0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views15 pages

Understanding Capacitive and Inductive Sensors

The document compares capacitive and inductive non-contact sensors, highlighting their construction, sensing techniques, and suitability for various applications. Capacitive sensors are sensitive to contamination and work best in clean environments, while inductive sensors are more robust in dirty conditions. A comparison table summarizes their performance across different factors, aiding in the selection of the appropriate technology for specific needs.

Uploaded by

overschie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views15 pages

Understanding Capacitive and Inductive Sensors

The document compares capacitive and inductive non-contact sensors, highlighting their construction, sensing techniques, and suitability for various applications. Capacitive sensors are sensitive to contamination and work best in clean environments, while inductive sensors are more robust in dirty conditions. A comparison table summarizes their performance across different factors, aiding in the selection of the appropriate technology for specific needs.

Uploaded by

overschie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Non-Contact Measurement

Comparing Capacitive and Inductive Sensors

Non-contact sensors
using capacitive and
inductive measuring
technologies each
represent a unique
blend of advantages
and disadvantages for
a variety of applications.

www.ibspe.com info@ibspe.com +31(0)40 290 12 70


Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Typical applications

www.ibspe.com info@ibspe.com +31 (0)40 290 12 70


Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Our inductive and capacitive measuring systems


Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

A comparison will help you


to select the best technology
for your application.

Understanding the Capacitive sensor


difference between
capacitive and inductive
(or eddy-current) sensors
begins by looking at how the
probes are constructed.
Inductive sensor
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Capacitive probe
construction
At the center of a capacitive
probe is the sensing tip
generating the electric field
used to sense the distance
to the target. The guard ring,
separated by an insulating
layer, surrounds the sensing
tip and focuses the electric
field toward the target.
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Inductive probe
construction
In the sensing coil of wire
alternating current is
passed through, creating an
magnetic field, used to sense
the distance to the target.
The epoxy and plastic
covered coil extends from
the steel housing to allow the
full sensing field to engage
the target.
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Sensing area
Capacitive
Sensing area diameter: 130% of sensing tip diameter.

Inductive
Sensing area diameter: 300% of sensing tip diameter.

Capacitive Inductive
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Capacitive sensing
technique
Capacitive sensors use a
high-frequency electric
field to determine the
capacitance. Changes in the
distance between the probe
and the target change the
capacitance, which changes
the current flow in the
sensing element.
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Inductive sensing technique


Inductive sensors use magnetic fields. Alternating
current is passed through the sensing coil, creating an
alternating magnetic field. This induces an eddy current
in the target that opposes
the magnetic field of the
coil. The impedance of the
sensing coil will change. The
amount of impedance change
is dependent on the distance
between the target and the Magnetic field induces eddy current
sensing coil in the probe. (blue) in conductive target
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Gap contamination
Capacitive: Contamination (dust, oil, and water) also
increases the capacitance. Therefore capacitive sensors
must be used in a clean environment.
Inductive: Magnetic fields are not affected by non-
conductive contaminants such as dust, water, and oil. So
these sensors are the best choice when the application
involves a dirty or hostile environment.
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Target materials and rotating targets


In capacitive sensors the electric field uses the target
as a conductive path to ground and does not penetrate
the material. Once calibrated, they can be used with any
conductive material with no material related errors, and
they work well with rotating targets.
Inductive sensors need to be calibrated to the same
material as the target and should
not be used with rotating magnetic
material targets unless the electrical
runout errors are acceptable in the
application. Actual runout (blue), and electri-
cal runout from ind. sensor (red).
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Temperature and Vacuum


Capacitive probes (affected by condensation) have an
standard operating range of +4 to +50°C. On request
available: 150°C or cryogenic options.
Inductive probes aren’t affected and have an operating
range from -25 to +125°C. On request available: 200°C
or cryogenic options.
Both sensors types can work well in vacuum
environments. In temperature sensitive vacuums, inductive
sensors may cause too much heat for the application, due
to the larger power consumption. In these applications,
capacitive sensors will be a better choice.
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Probe Mounting
When your application requires the use of multiple probes
with a common target, synchronized sensors are easy to
use. If the application requires inductive (or eddy-current)
technology, special care must be taken in the mounting
plan (mounting block may interfere) and special calibration
may be required.

Synchronized capacitive Synchronisation can eliminate interfer- Mounting hardware can


sensors will not interfere when ence occurring when inductive probes interfere with inductive
used on the same target. are mounted near each other. probe magnetic field.
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Comparison table
•• Best Choice • Good Choice – Not an option

Factor Capacitive Inductive


Dirty environments – ••
Small Targets •• •
Large Range • ••
Thin Materials •• •
Material Versatility •• •
Multiple Probes •• ••
Resolution •• ••
Bandwidth •• ••
Comparing Non-Contact Sensors

Further reading
Visit our website for more educational and technical
information about our non-contact sensors.

https://www.ibspe.com/measuring-systems/capacitive-
measuring-systems

https://www.ibspe.com/measuring-systems/inductive-
measuring-systems

https://www.ibspe.com/expertise/technical-resources

www.ibspe.com info@ibspe.com +31(0)40 290 12 70

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy