Homework 2 6 14
Homework 2 6 14
JWR
Feb 6, 2014
From the first two equations we get α̇ ∧ α̈ = σ̇ 3 κ b and hence |α̇ ∧ α̈| = σ̇ 2 κ.
Represent all three equations in the matrix form
α̇ σ̇ 0 0 t
α̈ = ∗ σ̇ 2 κ 0 n
...
α ∗ ∗ σ̇ 3 κτ b
...
and we get (α̇ ∧ α̈) · α = σ̇ 6 κ2 τ . Combining gives
...
|α̇ ∧ α̈| (α̇ ∧ α̈) · α
κ= , τ = .
σ̇ 3 |α̇ ∧ α̈|2
A plane curve is a special case: take α(t) = (x(t), y(t), 0). But in the case of
a plane curve we can define the unit normal vector by rotation the unit tangent
vector clockwise by a right angle. To maintain the second Frenet equation
t′ = κn we must allow κ to take negative values. The above equation for κ
becomes
α̇ ∧ α̈ ẋ ÿ − ẏ ẍ
κ= = 2 (♥)
σ̇ 3 (ẋ + ẏ 2 )3/2
2. Exercise 1.5-12. Let α : I → R3 be a curve parameterized by arclength
whose curvature κ and torsion τ do not vanish. If the trace of α lies in a
sphere, then
′ 2
1 κ
+ = constant (†)
κ2 κ2 τ
1
The converse holds if the derivative of κ′ of the curvature does not vanish.1
Assume that α(I) lies in the sphere of radius a > 0 centered at p0 ∈ R, i.e.
that
|α(s) − p0 |2 = a.
The curve α − p0 has the same curvature and torsion as α so we may assume
that p0 = 0. Then α · α′ = 0. But α′ = t so
α · t = 0.
Differentiating again gives α′ · t + α · t′ = 0. As α′ = t, |t| = 1, t′ = κn, and
t · n = 0 this gives
1
α·n=−
κ
Differentiating a third time gives α′ · n + α · n′ = κ′ κ−2 . As α′ = t and t · n = 0
this simplifies to α · n′ = κ′ κ−2 . Using the second Frenet equation this becomes
α · (−κt + τ b) = κ′ κ−2 and since α · t = 0 we get
κ′
α·b= .
κ2 τ
Now since t, n, b is an orthonormal basis we get
1 κ′
α = (α · t)t + (α · n)n + (α · b)b = − n + 2 b
κ κ τ
and hence 2
1 κ′
a2 = |α|2 = + . (∗)
κ2 κ2 τ
To prove the converse let
1 κ′
γ := − n + 2 b.
κ κ τ
denote the right hand side of (∗) and assume that |γ| is constant, i.e. that γ lies
on a sphere centered at the origin. It is enough to show that α′ = γ ′ for then
α = γ + p0 for some p0 ∈ R3 so α lies on a translate of the sphere containing γ.
Differentiate γ to get
′ ′
′ κ′ 1 ′ κ κ′ ′
γ = 2n− n + b + b.
κ κ κ2 τ κ2 τ
By Frenet we have n′ = −κt + τ b and b′ = −τ n so
′ ′
′ κ′ 1 κ κ′
γ = 2 n − (−κt + τ b) + b − τn
κ κ κ2 τ κ2 τ
′ ′
τ κ
=t− b+ b
κ κ2 τ
′ ′ !
τ κ
= α′ − − b.
κ κ2 τ
1 However, the converse does not hold in general. A helix has constant curvature and
2
so we must prove that the coefficient of b is zero. The assumption that |γ| is
constant is the same as the assumption that the derivative of the right hand
side of (∗) is zero so
′ 2 !′ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ !
1 κ −2κ′ κ κ 2κ′ τ κ
0= + = +2 =− 2 −
κ2 κ2 τ κ3 κ2 τ κ2 τ κ τ κ κ2 τ
3
4. Theorem. Let α : I → R2 be a plane curve parameterized by arclength,
s0 ∈ I, p0 = α(s0 ), and t0 = α′ (s0 ) be the unit tangent vector at s0 . Assume
that the curvature κ0 of α at s0 is not zero. Then there is a unique circle
s
β(s) = (x0 + r0 cos θ, y0 + r0 sin θ), θ=
r0
which has second order contact with α at s0 , i.e.
The curve α and the circle β have the same curvature κ0 = 1/r0 at s0 and the
center q0 = (x0 , y0 ) of the circle β is given by
q0 = p0 + r0 n0
4
Figure 1: The evolute of an ellipse
lines to a plane curve are tangent to the evolute of that curve and that the curve
is traced out by unwinding a string along its evolute. A curve which is obtained
by unwinding a taut string along a given curve is called an involute of the given
curve.
Here is a sage program which will draw Figure 1.
var(’x’,’y’,’t’,’X’,’Y’)
a=2.0; b=1.5
x(t)=a*cos(t); y(t)=b*sin(t)
dx(t)=x.derivative(t); dy(t)=y.derivative(t);
ddx(t)=dx.derivative(t); ddy(t)=dy.derivative(t)
m(t)=(dx(t)*dx(t)+dy(t)*dy(t))/(dx(t)*ddy(t)-dy(t)*ddx(t))
X(t)=x(t)-m(t)*dy(t); Y(t)=y(t)+m(t)*dx(t)
G=Graphics()
G+=parametric_plot((x(t),y(t)), (t,0.0,2*pi),color=’red’)
G+=parametric_plot((X(t),Y(t)), (t,0.0,2*pi),color=’blue’)
for i in range(0,40):
t=2*i*pi/40
G+=line([(x(t),y(t)),(X(t),Y(t))],color=’black’)
G.show(axes=False)