Ipc 7526a Toc
Ipc 7526a Toc
Contact:
IPC
Table of Contents
1.0 SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.12.5 Solder Paste Inconsistency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.1 Statement of Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.12.6 Deficient Solder Paste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.2 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.12.7 Excessive Solder Paste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.2.1 Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.12.8 Defective Stencils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
v
IPC-7526A March 2022
8.1 Stencil Cleaning Agents and Methods . . . . . . . . 33 Figure 3-9a Cleaning a Stencil Using a Brush . . . . . . . . 6
8.2 Matching the Cleaning Agent to Process . . . . . 34 Figure 3-9b Damaging of Small Features
After Brushing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.2.1 Manual Stencil Cleaning
using Pre-Saturated Wipes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Figure 3-10 Cleaning Stencil Underside . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.2.2 Solvent Cleaning with No Water Rinse . . . . . . . 34 Figure 3-11a Uncleaned Stencil Aperture . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
vi
March 2022 IPC-7526A
Figure 3-19a Good Solder Joint Wetting . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 6-9a Desirable Print . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Figure 3-19b Good Solder Joint Wetting . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 6-9b Undesirable Print Showing Flux
Figure 3-19c Bad Solder Joint Wetting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Bleed That Bridge Solder Prints . . . . . . . . 27
Figure 3-19d Bad Solder Joint Wetting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Figure 6-10a Spray Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Figure 3-20 Inadequate Stencil Coplanarity . . . . . . . . . 12 Figure 6-10b Stencil Printer Orifices Designed to Wet
Understencil Paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Figure 3-21 Inconsistent Solder Mask Thickness . . . . . 13
Figure 6-11a Flux Build-up and Solder Balls Observed
Figure 3-22 Component Pad Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 in Stencil Apertures After First Print on
Figure 3-23 Alignment Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Highly Dense Apertures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Figure 4-1a Ferrite Bead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure 6-11b Flux Build-up and Solder Balls Observed
in Stencil Apertures After First Print on
Figure 4-1b Chip Resistor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Highly Dense Apertures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Figure 4-1c BGA Bottom 368 Solder Balls . . . . . . . . . 14
Figure 6-12a Flux Build-up on Stencil Bottom Side
Figure 4-2a Ferrite Beads in the tip After Three Prints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
of a 25 Guage Needle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Figure 6-12b Flux Build-up on Stencil Bottom Side
Figure 4-2b BGA 0.400 mm Pitch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 After Three Prints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Figure 4-2c BGA 0.300 mm Pitch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Figure 6-13 Flux Streaks Following Dry Wipe . . . . . . . 29
Figure 4-3 Incompatible Cleaning Solvent and Figure 6-15 IPA/Dry/Vac Wipe Example . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Solder Paste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Figure 6-16 Engineered Solvent Wipe/Dry/Vac . . . . . . 30
Figure 4-4a Stencil Printing Cycle Time . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Figure 6-17 Solvent-Water Azeotrope Wetness on
Figure 4-4b Stencil Cleaning/Wipe Frequency . . . . . . . 15 Stencil Bottom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Figure 4-5 Interaction Plot for Boards/Second . . . . . . 16 Figure 9-1 Manual Wipe Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Figure 4-6 Examples of an Acceptable Print . . . . . . . . 16 Figure 9-2 Ultrasonic Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Figure 5-1 Illustration of the Stencil Aperture Figure 9-3 Spray-in-Air Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Gasket – Highlighting (red circles) the
Figure 10-1a Solder Balls Wedged into No Solder Mask
Gasketing Challenges for a NSMD
Defined Channels and Via Holes . . . . . . . . 40
vs. SMD Pad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Figure 10-1b Solder Balls Wedged into No Solder Mask
Figure 5-2 Area Ratio Impacts Transfer Efficiency . . 18
Defined Channels and Via Holes . . . . . . . . 40
Figure 6-1 Image of the Stencil Printing Process . . . . 23
Figure 10-2 Board printed with wet solder paste . . . . . 40
Figure 6-2a Desirable - Smooth and Clean
Figure 10-3 Reflowed Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Aperture Wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Figure 6-2b Undesirable - Irregular and Uncleaned Tables
