Human Resources Training and Individual Development
Human Resources Training and Individual Development
Strategic Training
January 21, 2003
Overview
• Business strategy
• Does HRM matter?
• High performance work practices/systems
• Training and HPWPs
• Influences on training
– Organizational characteristics
– Business strategy
– HRM strategy
• Example: Southwest Airlines
• Training models
Business Strategy
• Where to compete?
– In what markets will we compete?
• How to compete?
– On what outcome or differentiating characteristic
will we compete?
– Cost? Quality? Reliability? Delivery?
Innovativeness?
• With what will we compete?
– What resources will allow us to beat the
competition?
– How will we acquire, develop, and deploy those
resources to compete?
Strategy and Training
• Managing Alignment
• Encouraging Continuous Learning
• Coordinating Activities
• Facilitating Decision-Making Process
• Creating and Maintaining Trust
Implications for Training
• Business Strategy:
– Concentration
– Internal Growth
– External Growth
– Disinvestment
• Strategy influences focus of training
– current vs. future job skills
– reactionary vs. proactive
– job specific vs. team, unit of division
– all vs. specific groups
– training vs. other HR practices
HRM Strategy: Influence on Training
• What is HR planning?
• How does HR planning relate to,
and influence, training?
The Broadening of Training’s Role
• Training
– Train workers to understand what drives
costs so they can make suggestions to
improve them (instead of having to ask a
supervisor what to do)
Supporting Cost Leadership
• Compensation
– Give departments quarterly bonuses for
staying below budgets. Also give
bonuses for suggestions that improve
cost performance.
• Train on cost drivers, suggestion system,
and how to achieve bonuses
– Use stock options so employees feel
like owners (they’ll look out for the
company)
• Train on the relationship between certain
types of behaviors and how they influence
the bottom line and ultimately stock price
Models of Organizing the
Training Department
Models of Organizing the Training
Department
Faculty Model
Customer Model
Matrix Model
Corporate University
Model
Virtual Model
The Faculty Model
D ir e c t o r o f T r a in in g
S a fe ty Q u a lit y T e c h n o lo g y L e a d e r s h ip S a le s
T r a in in g T r a in in g and D e v e lo p m e n t T r a in in g
C o m p u te r
S y s te m s
D ir e c t o r o f T r a in in g
I n fo r m a t io n M a r k e t in g P r o d u c t io n F in a n c e
S y s te m s and
O p e r a t io n s
Business Functions
The Matrix Model
D ir e c t o r o f T r a in in g
S a le s Q u a lit y T e c h n o lo g y S a fe ty
Training T r a in in g T r a in in g and T r a in in g
Specialty C o m p u te r
Areas S y s te m s
Production
Marketing and
Operations
Business Functions
The Corporate University Model
• Needs assessment
– Noe, Chapter 3
– Zemke (1998)