Uk 1987020301
Uk 1987020301
February 1987
30
SATELLITE TV RECEPTION:
YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED
by J Et R v. Terborgh
Fundamentals
Q. Why do satellites not
transmit in AM, so that
private reception is possible Fig. 26. Linear (H/V) and circular (cw/ccw) polarization.
with a conventional TV set,
without the need for a special
likelihood of unacceptably high a single satellite TV channel oc- dealing here with a composite
FM demodulator?
intermodulation products from cupies a greater bandwidth colour video signal). The
A. Transmitting an amplitude-
the power output stage; than all short-wave bands modulation index, m' , thus
modulated TV signal re-
2. with a suitably dimensioned together? works out at only 1.35. Note that
quires highly linear operation
combination of pre- and de- A. Yes. There is nothing mys- sound subcarriers in the base-
of the transponder power out-
emphasis, the obtainable S/N terious about the output band spectrum are disregarded
put stage, which must conse-
ratio for both vision and sound bandwidth of 27 to 36 MHz re- for the moment, in order not to
quently be biased for class A or
is higher at a given receiver C/n quired for each transponder in complicate things unnecessar-
class AB operation, resulting in
input ratio; the satellite; it is merely the ily.
a relatively low overall ef-
3. no power is wasted in the already high frequency of the In theory, it can be shown that
ficiency. From about 5 GHz on-
process of modulating the modulating signal that causes the RF output signal from an FM
wards, sufficient transmitter
power for satellite TV services carrier; the wide output spectrum. In transmitter contains an infinite
can only be obtained from 4. vestigial sideband sup- fact, TV transponders are gen- number of harmonics whose
travelling wave tubes (TWTs), pression is entirely irrelevant. erally operated at a remarkably amplitudes decrease as they
which require to be operated in The fact that an FM TV system low modulation index, m' : are further away from the car-
Class C at very high acceler- typically occupies a greater rier. Without going into the
ation voltages to output a car- bandwidth than an AM system m'=,Lf/frnv complex mathematics of FM at
is of no consequence what- low values of m' , some 98% of
rier power level of the order of
10-30 W at an acceptable soever in view of the vast where Af is the maximum in- the total RF energy produced
efficiency—which is extremely capability in this respect of the stantaneous deviation from the by the transmitter is contained
centimetre-wave bands accom- carrier, and fmv is the maximum in a bandwidth, BW, written as
important in view of the limited
battery power available in the modating satellite TV uplinks frequency in the modulating Carson's rule:
craft. and downlinks. signal causing that deviation.
FM offers the following advan- With the still widely used peak- BW 2(m' +1)fmv
tages over AM: to-peak deviation of 13.5 MHz,
1. with several carriers trans- Q. I am utterly confused by the .A.f is of course 6.75 MHz, while With the previously mentioned
use of terms relating to the fmv is usually about 5 MHz (it system parameters, this gives
mitted by a single
transponder, there is less system bandwidth. Is it true that will be recalled that we are BW = 23.5 MHz, exclusive of
EE
February 1987
sound carriers, which can be The use of (14a) with parameters which has puzzled many con- approximate indication of the
expected to occupy a further Afpp = 13.5 MHzpp, fro,/ = 5 MHz, structors of the IDU: maximum height of obstruc-
5 MHz or so. BW= 36 MHz, and C/n= 9.66 dB to be able to line up the dish tions, given a specific angle of
With a tendency on part of results in aerial, one needs a fully elevation?
transponder leaseholders to S/N(video, rms)= operative receiver; A. The answer to this question
use relatively large values of 10logio(78.74)+ 9.66 +13.2 dB to be able to align the receiver, is best given in the form of
deviation (up to 28 MHzpp) so as S/N(video, rms)= 41.8 dB. one needs to have the dish ad- the formula
to improve the attainable S/N From this it is seen that (14) is a justed to "see" the satellite.
