Washing Machine
Washing Machine
LG
LG offers a wide array of washing machines with the latest and best
technology. They come in lovely colors, and modern and trendy designs.
Following are the various types of products in this segment:
1
Videocon:
Videocon can be credited for creating the first ever completely
automatic top loading washing machines that have direct drive technology. It
has also used the same technology to come up with India’s first tilt drum
washing machine. It primarily deals in Front Loading, Semi Automatic, and Top
Loading washing machines. .
Samsung:
The front loading washing machines of Samsung offer various looks as
well as functions. The top loading variety has a various settings and styles for
the discerning consumers. The semi automatic washing machines are known for
their effective performance. .
Whirlpool:
Whirlpool washing machines offer 1-2-1-2 hand wash facilities along
with in built heater and 6th sense benefits. They come in different variations like
the following:
Semi Automatic
Fully automatic (top load)
Fully automatic 360 degree machines
Fully automatic (front load)
Onida
The fully automatic washing machines of Onida have built-in brushes,
a unique aspect, which makes sure clothes are washed just like a hand wash.
These washing machines also have strong motors. The semi automatic washing
machines of Onida are competent enough to handle the regular laundry needs of
the owners. It also features the in-built brush. .
.
2
Godrej:
Godrej offers two main types of washing machines – the fully
automatic ones and the semi automatic ones. The fully automatic washing
machines are available in different versions like tilt open drum, top loading, and
front loading. .
IFB : .
IFB washing machines are built with German technology and have
features like Aqua Energie, a device that makes it easier for detergents to
operate and makes clothes softer. These washing machines also use less water,
electricity, and washing powders. These machines have smart sensors that find
out any imbalance during the spin and then correct it and also make the least
sound during extra insulation. They have shower and water jets in the paddles
that makes sure clothes are totally soaked. .
.
Haier:
Haier offers three major types of washing machines – semi automatic,
top load fully automatic, and front load fully automatic. The unique selling
point of these machines is 5 year warranty and near zero pressure technology.
They are mainly available in two colors – grey, and white. .
Panasonic:
The fully automatic washing machines of Panasonic have a washing
capacity ranging from 7 kg to 14 kg. They offer energy efficiency and water
saving that is at par with the very best in the industry. They also have foam and
auto load sensors and drum inlets that make loading and unloading easy. In
addition to these the washing machines offer programmed wash courses and
double layer doors. .
3
1.2 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
4
1.3 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
C.Madhavi, John William Felix, “Customers’ level of perception and experience of product values with
reference to refrigerators”, Volume : XXXII, No:10, October, 2002.
5
According to J.K.Sanzgiri, “The retailers stand to benefit too. They need
not worry about return of empties or breakages. It saves on the efforts. In
totality the concept is favourable to everyone. This response is fantastic, it has
been found that even the Pepsi drinks are switching very often.
6
and after sale service together decide the purchase. They study also found that
majority of the respondents prefer to its best availability and reasonable price.
Mr.A.Selvaraj and Mr.A.Mahendran ,“a study on brand preference of Washing Machine”. “Journal of
marketing” Vol XXXIV, Nov.2004
7
An attempt is made to find out the customer’s satisfaction towards the
marketing the products. The retailers are successful only if he can match his
products and services with that of the needs of his customer. A mix of products,
price, place, promotional evidences, people and process meet the physical and
emotional needs of the customer.
8
1.6 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:
To study consumer preference with respect to usage pattern of washing
machine as,
9
Now washing machine is a necessity and forms a part of life of the
people. In modern days, washing machine is a necessary one for every family
to satisfy themselves and to keep the prestige of holding them in the society.
This study has been undertaken to find out the brand preference of
washing machine among the people in Bhavani.
Every study has certain limitations. In our study, also there were certain
limitations, which I could not able to solve.
10
SAMPLE DESIGN
DATA COLLECTION
DATA ANALYSIS
SAMPLING DESIGN
SAMPLING AREA
SAMPLING SIZE
SAMPLING AREA
SAMPLING SIZE
DATA COLLECTION
PRIMARY DATA
SECONDARY DATA
PRIMARY DATA
The primary data was collected with the help of questionnaire and
interview schedule method. the questionnaire was administrated to 100
consumers of the washing machine in Bhavani town.
SECONDARY DATA
11
Secondary data collected from the records of the washing
machine ,Bhavani. Further data was collected by having discussions with
retailers, surveys on consumers and websites.
In order to analysis the data, various statistical tools were used in this
study.
PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
Chi- square analysis is a non parametric test which is used to check the
goodness of fit for large samples. This test is used to compare the given
observed frequencies with the corresponding expected frequencies of assumed
theoretical distribution to draw conclusion about whether or not the given data
follow the assumed distribution .
Chi-square 2 = ∑(O-E)2
E
O= Observed frequency
12
E= Expected frequency
Total
Weighted average = × 100
No of items × No of respondents
CHAPTER SCHEME
CHAPTER-I
13
Introduction and design of the study
of literature, scope of the study, objectives of the study, methodology of the study,
CHAPTER-II
The second chapter presents the theoretical aspects of textile industry and the
CHAPTER-III
CHAPTER-IV
14
The chapter deals with statistical analysis such as
CHAPTER-V
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
CHAPTER-II
15
THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THE STUDY
Introduction:
Since the development of the industry after years sand washer equipment,
national policy promote water conservancy bridges, hydroelectric dam
construction projects ongoing, the demand for sand washer equipment gradually
increased recently, the requirement of production technology is also
accompanied higher and higher. Market development gradually expand, more
economic benefits, many enterprises have invested in the washing machine
manufacturing industry, the production of these enterprises lack the correct lead,
rational planning, sand washer equipment is not subject to stringent testing
prompted a large number of low-quality products into the market, causing
market chaos. Washing machine is the key equipment in the production
equipment, and quickly became the mainstay of China's mining machinery
industry has very good results of the past few years of business development,
one of the machinery industry.
16
China washer equipment on the technical strength, there are a lot of
companies imitate other's technology, the ability of independent innovation
must be strengthened. Hongxing sand washer equipment production technology
by virtue of their own efforts to continuously improve the technical level of the
products put into force to increase the capability of independent innovation,
improve product quality and achieve market international. In the sand
production line, people also need primary stone crusher, vibrating screen, rotary
dryer and so on.
17
Removal of soap and water from the clothing after washing was
originally a separate process. First soap would be rinsed out with clear water.
After rinsing, the soaking wet clothing would be formed into a roll and twisted
by hand to extract water. The entire process often occupied an entire day of hard
work, plus drying and ironing.
Washing by machine
18
Wringing by machine
After the items were washed and rinsed, water had to be removed by
twisting. To help reduce this labor, the wringer/mangle machine was developed.
The mangle used two rollers under spring tension to squeeze water out of
clothing and household linen. Each laundry item would be fed through the
wringer separately. The first wringers were hand-cranked, but were eventually
included as a powered attachment above the washer tub. The wringer would be
swung over the wash tub so that extracted wash water would fall back into the
tub to be reused for the next load. As implied by the term "mangle," these early
machines were quite dangerous, especially if powered and not hand-driven. A
user's fingers, hand, arm, or hair could become entangled in the laundry being
squeezed, resulting in horrific injuries; unwary bystanders, such as children,
could also be caught and hurt. Safer mechanisms were developed over time, and
the more hazardous designs were eventually outlawed.
The modern process of water removal by spinning did not come into use
until electric motors were developed. Spinning requires a constant high-speed
power source, and was originally done in a separate device known as an
"extractor". A load of washed laundry would be transferred from the wash tub
to the extractor basket, and the water spun out in a separate operation. These
early extractors were often dangerous to use, since unevenly distributed loads
would cause the machine to shake violently.
Many efforts were made to counteract the shaking of unstable loads, such
as mounting the spinning basket on a free-floating shock-absorbing frame to
absorb minor imbalances, and a bump switch to detect severe movement and
stop the machine so that the load could be manually redistributed.
19
The process combined
Child lock
Time remaining indication
Steam
20
Future functionalities will include energy consumption prognosis before
starting the program, and electricity tariff induced delayed start of the machines.
Integration into home local (wireless) networks will allow to monitor energy
demand via different clients like computers or smart phones.
Buyers are now looking for factors like design, trends, and quality of a
product rather than just the prices. Visual appeal of products has also become an
important criterion in this regard. .
21
COMPANY PROFILE:
The group was formed through the merger of two Korean companies,
Lak-Hui (pronounced "Lucky") and GoldStar, from which the abbreviation of
LG was derived. The current "Life's Good" slogan is a backronym. Before the
corporate name change to LG, household products were sold under the brand
name of Lucky, while electronic products were sold under the brand name of
GoldStar. In January 2009 LG was able to buy the domain name LG.com for
low six figures USD.
22
By 2005, LG was a Top 100 global brand, and in 2006, LG recorded a
brand growth of 14%. Its display manufacturing affiliate, LG Display, is now
the world's largest plasma panel manufacturer.
Operations
23
Air Conditioning & Energy Solutions division
The Air Conditioning & Energy Solutions division makes air conditioners
and LED lighting.
Products
24
In the Guide the company scored badly on the Energy criteria, being
criticized for setting a weak target for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
and not making renewable energy part of its low carbon strategy. LG scored
most points in the Sustainable Operations category with the company providing
take-back for obsolete phones in 52 countries and being in the process of
addressing the issue of conflict minerals. However, the guide warned that LG
risks incurring a penalty point in future editions as it was still being listed as a
client of Asia Pulp and Paper (APP) who have been linked to illegal logging and
deforestation in Indonesia.
25
CHAPTER-III
For the purpose of the study, the respondents are classified according
to their demographic factors such as age, gender, educational qualification,
occupation, monthly income, marital status, place of residence and number of
members in the family and also on the basis of the factors concerning to choose
LG washing machine.
In this chapter an attempt has been made to outline the profile of the
respondents who were interview for the study of the LG washing machine in
Bhavani town.
No. of respondents
Percentage = × 100
Total
26
AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS:
For the purpose of this study, the respondents are divided into four groups
viz, below 21, 21 to 30, 31 to 40, above 40 as shown in table 3.1.
TABLE: 3.1
From the above table 3.1, it is noted that 12 percent of respondents were
in the age group of below 21, 30 percent of respondents were in the age group
of 21 to 30, 45 percent of respondents were in the age group of 31 to 40 and 13
percent of respondents were in the age group of above 40. Hence the majority
of the 45 percent were in the age group of 31 to 40.
27
TABLE: 3.1
28
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS:
The respondents are distributed on the basis of their gender for the
purpose of further analysis is shown in table 3.2.
TABLE: 3.2
It is observed from the above table 3.2 that there were 20 percent of
respondents representing male and the remaining 80 percent of them were
female. Hence the majority i.e. 80 percent of the respondents were female.
29
TABLE: 3.2
30
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS:
TABLE:3.3
31
TABLE: 3.3
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS
Student 08 08
Professional 52 52
Employee 25 25
Others 15 15
Total 100 100
TABLE: 3.4
OCCUPATION STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS
33
MONTHLY INCOME OF THE RESPONDENTS:
34
Income is one of the crucial factors in deciding the amount to be spent on
improvements of one’s personality. For the purpose of this study family
monthly income has been classified into four groups such as below Rs.10000,
Rs.10000 to 20000, 20000 to 30000 and above Rs.30000. The respondents are
distributed accordingly as shown in table 3.5.
TABLE: 3.5
Below 10000 06 06
Rs.10000 to 20000 26 26
Rs.20000 to 30000 50 50
Above Rs.30000 18 18
Total 100 100
It is evident from the table 3.5 that the 06 percent of the respondents
have a family monthly income ranging from below 10000 followed by 26
percent of them those family monthly income was Rs.10000 to 20000, 50
percent of the respondents have a family monthly income ranging from 20000
to 30000 where as there were 18 percent in the monthly income on above Rs.
30000. Hence the majority of 50 percent of the respondents were having a
family monthly income ranging from Rs.20000 to 30000.
