COMP1649 Human Computer Interaction and Design 2023-2024

Participant/student id: 445hhtui35 / 45435b6745

Maximum
Marking criterion marks Actual marks

Report
Professional writing style, English language proficiency, writing with appropriate level
of detail, professional report formatting, sufficient and appropriate referencing in 4
5
Harvard style of academic sources (e.g. journal papers, conference papers, academic
books) throughout the report.

A review of relevant and appropriate HCI background literature written in your own
words and appropriately referenced, to inform the design of the product and to
generate requirements. The relevant background research (e.g. related work, HCI
literature in relation to the product’s context, interaction design theory, cognitive 20 5
psychology etc.) should support generating requirements for the proposed solution. It
should be made clear which academic sources have been used and how they were
retrieved.

5The product design consisting of,

A) A discussion of the product idea (conceptual design) explaining the components of
the product and how the user will interact with the product, and how requirements
will be met. 15 5
B) The design principles (by Don Norman) and their application to the coursework
product are discussed. A brief discussion for each principle/concept and suitable
visual representations should be included.

A detailed proposal for an empirical HCI research study that uses your interactive
prototype. In this proposal, you need to describe and justify the details for a research
study including the research question(s) or hypothesis that your research study
attempts to investigate, who the participants of your study will be, how the study will 20 7
be run, the data collection, and how you will analyse the data. You do not need to run
the study but you need to create all necessary material and documentation that are
required for a usability expert to run the study.

A conclusion providing critical reflections on the limitations of the work that has been
carried out and a discussion of potential future work if the project would be
developed further. The conclusion needs to go beyond repeating what has been said 10 7
elsewhere and show a clear vision in the context of HCI of what the next steps for
such a project would be.
Mid-fidelity prototype 0
Clear links between the coursework report and the prototype with design decisions
explicitly documented and justified in the report. There is evidence of the effective
and successful application of HCI theory and design principles to create a prototype
that can be used to test core assumptions of your design and that is suitable for 30 23
researchers and designers to test and evaluate the product. The implementation of
design research, theory, and principles is evident in both the report and the
prototype.
0
Total 100 0

Feedback

What you did well

 Rubric COMP1649
Rubric 0-29% Fail 30-39% Fail 40-49% Satisfactory 50-59% Good 60-69% Very Good 70-79% Excellent 80-100% Exceptional
COMP1649
15 points 0-4 5 6-7 8 9-10 11 12-15
D1 Knowledge Little to no A poor discussion of A satisfactory A good discussion of A very good discussion An excellent An exceptional
discussion of the the product idea discussion of the the product idea of the product idea discussion of the discussion of the
Demonstratin product idea (conceptual design) product idea (conceptual design) (conceptual design) product idea product idea
g the design (conceptual explaining the (conceptual design) explaining the explaining the (conceptual design) (conceptual design)
process and design) explaining components of the explaining the components of the components of the explaining the explaining the
implementati the components of product and how components of the product and how the product and how the components of the components of the
on of design the product and the user will interact product and how the user will interact with user will interact with product and how the product and how the
principles how the user will with the product, user will interact with the product, and how the product, and how user will interact with user will interact with
interact with the and how the product, and how requirements will be requirements will be the product, and how the product, and how
product, and how requirements will requirements will be met. Also a good met. Also a very good requirements will be requirements will be
requirements will be met. Also a poor met. Also a satisfactory discussion of the discussion of the met. Also an met. Also an
be met. Also little discussion of the discussion of the design principles (by design principles (by excellent discussion exceptional discussion
to no design design principles (by design principles (by Don Norman) and their Don Norman) and their of the design of the design principles
principles (by Don Don Norman) and Don Norman) and their application to the application to the principles (by Don (by Don Norman) and
Norman) and their their application to application to the coursework product. coursework product. Norman) and their their application to the
application to the the coursework coursework product. The report has a good The report has a very application to the coursework product.
coursework product. The report The report has a discussion for each good discussion for coursework product. The report has an
product are has a poor satisfactory discussion principle/concept and each principle/concept The report has an exceptional discussion
discussed. The discussion for each for each good suitable visual and very good suitable excellent discussion for each
report lacks a principle/concept principle/concept and representations. visual representations. for each principle/concept and
discussion for each and poor suitable satisfactory suitable principle/concept exceptional suitable
principle/concept visual visual representations. and excellent visual representations.
and little to no representations. suitable visual
suitable visual representations.
representations.
30 points 0-8 9-11 12-14 15-17 18-20 21-23 24-30
D1 Knowledge Little to no links Poor links between Satisfactory links Good links between Very good links Excellent links Exceptional links
between the the coursework between the the coursework report between the between the between the
Mid-fidelity coursework report report and the coursework report and and the prototype with coursework report and coursework report coursework report and
Prototype and the prototype prototype with the prototype with design decisions the prototype with and the prototype the prototype with
with design design decisions design decisions explicitly documented design decisions with design decisions design decisions
decisions explicitly explicitly explicitly documented and justified in the explicitly documented explicitly explicitly documented
documented and documented and and justified in the report. Good evidence and justified in the documented and and justified in the
justified in the justified in the report. Satisfactory of the effective and report. Very good justified in the report. Exceptional
report. Little to no report. Poor evidence of the successful application evidence of the report. Excellent evidence of the
evidence of the evidence of the effective and of HCI theory and effective and evidence of the effective and
effective and effective and successful application design principles to successful application effective and successful application
successful successful of HCI theory and create a prototype that of HCI theory and successful application of HCI theory and
application of HCI application of HCI design principles to can be used to test design principles to of HCI theory and design principles to
theory and design theory and design create a prototype that core assumptions of create a prototype that design principles to create a prototype that
principles to create principles to create can be used to test your design and that is can be used to test create a prototype can be used to test
a prototype that a prototype that can core assumptions of suitable for core assumptions of that can be used to core assumptions of
can be used to test be used to test core your design and that is researchers and your design and that is test core your design and that is
core assumptions assumptions of your suitable for designers to test and suitable for assumptions of your suitable for
of your design and design and that is researchers and evaluate the product. researchers and design and that is researchers and
that is suitable for suitable for designers to test and Good demonstration of designers to test and suitable for designers to test and
researchers and researchers and evaluate the product. the implementation of evaluate the product. researchers and evaluate the product.
designers to test designers to test Satisfactory design research and Very good designers to test and Exceptional
and evaluate the and evaluate the demonstration of the theory in both the demonstration of the evaluate the product. demonstration of the
product. Little to product. Poor implementation of report and the implementation of Excellent implementation of
no demonstration demonstration of design research and prototype. design research and demonstration of the design research and
of implementation the implementation theory in both the theory in both the implementation of theory in both the
of design research of design research report and the report and the design research and report and the
and theory in both and theory in both prototype. prototype. theory in both the prototype.
the report and the the report and the report and the
prototype. prototype. prototype.

20 points 0-5 6-7 8-9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-20

D1 Research Little to no review Poor review of A satisfactory review of A good review of A very good review of An excellent review An exceptional review
of relevant and relevant and relevant and relevant and relevant and of relevant and of relevant and
Review of appropriate HCI appropriate HCI appropriate HCI appropriate HCI appropriate HCI appropriate HCI appropriate HCI
relevant HCI background background background literature background literature background literature background background literature
literature literature to literature to inform to inform the design of to inform the design of to inform the design of literature to inform to inform the design of
inform the design the design of the the product and to the product and to the product and to the design of the the product and to
 of the product and product and to generate generate generate product and to generate
to generate generate requirements. The requirements. The requirements. The generate requirements. The
requirements. The requirements. The background literature background literature background literature requirements. The relevance of the
background background has relevance and has relevance and is very relevant and relevance of the background literature
literature lacks literature has poor supports the supports the supports the background is to an exceptional
relevance and does relevance and requirements of a requirements of a requirements of a literature is to an level and supports the
not or very little supports the proposed solution to a proposed solution to a proposed solution to a excellent level and requirements of a
support the requirements of a satisfactory standard good standard (e.g. very good standard supports the proposed solution to
requirements of a proposed solution (e.g. related work, HCI related work, HCI (e.g. related work, HCI requirements of a an exceptional
proposed solution to a poor standard literature in relation to literature in relation to literature in relation to proposed solution to standard (e.g. related
(e.g. related work, (e.g. related work, the product’s context, the product’s context, the product’s context, an excellent standard work, HCI literature in
HCI literature in HCI literature in interaction design interaction design interaction design (e.g. related work, relation to the
relation to the relation to the theory, cognitive theory, cognitive theory, cognitive HCI literature in product’s context,
product’s context, product’s context, psychology etc.). psychology etc.). psychology etc.). relation to the interaction design
interaction design interaction design The literature research The literature research The literature research product’s context, theory, cognitive
theory, cognitive theory, cognitive was satisfactory was conducted and was conducted and interaction design psychology etc.).
psychology etc.). psychology etc.). conducted and documented to a good documented to a very theory, cognitive The literature research
Details of how the The literature documented. standard. good standard. psychology etc.). The was conducted and
literature was research was literature research documented to an
found were not superficially was conducted and exceptional standard.
provided or remain conducted or poorly documented to an
unclear. documented. excellent standard.
20 points 0-5 6-7 8-9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-20
D2 Research A detailed A poor proposal for A satisfactory proposal A good proposal for an A very good proposal An excellent proposal An exceptional
proposal for an an empirical HCI for an empirical HCI empirical HCI research for an empirical HCI for an empirical HCI proposal for an
Proposal for empirical HCI research study that research study that study that uses your research study that research study that empirical HCI research
an empirical research study that uses your uses your interactive interactive prototype. uses your interactive uses your interactive study that uses your
HCI research uses your interactive prototype. A A good standard and prototype. A very good prototype. An interactive prototype.
study interactive prototype. A poor satisfactory standard some good details for a standard and some excellent standard An exceptional
prototype is standard and few and some details for a research study were very good details for a and excellent details standard and
absent or nearly details for a research study were described, including research study were for a research study exceptional details for
absent. Nearly no research study were described, including the question(s) or described, including were described, a research study were
details for a described, including the question(s) or hypothesis that your the question(s) or including the described, including
research study the question(s) or hypothesis that your research study hypothesis that your question(s) or the question(s) or
were described, hypothesis that your research study attempts to research study hypothesis that your hypothesis that your
including the research study attempts to investigate, who the attempts to research study research study
question(s) or attempts to investigate, who the participants of your investigate, who the attempts to attempts to
hypothesis that investigate, who the participants of your study will be, how the participants of your investigate, who the investigate, who the
