0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views5 pages

Analysis 2 Week 5

The document presents a series of mathematical exercises involving inequalities, integrals, and convergence tests. It utilizes concepts such as the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and integration by parts to derive results about functions and their behavior over specified intervals. The analysis culminates in conclusions regarding the convergence of certain integrals based on parameters defined in the exercises.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views5 pages

Analysis 2 Week 5

The document presents a series of mathematical exercises involving inequalities, integrals, and convergence tests. It utilizes concepts such as the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and integration by parts to derive results about functions and their behavior over specified intervals. The analysis culminates in conclusions regarding the convergence of certain integrals based on parameters defined in the exercises.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Analysis 2 week 5

Quoc Trong Nguyen

March 13, 2025

Exercise 9
Since f is positive on [a, b], using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we obtain the first inequality
 b  b  bp  b  bp !2
dx 2 1 1
f (x)dx = f (x) dx 2 dx ≥ f (x) p dx = (b − a)2 .
f (x)
p
a a a a f (x) a f (x)

To prove the second inequality, consider h : [a, b] → R defined by

h(x) = m(x − a) + M (b − x).

We see that h is continuous and


 b
h(a) = (b − a)M ≥ f (x)dx,
a
b
h(b) = (b − a)m ≤ f (x)dx.
a

Therefore, there is a c ∈ [a, b] such that


 b
f (x)dx = h(c) = m(c − a) + M (b − c).
a

Next, we claim that


 b
dx 1 1
≤ (c − a) + (b − c),
a f (x) m M
or in other words  b   c 
1 1 1 1
− ≤ − .
c f (x) M a m f (x)
To prove this, write
f (x) − m M − f (x)
f (x) = M+ m.
M −m M −m
1
Then by the convexity of g(x) = , we have
x
1 f (x) − m 1 M − f (x) 1
≤ +
f (x) M −m M M −m m

1
which leads to
1 1 f (x) − M 1 M − f (x) 1
− ≤ +
f (x) M M −m M M −m m
f (x) − m
=
Mm
f (x) − m

f (x)m
1 1
= − .
m f (x)
Thus,
 b
dx 1 1
≤ (c − a) + (b − c),
a f (x) m M
as claimed. Now, we have
 b  b  
dx 1 1
f (x)dx ≤ [m(c − a) + M (b − c)] (c − a) + (b − c) .
a a f (x) m M
The right side of this inequality is a quadratic equation of variable c
M m 2 M m
− (2 −
)c − (a + b)(2 − − )c + •.
m M m M
M m a+b
Since 2 − − ≤ 0, this equation attains its maximum at c = . Hence,
m M 2
b b  
dx 1 1
f (x)dx ≤ [m(c − a) + M (b − c)] (c − a) + (b − c)
a a f (x) m M
   
b−a 1 1 b−a
≤ (m + M ) +
2 m M 2
(M + m)2
= (b − a)2 .
4M m

Exercise 10
Put
b 
1
f dx = F,
b−a a
b
1
gdx = G.
b−a a
Then we have
 b  b  b  b
1 1 1
f gdx − f dx gdx = f gdx − F G
b−a a (b − a)2 a a b−a a
b 
1
= f (g − G)
b−a a
b b
1 1
= f (g − G) + F (g − G)dx
b−a a b−a a
b
1
= (f − F ) (g − G) dx.
b−a a

2
Thus,
   
s
b b b  b 2
1 1 1
f gdx − f dx gdx = (f − F ) (g − G) dx
b−a a (b − a)2 a a b−a a
s  b  b
1 2
≤ (f − F ) dx (g − G)2 dx, (1)
(b − a)2 a a

by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Next, consider


 b
1
(f − F )2 dx,
b−a a

and observe that  b


(f − F ) dx = 0.
a
Therefore,
 b  b"   2 # 
1 1 M 1 + m1 M 1 + m 1
(f − F )2 dx = (f − F )2 + 2 F − (f − F ) + F − dx
b−a a b−a a 2 2
 b
M1 + m2 2

1
− F− dx
b−a a 2
 b  b
M1 + m1 2 M1 + m2 2
 
1 1
= f− dx − F− dx
b−a a 2 b−a a 2
 b
M 1 + m1 2

1
≤ M1 − dx
b−a a 2
1 (M1 − m1 )2
= .
b−a 4
Similarly, we also have

1 b
1 (M2 − m2 )2
2
(g − G) dx ≤ .
b−a a b−a 4
Substituting them into (1) gives
   s
1 b
1 b b
1 (M1 − m2 )2 (M2 − m2 )2
f gdx − f dx gdx ≤
b−a a (b − a)2 a a (b − a)2 16
(M1 − m1 ) (M2 − m2 )
= .
4