TABLE: 3.5
35
PLACE OF RESIDENCE:
36
Based on their place of residence, respondents have been classified into
three categories such as those who were engaged in rural, urban and semi-urban
as shown in table 3.6.
TABLE: 3.6
PLACE OF RESIDENCE
Rural 20 20
Urban 41 41
Semi-urban 39 39
Total 100 100
TABLE: 3.6
PLACE OF RESIDENCE
37
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS:
38
In general, buying decision will be different for the married couples when
compared to spinsters. For the purpose of this research , the respondents are
classified depending on their marital status as married and unmarried as shown
in table 3.7.
TABLE 3.7
TABLE 3.7
39
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS
40
In the present study based on the number of members in their family, the
respondents are classified into three categories as shown in table 3.8.
TABLE 3.8
NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN THE FAMILY
Upto 4 16 16
4 to 6 59 59
Above 6 25 25
Total 100 100
The above table 3.8 shows that 16 percent have family size were up to 4,
59 percent have family size were 4 to 6 and 25 percent have family size were
above 6. Hence the majority of 59 percent of the respondents have 4 to 6
members in their family.
TABLE 3.8
41
NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN THE FAMILY
42
The researcher has made an attempt to know the respondents opinion
about the price of the washing machine viz, highly satisfied, satisfied,
dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.9
TABLE 3.9
Highly satisfied 09 09
Satisfied 56 56
Dissatisfied 25 25
Highly dissatisfied 10 10
Total 100 100
The above table 3.9 inferred that 09 percent of the respondents are
highly satisfied, 56 percent of the respondents were satisfied, 25 percent of the
respondents were dissatisfied and 10 percent of the respondents were highly
dissatisfied. Hence the majority is 56 percent of the respondents were satisfied
in price offered by washing machine.
TABLE 3.9
43
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION ON PRICE
44
The researcher has made an attempt to know the respondents opinion
about the quality of the washing machine viz, highly satisfied, satisfied,
dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.10
TABLE 3.10
Highly satisfied 34 34
Satisfied 31 31
Dissatisfied 20 20
Highly dissatisfied 15 15
Total 100 100
The above table 3.10 inferred that 34 percent of the respondents are
highly satisfied, 31 percent of the respondents were satisfied, 20 percent of the
respondents were dissatisfied and 15 percent of the respondents were highly
dissatisfied. Hence the majority is 34 percent of the respondents were highly
satisfied in quality offered by washing machine.
TABLE 3.10
45
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION ON QUALITY
46
The researcher has made an attempt to know the respondents opinion
about the capacity of the washing machine viz, highly satisfied, satisfied,
dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.11
TABLE 3.11
Highly satisfied 21 21
Satisfied 43 43
Dissatisfied 29 29
Highly dissatisfied 07 07
Total 100 100
The above table 3.12 inferred that 21 percent of the respondents are
highly satisfied, 43 percent of the respondents were satisfied, 29 percent of the
respondents were dissatisfied and 07 percent of the respondents were highly
dissatisfied. Hence the majority is 43 percent of the respondents were satisfied
in capacity offered by washing machine.
TABLE 3.11
47
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION ON CAPACITY
48
According to level of satisfaction regarding convenience offered by the
washing machine, the respondents are classified such as highly satisfied,
satisfied, dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.12.
TABLE 3.12
Highly satisfied 13 13
Satisfied 47 47
Dissatisfied 28 28
Highly dissatisfied 12 12
Total 100 100
It is clear from the table 3.12, out of the total respondents 13 percent
were highly satisfied, 47 percent were satisfied, 28 percent were dissatisfied and
12 percent were highly dissatisfied. Hence the majority 47 percent of the
respondents were satisfied with the convenience offered by washing machine.
TABLE 3.12
49
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION ON CONVENIENCE
50
The researcher has made an attempt to know the respondents opinion
about the service facility of the washing machine viz, highly satisfied, satisfied,
dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.13
TABLE 3.13
Highly satisfied 05 05
Satisfied 50 50
Dissatisfied 36 36
Highly dissatisfied 09 09
Total 100 100
The above table 3.13 inferred that 05 percent of the respondents are
highly satisfied, 50 percent of the respondents were satisfied, 36 percent of the
respondents were dissatisfied and 09 percent of the respondents were highly
dissatisfied. Hence the majority is 50 percent of the respondents were satisfied
and satisfied in service facility offered by washing machine.
TABLE 3.13
51
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION ON SERVICE FACILITY
52
According to level of satisfaction regarding after sales service offered
by the washing machine, the respondents are classified such as highly satisfied,
satisfied, dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.14
TABLE 3.14
Highly satisfied 06 06
Satisfied 47 47
Dissatisfied 46 46
Highly dissatisfied 01 01
Total 100 100
It is clear from the table 3.14, out of the total respondents 06 percent
were highly satisfied, 47 percent were satisfied, 46 percent were dissatisfied and
01 percent were highly dissatisfied. Hence the majority 47 percent of the
respondents were highly satisfied with the after sales service offered by washing
machine.
TABLE 3.14
53
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION ON AFTER SALES SERVICE
54
According to level of satisfaction regarding investment offered by the
washing machine, the respondents are classified such as highly satisfied,
satisfied, dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.15.
TABLE 3.15
Highly satisfied 14 14
Satisfied 49 49
Dissatisfied 24 24
Highly dissatisfied 13 13
Total 100 100
It is clear from the table 3.15, out of the total respondents 14 percent
were highly satisfied, 49 percent were satisfied, 24 percent were dissatisfied and
13 percent were highly dissatisfied. Hence the majority 49 percent of the
respondents were satisfied with the investment offered by washing machine.
TABLE 3.15
56
According to level of satisfaction regarding color offered by the
washing machine, the respondents are classified such as highly satisfied,
satisfied, dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied as shown in table 3.16.
TABLE 3.16
Highly satisfied 15 15
Satisfied 51 51
Dissatisfied 21 21
Highly dissatisfied 13 13
Total 100 100
It is clear from the table 3.16, out of the total respondents 15 percent
were highly satisfied, 51 percent were satisfied, 21 percent were dissatisfied and
13 percent were highly dissatisfied. Hence the majority 51 percent of the
respondents were satisfied with the color offered by washing machine.
