0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views5 pages

Homework 2 6 14

The document contains exercises and theorems related to the curvature and torsion of curves parameterized by arclength in R3. It discusses the relationships between curvature, torsion, and the properties of osculating circles and planes, including the conditions for curves lying on spheres. Additionally, it includes mathematical expressions and derivations related to these concepts, along with a Sage program for visualizing the evolute of an ellipse.

Uploaded by

pradyut23
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views5 pages

Homework 2 6 14

The document contains exercises and theorems related to the curvature and torsion of curves parameterized by arclength in R3. It discusses the relationships between curvature, torsion, and the properties of osculating circles and planes, including the conditions for curves lying on spheres. Additionally, it includes mathematical expressions and derivations related to these concepts, along with a Sage program for visualizing the evolute of an ellipse.

Uploaded by

pradyut23
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Homework

JWR
Feb 6, 2014

1. Exercise 1.5-12. Let the position of a particle at time t be given by


α(t) = β(σ(t))
where β is parameterized by arclength and σ̇(t) = |α̇(t)| is the speed of the par-
ticle. Denote differentiation with respect to t by an overdot and differentiation
with respect to s by a prime so if g(t) = f (σ(t)) we have ġ(t) = f ′ (σ(t))σ̇(t) by
the chain rule. By the Frenet equations
α̇ = σ̇t
α̈ = σ̈t + σ̇ 2 t′ = σ̈t + σ̇ 2 κn
... ...
α = σ t + σ̈ σ̇t′ + (2σ̈ σ̇κ + σ̇ 3 κ′ )n + σ̇ 3 κ n′
...
= ( σ − σ̇ 3 κτ )t + (σ̈ σ̇κ + 2σ̈ σ̇κ + σ̇ 3 κ′ )n + σ̇ 3 κτ b

From the first two equations we get α̇ ∧ α̈ = σ̇ 3 κ b and hence |α̇ ∧ α̈| = σ̇ 2 κ.
Represent all three equations in the matrix form
    
α̇ σ̇ 0 0 t
 α̈  =  ∗ σ̇ 2 κ 0  n 
...
α ∗ ∗ σ̇ 3 κτ b
...
and we get (α̇ ∧ α̈) · α = σ̇ 6 κ2 τ . Combining gives
...
|α̇ ∧ α̈| (α̇ ∧ α̈) · α
κ= , τ = .
σ̇ 3 |α̇ ∧ α̈|2
A plane curve is a special case: take α(t) = (x(t), y(t), 0). But in the case of
a plane curve we can define the unit normal vector by rotation the unit tangent
vector clockwise by a right angle. To maintain the second Frenet equation
t′ = κn we must allow κ to take negative values. The above equation for κ
becomes
α̇ ∧ α̈ ẋ ÿ − ẏ ẍ
κ= = 2 (♥)
σ̇ 3 (ẋ + ẏ 2 )3/2
2. Exercise 1.5-12. Let α : I → R3 be a curve parameterized by arclength
whose curvature κ and torsion τ do not vanish. If the trace of α lies in a
sphere, then
 ′ 2
1 κ
+ = constant (†)
κ2 κ2 τ