Aperture Wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Table 3-1 Lists Process Recommendations when
Figure 6-3 Understencil Wipe Process . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Cleaning Different Types of Contaminants
from Misprinted Boards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Figure 6-4 Excessive Solder Paste on Paper
Can Indicate Process Related Issues . . . . . 26 Table 4-1 Stencil Aperature Size and Area Ratios
Stencil Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Figure 6-5 Image of an Understencil Wipe Design
Within the Stencil Printing Machine . . . . . 26 Table 7-1 Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) . . . . 31
Figure 6-6 During the Wet Wipe, Solvent is Wicked Table 7-2 Ratings for Flammable Liquids . . . . . . . . . 32
Through Small Orifices to Wet an Area Table 8-1 Stencil Cleaning Agents and
of the Wiper Roll. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Processing Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Figure 6-7 Vacuum System Designed to Extract
Trace Solder Balls and Chemical Residues
from the Bottom Side of the Stencil. . . . . . 27
Figure 6-8 Flux Smeared Across the Bottom Side
of the Stencil After a Dry Wiping
Sequence (UV Tracer in Flux Illuminated
by Back Light). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
vii
March 2022 IPC-7526A
1.0 SCOPE
1.1 Statement of Scope This handbook addresses understencil cleanliness during stencil printing, removal of solder paste from
stencils following the cleaning process and misprint PCB board cleaning considerations.
1.2 Purpose The goal in stencil printing is to place an exact amount of material in a precise location on the PCB. The print
medium might be solder paste, adhesive/glue, flux, or thick film materials. The squeegee speed or pressure can affect the quality
of the material deposition, the stencil is the primary control mechanism for material deposition. The purpose of this handbook
is to provide the assembler best practice guidelines for understencil cleanliness during the stencil printing process, and stencil
cleaning once the stencil is removed from the stencil printer. The document also addresses best practices for cleaning a PCB that
was misprinted.
1.2.1 Problem Statement: The stencil and PCB must be well aligned and in very tight contact (gasketing) to achieve an acceptable
print. The problem is that poor contact between the stencil and the board can cause poor quality prints resulting in soldering defects.
A common root cause of gasketing issues is solder paste on the stencil’s contact side. The cleanliness of the stencil is critical to
the success of the stencil printing process. Insufficient solder is the primary cause of defects originating from the stencil printing
process; therefore, stencil cleanliness is an essential process step for delivering the proper amount of solder paste to the PCB pads.
1
IPC-7526A March 2022
3.1 Process Overview Stencil printing is a well-known and proven process technology for surface mounted and through hole
components. Solder paste deposition on fine pitch and area array packages offer an attractive, cost-saving, and high-volume
production process. The cleanliness of the stencil is critical to the success of the stencil printing process. Insufficient solder is the
primary cause of defects originating from the stencil printing process; therefore, stencil cleanliness is an essential process step for
delivering the proper amount of solder paste to the PCB pads. Stencil cleaning must remove all solder particles and flux vehicle
from stencil apertures without damaging the stencil, bonding adhesive or mounting mesh.
The degree of cleanliness required varies with complexity of the board design. Stencils are usually cleaned to a visually clean
condition. Cleaning misprinted circuit boards requires the removal of un-reflowed solder paste and ionic contaminants. An
inadequately cleaned misprint can leave undesired residues on the processed assembly, potentially impacting quality and reliability.
For additional information on assembly cleaning processes, please refer to IPC-CH-65.
When cleaning the stencil after removal from the printer, the most effective cleaning processes integrate mechanical and chemical
cleaning forces. Cleaning chemistry suppliers work closely with cleaning equipment manufacturers to provide an integrated
process. Stencil cleaning faces the challenge of removing solder paste and Surface Mount Technology (SMT) adhesive from tiny
apertures while not damaging the stencil. To achieve reproducibility in cleaning, the process requires a mild chemistry integrated
with stencil cleaning equipment that removes solder paste and SMT residues from fine apertures without damaging the stencil.
In summary, the stencil cleaning objectives are the removal of contaminants in the form of non-reflowed solder paste and uncured
adhesives. Process engineers are seeking robust processes that provide practical, cost effective, safe, and environmentally friendly
methods.