TABLE 3.16
57
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION ON COLOR
CHAPTER-IV
58
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The data analysis and interpretation is a key to succeed the research. This
gives up-to-date information. Demographic factors concerning LG washing
machine are taken into account for analyzing the brand preference.
1. CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS
CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS
To find out whether or not the above factors determine the level of
satisfaction the level of satisfaction of the respondents these were considered as
independent variables and the level of satisfaction as already expressed by the
59
respondents were considered as dependent variable and the 2 test influences
were drawn.
Where,
O=Observed frequency
E=Expected frequency
60
distribution of sample respondents’ according to their age and level of
satisfaction with regards to price of LG washing machine. To analyze the
respondents’ satisfaction null hypothesis has been framed and tested by Chi-
Square test.
TABLE: 4.1
AGE AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO PRICE
PRICE Total
AGE Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 20 2(22%) 4(7%) 2(8%) 4(40%) 12
21 to 30 4(45%) 9(16%) 15(60%) 2(20%) 30
31 to 40 3(33%) 31(55%) 7(28%) 4(40%) 45
Above 40 0(0%) 12(22%) 1(4%) 0(0%) 13
Total 9 56 25 10 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.1 that the percentage of level of highly satisfied
is maximum (45%) among 21 to 30 and minimum is (0%) among above 40
years. The percentage of level of satisfied is maximum (55%) among 31 to 40
years and minimum is (07%) among below 20 years. The percentage of level of
dissatisfied is maximum (60%) among 21 to 30 years and the minimum is
(04%) among above 40. The percentage of level highly dissatisfied is maximum
(40%) among below 20 and 31 to 40 and the minimum is (0%) among above 40
aged respondents.
HYPOTHESIS
There is significant relationship between the respondent’s age and level of
satisfaction with regards to price of the LG washing machine.
61
TABLE: 4.1(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Factor Degree of Table Calculated Level of Rejected /
freedom value value significance Accepted
Price 9 23.589 31.188 5% Rejected
The above analysis reveals that the calculated value (31.188) is greater
than table value (23.589) therefore null hypothesis is rejected. Hence there is
relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with regards to price
62
distribution of sample respondents’ according to their age and level of
satisfaction with regards to quality of LG washing machine. To analyze the
respondents’ satisfaction null hypothesis has been framed and tested by Chi-
Square test.
TABLE: 4.2
AGE AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO QUALITY
QUALITY Total
AGE Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 20 5(15%) 5(16%) 0(0%) 2(13%) 12
21 to 30 10(29%) 8(26%) 6(30%) 6(40%) 30
31 to 40 16(47%) 12(39%) 11(55%) 6(40%) 45
Above 40 3(9%) 6(19%) 3(15%) 1(7%) 13
Total 34 31 20 15 100
HYPOTHESIS
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s age and level
of satisfaction with regards to quality of the LG washing machine.
TABLE: 4.2(a)
63
CHI-SQUARE TEST
The above analysis reveals that the calculated value (6.532) is less than
table value (23.589) therefore null hypothesis is accepted. Hence there is no
relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with regards to quality.
64
respondents’ satisfaction null hypothesis has been framed and tested by Chi-
Square test.
TABLE: 4.3
AGE AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO CAPACITY
CAPACITY Total
AGE Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 20 1(5%) 8(19%) 2(7%) 1(14%) 12
21 to 30 6(28%) 13(30%) 8(28%) 3(43%) 30
31 to 40 10(48%) 20(47%) 13(45%) 2(29%) 45
Above 40 4(19%) 2(4%) 6(20%) 1(14%) 13
Total 21 43 29 7 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.3 that the percentage of level of highly satisfied
is maximum (48%) among 31 to 40 years and minimum is (05%) among below
20 years. The percentage of level of satisfied is maximum (47%) among 31 to
40 years and minimum is (04%) among above 40 years. The percentage of level
of dissatisfied is maximum (45%) among 31 to 40 years and the minimum is
(07%) among below 20 years. The percentage of level highly dissatisfied is
maximum (43%) among 21 to 30 years and the minimum is (14%) among
below 20 and above 40 aged respondents.
HYPOTHESIS
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s age and level
of satisfaction with regards to capacity of the LG washing machine.
TABLE: 4.3(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
65
Factor Degree of Table Calculated Level of Rejected /
freedom value value significance Accepted
Capacity 9 23.589 8.295 5% Accepted
The above analysis reveals that the calculated value (8.295) is less than
table value (23.589) therefore null hypothesis is accepted. Hence there is no
relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with regards to capacity.
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the gender of the
respondent’s and their level satisfaction with regards to price, the following null
hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
66
TABLE: 4.4
PRICE Total
GENDER Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Male 2(22%) 12(21%) 6(24%) 0(0%) 20
Female 7(78%) 44(79%) 19(76%) 10(100%) 80
Total 9 56 25 10 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.4 that the percentage of excellent category
respondents is maximum (78%) among female group. The percentage of good
category is maximum (79%) among male group. The percentage of satisfactory is
maximum (76%) among female group. The percentage of poor category is maximum
(100%) among female group respondents.
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.4(a)
67
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (2.849) of chi-square is less than the table value
(12.838) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between gender and their level of satisfaction with regards to price.
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the gender of the
respondent’s and their level satisfaction with regards to quality, the following null
hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
68
TABLE: 4.5
QUALITY Total
GENDER Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Male 3(9%) 5(16%) 8(40%) 4(27%) 20
Female 31(91%) 26(84%) 12(60%) 11(73%) 80
Total 34 31 20 15 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.5 that the percentage of excellent category
respondents is maximum (91%) among female group. The percentage of good
category is maximum (84%) among male group. The percentage of satisfactory is
maximum (60%) among female group. The percentage of poor category is maximum
(73%) among female group respondents.
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.5(a)
69
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (1.309) of chi-square is less than the table value
(12.838) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between gender and their level of satisfaction with regards to quality.