1
The converse holds if the derivative of κ′ of the curvature does not vanish.1
Assume that α(I) lies in the sphere of radius a > 0 centered at p0 ∈ R, i.e.
that
|α(s) − p0 |2 = a.
The curve α − p0 has the same curvature and torsion as α so we may assume
that p0 = 0. Then α · α′ = 0. But α′ = t so
α · t = 0.
Differentiating again gives α′ · t + α · t′ = 0. As α′ = t, |t| = 1, t′ = κn, and
t · n = 0 this gives
1
α·n=−
κ
Differentiating a third time gives α′ · n + α · n′ = κ′ κ−2 . As α′ = t and t · n = 0
this simplifies to α · n′ = κ′ κ−2 . Using the second Frenet equation this becomes
α · (−κt + τ b) = κ′ κ−2 and since α · t = 0 we get
κ′
α·b= .
κ2 τ
Now since t, n, b is an orthonormal basis we get
1 κ′
α = (α · t)t + (α · n)n + (α · b)b = − n + 2 b
κ κ τ
and hence  2
1 κ′
a2 = |α|2 = + . (∗)
κ2 κ2 τ
To prove the converse let
1 κ′
γ := − n + 2 b.
κ κ τ
denote the right hand side of (∗) and assume that |γ| is constant, i.e. that γ lies
on a sphere centered at the origin. It is enough to show that α′ = γ ′ for then
α = γ + p0 for some p0 ∈ R3 so α lies on a translate of the sphere containing γ.
Differentiate γ to get
 ′ ′
′ κ′ 1 ′ κ κ′ ′
γ = 2n− n + b + b.
κ κ κ2 τ κ2 τ
By Frenet we have n′ = −κt + τ b and b′ = −τ n so
 ′ ′
′ κ′ 1 κ κ′
γ = 2 n − (−κt + τ b) + b − τn
κ κ κ2 τ κ2 τ
 ′ ′
τ κ
=t− b+ b
κ κ2 τ
 ′ ′ !
τ κ
= α′ − − b.
κ κ2 τ
1 However, the converse does not hold in general. A helix has constant curvature and

torsion so it also satisfies (†).

2
so we must prove that the coefficient of b is zero. The assumption that |γ| is
constant is the same as the assumption that the derivative of the right hand
side of (∗) is zero so
 ′ 2 !′  ′   ′ ′  ′ ′ !
1 κ −2κ′ κ κ 2κ′ τ κ
0= + = +2 =− 2 −
κ2 κ2 τ κ3 κ2 τ κ2 τ κ τ κ κ2 τ

As κ′ 6= 0, the other factor vanishes as required.


3. Exercise 1.6-3. Let α : I → R3 be a regular curve parameterized by
arclength and p0 = α(s0 ) be a point on its trace. Assume the curvature κ0 =
κ(s0 ) of C at p0 is nonzero. Let P0 ⊆ R3 be the osculating plane to C at p0 and
π : R3 → P0 be the orthogonal projection. We will show that the space curve α
and the plane curve π ◦ α have the same curvature at s0 .
On page 17 do Carmo defines the osculating plane as the “plane determined
by the unit tangent and normal vectors α′ (s) and n(s)” but in Figure 1-15 on
the same page he draws the osculating plane so that it touches the curve. What
he intends is that the osculating plane is the image of the two dimensional vector
subspace
V0 := {t1 t0 + t2 n0 , t1 , t2 ∈ R}, t0 := α′ (s0 ), n0 := n(s0 )
under the translation v 7→ p0 + v, i.e.
P0 = p0 + V0 .
The point is that V0 is a vector subspace of R3 and thus contains the origin
whereas P0 is a plane which probably does not pass through the origin. The
orthogonal projection π0 : R3 → V0 is defined by
π0 (v) = (v · t0 )t0 + (v · n0 )n0
whereas by the projection on the osculating plane do Carmo means the map
v 7→ π0 (v − p0 ) + p0 . We can use either interpretation in this problem since the
curvature is invariant under translations.
The problem is easy if we use the local canonical form on page 27 of do
Carmo. Here s0 = 0, p0 = 0, and α(s) = (x(s), y(s), z(s)) where
κ0 s3 κ0 s2 κ0 τ0 3
x=s− + ··· , y= + ··· , z= s + ··· ,
6 2 6
where κ0 and τ0 are the curvature and torsion at s0 = 0 and the dots represent
terms which vanish to order three. Thus t0 = (1, 0, 0), n0 = (0, 1, 0), and the
osculating plane is the (x, y)-plane. The plane curve π0 ◦ α(t) = (x(t), y(t)) has
a Taylor expansion
κ 0 t3 κ 0 t2
x= t− + ··· , y= + ··· ,
6 2
and the curvature at s = 0 of this plane curve π ◦ α is κ0 by Equation (♥) in
Exercise 1.5-12 above.

3
4. Theorem. Let α : I → R2 be a plane curve parameterized by arclength,
s0 ∈ I, p0 = α(s0 ), and t0 = α′ (s0 ) be the unit tangent vector at s0 . Assume
that the curvature κ0 of α at s0 is not zero. Then there is a unique circle
s
β(s) = (x0 + r0 cos θ, y0 + r0 sin θ), θ=
r0
which has second order contact with α at s0 , i.e.

β(s0 ) = α(s0 ), β ′ (s0 ) = α′ (s0 ), β ′′ (s0 ) = α′′ (s0 ).

The curve α and the circle β have the same curvature κ0 = 1/r0 at s0 and the
center q0 = (x0 , y0 ) of the circle β is given by

q0 = p0 + r0 n0

where n0 = κ0−1 α′′ (s0 ) is the unit normal vector.


5. Definition. In the notation of the theorem the circle β is called the oscu-
lating circle to the curve α at s0 , its center q0 = (x0 , y0 ) is called the center
of curvature, and its radius r0 = 1/κ0 is called radius of curvature. The
fact that the curvature of a circle is the reciprocal of its radius is an immediate
consequence of Equation (♥) in Exercise 1.5-12 above.
6. Remark. In Exercise 1.6-2 on page 30 do Carmo defines the osculating
circle at a point p0 = α(s0 ) of a space curve α : I → R3 . The curves α and
π0 ◦ α (see Problem 1.6-3 above) have the same osculating circle. Do Carmo
doesn’t give a precise definition for what it means for a parameterized family
of circles to converge. An adequate definition is that the centers, the radii, and
the unit normal vectors of the ambient planes all converge.
7. Exercise 1.7-3. By Equation (♥) in Exercise 1.5-12 above the curvature of
the ellipse α(θ) = (a cos θ, b cos θ) is
α̇ ∧ α̈ ẋ ÿ − ẏ ẍ 2ab sin θ cos θ
κ= = 2 = 2
σ̇ 3 (ẋ + ẏ 2 )3/2 (a cos2 θ + b2 sin2 θ)3/2
which vanishes at the four points θ = 0, π/2, π, 3π/2 so the vertices are (±a, 0),
(0, ±b). (The Four Vertex Theorem (see do Carmo pages 37 and 40) says that
every simple closed plane curve has at least four vertices.)
8. Remark. The locus of centers of curvature of a plane curve is called its
evolute2 By Equation (♥) in Exercise 1.5-12 above the evolute of a parame-
terized curve α(t) = (x(t), y(t)) has parameterized equations β(t) = (ξ(t), η(t))
where
ẋ2 + ẏ 2
β = (−mẏ, mẋ), m=
ẋÿ − ẏ ẍ
The evolute of an ellipse is called an asteroid. Figure ?? shows this curve
together with the normal lines to the ellipse. It is easy to prove that the normal
2 Click if reading online.

4
Figure 1: The evolute of an ellipse

lines to a plane curve are tangent to the evolute of that curve and that the curve
is traced out by unwinding a string along its evolute. A curve which is obtained
by unwinding a taut string along a given curve is called an involute of the given
curve.
Here is a sage program which will draw Figure 1.

var(’x’,’y’,’t’,’X’,’Y’)
a=2.0; b=1.5
x(t)=a*cos(t); y(t)=b*sin(t)
dx(t)=x.derivative(t); dy(t)=y.derivative(t);
ddx(t)=dx.derivative(t); ddy(t)=dy.derivative(t)
m(t)=(dx(t)*dx(t)+dy(t)*dy(t))/(dx(t)*ddy(t)-dy(t)*ddx(t))
X(t)=x(t)-m(t)*dy(t); Y(t)=y(t)+m(t)*dx(t)
G=Graphics()
G+=parametric_plot((x(t),y(t)), (t,0.0,2*pi),color=’red’)
G+=parametric_plot((X(t),Y(t)), (t,0.0,2*pi),color=’blue’)
for i in range(0,40):
t=2*i*pi/40
G+=line([(x(t),y(t)),(X(t),Y(t))],color=’black’)
G.show(axes=False)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy