Reviewer For E III Divisibility - Docx Version 1
Reviewer For E III Divisibility - Docx Version 1
DIVISIBILITY
Write down any 3-figure number you like and then repeat the number so that you have a 6-figure
number. So if you chose 328 you would write 328328.
number test
2 Is the last figure 0 or even?
3 Is the digit sum 3, 6 or 9?
4 Does 4 divide into the last two figures?
5 Is the last figure 5 or 0?
6 Is the numbers divisible by both 2 and 3?
9 Is the digit sum 9?
10 Is the last figure 0?
15 Is the number divisible by both 3 and 5?
EXAMPLE
EXERCISE
EXAMPLE
Is 70134 divisible by 8?
We divide 8 into the last three figures, 134: 8) 1 3 54
1 6 r6
When testing for divisibility by 8 it is worth testing for divisibility by 2 and 4 first because if a
number is divisible by 8 it must also be divisible by 2 and by 4.
So there is no need to divide a number like 38015 by 8 as it ends in a 5 and so is not divisible by 2,
and therefore cannot be divisible by 8 (or 4).
EXERCISE
EXAMPLE
Since 18 = 3×6 also you may think that we can test for 3 and 6 when testing for 18, but this does
not work. Because 3 and 6 have a common factor of 3 you would be testing for divisibility by 3
twice, and not testing that the number is divisible by 9.
We choose 2×9 rather than 3×6 because 2 and 9 are relatively prime.
EXAMPLE
EXERCISE
--------- ---------
The answer to all these questions is Yes. If you add or subtract 7 or any multiple of 7 to or from the
numbers in the above sequence they will still be divisible by 7.
EXAMPLE
Is 693 divisible by 7?
We could divide 693 to find out if there is a remainder.
But we may also notice that if we add 7 to 693 we get 700, which is clearly a multiple of 7.
So 693 is divisible by 7.
EXAMPLE
Is 135 divisible by 7?
135 is close to 140, which is a multiple of 7, but if we add 7 to it we get 142.
So the answer to the question is No.
EXAMPLE
Is 2817 divisible by 7?
Here we spot that that 28 is a multiple of 7 so remove it (we are in fact subtracting 2800 from
the number).
This leaves 17 which is clearly not divisible by 7, so the answer is No.
7G4 VEDIC MATHEMATICS ACADEMY
This method does not apply only to divisibility by 7: it applies for any number.
EXAMPLE
We see that if we add 13 to 117 we get 130 which is clearly a multiple of 13.
So we answer Yes.
EXAMPLE
Is 324 divisible by 8?
Here we can add or subtract 8's.
We notice that the 32 in 324 is a multiple of 8, so we can remove it.
This gives 4, which is not divisible by 8, so we say No.
EXAMPLE
EXERCISE
CANCELLING ZEROS
Divisibility or non-divisibility is not affected by adding zeros: 70, 1400 etc. are also divisible by 7.
Similarly, for numbers not in this sequence, they will not come into the sequence by adding zeros.
For example 8 is not in the sequence and so 80 cannot be either, because you have only
multiplied 8 by 10 so it still cannot contain a factor of 7.
We can cancel off any zeros at the end of a number when testing for divisibility
(provided we are not testing for divisibility by a number containing 2 or 5 as a factor).
EXAMPLE
Is 4200 divisible by 7?
We can ignore the zeros and ask if 7 divides into 42.
It does, so we say Yes.
EXAMPLE
EXAMPLE
Is 170014 divisible by 7?
Subtracting 14 leaves 170000.
Drop the zeros leaves 17 which is not divisible by 7.
170014 is therefore not divisible by 7.
--------- ---------
Testing for divisibility by 11 is particularly easy and comes under the formula By Addition and by
Subtraction.
EXAMPLE
EXERCISE
Test the following numbers for divisibility by the number in square brackets:
a 5192 [11] b 3476 [11] c 1358016 [11]
l What should the 7 at the end of 1030607 be changed to for the number to be divisible by 11?
7G5 VEDIC MATHEMATICS ACADEMY
REMAINDER AFTER DIVISION BY 11
You have just seen, in the last exercise, that we find if a number is divisible by 11 by adding
alternate figures and subtracting the two totals.
Note that we do the figures in the odd positions minus the figures in the even positions.
You can add 11 to this –7 to get 4 as the smallest remainder (either –7 or 4 will do here).
EXERCISE
m 85 n 32
You are already familiar with the digit sum check which helps to show that a calculation is
correct. For example, 2434 × 32 = 77888 is confirmed by the digit sums because adding
This works because adding the digits in a number gives the remainder of the number after
division by 9.
A similar method works by using the remainders of numbers from 11 rather than 9.
EXAMPLE
Now suppose we want another check for the sum: 2434 × 32 = 77888.
We find the remainders for each of the 3 numbers as in the exercise before.
Replacing the numbers by their remainders we get: 3 × 10 = 8 and this is correct in this
arithmetic as 30 clearly has a remainder of 8 after division by 11.
For the number 32 in this example you may use a remainder of –1 instead of 10 and in this
case the sum we get is: 3 × –1 = 8 or –3 = 8.
But this is also correct because when we add 11 to –3 we get 8 again.
EXERCISE
Which of the following sums are correct according to the alternative digit sum check?