70
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the gender of the
respondent’s and their level satisfaction with regards to capacity, the following null
hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
TABLE: 4.6
CAPACITY Total
GENDER Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Male 4(19%) 8(19%) 8(28%) 0(0%) 20
Female 17(81%) 35(81%) 21(72%) 7(100%) 80
Total 21 43 29 7 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.6 that the percentage of excellent category
respondents is maximum (81%) among female group. The percentage of good
category is maximum (81%) among male group. The percentage of satisfactory is
maximum (72%) among female group. The percentage of poor category is maximum
(100%) among female group respondents.
HYPOTHESIS
71
There is no significant relationship between gender and level of satisfaction
with regards to capacity of the LG washing machine.
TABLE: 4.6(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (2.857) of chi-square is less than the table value
(12.838) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between gender and their level of satisfaction with regards to capacity.
72
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the
educational qualification of the respondent’s and their level satisfaction with
regards to price, the following null hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
TABLE: 4.7
REGARDS TO PRICE
PRICE Total
EDUCATIONAL Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
QUALIFICATION Satisfied Dissatisfied
Illiterate 2(22%) 6(11%) 5(20%) 0(0%) 13
School level 0(0%) 13(23%) 7(28%) 2(20%) 22
College level 5(56%) 28(50%) 10(40%) 8(80%) 51
Others 2(22%) 9(16%) 3(12%) 0(0%) 14
Total 9 56 25 10 100
HYPOTHESIS
73
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s educational
qualification and level of satisfaction with regards to capacity of the LG
washing machine.
TABLE: 4.7(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
The above analysis reveals that the calculated value (9.868) is lesser than
table value (23.589) therefore null hypothesis is accepted. Hence there is no
relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with regards to quantity.
74
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the
educational qualification of the respondent’s and their level satisfaction with
regards to quality, the following null hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
TABLE: 4.8
REGARDS TO QUALITY
QUALITY Total
EDUCATIONAL Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
QUALIFICATION Satisfied Dissatisfied
Illiterate 6(18%) 1(3%) 2(10%) 4(27%) 13
School level 8(24%) 9(29%) 4(20%) 1(7%) 22
College level 16(47%) 21(68%) 9(45%) 5(33%) 51
Others 4(12%) 0(0%) 5(25%) 5(33%) 14
Total 34 31 20 15 100
HYPOTHESIS
75
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s educational
qualification and level of satisfaction with regards to quality of the LG washing
machine.
TABLE: 4.8(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
The above analysis reveals that the calculated value (20.570) is lesser
than table value (23.589) therefore null hypothesis is accepted. Hence there is
no relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with regards to quality.
76
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the
educational qualification of the respondent’s and their level satisfaction with
regards to capacity, the following null hypothesis has been formulated and
tested.
TABLE: 4.9
REGARDS TO CAPACITY
CAPACITY Total
EDUCATIONAL Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
QUALIFICATION Satisfied Dissatisfied
Illiterate 0(0%) 5(11%) 5(17%) 3(43%) 13
School level 7(33%) 11(26%) 4(14%) 0(0%) 22
College level 11(52%) 23(53%) 16(55%) 1(14%) 51
Others 3(15%) 4(10%) 4(14%) 3(43%) 14
Total 21 43 29 7 100
HYPOTHESIS
77
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s educational
qualification and level of satisfaction with regards to capacity of the LG
washing machine.
TABLE: 4.9(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
The above analysis reveals that the calculated value (18.751) is lesser
than table value (23.589) therefore null hypothesis is accepted. Hence there is
no relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with regards to
quantity.
78
OCCUPATION AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO
PRICE
TABLE: 4.10
PRICE Total
OCCUPATION Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Student 1(11%) 3(5%) 4(16%) 0(0%) 8
Employee 4(44%) 32(57%) 11(44%) 5(50%) 52
Professional 3(34%) 14(25%) 5(20%) 3(30%) 25
Others 1(11%) 7(13%) 5(20%) 2(20%) 15
Total 9 56 25 10 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.10 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (44%) among employee and minimum is (11%) among
student and others. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (57%) among
employee and minimum is (05%) among student. The percentage of dissatisfied is
maximum (44%) among employee and professional and the minimum is (16%) among
student. The percentage of highly dissatisfied category is maximum (50%) among
employee and the minimum is (0%) among students respondents.
79
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.10(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (5.604) of chi-square is less than the table value
(23.589) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between occupation and their level of satisfaction with regards to price.
80
OCCUPATION AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO
QUALITY
TABLE: 4.11
QUALITY Total
OCCUPATION Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Student 1(3%) 1(3%) 3(15%) 3(20%) 8
Employee 16(47%) 13(42%) 13(65%) 10(66%) 52
Professional 10(29%) 13(42%) 1(5%) 1(7%) 25
Others 7(21%) 4(13%) 3(15%) 1(7%) 15
Total 34 31 20 15 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.11 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (47%) among employee and minimum is (03%) among
student. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (44%) among employee and
minimum is (09%) among student. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum (35%)
among employee and professional and the minimum is (12%) among others. The
percentage of highly dissatisfied category is maximum (39%) among professional and
the minimum is (15%) among students respondents.
81
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.11(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (18.461) of chi-square is less than the table value
(23.589) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between occupation and their level of satisfaction with regards to quality.
82
OCCUPATION AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO
COLOR
TABLE: 4.12
COLOR Total
OCCUPATION Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Student 2(13%) 4(8%) 2(10%) 0(0%) 8
Employee 8(53%) 30(58%) 7(33%0 7(54%) 52
Professional 1(7%) 11(22%) 8(38%) 5(38%) 25
Others 4(27%) 6(12%) 4(19%) 1(8%) 15
Total 15 51 21 13 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.12 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (53%) among employee and minimum is (07%) among
professional. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (58%) among
employee and minimum is (08%) among student. The percentage of dissatisfied is
maximum (38%) among professional and the minimum is (10%) among student. The
percentage of highly dissatisfied category is maximum (54%) among employee and
the minimum is (0%) among students respondents.
83
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.12(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (10.562) of chi-square is less than the table value
(23.589) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between occupation and their level of satisfaction with regards to color.
84
MONTHLY INCOME AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO PRICE
TABLE: 4.13
PRICE Total
MONTHLY INCOME Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 10000 1(11%) 4(7%) 1(4%) 0(0%) 6
10000 to 20000 1(11%) 16(29%) 9(36%) 0(0%) 26
20000 to 30000 6(67%) 30(53%) 11(44%) 3(30%) 50
Above 30000 1(11%) 6(11%) 4(16%) 7(70%) 18
Total 9 56 25 10 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.13 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (67%) among 20000 to 30000 and minimum is (11%) among
below 10000, 10000 to 20000 and above 30000. The percentage of satisfied category
is maximum (53%) among 20000 to 30000 and minimum is (07%) among below
10000. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum (44%) among 20000 to 30000 and
the minimum is (04%) among below 10000. The percentage of highly dissatisfied
category is maximum (70%) among above 40000 and the minimum is (0%) among
below 10000 and 10000 to 20000 respondents.
85
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.13(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (24.341) of chi-square is greater than the table value
(23.589) the null hypothesis is rejected. This reveals that there is significant
relationship between monthly income and their level of satisfaction with regards to
price.
86
MONTHLY INCOME AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO THEME
TABLE: 4.14
QUALITY Total
MONTHLY Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
INCOME Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 10000 2(6%) 2(6%) 1(5%) 1(7%) 6
10000 to 20000 7(21%) 7(23%) 7(35%) 5(33%) 26
20000 to 30000 21(61%) 13(42%) 11(55%) 5(33%) 50
Above 30000 4(12%) 9(29%) 1(5%) 4(27%) 18
Total 34 31 20 15 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.14 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (61%) among 20000 to 30000 and minimum is (06%) among
below 10000. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (42%) among 20000
to 30000 and minimum is (06%) among below 10000. The percentage of dissatisfied
is maximum (35%) among 10000 to 20000 and 20000 to 30000 and the minimum is
(05%) among below 10000 and above 40000. The percentage of highly dissatisfied
category is maximum (33%) among 10000 to 20000 and 20000 to 30000 and the
minimum is (07%) among below 10000 respondents.
87
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.14(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (9.123) of chi-square is less than the table value
(23.589) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between monthly income and their level of satisfaction with regards to
quality.
88
MONTHLY INCOME AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO COLOR
TABLE: 4.15
COLOR Total
MONTHLY INCOME Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 10000 2(13%) 1(1%) 1(5%) 2(15%) 6
10000 to 20000 6(40%) 9(18%) 4(19%) 7(55%) 26
20000 to 30000 2(13%) 28(55%) 16(76%) 4(30%) 50
Above 30000 5(34%) 13(26%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 18
Total 15 51 21 13 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.15 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (40%) among 10000 to 20000 and minimum is (13%) among
below 10000 and 20000 to 30000. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum
(55%) among 20000 to 30000 and minimum is (01%) among below 10000. The
percentage of dissatisfied is maximum (76%) among 20000 to 30000 and the
minimum is (0%) among above 30000. The percentage of highly dissatisfied category
is maximum (55%) among 10000 to 20000 and the minimum is (0%) among above
30000 respondents.
89
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.15(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (29.250) of chi-square is greater than the table value
(23.589) the null hypothesis is rejected. This reveals that there is significant
relationship between monthly income and their level of satisfaction with regards to
color.
90
PLACE OF RESIDENCE AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO PRICE
TABLE: 4.16
PRICE Total
PLACE OF Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
RESIDENCE Satisfied Dissatisfied
Rural 0(0%) 8(14%) 12(48%) 0(0%) 20
Urban 5(56%) 23(41%) 8(32%) 5(50%) 41
Semi-Urban 4(44%) 25(45%) 5(20%) 5(50%) 39
Total 9 56 25 10 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.16 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (56%) among urban and minimum is (0%) among rural. The
percentage of satisfied category is maximum (45%) among semi-urban and minimum
is (14%) among rural. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum (48%) among rural
and the minimum is (20%) among semi-urban. The percentage of highly dissatisfied
category is maximum (50%) among urban and semi-urban and the minimum is (0%)
among rural respondents.
91
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.16(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (18.821) of chi-square is greater than the table value
(18.548) the null hypothesis is rejected. This reveals that there is significant
relationship between place of residence and their level of satisfaction with regards to
price.
92
PLACE OF RESIDENCE AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO QUALITY
TABLE: 4.17
QUALITY Total
PLACE OF Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
RESIDENCE Satisfied Dissatisfied
Rural 6(18%) 6(19%) 5(25%) 3(20%) 20
Urban 17(50%) 13(42%) 6(30%) 5(33%) 41
Semi-Urban 11(32%) 12(39%) 9(45%) 7(47%) 39
Total 34 31 20 15 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.17 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (50%) among urban and minimum is (18%) among rural.
The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (42%) among urban and minimum is
(19%) among rural. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum (45%) among semi-
urban and the minimum is (25%) among rural. The percentage of highly dissatisfied
category is maximum (47%) among semi-urban and the minimum is (20%) among
rural respondents.
93
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.17(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (2.631) of chi-square is less than the table value
(18.548) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between place of residence and their level of satisfaction with regards to
quality.
94
PLACE OF RESIDENCE AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO COLOR
TABLE: 4.18
COLOR Total
PLACE OF
Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
RESIDENCE
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Rural 4(27%) 10(20%) 4(19%) 2(15%) 20
Urban 9(60%) 18(35%) 9(43%) 5(38%) 41
Semi-Urban 2(13%) 23(45%) 8(38%) 6(47%) 39
Total 15 51 21 13 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.18 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (60%) among urban and minimum is (13%) among semi-
urban. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (45%) among semi-urban and
minimum is (20%) among rural. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum (43%)
among urban and the minimum is (19%) among rural. The percentage of highly
dissatisfied category is maximum (47%) among semi-urban and the minimum is
(15%) among rural respondents.
95
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.18(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (5.444) of chi-square is less than the table value
(18.548) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between place of residence and their level of satisfaction with regards to
color.
96
MARITAL STATUS AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO PRICE
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the marital status
of the respondent’s and their level satisfaction with regards to price, the following null
hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
TABLE: 4.19
PRICE Total
MARITAL STATUS Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Married 6(67%) 30(54%) 12(48%) 7(70%) 55
Unmarried 3(33%) 26(46%) 13(52%) 3(30%) 45
Total 9 56 25 10 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.19 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (67%) among married and minimum is (33%)among
unmarried. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (54%) among married
and minimum is (46%) among unmarried. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum
(52%) among unmarried and the minimum is (48%) among married. The percentage
of highly dissatisfied category is maximum (70%) among married and the minimum is
(30%) among unmarried respondents.
97
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.19(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (1.945) of chi-square is less than the table value
(12.838) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between marital status and their level of satisfaction with regards to price.
98
MARITAL STATUS AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO QUALITY
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the marital status
of the respondent’s and their level satisfaction with regards to quality, the following
null hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
TABLE: 4.20
QUALITY Total
MARITAL STATUS Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Married 15(44%) 23(74%) 9(45%) 8(53%) 55
Unmarried 19(56%) 8(26%) 11(55%) 7(47%) 45
Total 34 31 20 15 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.20 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (56%) among unmarried and minimum is (44%) among
married. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (74%) among married and
minimum is (26%) among unmarried. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum
(55%) among unmarried and the minimum is (45%) among married. The percentage
of highly dissatisfied category is maximum (53%) among married and the minimum is
(47%) among unmarried respondents.
99
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.20(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (7.066) of chi-square is less than the table value
(12.838) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between marital status and their level of satisfaction with regards to
quality.
100
MARITAL STATUS AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH
REGARDS TO COLOR
In order to study the significance of the relationship between the marital status
of the respondent’s and their level satisfaction with regards to color, the following null
hypothesis has been formulated and tested.
TABLE: 4.21
COLOR Total
MARITAL STATUS Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Married 8(53%) 25(49%) 13(62%) 9(69%) 55
Unmarried 7(47%) 26(51%) 8(38%) 4(31%) 45
Total 15 51 21 13 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.21 that the percentage of highly satisfied category
respondents is maximum (53%) among married and minimum is (47%) among
unmarried. The percentage of satisfied category is maximum (51%) among unmarried
and minimum is (49%) among married. The percentage of dissatisfied is maximum
(62%) among married and the minimum is (38%) among unmarried. The percentage
of highly dissatisfied category is maximum (69%) among married and the minimum is
(31%) among unmarried respondents.
101
HYPOTHESIS
TABLE: 4.21(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (2.222) of chi-square is less than the table value
(12.838) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between marital status and their level of satisfaction with regards to color.
102
NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN THE FAMILY AND LEVEL OF
SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO PRICE
TABLE: 4.22
PRICE Total
NO.OF MEMBERS IN Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
THE FAMILY Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 4 2(22%) 6(11%) 5(20%) 3(30%) 16
4 to 6 2(22%) 39(70%) 12(48%) 6(60%) 59
Above 6 5(56%) 11(19%) 8(32%) 1(10%) 25
Total 9 56 25 10 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.22 that the percentage of level of highly
satisfied is maximum (56%) among above 6and minimum is (22%) among 4to 6
and below 4.The percentage of level of satisfied is maximum (70%) among 4 to
6 and minimum is (11%) among below 4. The percentage of level of dissatisfied
is maximum (48%) among 4 to 6 and the minimum is (20%) among below 4.
The percentage of level highly dissatisfied is maximum (60%) among 4 to 6 and
the minimum is (10%) among above 6 respondents.
103
HYPOTHESIS
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s number of
members in the family and level of satisfaction with regards to price of the LG
washing machine.
TABLE: 4.22(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (11.717) of chi-square is less than the table value
(18.548) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between number of members in the family and their level of
satisfaction with regards to price.
104
NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN THE FAMILY AND LEVEL OF
SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO QUALITY
TABLE: 4.23
QUALITY Total
NO.OF MEMBERS IN Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
THE FAMILY Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 4 8(24%) 4(13%) 2(10%) 2(13%) 16
4 to 6 19(56%) 14(45%) 14(70%) 12(80%) 59
Above 6 7(20%) 13(42%) 4(20%) 1(7%) 25
Total 34 31 20 15 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.23 that the percentage of level of highly
satisfied is maximum (56%) among 4 to 6 and minimum is (20%) among above
6. The percentage of level of satisfied is maximum (45%) among 4 to 6 and
minimum is (13%) among below 4. The percentage of level of dissatisfied is
maximum (70%) among 4 to 6 and the minimum is (10%) among below 4. The
percentage of level highly dissatisfied is maximum (80%) among 4 to 6 and the
minimum is (7%) among above 6 respondents.
105
HYPOTHESIS
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s number of
members in the family and level of satisfaction with regards to quality of the LG
washing machine.
TABLE: 4.23(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (10.539) of chi-square is less than the table value
(18.548) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between number of members in the family and their level of
satisfaction with regards to quality.
106
NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN THE FAMILY AND LEVEL OF
SATISFACTION WITH REGARDS TO COLOR
TABLE: 4.24
COLOR Total
NO.OF MEMBERS Highly Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly
IN THE FAMILY Satisfied Dissatisfied
Below 4 2(13%) 12(24%) 1(5%) 1(8%) 16
4 to 6 9(60%) 29(56%) 13(62%) 8(62%) 59
Above 6 4(27%) 10(20%) 7(33%) 4(30%) 25
Total 15 51 21 13 100
Source: Primary data
The above table shows 4.24 that the percentage of level of highly
satisfied is maximum (60%) among 4 to 6 and minimum is (13%) among below
4. The percentage of level of satisfied is maximum (56%) among 4 to 6 and
minimum is (20%) among above 6. The percentage of level of dissatisfied is
maximum (62%) among 4 to 6 and the minimum is (5%) among below 4. The
percentage of level highly dissatisfied is maximum (62%) among 4 to 6 and the
minimum is (8%) among below 4 respondents.
107
HYPOTHESIS
There is no significant relationship between the respondent’s number of
members in the family and level of satisfaction with regards to color of the LG
washing machine.
TABLE: 4.24(a)
CHI-SQUARE TEST
As the calculated value (5.545) of chi-square is less than the table value
(18.548) the null hypothesis is accepted. This reveals that there is no significant
relationship between number of members in the family and their level of
satisfaction with regards to color.
