Scribd
Upload
11 views4 pages

Handout

The handout explains alternative assessment, which evaluates student learning through methods beyond traditional tests, focusing on real-world applications and critical thinking. Key features include authenticity, student-centered approaches, and performance-based assessments, with examples like portfolios and projects. It also outlines principles for effective alternative assessment design, benefits, challenges, and reflection questions for educators.

Uploaded by

Jerico Anciano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
11 views4 pages

Handout

The handout explains alternative assessment, which evaluates student learning through methods beyond traditional tests, focusing on real-world applications and critical thinking. Key features include authenticity, student-centered approaches, and performance-based assessments, with examples like portfolios and projects. It also outlines principles for effective alternative assessment design, benefits, challenges, and reflection questions for educators.

Uploaded by

Jerico Anciano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Handout: Understanding Alternative Assessment

Objectives:

 Define and explain alternative assessment and related concepts.


 Demonstrate understanding of the different principles of assessing learning using
alternative methods.

1. What is Alternative Assessment?

Alternative assessment refers to methods of evaluating student learning that go beyond


traditional standardized tests and examinations. It emphasizes real-world applications, critical
thinking, creativity, and the demonstration of skills and knowledge in authentic contexts
(Wiggins, 1998).

Key Features of Alternative Assessment:

 Authenticity: Tasks mirror real-life challenges or problems (Mueller, 2005).


 Student-Centered: Focus on individual learning processes and outcomes.
 Performance-Based: Emphasis on demonstrating skills, not just recalling facts.
 Process-Oriented: Assessment of both learning processes and final outcomes.

Examples of Alternative Assessment Methods:

 Portfolios
 Performance tasks
 Peer and self-assessments
 Projects and presentations
 Open-ended questions
 Case studies
 Journals and reflective essays (Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000).

2. Related Concepts

Performance Assessment:

A subset of alternative assessment, performance assessment requires students to perform a task


or create a product that demonstrates their understanding and skills (Linn & Miller, 2005).

Formative vs. Summative Alternative Assessment:


 Formative Assessment: Ongoing assessments designed to provide feedback for
improvement (e.g., drafts of a project, peer reviews) (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
 Summative Assessment: End-of-unit or term evaluations to measure overall
achievement (e.g., final projects, exhibitions).

Authentic Assessment:

Authentic assessment involves evaluating students through tasks that are meaningful and directly
linked to real-world contexts and applications (Wiggins, 1998).

3. Principles of Assessing Learning Using Alternative Methods

Principle 1: Alignment with Learning Goals

Alternative assessments must align with the intended learning outcomes and objectives. For
example, if the objective is to develop collaborative skills, group projects or team-based
assessments may be appropriate (Brookhart, 2013).

Principle 2: Fairness and Equity

All students should have equal opportunities to demonstrate their learning. This includes
providing accommodations for students with diverse needs and ensuring cultural relevance in
assessment tasks (Stiggins, 2005).

Principle 3: Clear Criteria and Rubrics

 Use detailed rubrics or scoring guides to communicate expectations.


 Provide students with the criteria before starting the assessment (Brookhart, 2013).

Principle 4: Emphasis on Higher-Order Thinking

Assessments should encourage critical thinking, problem-solving, analysis, and creativity, rather
than rote memorization (Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000).

Principle 5: Use of Multiple Assessment Methods

A combination of methods provides a more comprehensive view of student learning. For


example:

 Combine a portfolio review with a reflective essay.


 Pair performance tasks with peer evaluations (Mueller, 2005).

Principle 6: Focus on Feedback


Timely, constructive feedback helps students understand their strengths and areas for
improvement. Encourage self-reflection as part of the process (Black & Wiliam, 1998).

Principle 7: Real-World Relevance

Design tasks that replicate challenges or contexts students may encounter outside the classroom,
such as creating a marketing plan, building a model, or conducting an experiment (Wiggins,
1998).

4. Steps for Designing Alternative Assessments

1. Identify Objectives: Define what you want students to learn and demonstrate.
2. Choose an Assessment Type: Decide on the best method based on your objectives (e.g.,
portfolio, project).
3. Develop Clear Criteria: Create rubrics or guidelines to evaluate the task fairly and
transparently (Brookhart, 2013).
4. Prepare Students: Explain the assessment purpose, process, and expectations.
5. Facilitate and Monitor: Provide guidance and support during the task.
6. Assess and Provide Feedback: Use the rubric to evaluate student work and offer
actionable feedback.

5. Benefits of Alternative Assessment

 Encourages active and engaged learning.


 Provides a deeper understanding of student progress.
 Focuses on practical application of skills.
 Promotes self-directed and lifelong learning (Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000).

6. Challenges and Considerations

 Time-Consuming: Designing and grading alternative assessments can take more time
than traditional methods.
 Subjectivity: Rubrics and guidelines must be clear to minimize biases (Stiggins, 2005).
 Resource-Intensive: Some tasks may require additional materials or resources.
 Professional Development: Teachers may need training to effectively implement
alternative assessments.

Reflection Questions:
1. How can alternative assessments enhance student learning in your classroom?
2. What challenges might you face when implementing alternative assessments, and how
can you address them?
3. How can you ensure fairness and equity in alternative assessments?

References:

 Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in
Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
 Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and
grading. ASCD.
 Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545.
 Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Pearson
Education.
 Mueller, J. (2005). Authentic assessment toolbox. Retrieved from
http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm
 Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to
success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.
 Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and
improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

End of Handout

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy