Resource Mobilization and Financial Management
Resource Mobilization and Financial Management
GOVERNMENT PROJECTS
Presented by:
Irene Ng’ong’a
Static perspective
The financial resources at any point in time
are the major input that determines results
and analyzing their sources and uses is an
essential part of tracking progress and
attributing results to the program.
The processes of formulating the resource
mobilization strategy, managing the
peculiarities of responding to diverse donor
cycles and committing and allocating funds
need to be examined in their own right
because they affect the ability of the program
to achieve its objectives on a larger scale or
new ways.
Descriptions of the sources and uses of
public and private funds
Assessment on how the patterns of financing
have affected the scope, reach and results of
the programs achieved.
Analysis of the allocation processes and any
effects that donor restrictions have had on
achievement of the program’s objectives
Assessment of the strategy of the program-
the degree to which the programs RM
strategy & execution is adequate to meet the
needs of the program to achieve the desired
scale. E.g. assessment of governance.
Assessment of the degree to which the
financial management system and financial
reporting are meeting the expectation of
donors as it can have a significant effect on
mobilizing resources.
Link between governance and financing
Are there financial requirements like
minimum contributions that condition
membership in the governing body? Does
participation of some donors on the
governing bodies discourage other donors
form contributing?
Should different roles for different types of
donors (e.g. private sector & individuals) be
considered?
Role of the governing body in mobilizing
resources: Is the governing body
appropriately exercising its role in
a) Guiding the formulation of the RM strategy
responsive to strategic direction
b) Setting policy rules regarding acceptance of
tied funds, private sector funds.
c) Staying open to possibility of new donors.
The prospects for beneficiary country or local
partners to make financial contributions to
the program now or in the future
Does RM strategy address this issue? Has a
timeline been established for the country
partners to take over more responsibility for
financing and implementation of program
activities at both national and regional levels.
The quality of financial management and
accounting
Have financial management systems met all
standards of trustees and contributing
donors?
Are financial reporting and auditing
arrangements satisfactory?
Do the recorded categories of expenditures
facilitate adequate monitoring and attribution
of costs to activities and results?
The methods ,criteria and processes for
allocating funds
Are the processes and criteria being applied?
To what extent have these evolved over time
in response to new priorities or objectives.
How effective and efficient are these
processes?
Africa depends on external resources because
domestic savings fall short of current
investment needs. Given that this gap will not
be closed quickly, most African countries will
continue to rely on external resources in the
near future. Better public resource
mobilisation is thus not an alternative to aid;
they must go together.
The challenge is for African countries and
their partners to end the vicious circle of aid
dependence that shifts government
accountability away from citizens towards
donors. Instead, they need to start a virtuous
circle of aid working to make itself
redundant, by supporting public resource
mobilisation.
Video link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWyXecX
r9bc
A good RM strategy and evaluation should
compare the costs and benefits of constraints
imposed by donors. On the other hand, the
need to accommodate donors preferences,
expressed through tied funding arrangement
or earmarking, can constrain program wide
priotization process and result inefficient
allocation of resources.
Channeling the additional funds through the
program rather than to uncoordinated
parallel activities may have important
benefits, such as expanding the scale or
scope of the program, adopting a new,
special focus for the program, or better aid
coordination.
THANK YOU