Exercise 11
Using integration by parts formula, we have
 b  b
1

b 1 1
xf (x)f (x)dx = xf (x) − f (x)dx = − .
a 2 a 2 a 2
Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain
 b  b  b 2

2 2 2 1 ′
f (x) dx x f (x)dx ≥ xf (x)f (x)dx = .
a a a 4

3
Exercise 25
(a) The integral  ∞
x. sin ax
dx
0 k 2 + x2
is not an improper integral of type 2 as
x. sin ax
lim = 0.
x→0+ k 2 + x2
The integral
 b
sin ax dx
a
x
is bounded for every b > 0, and the function g defined by g(x) = has
k2 + x2
lim g(x) = 0.
x→+∞

Furthermore, g is monotonically decreasing for x > k. Thus, the Dirichlet’s test, with
f (x) = sin ax and g(x) defined as above, applies here, meaning that the integral
 ∞
x. sin ax
dx
0 k 2 + x2
is convergent.
(b) Write
 ∞  1  ∞
sin 2x sin 2x sin 2x
I= esin x dx = esin x dx + esin x dx.
0 xλ 0 xλ 1 xλ
Then I is convergent if and only if both of its parts are convergent. If λ = 1 then I is convergent
sin 2x
by Abel’s test with f (x) = and g(x) = esin x . Thus, we may assume that λ ̸= 1.
x
Step 1: We determine the set of values for which the integral
 1
sin 2x
I1 = esin x dx.
0 xλ
converges. Integration by parts gives
 1  1
sin 2x x1−λ sin x 1 x1−λ sin x
esin x λ dx = e sin 2x − 2 e cos x cos 2xdx.
0 x 1−λ 0 0 1−λ
Not that the notations we are using here are just formal. In case λ < 2, we have

x1−λ sin x 1 x1−λ sin x 1


e sin 2x = lim e sin 2x
1−λ 0 δ→0+ 1 − λ δ
1  
= lim esin 1 sin 2 − δ 1−λ esin δ sin 2δ
δ→0+ 1 − λ
 
1 sin 1 2−λ sin δ sin 2δ
= lim e sin 2 − δ e
δ→0+ 1 − λ δ
e sin 1 sin 2
= .
1−λ

4
We also have in this case that the integral
 1
x1−λ sin x
2 e cos x cos 2xdx
0 1−λ
2x1−λ
converges by Abel’s test with f (x) = and g(x) = esin x cos x cos 2x. Thus the integral I1 is
1−λ
convergent if λ < 2. Next, in case λ ≥ 2, we have
x1−λ sin x
 
1 1 sin 1 2−λ sin δ sin 2δ
e sin 2x = lim e sin 2 − δ e = +∞.
1−λ 0 δ→0+ 1 − λ δ
Additionally, in this case, we have  1
x1−λ dx = +∞.
0
x1−λ sin x
For x sufficiently near 0, C1 x1−λ ≤− e cos x cos 2x ≤ C2 x1−λ with some C1 , C2 such that
1−λ
0 < C1 ≤ C2 . Therefore, we have
 1
x1−λ sin x
− e 2 cos x cos 2xdx = +∞
0 1−λ
as well. Thus, we conclude that I1 diverges if λ ≥ 2 and converges if λ < 2.
Step 2: We determine the range of convergence for
∞
sin 2x
I2 = esin x λ dx.
1 x
This is easy. In case λ > 0, I2 converges by Dirichlet’s test with f (x) = esin x sin 2x and
1
g(x) = λ . In case λ ≤ 0, observe that
x
 nπ+δ
sin 2x
An = esin x λ dx ̸= 0
nπ x
for some δ > 0 being sufficiently small. Moreover, |An | is not bounded as n → +∞. Hence, I2
diverges.
In conclusion, the given integral I converges if 0 < λ < 2 and diverges otherwise.
(c) Let u(x) = x2 + x. Then u is a bijection on [0, +∞), and we have
∞  ∞ −λ
sin x2 + x

x
I= λ
dx = sin u(x)du(x).
0 x 0 2x + 1
x−λ
Case 1: λ > −1. Then is eventually monotone. It tends to 0 as u tends to +∞.
2x + 1
Furthermore, we see that  ∞
sin u(x)du(x)
0
is bounded. Hence, I is convergent by Dirichlet’s test.
x−λ
Case 2: λ ≤ −1. In this case, tends to either 1/2, if λ = 1, or +∞, if λ > −1, as u tends
2x + 1
to +∞. Therefore, for n ∈ N be sufficiently large, we have
 
2nπ+π
x−λ 1 2nπ+π 1
sin u(x)du(x) ≥ sin u(x)du(x) =
2nπ 2x + 1 4 2nπ 4
which shows that I does not converges.
In conclusion, I converges if λ > −1 and diverges otherwise.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy