0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views42 pages

Basics of Hypothesis Testing

This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing procedures, including the key steps: defining the null and alternative hypotheses, calculating a test statistic, determining the p-value, and making a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on a significance level. It introduces the one-sample z-test as an example and walks through each step using sample problems. It also discusses type I and type II errors, power, and how to determine necessary sample size for a given power and significance level.

Uploaded by

Randy Natal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views42 pages

Basics of Hypothesis Testing

This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing procedures, including the key steps: defining the null and alternative hypotheses, calculating a test statistic, determining the p-value, and making a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on a significance level. It introduces the one-sample z-test as an example and walks through each step using sample problems. It also discusses type I and type II errors, power, and how to determine necessary sample size for a given power and significance level.

Uploaded by

Randy Natal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

Chapter 9:

Basics of Hypothesis
Testing
In Chapter 9:

9.1 Null and Alternative Hypotheses


9.2 Test Statistic
9.3 P-Value
9.4 Significance Level
9.5 One-Sample z Test
9.6 Power and Sample Size
Terms Introduce in Prior Chapter
• Population  all possible values
• Sample  a portion of the population
• Statistical inference  generalizing from a
sample to a population with calculated degree
of certainty
• Two forms of statistical inference
– Hypothesis testing
– Estimation
• Parameter  a characteristic of population, e.g.,
population mean µ
• Statistic  calculated from data in the sample, e.g.,
sample mean ( x )
Distinctions Between Parameters
and Statistics (Chapter 8 review)
Parameters Statistics

Source Population Sample


Notation Greek (e.g., μ) Roman (e.g., xbar)

Vary No Yes

Calculated No Yes
Sampling Distributions of a Mean
The sampling distributions of a mean (SDM)
describes the behavior of a sampling mean

x ~ N   , SE x 

where SE x 
n
Hypothesis Testing
• Is also called significance testing
• Tests a claim about a parameter using
evidence (data in a sample
• The technique is introduced by
considering a one-sample z test
• The procedure is broken into four steps
• Each element of the procedure must be
understood
Hypothesis Testing Steps
A. Null and alternative hypotheses
B. Test statistic
C. P-value and interpretation
D. Significance level (optional)
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
• Convert the research question to null and
alternative hypotheses
• The null hypothesis (H0) is a claim of “no
difference in the population”
• The alternative hypothesis (Ha) claims
“H0 is false”
• Collect data and seek evidence against H0
as a way of bolstering Ha (deduction)
Illustrative Example: “Body Weight”
• The problem: In the 1970s, 20–29 year
old men in the U.S. had a mean μ body
weight of 170 pounds. Standard deviation
σ was 40 pounds. We test whether mean
body weight in the population now differs.
• Null hypothesis H0: μ = 170 (“no difference”)
• The alternative hypothesis can be either
Ha: μ > 170 (one-sided test) or
Ha: μ ≠ 170 (two-sided test)
Test Statistic
This is an example of a one-sample test of a
mean when σ is known. Use this statistic to
test the problem:
x  0
z stat 
SE x
where  0  population mean assuming H 0 is true

and SE x 
n
Illustrative Example: z statistic
• For the illustrative example, μ0 = 170
• We know σ = 40
• Take an SRS of n = 64. Therefore
 40
SE x   5
n 64

• If we found a sample mean of 173, then


x   0 173  170
z stat    0.60
SE x 5
Illustrative Example: z statistic
If we found a sample mean of 185, then

x   0 185  170
zstat    3.00
SE x 5
Reasoning Behinµzstat

x ~ N 170,5
Sampling distribution of xbar
under H0: µ = 170 for n = 64 
P-value
• The P-value answer the question: What is the
probability of the observed test statistic or one
more extreme when H0 is true?
• This corresponds to the AUC in the tail of the
Standard Normal distribution beyond the zstat.
• Convert z statistics to P-value :
For Ha: μ> μ0  P = Pr(Z > zstat) = right-tail beyond zstat
For Ha: μ< μ0  P = Pr(Z < zstat) = left tail beyond zstat
For Ha: μμ0  P = 2 × one-tailed P-value
• Use Table B or software to find these
probabilities (next two slides).
One-sided P-value for zstat of 0.6
One-sided P-value for zstat of 3.0
Two-Sided P-Value
• One-sided Ha 
AUC in tail
beyond zstat
• Two-sided Ha 
consider potential Examples: If one-sided P
deviations in both = 0.0010, then two-sided
directions  P = 2 × 0.0010 = 0.0020.
double the one- If one-sided P = 0.2743,
sided P-value then two-sided P = 2 ×
0.2743 = 0.5486.
Interpretation
• P-value answer the question: What is the
probability of the observed test statistic …
when H0 is true?
• Thus, smaller and smaller P-values
provide stronger and stronger evidence
against H0
• Small P-value  strong evidence
Interpretation
Conventions*
P > 0.10  non-significant evidence against H0
0.05 < P  0.10  marginally significant evidence
0.01 < P  0.05  significant evidence against H0
P  0.01  highly significant evidence against H0

