Ethics Week 3
Ethics Week 3
ETHICS- Greek word “ethos” which means “characteristics way of acting”. Its Latin equivalent is
mos, mores, meaning “tradition or custom”.
Ethos includes cultural mannerisms, religion, political, laws, and social aspirations of a group of
people.
In this study, ethos refers to those characteristics belonging to man as a rational being, endowed
with intellect and free-will.
Distinguishes between good and evil, right and wrong, moral and immoral.
Feels an obligation to do good and avoid evil.
Feels accountable for actions, expecting reward or punishment.
Self-conscious of dignity and duty to do good and avoid wrong.
Conducts according to "dictates of reason.
Moral Standards
Based on natural law, revealed through human reason or written in human hearts.
Consequence standards: Those leading to the greatest good of the greatest number.
Non-consequence standards: Respect for humanity, treatment of others as human beings, a
moral act derived from a sense of duty.
Non- moral standards originate from social rules, demands of etiquette and good manners. They are
guides of action which should be followed as expected by society.
For theists, the origin of moral standards is God who wrote his law in the heart of every person,
the natural law. Belief in God strengthens them to be moral.
For non-theists, the origin of moral standards is the moral frameworks formulated by
philosophers like Confucius, Immanuel Kant, Stuart Mill, etc.
Evolutionists argue that moral standards evolved with humans, not instantaneously implanted
during creation, suggesting that creation may have occurred billions of years ago.
MORAL DILEMMAS
A moral dilemma is a decision-making problem between two possible moral imperatives, neither
of which is unambiguously acceptable or preferable.
A moral dilemma is a situation where a person has the moral obligation to choose between two
options both based on moral standards, but he/she cannot choose both, and choosing one
means violating the other.
In a moral dilemma, one is caught between two options. It is a damn-if-you-do and damn-if-you-
don’t situation. One is in a deadlock.
False dilemmas are situations where the decision-maker has a moral duty to do one thing, but is
tempted or under pressure to do something else. A false dilemma is a choice between a right and a
wrong unlike a moral dilemma where both choices are wrong.
FRAME WORK
Intellectual virtues- refers to excellence of the mind (to understand, reason, and judge well)
Moral virtues- refers to a person’s disposition to act well
Virtue as a Mean
For Aristotle, virtue is the Golden Mean between two extremes. The virtue of courage is a mean
between two extremes of deficiency and extreme, namely, cowardice and foolhardiness,
respectively.
Too little courage is cowardice and too much courage is foolhardiness.
For St. Thomas, what is right is what follows the natural law, the rule says, “do good and
avoid evil.”
In knowing the good as distinguished from evil, one is guided by the Ten Commandments
which is summed up as loving God and one’s fellowmen.
Theological virtues (faith, hope, and love) are infused into human soul by God and
enable human beings to participate in the divine life.
Cardinal virtues (prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance) are acquired through
practice and habituation and enable human beings to live a good life in accordance with
natural law.
UTILITARIANISM
Quantitative Utilitarianism
Qualitative Utilitarianism
Basic Assumption
No matter how morally good their consequence, some choices are morally forbidden.
What make a choice right is its conformity with moral norm
The Right is said to have priority over the good.
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
ACT ONLY ACCORDING TO THE MAXIM BY WHICH YOU CAN AT THE SAME TIME WILL THAT IT
SHOULD BECOME A UNIVERSAL LAW