4 ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

PART- A: EMPLOYEE PROFILE.

TABLE 5.1-Age of the respondents: Age group Below 30 31-40 41-50 Above 50 Total No. of respondents 26 3 1 0 30 Percentages 87 10 3 0 100

Chart 5.1-Age of respondents:

No. of respondents

0 10 3

below 30 31-40 41-50 above 50 87

Dssdddddddd

From the above analysis it can be observed that majority of the respondents, i.e,87% belong to the age group 30,10% of them are of the age group 31-40,3% of them are of the age group of the 41-50 years and 0% of them belong to the age group- of above 50 years. From the above interpretation its clear that majority of the respondents are belong to the age group of below 30.Most of the respondents are young and of middle-age and 3% of respondents are elder ones.

Table-5.2: Gender of the respondents:

Sex Male Female Total No. of respondents Percentages 28 2 30 93 7 100

Chart 5.2-Gender of the respondents: No. of respondents

7

male

female

97

From the above analysis it can be observed that majority of the respondents, i.e, 97% belong to the Male population and only 7% belong to the Female population. From the above interpretation it is clear that majority of the Employees belong to the Male population.

Table-5.3: Education Qualification of the Employees:

Qualification Post graduates Graduates Under graduates Total No. of respondents 7 13 10 30 Percentages 24 43 33 100

Chart-5.3: Education Qualification of the Employees: No.of respondents

24

33

P.gradutes graduates U.graduates 43

From the above analysis it can be observed that majority of the respondents, i.e, 33% are under Graduates, 43% are Graduates and only 24% are post Graduates. From the above interpretation it is clear that Majority of the Employees are qualified Graduates.

Table-5.4: Designation of the respondents:

Group Clerk Sales executive Officer Manager Total No. of respondents 6 17 0 7 30 Percentages 20 57 0 23 100

Chart-5.4: Designation of the respondents: percentages

60 50 40 30 20 20 10 0 0 clerk sales executive officer manager 23 percentages 57

From the above analysis it is clear that the majority of respondents, i.e, 20% belong to the group of clerk, 0% belong to the group officer and only 23% belong to the group of manager & majority of the employees are sales executives i.e,57%. From the interpretation it is clear that the majority of employees hold the clerk position.

Table-5.5: Department of the respondents:

Group Electronics Home appliances Mobile communication Total No. of respondents Percentages 22 73 6 2 30 20 7 100

Chart-5.5: Department of the respondents: No.of respondents

7 20 electronics h.appliances 73 m.communication

From the above analysis it can be observed that majority of respondents, i.e, 73% belong to the group of electronics , 20% belong to the group home appliances & 7% belong to the group of mobile communication. From the above analysis its clear that majority of the employees of LG company ltd are working in electronic department.

Table-5.6: Martial status of the respondents:

Group Married Unmarried Total No. of respondents 18 12 30 Percentages 60 40 100

Chart-5.6: Martial status of the respondents:

MARITAL STATUS

40 married 60 unmarried

From the above analysis its clear that majority of the respondents i.e, 60% belong to the group respondents who are married and 40% belong to the employees who are unmarried. From the above interpretation its clear that majority of the employees are unmarried.

PART-B:Employees opinion Table-5.7: whether performance appraisal system carried on is effective:

Group Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 17 12 1 0 30 Percentages 57 40 3 0 100

Chart-5.7: performance appraisal system carried on is effective:

60 50 40 40 30 20 10 0 agree strongly agree partially agree disagree percentages 57

From the above analysis it can be observed that majority of the respondents i.e, 57% belong to the group of respondents who are agree , 40% of respondents belong to the group of respondents who are strongly agree and 7% of respondents who are partially agree & none of the respondents are disagree with the fact.

Table-5.8: Conduction of Performance Appraisal in LG company ltd:

Particulars Subordinates Superior officials Peers Customers 360 appraisal Total No. of respondents 3 0 10 8 9 30 Percentages 10 0 33 27 30 100

Chart-5.8: Conduction of Performance Appraisal in LG company ltd:

35 30 25 20 15 10 10 5 0 0 subordinates s.officials peers customers 360 appraisal no.of respondents 33 30 27

From the above analysis, we can say that majority of the respondents, i.e,33% have an opinion with the fact that performance appraisal program is conducted in LG company ltd is done by peers & coworkers,0% with the superior officials, 3% with subordinates, 30% with 360 appraisal and the rest 8% with the customers. So, its clear that maximum of the performance appraisal of the employees is done by peers & co-workers.

Table-5.9: Performance appraisal systems provide for a frank discussion between the appraisers and appraise:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 18 11 1 0 30 Percentages 60 37 3 0 100

Chart-5.9: A Performance appraisal system provides for a frank discussion between the appraisers and appraises: No.of respondents
0 3

agree 37 strongly agree partially agree 60 disagree

From the above analysis its clear that, majority of respondents, i.e, 60% with fact that performance appraisal program conducted in the organization provides for a frank discussion b/w the appraiser and the appraise 0% disagree, 37% strongly agree, & only 3% partly agree with the fact. From the above interpretation its clear that performance appraisal program conducted in the organization provides for a frank discussion b/w appraiser and appraise.

Table-5.10: Whether performance appraisal system done in the organization is transparent:

Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 12 9 8 1 30 Percentages 40 30 27 3 100

Chart-5.10: Whether performance appraisal system done in the organization is transparent:

disagree

partially agree

27

No.of respondents
strongly agree 30

agree

40 0 10 20 30 40

From the above analysis its clear that, majority of the respondents i.e, 27% partly agree with the fact that the performance appraisal program done in the organization is transparent, 3% disagree, 30% strongly agree, 40% agree with the fact.

Table-5.11: How often the customers are visiting to L.G Company:

Opinion Once in a week Once in a month Once in a 6 month Once in a year Total No. of respondents 15 9 5 1 30 Percentages 50 30 17 3 100

Chart-5.11: How often the customers are visiting to L.G Company:

60

50

40

30

No.of respondents

20

10

0 once in a week once in a month once in a 6 month once in a year

From the above analysis its clear that the majority of the customers are visiting to the company once in a week.

Table-5.12: After appraising the employees, the organization provides training benefit:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partly agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 17 9 3 1 30 Percentages 57 30 10 3 100

Chart-5.12: After appraising the employees, the organization provides training benefit:
60 57

50

40 30 30 percentages 20 10 10 3 0 agree strongly agree partially agree disagree

From the above analysis its clear that the majority of respondents i.e, 10% partly agree with the fact that after appraising the employees, the organization provides for training benefit, 30% strongly agree, 57% agree & only 3% disagree with the fact.

Table-5.13: whether sufficient amount of time & money spent on training program:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 20 7 2 1 30 Percentages 67 23 7 3 100

Chart-5.13: whether sufficient amount of time & money spent on training program:
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 agree strongly agree partially agree disagree 7 3 23 67

percentages

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of the respondents i.e, 67% agree to the fact that sufficient amount time & money spent on training program, 23% strongly agree, 7% partly agree & only 3% disagree with the fact.

Table-5.14: Whether the promotions & rewards based on performance:

Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 17 7 5 1 30 Percentages 57 23 17 3 100

Chart-5.14: Whether the promotions & rewards based on performance: No.of respondents
3 17 agree strongly agree partially agree 23 57 disagree

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of the respondents i.e,57% agree to the fact that performance appraisal system conducted in the organization is been adequately associated with the performance appraisal,23% strongly agree,17% partially agree, & 3% of employees disagree with the fact.

Table-5.15: Efforts put by the organization to develop the performance appraisal programs are maximum:
Opinion Highly satisfactory Satisfactory Partly satisfactory Dissatisfactory Total No.of respondents 10 18 2 0 30 Percentages 33 60 7 0 100

Chart-5.15: Efforts put by the organization to develop the performance appraisal programs are maximum: No.of respondents
0 7 33 highly satisfactory satisfactory partly satisfactory dissatisfactory 60

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of respondents i.e, 60% are satisfactory with the fact that effort areput forward by the organization to develop the performance appraisal program, 33% are highly satisfied, 7% are partly satisfied & none are dissatisfied.

Table-5.16:Rating of human resource development in LG company ltd:

Opinion Very good Good Average Poor Total No.of respondents 4 21 5 0 30 Percentages 13 70 17 0 100

Chart-5.16: Rating of human resource development in LG company ltd:

poor

average

17

Opinion of employees
70

good

very good

13 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

From the above analysis its clear that majority of the respondents i.e, 70% are belong to the fact that the performance appraisal in the organization is good, 17% say its average,13% say its very good & none say its poor.

Table-5.17: whether employees regularly receive feedback about their potential for higher level jobs:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of employees 10 16 4 0 30 Percentages 33 53 13 0 100

Chart-5.17: whether employees regularly receive feedback about their potential for higher level jobs: No.of respondents
0 13 33 agree strongly agree partially agree 53 disagree

From the above analysis, we can say that, the majority of respondents i.e, 53% strongly agree with the fact that, they regularly receive feedback about their potential for higher level jobs, 33% agree,13% partly agree & none disagree with the fact.

Table-5.18: whether job rotation is practiced widely to help people develop their potential in new areas:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 20 4 6 0 30 Percentages 67 13 20 0 100

Chart-5.18: whether job rotation is practiced widely to help people develop their potential in new areas:
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 13 0 agree strongly agree partially agree 20 0 disagree 67 Opinion of employees

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of the respondents i.e, 67% agree with the fact that job rotation is widely practiced, to help the employees develop their potential in new areas.20% partly agree, 13% strongly agree,% none disagree with the fact.

Table-5.19: Whether Performance appraisal provides feedback information about the level of acheivement & behaviour of the employees:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 14 8 8 0 30 Percentages 47 27 26 0 100

Chart-5.19: Whether Performance appraisal provides feedback information about the level of acheivement & behaviour of the employees :
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 agree strongly agree partially agree disagree 27 26 percentages 47

From the above analysis it can be observed that majority of the respondents, i.e, 47% agree with the fact that performance appraisal system is conducted in the organization, 27% strongly agree,8% partially agree & none disagree with the fact.

Table-5.20: Whether procedure allows the employee aware of the Performance Appraisal standard targets:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 13 9 7 1 30 Percentages 43 30 23 4 100

Chart-5.20: Whether procedure allows the employee aware of the Performance Appraisal standard targets :
Opinion of employees
4 23 43 agree strongly agree partially agree 30 disagree

From the above analysis, we can say that majority of the respondents, i.e, 43% agree with the fact that performance appraisal program is conducted in LG company ltd is satisfactory to the employees, 30% strongly agree, 23% partly agree, & only 4% disagree with the fact.

Table-5.21: Whether performance appraisal provides an opportunity for self appraisal:

Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No.of respondents 11 12 4 3 30 Percentages 37 40 13 10 100

Chart-5.21: Whether performance appraisal provides an opportunity for self appraisal:

45 40 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 agree strongly agree partially agree disagree 13 10 37

No.of respondents

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of the respondents i.e, 40% strongly agree to the fact that performance appraisal program provides for self review & reflection, 37% agree, 13% partly agree & only 3% disagree with the fact.

Table-5.22: Whether performance appraisal system provides for interaction or discussion between appraisals & appraises:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 20 8 2 0 30 Percentages 66 27 7 0 100

Chart-5.22: Whether performance appraisal system provides for interaction or discussion between appraisals & appraises:

disagree

partially agree

7 Performance

strongly agree

27

agree

66 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of respondents i.e, 66% s agree with the fact that performance appraisal system provides for interaction between appraisals & appraises, 27% strongly agree, 7% partly agree & none disagree with the fact.

Table-5.23: Whether appraisal procedure allows the appraise to express his/her developmental needs:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 13 13 3 1 30 Percentages 43 43 10 4 100

Chart-5.23: Whether appraisal procedure allows the appraise to express his/her developmental needs: Percentages
4 10 agree 43 strongly agree partly agree disagree 43

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of the respondents I.e, 43%strongly agree with the fact that appraisal procedure allows the appraise to express his/her developmental needs, 43% agree,10% partly agree & 4% disagree with the fact.

Table-5.24: Whether individual goals match with the organization goals:

Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 18 5 6 1 30 Percentages 60 17 20 3 100

Chart-5.24: Whether individual goals match with the organization goals: No.of respondents
3 20 agree strongly agree partially agree 17 60 disagree

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of the respondents i.e, 60 % agree to the fact that performance appraisal program provides the individual goals to match with that of the organization goals, 17% strongly agree, 20% partially agree & only 3% disagree with the fact.

Table 5.25: Is there a need for an external rating committee for performing the performance appraisal program:
Opinion Agree Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree Total No. of respondents 9 8 6 7 30 Percentages 30 27 20 23 100

Chart-5.25: Is there a need for an external rating committee for performing the performance appraisal program: Opinion of Employees

23 30 agree strongly agree partly agree 20 27 disagree

From the above analysis we can say that, majority of the respondents i.e, 30% agree to the fact that an external rating committee is required for performing performance appraisal program, 27%strongly agree, 20% partly agree & only 23 % disagree with the fact.

TABLE-5.26: Would you like the organization to implement 360 degree appraisal system:
Opinion Yes No Total No. of respondents 30 0 30 Percentages 100 0 100

CHART-5.26: Would you like the organization to implement 360 degree appraisal system:

No.of respondents
100 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 YES

No.of respondents

0 NO

From the above analysis we can say that the majority of the respondents i.e, 100% would like to implement the 360 degree appraisal system.