108
WEIGHTED SCORE ANALYSIS:
In the weighted score analysis various factors are obtained by multiplying the
rank with given frequency, it gives the weighted score. On the basis of the weighted
score, the rank will be given.
Total
Weighted average = × 100
No. of items × No. of respondents
109
WEIGHTED AVERAGE RANKING
For which respondents were asked to assign the rank for each of the ten factors,
which are in the interview schedule. As per this technique, number of
respondents was multiplied with the rank assigned by them. A score of 8 for the
first rank, 7 for the second rank, 6 for the third rank, 5 for the fourth rank, 4 for
the fifth rank, 3 for the sixth rank, 2 for the seventh rank, and 1 for the eighth
rank. On the basis of the total score the rank has been assigned.
TABLE 4.25
Weighted
S. No Factors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total score Rank
average
1 Reasonable price 12 12 08 20 08 20 08 12 452 56.5 4
2 Quality 20 04 20 04 20 04 16 12 436 54.5 6
3 Brand image 28 28 04 12 04 08 12 04 328 41.0 8
4 Color and design 16 24 16 12 08 12 08 04 360 45.0 7
5 Technology 04 08 24 16 24 12 04 08 440 55.0 5
6 Advertisement 12 04 12 20 08 12 16 16 488 61.0 3
7 Friends and relatives 00 12 08 04 20 12 16 28 560 70.0 1
8 Convenience 08 08 08 12 08 20 20 16 512 64.0 2
110
From the above table, it is observed that out of various factors the
respondents are considering product quality as the main factor which influenced
scored the highest value of 560. It is also convenience second ranked and it is
ranked fourth, technology is ranked fifth, quality is ranked sixth, color and
give more importance to quality of product rather than others factors & less
111
PROBLEM FACED BY THE CONSUMERS:
the quality products. Through the customers are entitled to have certain basic
interest of the customers. They do small practices such as charging higher price,
The LG washing machine customers also facing the above said problems
while using a particular brand. They face problems such as reasonable price,
Problems such as high price, less quality, brand image, color and design,
112
RANKING ANALYSIS FOR PROBLEM FACED BY THE
RESPONDENTS
TABLE 4.26
Weighted
S. No Factors 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total score Rank
average
1 Reasonable price 05 04 03 04 04 05 352 58.6 3
2 Quality 07 02 03 03 03 07 356 59.3 2
3 Brand image 04 07 02 04 04 04 336 56.0 6
4 Color and design 02 07 03 03 07 03 360 60.0 1
5 Technology 04 02 07 07 00 05 348 58.0 4.5
6 Advertisement 03 03 07 04 07 01 348 58.0 4.5
113
CHAPTER - V
FINDINGS:
The present study has led the researcher to the following findings
through a complete examination of the discovered facts.
PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS:
The majority of the 45 percent were in the age group of 31 to 40.
The majority i.e. 60 percent of the respondents were female
The majority of the respondents representing 51 percent were college
level.
The majority is 52 percent of the respondents were professional.
The majority of 50 percent of the respondents were having a family
monthly income ranging from rs.20000 to 30000.
The majority is 41 percent of the respondents were urban.
The majority of 55 percent of the respondents were unmarried.
The majority of 59 percent of the respondents have 4 to 6 members in
their family.
The majority is 56 percent of the respondents were satisfied in price
offered by washing machine.
The majority is 34 percent of the respondents were highly satisfied in
quality offered by washing machine.
The majority is 33 percent of the respondents were satisfied in capacity
offered by washing machine.
The majority 37 percent of the respondents were satisfied with the
convenience offered by washing machine.
The majority is 50 percent of the respondents were satisfied and satisfied
in service facility offered by washing machine.
114
The majority 47 percent of the respondents were highly satisfied with the
after sales service offered by washing machine.
The majority 49 percent of the respondents were satisfied with the
investment offered by washing machine.
The majority 51 percent of the respondents were satisfied with the color
offered by washing machine.
CHI-SQUARE ANALYS:
There is relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with
regards to price
There is no relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with
regards to quality.
There is no relationship between the age and level of satisfaction with
regards to capacity.
There is no significant relationship between gender and their level of
115
There is no significant relationship between occupation and their level of
satisfaction with regards to color
There is significant relationship between monthly income and their level of
satisfaction with regards to price.
There is no significant relationship between monthly income and their level of
satisfaction with regards to quality.
There is significant relationship between monthly income and their level of
satisfaction with regards to color.
There is significant relationship between place of residence and their level of
satisfaction with regards to price.
There is no significant relationship between place of residence and their level
of satisfaction with regards to quality.
There is no significant relationship between place of residence and their level
of satisfaction with regards to color.
There is no significant relationship between marital status and their level of
satisfaction with regards to price.
There is no significant relationship between marital status and their level of
satisfaction with regards to quality.
There is no significant relationship between marital status and their level of
satisfaction with regards to color.
There is no significant relationship between number of members in the
family and their level of satisfaction with regards to price.
There is no significant relationship between number of members in the
family and their level of satisfaction with regards to quality.
There is no significant relationship between number of members in the
family and their level of satisfaction with regards to color.
116
WEIGHTED SCORE ANALYSIS:
Problems such as high price, less quality, brand image, color and design,
technology, advertisement, etc. are taken into consideration.
It can be conducted that majority of the sample respondents are give
more importance to quality of product rather than others factors & less
important to given the respondents.
117
SUGGESTION:
The respondents are highly satisfied on the quality and brand image of
the LG washing machine. But they are dissatisfied at the color and design of
the washing machine with different colors and design.
118
CONCLUSION
119
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS REFERENCE :
1. Rajan Nair, “Marketing”, Sultan & Sons, New Delhi, 1987 P.244.
2. Philip kotler, “Principles of Marketing”, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New
3. Gary Armstrong and Philip Kotler, “Marketing”, Pearson Education (P) Ltd,
2003.
JOURNALS :
Vol.XXXIV, Nov.2004.
120
WEBSITES:
www.google.com
www.lg.co.in
www.wikipedia.org
www.researchandmarkets.com
www.marketresearch.com
121