-dala ang iba pang mga
sugatan.”
Other contents of Pigafetta’s manuscript:
• Lifestyle of early Filipinos in Visayas
• First vocabulary of Visayan words ever penned by a
European
• Description of early Visayan music
• Evidence that the world is round
• Re-discovery of Pacific Ocean
“Redencion presupone
virtud, virtud sacrificio,
sacrificio amor!”
(Redemption presupposes virtue; virtue sacrifice,
sacrifice, love!)