ratio at limited RF power, there slightly too optimistic S/N cal- Practice does it! With a few h =k + d • sina
is, at present, increasing culation, yielding the so-called helping hands available at the or
pressure on receiver manufac- unweighted quasi-peak value. time of positioning the dish, you d=(h-k)/sina
turers to give up the widely Formula (14a), obviously more will find that this is not nearly as
used 27 MHz bandwidth stan- complex than (14), is the more difficult as it may seem at first where
dard (for Af =28 MHzpp, BW authoritative of the two, as it is sight. In fact, by studying the h = height of obstruction in
works out at 38 MHz). given by the EBU in Literature following questions and line-of-sight path to satel-
Reference [5]. answers, sufficient insight can lite;
Q. I am under the impression be acquired to be able to go d = horizontal distance be-
that the quality of reception round the majority of difficult- tween dish and obstruc-
offered by my receiving system ies encountered while lining up tion;
is slightly improved as its gets and tuning in. k = safety margin; 1 metre is
colder outside. Why is that? Dish location and
recommended;
A. Refer to Fig. 6 in [A] to see adjustment Q. / can not decide on a a = angle of elevation for the
that the noise figure, Fas, of Let us consider the following suitable location for my dish dish.
your LNB is a function of its chicken-and-egg problem, in the garden. Can you give an Especially with trees, due ac-
noise factor and the ambient
temperature; the curve shown
is relevant to To= 17 °C, but the Table 5.
inset calculations make it quite
>LIST
evident that Tr, and hence 10 REM azimuth and angle of elevation for geostationary satellites
Pn(sys), decrease with lower 20 DIM Orb(6):RESTORE:MODE3:REM 24x80 text only
values of To . It goes without 30 H=180/PI:REM rad-deg conversion
40 FOR X=0 TO 5:READ Pos%:Orb(X)=Pos%:NEXT X
saying that the final S/N figure is 50 R=6371:ALT.35822:REM See EE September 1986
improved accordingly. 60 PRINT"*** Longitude and orbital position WEST of Greenwich: PRECEDE BY MIN
US SIGN ***":PRINT
70 INPUT"Longitude of location ?"LO:LO=LO/H
Q. With reference to Satellite 80 INPUT"Latitude of location ?"LA:LA=LA/H
TV reception in the 90 GOSUB 1000
100 B=LO-SAT
September 1986 issue, I am able 110 AZI=180+H*ATN(TAN(B)/SIN(LA))
to follow all the calculations 120 AZI=INT(AZI+0.5):PRINT:PRINT "Azimuth = ";AZI;" degrees
130 WS." West of South":ES=" East of South":SS=" straight South"
from system noise to the 140 IF AZI=180 THEN PRINT" = ";SS:GOTO 170
theoretical S/N formula, (14). Yet 150 IF AZI<180 THEN PRINT "= ";180-AZI;" degrees ";ES:GOTO 170
I am intrigued by the origin of 160 PRINT "= ";AZI-180;" degrees ";WS
170 ELE=11*ATN((COS(LA)*COS(B) -R/(R+ALT))/SQR(1-(COS(LA)^2*COS(B) -2)))
the constant, x, given as 180 IF ELE<1 THEN PRINT"Satellite below horizon":GOTO 70
147.3 dB for 36 MHz system 190 PRINT"Elevation = ';INT(ELE+0 -5);" degrees":PRINT
bandwidth. 200 GOTO 60
1000 PRINT"Which satellite ?":PRINT
A. Formula (14) is a purposely 1010 PRINT"1 = INTELSAT V F1/7 (FRG) +60 deg. E"
simplified evaluation of the 1020 PRINT"2 = EUTELSAT 1 F-1 (ECS-1) +13 deg. E"
1030 PRINT"3 = EUTELSAT 1 F-2 (ECS-2) +07 deg. E"
standard S/N calculus reading 1040 PRINT"4 = INTELSAT IV A F2 (NORDIC-1) -04 deg. W"
1050 PRINT"5 = TELECOM F-1 (F) -08 deg. W (not in CSS band)"
1060 PRINT"6 = INTELSAT V F4 (UK/US) -27.5 deg. W"
S/14(video, rms).
1070 PRINT"7 = other satellite"
10loglo[3/2 •(Afpp/frov)2 • BW/fmv] 1080 PRINT:INPUT"Select 1-7 --->"N
+ C/n + 13.2 [dB] 1090 IF N>=1 AND N<=6 THEN SAT=Orb(N-1):SAT=SAT/H:RETURN
(14a) 1100 IF N=7 THEN INPUT"Orbital position of satellite --- >"SAT:SAT=SAT/H:RETURN
1110 GOTO 1080
in which 5000 REM geostationary arc; orbital positions East to West
5010 DATA 60,13,7,-4,-8,-27.5
S/N(video, rms)= weighted, effec-
tive signal-to-noise ratio at the
output of the receiver's FM vi- >RUN
*** Longitude and orbital position WEST of Greenwich: PRECEDE BY MINUS SIGN ***
sion demodulator;
Afpp = peak-to-peak deviation Example: Dundalk, Ireland
resulting from modulating the Longitude of location 7-6.5
FM transmitter with fmv; Latitude of location ?54
fmv = highest video frequency Which satellite ?
in uplink & downlink baseband 1 = INTELSAT V F1/7 (FRG) +60 deg. E
spectrum; 2 = EUTELSAT 1 F-1 (ECS-1) +13 deg. E
BW= theoretical bandwidth of 3 = EUTELSAT 1 F-2 (ECS-2) +07 deg. E
4 = INTELSAT IV A F2 (NORDIC-1) -04 deg. W
transponder's output spectrum; 5 = TELECOM F-1 (F) -08 deg. W (not in CSS band)
C/n= theoretical carrier-to- 6 = INTELSAT V F4 (UK/US) -27.5 deg. W
7 = other satellite
noise ratio at the input of the re-
ceiver's FM vision demodu- Select 1-7 --->6
lator—see (12);
Azimuth•= 205 degrees = 25 degrees West of South
13.2= the effect of pre-
Elevation = 26 degrees
emphasis and r.m.s. weighting 86082- 4 - T5
to CCIR Report 637-1.
EE
February 1987
as viewed from the front of the AUSSAT III (1985) AUSTRALIA 164° E
AUSSAT II (1984) AUSTRALIA 160° E INSAT 18 (1983) INDIA 94 E
dish. AUSSAT I (1984) AUSTRALIA 156° E
GORIZONT USSR 90 E •
You will probably find that • 143° W SATCOM V us RADUGA USSR 86° E
0-139.W SATCOM IR (1983) us PALAPA A2 INDONESIA 83° E •
manual adjustment of the dish o• -135° W SATCOM I, GALAXY I (1983) us PALAPA Al INDONESIA 77° E
W SATCOM IIIR us
soon becomes a routine job, W COMSTAR IV, TELSTAR IIIC (1984) us
and spotting various satellites 123° W WESTAR V us
• —%-119° W SATCOM II, SPACENET I (1984) us
within 5 minutes or so can be 116° W ANIK Cl CANADA
11
INTELSAT IVA F6. INTELSAT V F5 63° E
14; W ANIK 02 CANADA INTELSAT V F12 60°E
done with the help of two or ° W ANIK C2 'CANADA
GORIZONT USSR 53° E
Ov ,
"°:,— 109° W ANIK B CANADA
three orientation points at a W GTE II (1984) US
W ANIK 01 CANADA
familiar location, and a few 0,-103° W GTE I (1984) us
simple notes as a guide in set- 102° W ILHUICAHUA (1985) MEXICO
W SBS I us
ting the two dish angles plus • --- 99° W WESTAR IV US
• —■97° W SBS II us
RADUGA usso W° E •
the tuning dial indication on the 95° W COMSTAR II. TELSTAR IIIA (1983) us ARABSAT (1986) 26° E 0
94° W SBS III us ARABSAT (1986) 19° E o ASTRA 6(1987)
IDU for a specific transponder. ECS-2 (1984) ESA 15° E •o
74° W GALAXY II (1983) us ECS-1 (1983) ESA 10 E 0
70° W SPACENET II (1984) us TELE-X (1988) SWEDEN 5° E
o 53° W INTELSAT IV F7 10° W DTELECOMM I (1983)
TELECOMM II (1983) FRANCO-GERMAN
_....„....„..„,Z---
• 11ALLEY I (1986) UK 31° W-1 11.5° W SYMPHONIE I.
INTELSAT IVA F4, 34.5° W VA .„.../. SYMPHONIE II FRANCO-GERMAN
Miscellaneous INTELSAT V F2
—79° W WESTAR I. WESTAR II,
1 3 • • .. 14° W GORIZONT ussn
• L-18.5° W INTELSAT WA Fl
matters and the — ADVANCED WESTAR II (1984) us
—83° W SATCOM IV us
19° W TV-SAT A3 (1986) GERMANY L-SAT (1987) ESA
— LUX-SAT (1987) LUXEMBOURG TDF 1 (1987) FRANCE
future —85° W ILHUICAHUA (1985) MEXICO
— 87° W COMSTAR III, TELSTAR 1118 (1984) us
21.5° W INTELSAT IVA F2
24.5° W INTELSAT V F3. SIR/0 ITALY
—91° W WESTAR III. ADVANCED WESTAR I (1984) us
Q. Apart from ECS-I and 27.5° W INTELSAT IV F4. INTELSAT V F4
86082 - 4 - 30
Intelsat VF10, are there more
satellites transmitting TV pro-
grammes? Fig. 30. Communications and TV satellites operating in the 4 GHz (C) 11 GHz (Ku) bands.
EE
February 1987
scanning the geostationary arc required output power of some examples, will hold twice as 52 dBW type, to be positioned
for further satellites; many are 300 W still worries the many transponders as TV-SAT 1, at OP 19° West (see Fig. 9 in
scheduled for launching, while engineers at Marconi, each producing an EIRP of [A]). It is our understanding that
existing ones are sometimes Thomson-CSF, Telefunken and about 50 dBW, enabling good Astra will be operational in the
operated on an experimental G&C. Although the availability reception with a 1 metre dish summer of this year, i.e., even
basis; we have seen trial of sufficient battery power to and an LNB with a noise figure earlier than the Franco-German
transmissions in various MAC feed the DB transponders is en- of less than 2 dB. It will be in- project. With our readers, we
standards, as well as test charts sured with solar panels exten- teresting to see how these ser- are very keen on receiving the
in encrypted video with accom- ding over some 20 metres, the vices will do as compared with first high or medium power
panying datachannels in the stability of the carrier output the prestigious TV-SAT and TDF signals from orbital positions
audio section of the baseband. level still does not meet the set combination. assigned to DB satellites. Mean-
To round off this answer, Fig. 30 requirements for good quality RTL (Radio Television Luxem- while, we will do our best to
shows an overview of currently reception on earth during worst bourg) has taken the daring keep you abreast of the latest
operative satellites; it must be case atmospheric conditions. step of having RCA develop and developments!
noted, however, that many of 3. The economic viability of DB build the Astra satellite, which RGK;Bu
these only transmit digital data services remains rather is said to be a six-channel,
for use in international business questionable; the follow-up
communication systems. Others projects, TV-SAT 2 and TDF-2,
have either a very low output are now in real danger of being
power, or a very narrow cancelled altogether. Also
downlink beam. there are numerous political
and commercial problems in-
Q. What is causing the delay in volved in finding leaseholders
getting started with the for the transponders on board
European direct broadcasting of these craft. Meanwhile, re-
projects? ceiver technology has not
A. Although expressly prom- come to a standstill. Once TV-
ised by the French and SAT & TDF-1 are operational,
German broadcasting organiz- their huge transmit power
ations, last year did not see the rating may well be superfluous
commissioning of their joint for LNBs with a noise figure of
DBS project, TV-SAT & TDF-l. In the order of 1.8 dB. Refer to the
order to avoid adding to the calculations in [A] to under-
stand that a 1.2 dB improvement Work in progress: engineers at AEG are building and testing a
general confusion about the
section of a DB satellite.
future of direct broadcasting by in LNB noise figure is equiv-
satellite, the following points alent to an EIRP increase of
summarize the problems in- about 3 dB.
volved: In view of the above consider-
1.Both ESA and NASA have ations, it is not surprising to
been forced to re-organize read about swift progress being
launch schedules because of made in the development of
their research into the possible medium-power transponders.
cause of technical failures in Often referred to as quasi-DB
carrier rockets used in attempts Satellites, a new series of or-
to put satellite payloads into biting craft is currently being
orbit. developed. These satellites, of
2. The final reliability of high- which the new Intelsat V FII
power TWTs providing the and Eutelsat F-2 types are good Eutelsat 1-F1 in orbit.