ANALYSIS THE DATA INTERPRETATION

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

TABLE: 4.1
Gender of the respondent

S. No Gender Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent
Frequency Percent
Male 57 81.4 81.4 81.4
1
Female 13 18.6 18.6 100.0
2
Total 70 100.0 100.0
3

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.1 it is understood that 81% of the
respondents are male and 41% of the respondents are female

INFERENCE:
It is inferred from above analysis that a sizable percentage of
sample respondents who were consulted in the study (81%) are male.
 GENDER OF THE RSPONDENTS

PIE CHART:4.1
 MARITAL OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE: 4.2
Marital of the respondents

S. No Marital Valid Cumulative

Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Married 17 24.3 24.3 24.3
1

Unmarried 53 75.7 75.7 100.0

2

Total 70 100.0 100.0

3

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.2 it is understood that 24% of the
respondents are married and 75% of the respondents are unmarried.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (24%) of the respondents are married.
 MARITAL OF THE RESPONDENTS

PIE CHART:4.2
AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

TABLE: 4.3
Age of the respondents

S. No Age
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Below 20 25 35.7 35.7 35.7
Years
1
Between 26 37.1 37.1 72.9
20-30
2
Years
Above 30 19 27.1 27.1 100.0
years
3
Total 70 100.0 100.0
4

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above the table 4.2 it is understood that 37% of the respondents
are in between 19 to 30 years, 35% of the respondents are below 20 years, 27% of
the respondents are above 30 years.

INFERENCE:
It is inference from the above analysis that a sizable percentage of sample
respondents who were consulted in the study (37%) come under the age group
between 20 to 30 years.
 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

PIE CHART:4.3
 QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE: 4.4
Qualification of the respondents

S. No Sources Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

Percent
Percent
1 17 24.3 24.3 24.3
School
Education
2 Graduate 17 24.3 24.3 48.6

3 Post 19 27.1 27.1 75.7

graduate
4 Uneducated 17 24.3 24.3 100.0

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCES: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.3 it is understood that 24% of the
respondents are school education, 27% of the respondents are post
graduate, 24% of the respondents graduate and 24% of the respondents
are uneducated people.
 INFERENCE:
The Majority (24%) of the respondents are students.
 QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

PIE CHART:4.4
 OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

TABLE: 4.5

Occupation of the respondents

S. No Age Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent

1 Professional 7 10.0 10.0 10.0

2 Business man 8 11.4 11.4 21.4

3 Govt. Employee 4 5.7 5.7 27.1

4 Farmers 2 2.9 2.9 30.0

5 Other specify 49 70.0 70.0 100.0

6 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCES: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.5 it is understood that 10% of the respondents are
professional, 5% of the respondents are employee, 2% of the respondents
are farmers, 11% of the respondents Business man and 70% of the
respondents are other specify.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (10%) of the respondents are professional.
 OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

PIE CHART:4.5

QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE: 4.6
 Qualification of the respondent

Qualificatio
Valid Cumulative
n
S. No Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 Less than 27 38.6 38.6 38.6

10000

2 Rs.10000-2 32 45.7 45.7 84.3

0000

3 Rs.20000-3 9 12.9 12.9 97.1

0000

4 Above 2 2.9 2.9 100.0

30000

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 4.5 is understood that 38% of the respondents are Less
than 10000, 45% of the respondents are Rs,10000 to 20000, 2% of the
respondents are above 30000 and 12% of the respondents are Rs,,20000 to 30000.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (38%) of the respondents are Monthly income.
 QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:4.6

USING OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE: 4.7
Using of the respondent

Valid Cumulative
S. No Source Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 For shining 19 27.1 27.1 27.1

2 Attractive 26 37.1 37.1 64.3

Color

3 For longer 17 24.3 24.3 88.6

duration

4 For safety 8 11.4 11.4 100.0

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCES: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the table 4.7 is understood that 27% of the respondents are for
shining, 37% of the respondents are Attractive color, 24% of the
respondents are for longer duration and 11% of the respondents are for
safety.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (27%) of the respondents are using.

USING OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:4.7
 BRAND OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE: 4.8

Brand of the respondent

S .NO
Valid Cumulative
Sources Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 Nerolac 7 10.0 10.0 10.0

2 Nippon 24 34.3 34.3 44.3

paints

3 Asian paints 28 40.0 40.0 84.3

4 Berger 11 15.7 15.7 100.0

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.9 it is understood that 10% of the
respondents are Nerolac, 34% of the respondents are Nippon paints, 40%
of the respondents are Asian paints and 15% of the respondents are Berger.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (10%) of the respondents are Brand.
 BRAND OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:4.8
 COMPETITIVE PRICE OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE: 4.9
Competitive price of the respondents

S. No Source Valid Cumulative

Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 Asian 10 14.3 14.3 14.3

paints
2 Nippon 25 35.7 35.7 50.0
paints
Both are 22 31.4 31.4 81.4

3 similarly
priced
4 Other 13 18.6 18.6 100.0
specify
5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.9 it is understood that 14% of the respondents are Asian
paints, 35% of the respondents are Nippon paints, 31% of the respondents are
Both are similarly priced and 18% of the respondents are other specify.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (14%) of the respondents are Competitive price.
 COMPETITIVE PRICE OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:4.9

TYPE OF PAINT OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE:4.10
Type of paint of the respondent

S. No Source Valid Cumulative

Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 Plastic 24 34.3 34.3 34.3

paints

2 Distemper 24 34.3 34.3 68.6

3 Oil Based 15 21.4 21.4 90.0

paint

4 Water 7 10.0 10.0 100.0

based
paint

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.9 it is understood that 34% of the respondents are plastic
paints, 24% of the respondents Distemper, 21% of the respondents are Oil based
paint and 10% of the respondents are Water based paint.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (34%) of the respondents are Types of paint.
 TYPE OF PAINT OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:4.10
 PREFERRED OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE:11
Type of paint of the respondent

S. No Source Valid Cumulative

Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 Color 30 42.9 42.9 42.9

2 Smell 26 37.1 37.1 80.0

3 Price 10 14.3 14.3 94.3

4 Other 4 5.7 5.7 100.0

specify

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.10 it is understood that 42% of the respondents are Color,
37% of the respondents are smell, 14% of the respondents are Price and 5% of the
respondents are other specify.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (42%) of the respondents are Preferred.
 TYPE OF PAINT OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:11
 FEATURE OF THE RESPONDENT

Feature of the respondent

S. No Source Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

1 Royal Health 25 35.7 35.7 35.7

Shield Protect

2 Terrace water 32 45.7 45.7 81.4

proofing

3 Ultimate 13 18.6 18.6 100.0

protect
limitation
feature

4 Total 70 100.0 100.0

TABLE:12
SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 4.11 it understood that 35% of the respondents are Royal health
shield protect, 45% of the respondents are Terrace water proofing and 18% of the
respondents Ultimate protect Laminations.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (35%) of the respondents are Feat

FEATURE OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:12

FROM KNOWN OF THE RESPONDENT

TABLE:4.13
 From known of the respondent

S. No Source Valid Cumulative

Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 Friends & 28 40.0 40.0 40.0

family

2 Advertisement 20 28.6 28.6 68.6

3 Internet 13 18.6 18.6 87.1

4 Other specify 9 12.9 12.9 100.0

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From above table 4.13 it is understood that 40% of the respondents are
Friends and family, 28% of the respondents are Advertisement, 18% of the
respondents are Internet and 12% of the respondents are Other specify.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (40%) of the respondents are From Known.

FROM KNOWN OF THE RESPONDENT

PIE CHART:4.13
 LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF THE RESPONDENTS

TABLE: 4.14
 Level of satisfaction of the respondents

S. No Source
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

1 High 26 37.1 37.1 37.1

satisfaction

2 Satisfaction 25 35.7 35.7 72.9

3 Dissatisfaction 10 14.3 14.3 87.1

4 High 9 12.9 12.9 100.0

dissatisfaction

5 Total 70 100.0 100.0

SOURCE: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION:
From the above the table 4.11 it is understood that 37% of the respondents
are High Satisfaction, 35% of the respondents are Satisfaction, 14% of the
respondents are Dissatisfaction and 12% of the respondents are High
Dissatisfaction.

INFERENCE:
The Majority (37%) of the respondents are Level of satisfaction.

LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF THE RESPONDENTS

PIE CHART:4.14