Knight Chapter 2
Knight Chapter 2
GUIDING QUESTIONS
"Success depends upon previous preparation, and without preparation, there is sure to be
failure."
—Confucius
"Pay attention to where you are going because without meaning, you might get nowhere."
—A. A. Milne
Ethel Edwards, a former curriculum director for mathematics in Topeka, Kansas, worked with
me on many projects when the Kansas Coaching Project partnered with USD 501. A
mathematics expert, a former state employee, and a district administrator, Ethel is a woman of
many surprises. A passionate educator deeply committed to students, she also happens to be a
former triathlete who completed Ironman competitions and a person who still likes to take her
Harley Davidson out for long rides on her vacations with her husband.
Ethel and I created a process, Intensive Learning Teams (ILTs), described in Unmistakable
Impact: A Partnership Approach for Dramatically Improving Instruction (2011). Intensive
Learning Teams bring together all the teachers who teach the same course—we started with
9th-grade math—so that they can collectively do planning. The teachers create the guiding
questions, learning maps, and formative assessments for a course.
During the first hours of our first ILT, Ethel and I realized that a special kind of magic was taking
place in the group. When teachers worked together to design guiding questions and
assessments, their instruction improved rapidly, and they developed a much deeper
knowledge of their subject, which helped their teaching become more efficient, precise, and
effective.
PLANNING
Teachers had figured out what to teach, how to teach it, and how to assess the subsequent
learning. They realized that instruction took off like a rocket when they had a deeper
knowledge of the content, which made their teaching more efficient, precise, and effective.
They clearly understood what students were expected to learn and how to measure student
progress.
When we observed the seventh-grade teachers creating guiding questions and learning
maps, we noticed a shift in their thinking. Instructional coaches working with individual teachers
found that careful planning led teachers to think deeply about their instruction.
For example, Jenny MacMillan, an instructional coach in Beaverton, Oregon, spent time
working with Robin Turner on guiding questions. Jenny saw that Robin’s experience mirrored
what Ethel and I had observed.
Robin and Jenny collaborated to develop guiding questions because Robin wanted a clearer
understanding of her instructional targets. Jenny arranged for a substitute teacher to cover
Robin’s class so they could spend an afternoon together clarifying key questions for an
upcoming unit. This simple planning exercise proved extremely valuable.
After writing the guiding questions, Robin felt a renewed sense of clarity in her teaching.
She told Jenny, "This has helped me so much because I now feel like I am clearer. I know
where I am going with my students and what I want them to learn. I can ask better
questions as we go along, and I can check in with them more effectively."
Jenny reflected, "It’s clearer for her, and that gives her more focus in her teaching."
When teachers take the time to think ahead about what they will teach, instruction becomes
more focused, and student learning improves. In Where Great Teaching Begins: Planning for
Student Thinking and Learning (2011), Ann Reeves highlights the importance of teacher
planning in guiding student learning.
Effective guiding questions help students focus on the learning goals and provide a clear
roadmap for what they need to understand.
Page 31
Big ideas should guide students toward a complete understanding. Guiding questions help
students focus on what they need to learn in a unit. If students can answer these guiding
questions, they demonstrate mastery of the key knowledge and concepts.
The act of writing guiding questions compels teachers to create a focused approach to
instruction. It helps them better understand learning expectations for each unit.
When asked why he was successful as a football coach, two-time national champion Urban
Meyer replied, "Well-prepared players make plays. I have yet to be in a game where the
most prepared team didn’t win."
This is true in the classroom as well. Preparation leads to success. When teachers carefully
plan what will be learned and how learning will happen, their instruction is more focused,
efficient, and accessible to all students.
Many teachers say that content planning helps them be more organized, which in turn helps
students stay on track.
To craft effective guiding questions, teachers must view learning from the students’
perspective. Instead of focusing on what activities to assign, they must focus on what
students will learn.
For example, students may enjoy hands-on activities, but if those activities don’t reinforce
essential learning goals, they do not effectively support student growth.
This question forces teachers to be precise about what students will learn and how their
mastery of knowledge, skills, and big ideas will be measured.
(From The Collected Poems of Langston Hughes, copyright © 1994, used with permission.)
When teachers do not plan effectively, the distinction between important and unimportant
content becomes blurred, making it difficult for students to focus on the most essential
learning. Good content planning ensures that the most important concepts receive the
attention they require.
"Students can hit any target they can see and that holds still for them." (Cited
by Sparks, 1999, p. 3.)
When teachers clearly define what they are teaching, students are more likely to understand
and retain information.
By focusing on big ideas and essential questions, teachers help students develop a deeper
understanding of the content rather than just memorizing facts.
Page 33
Guiding questions help teachers identify where and how to differentiate. When teachers
create guiding questions, they gain a clearer understanding of the essential learning goals,
which allows them to adjust instruction for different learners.
However, real-life teaching does not always follow this pattern. Some students grasp concepts
quickly, while others need more time and support.
Teachers must adapt their plans based on student progress. Sometimes, students show
unexpected interest in a topic, requiring teachers to adjust their lessons to capitalize on that
enthusiasm.
1. Course Level – Teachers outline big-picture goals, essential themes, and overarching
questions for an entire semester or year.
2. Unit Level – Teachers break down the course plan into units, specifying guiding
questions, key concepts, and assessments.
3. Lesson Level – Teachers develop day-to-day instructional plans that align with unit
and course goals.
Many educators find unit planning to be the most effective because it allows them to:
Some teachers prefer to plan at the lesson level, focusing on immediate objectives. However,
unit-level planning allows for a more structured yet adaptable approach.
Similarly, Wiggins and McTighe (2005) emphasized the importance of planning backward,
ensuring that each lesson contributes to students' understanding of big ideas.
Conclusion
Teachers must carefully balance structure and flexibility in their lesson planning. Guiding
questions help ensure that instruction remains focused and meaningful, while unit planning
provides the best framework for both consistency and adaptability in the classroom.
Page 36
However, some educators prefer a different approach. Moss (2011) suggests using learning
intentions, which she defines as:
These learning intentions describe student outcomes and are designed to guide
instruction.
Similarly, Robert Marzano (2007), in The Art and Science of Teaching, recommends writing
learning goals in one of these formats:
"An effective way to create clear learning goals is to translate them into a
small set of 'big idea' questions that guide student learning."
Final Thoughts
Effective planning and the use of guiding questions help students: