Structural Design of Travelways
Structural Design of Travelways
Travel ways
The design procedures used for highway and airport pavements are similar but
the loads imposed on an airport pavement by aircraft taking off or landing are
much higher than those imposed by automobiles on highway pavements
The maximum horizontal stresses also occur directly under the wheel load •
but can be either tensile or compressive
The structural design of the travelway is therefore generally based on •
stress/strain characteristics for each structural component that limit both
cause the horizontal and vertical strains/stresses below those that will c
permanent deformation
Design gross weight for airport pavement
The design gross weight for an airport pavement depends on the design •
aircraft which is the aircraft requiring the greatest pavement thickness
This is determined from the gross take-off weight and the number of •
annual departures of the aircraft
the distribution of the load imposed on the pavement depends on the •
gear type and configuration of the aircraft, it is first necessary to convert
all aircraft to the design aircraft, using the appropriate multiplication
factors that have been established.These factors, given in Table 7.2.
account for the relative fatigue effect of different gear types and are the •
same for rigid and flexible pavements These factors are comparable to the
equivalency factors for converting axle load to equivalent axle loads
(ESAL).
The federal aviation administration design methods for
flexible airport runway pavements
The design inputs in this procedure are the CBR value for the
subgrade material. the CBR value for the subbase material, the gross
weight of the design aircraft, and the number of departures of the
design aircraft
1-the required total pavement thickness and the thickness of the hot-
mix asphalt surfacing, for single, dual, and tandem main-gear landing
assemblies as shown in Figures 7.16, 7.17, 7.187.19, 7.20, and 7.21
2-A minimum base course thickness is also specified for each family of
aircraft and for each specific aircraft, as shown in Table 7.29
3-The thicknesses provided on these charts are adequate for annual
departures of 25,000 or less and should be adjusted by the
percentages shown in Table 7.30
Departure greater than 25k
departures greater than 25,000, 1 in from the correct thickness should •
add to the asphalt ,the remaining thickness increase should be
proportioned between the base and subbase courses, to determine the
increase go table 7.30