your research participants of your study will be, how the study will be run, the study will be, how the participants of your participants of your
study attempts to study will be, how study will be run, the data collection, and study will be run, the study will be, how study will be, how the
 investigate, who the study will be data collection, and how you will analyse data collection, and the study will be run, study will be run, the
the participants of run, the data how you will analyse the data. The material how you will analyse the data collection, data collection, and
your study will be, collection, and how the data. The material and documentation the data. The material and how you will how you will analyse
how the study will you will analyse the and documentation that are required for a and documentation analyse the data. The the data. The material
be run, the data data. The material that are required for a usability expert to run that are required for a material and and documentation
collection, and and documentation usability expert to run the study were created usability expert to run documentation that that are required for a
how you will that are required for the study were created to a good standard. the study were created are required for a usability expert to run
analyse the data. a usability expert to to a satisfactory to a very good usability expert to the study were created
Little to no run the study were standard. standard. run the study were to an exceptional
necessary material created to a poor created to an standard.
and standard. excellent standard.
documentation
that are required
for a usability
expert to run the
study were
created.
10 points 0-2 3 4 5 6 7 8-10
D3 Little to no critical A poor conclusion A satisfactory A good conclusion with A very good conclusion An excellent An exceptional
Evaluation / reflections on the with barely any conclusion with good critical reflections with very good critical conclusion with conclusion with
D6 limitations of the critical reflections satisfactory critical on the limitations of reflections on the excellent critical exceptional critical
Employability work that has been on the limitations of reflections on the the work that has been limitations of the work reflections on the reflections on the
carried out and the work that has limitations of the work carried out and a good that has been carried limitations of the limitations of the work
little to no been carried out that has been carried discussion of potential out and a very good work that has been that has been carried
Conclusion discussion of and a poor out and a satisfactory future work if the discussion of potential carried out and an out and an exceptional
potential future discussion of discussion of potential project would be future work if the excellent discussion discussion of potential
work if the project potential future future work if the developed further. project would be of potential future future work if the
would be work if the project project would be developed further. work if the project project would be
developed further. would be developed developed further. would be developed developed further.
further. further.
5 points 0 1 2 2 3 3 4-5
D4 A lack of Poor demonstration a satisfactory a good professional a very good excellent exceptional
Communicati demonstrating a of a professional professional writing writing style, good professional writing professional writing professional writing
on / D5 professional writing style, poor style, satisfactory English language style, very good English style, excellent style, exceptional
Referencing writing style, little English language English language proficiency, good level language proficiency, a English language English language
to no English proficiency, poor proficiency, of detail and very good level of proficiency, excellent proficiency,
Professional language level of detail or too satisfactory level of conciseness, good detail and conciseness, level of detail and exceptional level of
writing and proficiency, superficial writing, detail and conciseness, report formatting, very good report conciseness, detail and conciseness,
referencing Unnecessarily poor report satisfactory report good referencing in formatting, very good excellent report exceptional report
detailed writing or formatting, poor formatting, satisfactory Harvard style of referencing in Harvard formatting, excellent formatting, exceptional
too superficial, referencing in referencing in Harvard academic sources (e.g. style of academic referencing in referencing in Harvard
the report lacks Harvard style of style of academic journal papers, sources (e.g. journal Harvard style of style of academic
professional academic sources sources (e.g. journal conference papers, papers, conference academic sources sources (e.g. journal
formatting, largely (e.g. journal papers, papers, conference academic books) papers, academic (e.g. journal papers, papers, conference
incorrect or no conference papers, papers, academic throughout the report. books) throughout the conference papers, papers, academic
referencing in academic books) books) throughout the report. academic books) books) throughout the
Harvard style of throughout the report. throughout the report.
academic sources report. report.
(e.g. journal
papers, conference
papers, academic
books) throughout
the report.