Examples
P =.27  non-significant evidence against H0
P =.01  highly significant evidence against H0
* It is unwise to draw firm borders for “significance”
α-Level (Used in some situations)
• Let α ≡ probability of erroneously rejecting H0
• Set α threshold (e.g., let α = .10, .05, or
whatever)
• Reject H0 when P ≤ α
• Retain H0 when P > α
• Example: Set α = .10. Find P = 0.27  Fail to
reject H0
• Example: Set α = .01. Find P = .001  reject H0
(Summary) One-Sample z Test
A. Hypothesis statements
H0: µ = µ0 vs.
Ha: µ ≠ µ0 (two-sided) or
Ha: µ < µ0 (left-sided) or
Ha: µ > µ0 (right-sided)
B. Test statistic x  0 
z stat  where SE x 
SE x n

C. P-value: convert zstat to P value


D. Significance statement (usually not necessary)
Conditions for z test
• σ known (not from data)
• Population approximately Normal or
large sample (central limit theorem)
• SRS (or facsimile)
• Data valid
The Lake Wobegon Example
“where all the children are above average”
• Let µ represent Weschler Adult Intelligence scores
(WAIS)
• Typically, µ ~ σ(100, 15)
• Take SRS of n = 9 from Lake Wobegon population
• Data  {116, 128, 125, 119, 89, 99, 105, 116,
118}
• Calculate: x-bar = 112.8
• Does sample mean provide strong evidence that
population mean μ > 100?
Example: “Lake Wobegon”
A. Hypotheses:
H0: µ = 100 versus
Ha: µ > 100 (one-sided)
Ha: µ ≠ 100 (two-sided)
B. Test statistic:
 15
SE x   5
n 9
x   0 112 .8  100
z stat    2.56
SE x 5
C. P-value: P = Pr(Z ≥ 2.56) = 0.0052

P =.0052  it is unlikely the sample came from this


null distribution  strong evidence against H0
Two-Sided P-value: Lake Wobegon
• Ha: µ ≠100
• Considers random
deviations “up” and
“down” from μ0 tails
above and below ±zstat
• Thus, two-sided P
= 2 × 0.0052
= 0.0104
§9.6 Power and Sample Size
Two types of decision errors:
Type I error = erroneous rejection of true H0
Type II error = erroneous retention of false H0
Truth
Decision H0 true H0 false
Retain H0 Correct retention Type II error
Reject H0 Type I error Correct rejection

α ≡ probability of a Type I error


β ≡ Probability of a Type II error
Power
• β ≡ probability of a Type II error
β = Pr(retain H0 | H0 false)
(the “|” is read as “given”)

• 1 – β “Power” ≡ probability of avoiding a


Type II error
1– β = Pr(reject H0 | H0 false)
Power of a z test
 | 0   a | n 
1      z1   


2  
where
• Φ(z) represent the cumulative probability
of Standard Normal Z
• μ0 represent the population mean under
the null hypothesis
• μa represents the population mean under
the alternative hypothesis
Calculating Power: Example
A study of n = 16 retains H0: μ = 170 at α = 0.05
(two-sided); σ is 40. What was the power of test’s
conditions to identify a population mean of 190?

 |    | n 
1      z1   0 a 
 2  
 
 | 170  190 | 16 
   1.96  
 40 
 
   0.04
 0.5160
Reasoning Behind Power
• Competing sampling distributions
Top curve (next page) assumes H0 is true
Bottom curve assumes Ha is true
α is set to 0.05 (two-sided)
• We will reject H0 when a sample mean exceeds
189.6 (right tail, top curve)
• The probability of getting a value greater than
189.6 on the bottom curve is 0.5160,
corresponding to the power of the test
Sample Size Requirements
Sample size for one-sample z test:

n

 z1   z1 
2
2
 2


2

where
1 – β ≡ desired power
α ≡ desired significance level (two-sided)
σ ≡ population standard deviation
Δ = μ0 – μa ≡ the difference worth detecting
Example: Sample Size
Requirement
How large a sample is needed for a one-sample z
test with 90% power and α = 0.05 (two-tailed)
when σ = 40? Let H0: μ = 170 and Ha: μ = 190
(thus, Δ = μ0 − μa = 170 – 190 = −20)

n
2

 z1   z1 
2
 2


2
40 (1.28  1.96) 2
 41.99
2 2
  20

Round up to 42 to ensure adequate power.


Illustration: conditions
for 90% power.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy