CH5 - 7 NDT
CH5 - 7 NDT
13-1B
Note:
All dimensions in inches followed by centimeters in parentheses.
FIGURE 5-18. Example of position fixture and shoe.
(3) Underlying structures contain differ- containing: closure members, core splices,
ences in; core material, cell size, thickness, and stepped skins, and internal ribs similar to the test
height, back skin material and thickness, doublers part if bonded areas over or surrounding these
(material and thickness), closure member attach- details are to be inspected.
ments, foam adhesive, steps in skins, internal ribs,
and laminates (number of layers, layer thickness, (2) The reference standard must contain
and layer material). bonds of good quality except for controlled areas
of unbond fabricated as explained below.
(4) The top only or top and bottom skin of
a bonded structure may be accessible. (3) The reference standard must be
bonded using the adhesive and cure cycle pre-
b. Application of Ultrasonic Inspection. scribed for the test part.
Application to bonded structures must be exam-
ined in detail because of the many inspection e. Types of Defects. Defects can be sepa-
methods and structural configurations. The rated into five general types to represent the vari-
advantages and limitations of each inspection ous areas of bonded sandwich and laminate struc-
method should be considered, and reference tures as follows:
standards (representative of the structure to be
inspected) should be ultrasonically inspected to (1) Type I. Unbonds or voids in an outer
verify proposed techniques. skin-to-adhesive interface.
c. Internal Configuration. Complete in- (2) Type II. Unbonds or voids at the ad-
formation on the internal configuration of the hesive-to-core interface.
bonded test part must be obtained by the inspec-
tor. Drawings should be reviewed, and when (3) Type III. Voids between layers of a
necessary, radiographs of the test part should be laminate.
taken. Knowledge of details such as the location
and boundaries of doublers, ribs, etc., is required (4) Type IV. Voids in foam adhesive or
for valid interpretation of ultrasonic inspection re- unbonds between the adhesive and a closure
sults. The boundaries of internal details should be member at core-to-closure member joints.
marked on the test part using a grease pen or
other easily removable marking. (5) Type V. Water in the core.
suggested methods contained in figure 5-21 and (1) Ultrasonic resonance. Sound waves
table 5-7 are for reference only. Details of the in- from a resonant transducer are transmitted into
spection coverage and inspections for a particular and received from a structure. A disbond in the
assembly should be obtained from the OEM’s structure will alter the sound wave characteristics,
manuals, or other FAA-approved requirements. which in turn affect the transducer impedance.
h. Inspection Methods. Table 5-8 lists the (2) Mechanical impedance. Low-
various inspection methods for bonded structures frequency, pulsed ultrasonic energy is generated
along with advantages and disadvantages of each into a structure. Through ultrasonic mechanical
inspection method. vibration of the structure, the impedance or stiff-
ness of the structure is measured, analyzed, and
5-95. BOND TESTING INSTRUMENTS. displayed by the instrumentation.
Standard ultrasonic inspection instruments can be
used for bond testing as previously noted; how- b. Operation. In general, operation of the
ever, a wide variety of bond testing instruments adhesive bond test instruments noted is similar.
are available for adaptation to specific bonded The test probe is moved over the surface in
structure inspection problems. smooth overlapping strokes. The direction of the
stroke with regard to the surface is generally im-
a. General Principle. Two basic operating material; however, when using the Sondicator
principles are used by a variety of bond testers for models, the direction of the stroke becomes criti-
single-sided bond inspection. cal when the test probe is
FIGURE 5-21. Examples of bonded structure configurations and suggested inspection coverage.
TABLE 5-7. Acceptable ultrasonic inspection methods associated with the example bonded structure configurations
shown in figure 5-21.
1 Either
(a) Pulse-echo straight or angle beam, on each side
or
(b) Through-transmission.
3 Refer to 1 for methods. If all these methods fail to have sufficient penetration
power to detect reference defects in the reference standard, then the ringing
method, applied from both sides, should be used. Otherwise, the ringing method
is unacceptable.
4 Either
(a) Ringing, on each skin of the doubler.
or
(b) Through-transmission
or
(c) Damping.
5 Ringing.
7 Either
(a) Through-transmission
or
(b) Damping.
NOTE
A variety of ultrasonic testing methods and instruments are available for adaptation to specific inspection
problems. Other bond inspection instruments can be used if detailed procedures are developed and
proven on the applicable reference standards for each configuration of interest. Some representative in-
struments, which can be used for the inspection of bonded structures are; the Sondicator, Harmonic Bond
Tester, Acoustic Flaw Detector, Audible Bond Tester, Fokker Bond Tester, 210 Bond Tester, and Bon-
dascope 2100.
INSPECTION METHOD
In some cases
water in core can
be detected.
Disadvantages Access to both Inspection from both Applicable only to Applicable only to
sides of part is re- sides required, does near surface un- doublers and lami-
quired. not detect far side bonds, works best nate-type struc-
unbonds. on unbonds be- tures.
Does not deter- tween top sheet
mine layer posi- Applicable only to and adhesive, may Access to both
tion of unbonds. skin-to-honeycomb miss other un- sides required.
core structures. bonds.
Alignment of Does not deter-
search units is Reduced effective- Reduced effective- mine layer posi-
critical. ness on structures ness on thick tions of unbonds.
with multiple skins skins.
Couplant is re- over honeycomb Couplant required.
quired. core. Couplant required.
operated near a surface edge. Edge effects on vi- Since the velocity for a given material
bration paths give a test reading that may be
misinterpreted. To avoid edge effects, the test
probe should be moved so that the inspection
path follows the surface edge, giving a constant
edge for the test probe to inspect. Edge effects
are more pronounced in thicker material. To
interpret meter readings correctly, the operator
should determine whether there are variations in
the thickness of the material.
5-98.5-104. [RESERVED.]