Aes Cep 122
Aes Cep 122
SUBJECT CODE
MA-241 AES
SUBMITTED TO
SUBMIITED BY
2023-ME-122
DATE
1|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
PART 1
1. Physical Measurements: Quantitative traits such as human height, body mass, and
systolic blood pressure frequently exhibit distributions that approximate the normal
curve, particularly within large populations.
2. Financial Modeling: In the field of finance, normal distributions are often employed—
albeit sometimes as idealized assumptions—to model asset returns, interest rate
fluctuations, and other stochastic financial processes.
4. Biomedical and Life Sciences: Variables such as reaction times, biochemical marker
levels, and drug absorption rates are often normally distributed, allowing for effective
statistical treatment in medical research.
6. Behavioral and Social Sciences: Constructs such as personality traits, social attitudes,
and preference scales often yield normally distributed results when measured across
sufficiently large and diverse samples.
2|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
Approximately 68% of the observations reside within one standard deviation of the
mean.
Around 95% of the data falls within two standard deviations.
Nearly 99.7% of all values lie within three standard deviations.
These proportions are instrumental for probabilistic inference and are particularly useful in
assessing outliers and evaluating the significance of deviations from the mean. Though the
percentages are approximate, they offer robust practical guidance for interpreting normally
distributed datasets.
To utilize a z-table effectively, one must proceed through the following analytical steps:
𝑥−μ
𝑧=
σ
where x denotes the value of interest, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. This
transformation allows disparate normal distributions to be mapped onto the standard
normal curve.
3|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
1. For probabilities less than a given value, the z-table provides a direct answer.
2. For probabilities greater than a value, subtract the cumulative probability from 1.
3. For probabilities between two values, compute the z-scores for both and subtract
the smaller cumulative probability from the larger.
Z-tables are indispensable for solving a broad spectrum of statistical problems, including but not
limited to the construction of confidence intervals, the evaluation of hypothesis tests, and the
determination of critical thresholds. Their relevance persists even in the era of computational
software, particularly in foundational statistical education and manual problem-solving
scenarios.
Example:
Suppose we want to find the probability of getting a score of 80 or higher on an exam with a
mean of 70 and a standard deviation of 5. First, we need to convert the raw score of 80 to a z-
score:
80−70
z= =2
5
Then, we will look up the probability associated with a z-score of 2 in the normal distribution
table, which is 0.9772. This means that the probability of getting a score of 80 or higher is
0.9772, or 97.72%.
The normal distribution is renowned for its mathematical tractability and empirical relevance
across a vast array of disciplines. Its symmetrical, bell-shaped form, defined mean and variance,
and the foundational Central Limit Theorem (CLT) make it a cornerstone in statistical theory
and practice. Nonetheless, in certain analytical contexts—particularly when direct application of
the normal model is infeasible—other probability distributions can be employed to approximate
it.A quintessential example is the Student’s t-distribution, which is particularly suited for
approximating the normal distribution in situations involving small sample sizes (typically n <
30) and unknown population standard deviation. Although the t-distribution resembles the
normal distribution in shape, it possesses heavier tails, thereby accounting for the additional
uncertainty inherent in small-sample estimation. As the sample size increases, the degrees of
4|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
freedom grow, and the t-distribution converges asymptotically to the standard normal
distribution.
The appropriateness of using the normal distribution as an approximation for other distributions
is contingent upon several statistical conditions and structural properties of the underlying data:
Well-Behaved Data:
The suitability of a normal approximation deteriorates in the presence of
heavy skewness, multiple modes, or extreme outliers. Distributions with long tails,
pronounced asymmetry, or erratic behavior deviate significantly from the assumptions
underpinning normality and may necessitate alternative modeling strategies.
5|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
Part B:
Problem Statement:
4.1 3.8 3.9 4.3 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.8 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.7 4.1 3.6 4.0 4.3 4.1
3.9 4.3 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.2 4.3 4.4 3.6 4.1 4.2 4.0 3.9 4.4 3.7 3.8 4.0 3.7 3.9
4.3 4.2 3.9 4.4 3.5 4.2 4.3 4.1 3.6 4.1 4.3 4.0 3.8 4.3 4.1 3.9 4.0 4.4 4.2 4.0
4.3 4.2 3.9 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.5 4.4 4.3 3.6 4.1 4.3 4.4 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.1 3.6
3.8 4.2 3.9 3.7 4.3 4.4 3.6 4.1 4.2 4.0 3.9 4.3 4.1 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 3.8 4.4 3.5
3.5 3
3.6 7
3.7 8
3.8 8
3.9 13
4 12
4.1 12
4.2 11
4.3 15
4.4 9
6|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
HISTOGRAM
16
14
12
10
0
3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4
As we can see, the histogram has a bell-shaped curve, which is typical of a normal distribution.
However, the distribution is not perfectly symmetrical since we only have a sample size of 100
bolts. To obtain a more symmetrical distribution, we would need to measure thousands of bolts.
3.1 Mean:
To compute the mean and standard deviation of the data, we can use the following formulas:
Mean = 3.939 mm
7|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
𝑆 = 0.254
3.3 Median:
So,
Median = 4.0 mm
3.4 Mode:
f = 15 at 4.3 mm
Mode is 4.3 mm
8|P a ge
Applied Engineering Statistics CEP
Summary of Statistics
Mean 3.939 mm
Standard Deviation 0.254 mm
Median 4.0 mm
Mode 4.3 mm
To solve the problem, we need to find the proportion of bolts that have a diameter smaller than
3.5 mm or bigger than 4.4 mm. We'll use the z-scores and the standard normal distribution.
3.5−3.939
𝑧= ≈ −1.73
0.254
Z-score for 4.4 mm:
4.4−3.939
𝑧= ≈ 1.82
0.254
Now, using the standard normal distribution, we find the probabilities:
≈ 0.04175
≈ 0.03457
0.04175+0.03457 = 0.07632
= 5000×0.07632 ≈ 382
Therefore, out of a batch of 5000 bolts, approximately 382 bolts would be rejected due to their
diameter being smaller than 3.5 mm or bigger than 4.4 mm.
9|P a ge