Ilovepdf_merged (1) - Converted
Ilovepdf_merged (1) - Converted
Definitions of Globalization
“Globalization constitutes integration of National economies into the
International economy through trade, direct foreign investment (by corporations
and multinationals), short-term capital flows, international flows of workers and
humanity generally, and flows of technology”
Jagdish Bhagwati, In Defence of Globalization (Oxford, 2006), p. 3.
“[Globalization] is a reality that now affects every part of the globe and every
person on it, even though in widely differing local contexts.”.
Bruce Mazlish, “Comparing Global History to World History,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 28/3 (1998), p. 387.
Globalization today?
- Manila to Acapulco
Hegemony (1250-1350)
Andre Gunder Frank, The World System: Five
The Silk Road Hundred Years or Five Thousand? (1996) and later Re-
was a 4000- Orient (1998) argued that globalization was there well
mile-long before 1500. This is because:
network of
trade routes - Single world economy before 1500
that connected - trade (Silk roads and later European trade in Asia)
the medieval -Centrality of China
world's regions
through trade.
Periods of de-globalisation Periods of De-globalisation
Post 2016: A second de-
1914-1945: De-globalisation?
globalisation?
The interwar period saw:
Is it possible that we are going towards
de-globalisation once again?
-economic protectionism and autarky
- the 2008 financial crisis
-economic and monetary instability
- global alliances not working
- Failure of international bodies
-stagnation of the economies
(UN)
- revolutionary terrorism – violent
-moribund empires, and the
disconnections
confrontation between the US and the
- Crisis of European integration and
Soviet Union
values
- Rise of Nativism
- lack of innovation
GLOBALIZATION
AS AN
ECONOMIC
PROCESS
Globalization as an Economic Process
Globalization as an Economic Process
Economic Globalization
Economic accounts of globalization convey the notion that Their strong affirmation of globalization culminates in the
the essence of the phenomenon involves ‘the increasing suggestion that a quantum change in human affairs has taken
linkage of national economies through trade, financial flows, place as the flow of large quantities of trade, investment, and
and foreign direct investment ... by multinational firms’ technologies across national borders has expanded from a
(Gilpin, 2000: 299). trickle to a flood (Gilpin, 2000: 19).
Globalization as an Economic Process Globalization as an Economic Process
1944 Bretton Woods Conference Golden Age of Controlled Capitalism (Luttwak, 1999)
Collapse of the Bretton Woods System in the early 1970s and • Emergence of a transnational financial system (most
the rise of neo-liberalism in the 1980s fundamental economic feature)
- deregulation of interest rates
- Changing nature of the production process - removal of credit controls
- Liberalization and internationalization of financial - privatization of government-owned banks and
transactions financial institutions
Globalization as an Economic Process Globalization as an Economic Process
the process of financial globalization accelerated dramatically Explosive growth of tradeable financial value due to
in the late 1980s as capital and securities markets in Europe advances in data processing and information technology
and the United States were deregulated. The liberalization of
financial trading allowed for the increased mobility among
- New satellite systems
different segments of the financial industry, with fewer
restrictions and a global view of investment opportunities. - Fibre-optic technologies
(Castells, 2000)
Globalization as a
Political Process
The faith of the modern state World Wide Web (continuous
advances in computer
technology and communication
systems) as primary force
1. What are the political causes for the massive flows of responsible for the the creation
capital, money, and technology across territorial of single global market
boundaries?
2. Do these flows constitute a serious challenge to the power
of the nation- state?
Globalization as a Political Process Globalization as a Political Process
Globalization has happened because technological advances Lowell Bryan and Diana Farrell (1996: 187) assert, the role of
have broken down many physical barriers to worldwide government will ultimately be reduced to serving as ‘a
communication which used to limit how much connected or superconductor for global capitalism’.
cooperative activity of any kind could happen over long
distances.
-- Richard Langhorne (2001: 2)
Globalization as a
Globalization as a Political
Political Process Process
“borderless world” Political globalization = decline
the nation-state has already lost of territory as a meaningful
its role as a meaningful unit of framework for understanding
participation in the global
economy political and social change
the central role of politics – especially the successful mobilization globalization refers to gradual processes of ‘relative
of political power – in unleashing the forces of globalization deterritorialization’ that facilitate the growth of ‘supraterritorial’
relations between people
(Jan Aart Scholte, 2005)
→Continuing relevance of conventional political units, operating If concrete political decisions were responsible for changing the
either in the form of modern nation-states or “global cities” international context in the direction of deregulation, privatization,
and the globalization of the world economy, then different
political decisions could reverse the trend in the opposite
→Saskia Sassen (2008); Amen, et.al. (2006); Brenner (2006) direction.
John Tomlinson (1999: 1) puts it, ‘Globalization lies at the heart of globalization process and contemporary cultural change
modern culture; cultural practices lie at the heart of globalization.’
1. Does globalization increase cultural homogeneity, or does it Tomlinson (1999: 28), for example, defines cultural globalization
lead to greater diversity and heterogeneity? Or; as a ‘densely growing network of complex cultural
interconnections and interdependencies that characterize modern
2. Does globalization make people more alike or more different? social life’. He emphasizes that global cultural flows are
And second, how does the dominant culture of consumerism directed by powerful international media corporations that
utilize new communication technologies to shape societies
impact the natural environment?
and identities.
The American sociologist George Ritzer (1993), for example, Benjamin R. Barber (1996: 17) also enters the normative
coined the term ‘McDonaldization’ to describe the wide- realm when he warns his readers against the cultural
ranging process by which the principles of the fast-food
imperialism of what he calls ‘McWorld’ – a soulless consumer
restaurant are coming to dominate more and more sectors of
American society, as well as the rest of the world. capitalism that is rapidly transforming the world's diverse
population into a blandly uniform market.
The idea of historical particularism suggests The central theme of ethnic nationalists is that "nations are
all cultures have their own historical trajectory and that defined by a shared heritage, which usually includes a
each culture developed according to this history. common language, a common faith, and a common ethnic
ancestry".
Religious fundamentalism refers to the belief of an cultural diversity existing on our planet is destined to vanish
individual or a group of individuals in the absolute authority
of a sacred religious text or teachings of a
particular religious leader, prophet,and/ or God .
Globalization as Cultural Process Globalization as Cultural Process
Contending that cultural globalization always takes place in Often referred to as ‘hybridization’ or ‘creolization’, the
local contexts, Robertson predicts a pluralization of the world processes of cultural mixing are reflected in music, film,
as localities produce a variety of unique cultural responses to fashion, language, and other forms of symbolic
global forces. The result is not increasing cultural expression. Sociologist Jan Nederveen Pieterse (2003:
homogenization, but ‘glocalization’ – a complex interaction 117), for example, argues that exploring ‘hybridity’
of the global and local characterized by cultural amounts to ‘mapping no man's land'.
borrowing.
Cultural theorists such as Ulrich Beck (2000: 102) and Arjun Appadurai identifies five conceptual dimensions or ‘landscapes’ that are
constituted by global cultural flows:
Appadurai (1996) have refined this argument by contrasting ethnoscapes (shifting populations made up of tourists, immigrants, refugees,
common interpretations of globalization as a ‘process’ with and exiles),
the less mechanical concept of ‘globality’, referring to ‘the technoscapes (development of technologies that facilitate the rise of TNCs),
experience of living and acting across borders’. finanscapes (flows of global capital),
mediascapes (electronic capabilities to produce and disseminate
information), and
ideoscapes (ideologies of states and social movements).
Globalization as Cultural Process